ZZ
In a surprising turn of events, the Senate has voted to overturn former President Donald Trump’s 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports. The vote passed narrowly with a 52-48 majority, effectively dismantling one of the key components of Trump’s “America First” trade policy. The move is seen as a significant shift in trade relations, with implications for both American industry and international commerce.
The tariffs, introduced during Trump’s presidency, were designed to protect American workers and manufacturing by discouraging cheap imports and encouraging domestic production. However, the decision to eliminate them has sparked a heated debate about the future of U.S. trade policy and the balance between protectionism and free-market principles.
Notably, several Republicans broke ranks with their party’s traditional stance on trade by siding with Democrats in voting to repeal the tariffs. Among those Republicans were Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Senators Thom Tillis, Rand Paul, Lisa Murkowski, and Susan Collins. Their votes have drawn significant criticism from conservatives who argue that the tariffs were instrumental in boosting American jobs and industries.
The vote, however, is not the final word on the matter. The measure still has to pass through the House of Representatives, where its fate remains uncertain. Given the political landscape, it is unlikely to gain the support necessary to clear the House and become law, though the outcome is still in play.
Former President Trump’s supporters argue that the tariffs were a cornerstone of his administration’s efforts to reduce the U.S. trade deficit and promote American-made goods. They point to the jobs created in industries like steel and manufacturing as a direct result of the tariff policy, which aimed to level the playing field for American companies facing stiff competition from abroad.
Critics of the tariffs, however, contend that they led to higher prices for American consumers and disrupted supply chains. The decision to overturn them is seen as a move to restore trade relationships with Brazil and other countries, which were strained under Trump’s aggressive tariff policies. Some view this as a step toward a more globalist approach to trade.
As the debate continues to unfold, many are questioning whether Washington’s globalist factions are seeking to undo the economic gains made during Trump’s tenure. The controversy surrounding these tariffs reflects the deep divides within U.S. politics over how best to navigate the complex world of international trade and American industry.
Mike Johnson’s confirmation ends weeks of political deadlock and opens a new chapter for congressional leadership. His narrow approval followed tense negotiations, with lawmakers and citizens alike hoping it signals renewed stability in Washington.
A disciplined and methodical figure, Johnson is praised by supporters as a steady hand focused on fiscal responsibility and national defense. Critics, however, warn that his conservative approach may deepen divides rather than bridge them. His leadership will immediately be tested by urgent fiscal debates and policy decisions affecting millions of Americans.
Reactions nationwide reflect both hope and caution. Many see Johnson’s rise as an opportunity to restore purpose and cooperation in government, while others fear renewed partisanship. Whether his tenure brings unity or further division will depend on his ability to balance principle with pragmatism in the challenging months ahead.
The official confirmation of Mike Johnson marks a defining moment in the evolving story of American politics. Rising from relative obscurity to one of the most powerful positions in Washington, Johnson now faces the monumental challenge of leading a deeply divided nation through an era of political tension, economic uncertainty, and shifting global power dynamics.
Mike Johnson has long been known for his deeply rooted conservative beliefs and his unwavering commitment to constitutional principles. His career reflects a consistent focus on defending what he views as traditional American values — faith, family, and freedom. Supporters see him as a principled leader with a moral compass that could bring integrity and discipline back to Washington politics. Critics, however, question whether his rigid ideology might limit his ability to reach across the aisle and find bipartisan solutions.
Johnson’s background as a constitutional lawyer and his long-standing advocacy for religious freedom are expected to influence his legislative agenda. He has often spoken about America’s need to return to its founding ideals — emphasizing limited government, fiscal restraint, and respect for individual liberties.
At the forefront of Johnson’s new role lies one of America’s most pressing issues: the economy. With rising national debt, inflation concerns, and ongoing debates over government spending, Johnson has vowed to restore fiscal discipline. His approach is expected to include reducing federal expenditures, promoting economic efficiency, and encouraging private-sector growth.
However, achieving these goals won’t be easy. He will need to navigate complex negotiations with both parties to pass a sustainable budget plan while avoiding further government shutdowns — a test that will likely define the early months of his tenure.
In an era where public confidence in government institutions is at an all-time low, Johnson’s ability to restore credibility and transparency could shape his legacy. He has promised to increase accountability in Congress and prioritize legislation that directly benefits working-class Americans.
His challenge will be to demonstrate that leadership grounded in faith and principle can also be pragmatic and inclusive — capable of addressing issues such as healthcare reform, border security, and education without alienating moderate voters.
Perhaps the greatest test of Mike Johnson’s leadership will be his capacity to unite a fractured political landscape. With the 2024 presidential election on the horizon, partisanship in Washington remains fierce. Johnson must find a way to balance the expectations of his party’s conservative base with the broader demands of a diverse electorate seeking stability and progress.
If he succeeds, he could emerge as a transformative figure who bridges divides and restores order to a gridlocked system. If he fails, his tenure could deepen America’s political polarization — a risk that many observers are watching closely.
Beyond domestic policy, Johnson will also have to assert his leadership on the global stage. America’s relationships with China, Russia, and its NATO allies are in flux, and the country’s role in global security is being redefined. His stance on foreign policy, trade, and defense spending will reveal whether he intends to pursue a more isolationist or interventionist path.
Mike Johnson’s confirmation symbolizes both renewal and uncertainty. It represents a chance for change — a promise to bring faith, discipline, and a new vision to the heart of American governance. But it also raises critical questions about the balance between ideology and practicality, conviction and compromise.
As America watches his first major moves in office, one thing is certain: Mike Johnson’s leadership will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of the United States — not just for his term, but for a generation to come.
The truth about the Russia investigation has finally emerged, confirming what many, including the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), had argued all along: the Russia collusion narrative was not just a flawed investigation but a deliberate attempt to undermine the legitimacy of President Donald Trump’s presidency.With the release of a previously classified annex to Special Counsel John Durham’s report, the long-standing accusations that the investigation was politically motivated are now backed by smoking-gun evidence that further exonerates President Trump and exposes systemic misconduct within federal agencies.The ACLJ, a steadfast defender of the Constitution, played a crucial role in challenging the Russia investigation from the outset. Executive Director Jordan Sekulow, Senior Counsel for
Litigation and Public Policy Ben Sisney, and Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow all served as President Trump’s personal legal counsel during the investigation.
This newly declassified material does not only validate their defense of President Trump; it also exposes the deep corruption that allowed the Russia hoax to continue for years, diverting attention from the real threats facing the nation.The annex reveals that federal agencies had exculpatory evidence early in the investigation—evidence that would have immediately debunked the collusion allegations had it been properly disclosed.Instead, key documents were suppressed, and a false narrative was perpetuated, leading to years of wasted resources, divisiveness, and constitutional violations. The most crucial revelation in the Durham annex is that federal law enforcement agencies were in possession of exculpatory evidence from the very beginning of the investigation.
This evidence, had it been disclosed or properly considered, would have immediately dismissed the Russia collusion narrative. The investigation, which was initially justified under the premise of national security, was, in reality, an effort to create a narrative that served political interests.The annex goes into greater detail about the suppression of evidence, the coordination among agencies to maintain a false narrative, and the deliberate misconduct that characterized the investigation.It has been clear from the outset that the FBI was at the center of this misconduct. The timeline, actions, and strategies used by those involved in the investigation make it evident that this was no ordinary case of prosecutorial overreach but an orchestrated effort to nullify the results of a democratically elected president.The smoking-gun evidence in the Durham annex proves that the Russia investigation was built on a foundation of lies and suppression. Federal agencies knew the allegations were false, yet they pursued them aggressively to undermine President Trump’s administration.The annex underscores that these actions went far beyond errors made by a few rogue individuals within the FBI. It was a coordinated effort by the highest levels of government to create a crisis where none existed, using the power of federal law enforcement to interfere in the political process.From the beginning, the ACLJ warned that the Russia investigation represented a direct assault on the constitutional principle of separation of powers. It was not just about one individual but about an effort to undermine the office of the president itself.
The actions of unelected bureaucrats sought to nullify the 2016 election and overturn the will of the American people.The Durham annex confirms these concerns. The investigation, which was supposed to be about national security, was actually an attempt to destroy a presidency through fabricated legal proceedings.
The misuse of federal agencies for political purposes undermines the integrity of the rule of law and demonstrates how easily power can be abused when there is no accountability.This coordinated effort, according to the newly declassified materials, was not just an isolated case of political bias but a systematic attempt by the previous administration to target President Trump.From the beginning, there was a deliberate attempt to create a narrative that could be used to delegitimize Trump’s election and presidency. This wasn’t just an attack on one man—it was an attack on the democratic process itself.A critical element of the Russia investigation was the involvement of the Justice Department and the FBI in perpetuating false narratives. Even as more evidence emerged that debunked the claims of collusion, these agencies continued their investigation without regard for the facts.The Durham annex sheds light on how intelligence that would have exonerated President Trump was either ignored or actively suppressed.The evidence that was hidden or disregarded shows a clear pattern of misconduct. It wasn’t simply a case of poorly executed investigations—it was a calculated effort to manipulate public perception and maintain a false narrative.The misuse of the Justice Department and the FBI to carry out a politically motivated witch hunt undermines the credibility of the entire justice system.For years, critics of the investigation were dismissed as conspiracy theorists. The mainstream media, political opponents, and other institutions ignored the mounting evidence that contradicted the Russia collusion narrative.
The release of the Durham annex is the moment that those critics, including the ACLJ, are vindicated. The truth has come to light, and it is more damning than anyone could have imagined.The revelations in the Durham annex are not just politically significant—they are legally explosive. The documents shed light on the deep corruption that infiltrated the FBI and other federal agencies, revealing a level of coordination that transcended individual misconduct.This raises the question: how high did the corruption go? What major players were involved in this effort to undermine President Trump?The legal implications are far-reaching. The annex highlights that the Russia investigation was driven by a political agenda and that the misuse of government agencies to achieve political goals is a violation of constitutional principles.The ACLJ has long argued that the investigation lacked legitimate predication and was politically motivated from the start. The new evidence provides undeniable support for these arguments.As the ACLJ continues to seek accountability for this unprecedented abuse of power, the legal community must grapple with the consequences of these revelations.
As the ACLJ continues to seek accountability for this unprecedented abuse of power, the legal community must grapple with the consequences of these revelations.The investigation into President Trump was not just a misuse of prosecutorial discretion—it was an assault on the very foundations of our government. The misuse of federal agencies for political purposes raises serious questions about the integrity of the justice system and the potential for future abuses of power.The release of the Durham annex is just the beginning of a larger effort to uncover the full truth of what happened during the Russia investigation. In the coming weeks, the ACLJ will release a series of detailed reports that examine the evidence contained in the annex and demonstrate how it validates the legal arguments made on behalf of President Trump.
Each installment will expose specific instances of FBI misconduct, the suppression of exculpatory intelligence, and the coordinated efforts to perpetuate a false narrative.The revelations contained in the Durham annex demand immediate action and accountability. It is not enough to simply acknowledge the misconduct that occurred—it is essential that those responsible for orchestrating this politically motivated investigation be held accountable.The ACLJ will continue to push for transparency and justice, ensuring that the American people understand the full extent of the corruption that took place within the government.What happened to President Trump was not just an attack on one individual—it was an attack on the democratic process and the principles that underpin our nation. The Durham annex has provided the evidence needed to hold those responsible accountable and restore faith in the integrity of our government.The release of the Durham annex represents a victory not just for President Trump but for the American people. It proves that the truth will ultimately prevail, even when powerful institutions seek to suppress it.The ACLJ has always stood with the Constitution and the rule of law, even when it meant standing alone against the tide of misinformation and political bias.Justice may be delayed, but it is not denied. The release of this key evidence is a step toward healing the divisions created by the Russia investigation and restoring faith in the institutions that are meant to serve the American people.The ACLJ will continue its mission to ensure that the full truth about what happened during this dark chapter in American history is revealed.
Justice may be delayed, but it is not denied. The release of this key evidence is a step toward healing the divisions created by the Russia investigation and restoring faith in the institutions that are meant to serve the American people.The ACLJ will continue its mission to ensure that the full truth about what happened during this dark chapter in American history is revealed.
As we move forward, the lessons of this period must be remembered. The abuse of power that occurred during the Russia investigation cannot be allowed to happen again.It is essential that we hold those responsible accountable and ensure that future generations are protected from the weaponization of government institutions for political purposes.The release of the Durham annex marks the beginning of a new chapter in the fight for truth, justice, and constitutional governance. The ACLJ remains committed to standing for the rule of law and ensuring that the American people receive the full truth about what happened during this pivotal moment in our history.
A federal judge overseeing the Justice Department’s push to unseal grand jury records from Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal case has requested more information before issuing a decision. In a four-page order filed Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer stated he intends to rule “expeditiously” but noted the DOJ’s initial motion lacks sufficient detail to address the legal standards required for disclosing secret grand jury material, ABC News reported.
Engelmayer directed the DOJ to submit a supplemental brief by July 29 that explains in greater depth its justification for seeking the release of the records. The brief must also clarify whether prosecutors have already reviewed the transcripts and if victims were notified prior to the filing. Additionally, the DOJ must file — under seal — an index of all relevant grand jury materials, the full transcripts, a redacted version proposed for public release, and any other pertinent documents.
Defense attorneys for Maxwell also responded on Tuesday, requesting access to the grand jury transcripts before formally stating their position. “We have not seen them, and our understanding is that they have never been provided to the defense in their entirety,” wrote defense lawyer David Oscar Markus. He emphasized that reviewing the transcripts is necessary for Maxwell’s legal team to offer a meaningful response. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche reportedly does not oppose allowing the defense access to these materials.
Separately, the judge set an August 5 deadline for victims in the case to submit their views on whether the grand jury records should be made public. The case has gained renewed attention after President Donald Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to release additional Epstein-related files, citing transparency concerns. Bondi confirmed that Blanche will soon meet with Maxwell and stated that the DOJ is prepared to hear any credible evidence she may provide involving crimes against victims.
The move has sparked political backlash, particularly from Democrats who view it as a politicization of the justice system. Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) accused Blanche of acting as a “political agent” for Trump and potentially offering Maxwell leniency in exchange for politically useful information. Meanwhile, former Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz told Fox News that while no official “client list” exists, some redacted names in FBI reports may implicate prominent figures. He mentioned George Mitchell, Bill Richardson, and Ehud Barak as individuals named in victim interviews but stressed that accusations alone do not equate to guilt.
At 7 a.m., Deputy Sheriff Lana Whitaker received a call about a possible find near Morning Lake Pines. Construction crews uncovered a buried school bus while searching for a septic tank. Lana instantly recognized the cold case — 15 children had vanished decades ago on a field trip.
The bus was half-buried and crushed, with faded metal showing through the mud. The emergency exit was forced open, revealing seatbelts still fastened, a pink lunchbox, and a single child’s moss-covered shoe. No remains were found. A class list pinned to the dashboard named 15 children aged 9 to 11, with “We never made it to Morning Lake” written in red ink.
Lana, who had missed that last trip due to chickenpox, felt shaken. The school had closed years ago, and records showed the children were presumed missing, with no evidence of foul play. The bus driver had disappeared; theories about cults and accidents circulated, but no proof existed.
Nearby, a woman was found alive but barely conscious, claiming to be twelve. She was Nora Kelly, one of the missing children. As Nora recovered, she shared memories of being held in secret barns and camps, with frozen clocks and strange caretakers. Lana uncovered hidden photos, bracelets, and cabins linked to the children’s disappearance.
At a camp called Riverview, Lana and Nora found a pale boy named Jonah and reunited with other survivors, including Aaron, who chose to stay behind. They discovered underground chambers with murals, classrooms, and a locked cabinet labeled “Safety comes from obedience. Memory poses a risk.”
A mural of a girl running through the forest led Lana to Maya Ellison, the quiet local bookseller, who was one of the children under a different name. Together, they remembered their lost years and those who never returned.
A memorial now stands at Morning Lake, honoring the missing children and the secrets finally uncovered in Hallstead County.
The Haunting Mystery of the Morning Lake 15: A Tale of Disappearance, Survival, and Unveiled Truths
In 1986, fifteen children boarded a school bus for a field trip to Morning Lake — a trip they were never to complete. No crash, no wreckage, no trace was ever found. For nearly four decades, their disappearance remained one of the most chilling unsolved mysteries in Holstead County.
But when a forgotten bus was unearthed deep in the woods of Morning Lake in 2025, along with a survivor whose memories unraveled a terrifying truth, the quiet town was forced to confront a dark past it had long tried to bury.
The Vanishing of the Morning Lake 15: An Unforgettable Tragedy
On a foggy morning in May 1986, fifteen children from Holstead Ridge Elementary boarded a yellow school bus for their last field trip before summer break.
Excited faces pressed against the windows, backpacks filled with disposable cameras and Walkmans, they were headed to a nature camp at Morning Lake Pines — a place of cabins, a fire pit, and lakeside adventures.
But the bus never arrived.
No wreckage was found, no bodies recovered. The children and their bus driver, Carl Davis, simply vanished. The case was sealed after five years, marked “missing persons presumed lost,” haunting the town and its people for decades.
Deputy Sheriff Lana Whitaker: A Personal Connection to the Case
Lana Whitaker, a deputy sheriff in Holstead County and former classmate of the vanished children, carried the weight of the case with a strange, persistent guilt. She had been homesick that day, sidelined by chickenpox, and had missed the trip.
For nearly 40 years, Lana lived with the question: what really happened to those children?
When construction workers unearthed the old bus buried in mud near Morning Lake Pines, Lana was the first on the scene. The bus was empty — no bodies, only decayed seats, a pink lunchbox, a child’s shoe covered in moss, and a haunting message scrawled on a class list taped to the dashboard: “We never made it to Morning Lake.”
Discovering a Survivor: Norah Kelly’s Return
Just half a mile from the bus site, a fishing couple found a woman wandering barefoot in tattered clothes. Barely conscious, dehydrated, malnourished, she was believed to be in her mid-30s — but she insisted she was only 12 years old. Her name was Norah Kelly, a child who had been missing for nearly 40 years.
Norah’s memories were fragmented, but she recalled the bus ride, the driver’s unfamiliar face, and a man with a beard who told them the lake wasn’t ready.
She described waking up in a barn that was more like a home, with windows covered and clocks that never showed the right time. The children were given new names and forbidden to speak of their past.
The Dark Sanctuary: Uncovering the Horrors Hidden in the Woods
Lana’s investigation led her to a series of abandoned properties linked to a man named Frank Avery and his unknown son, Martin Avery — both connected to the children’s disappearance. Among these was Riverview Camp, a secluded summer retreat turned prison.
Inside the crumbling buildings, Lana found evidence of a sinister captivity: carved names, scratched messages, and a chilling mural painted by one of the children, Cassia, depicting a girl running toward the light with the words, “Cassia remembered. She left the light on for us.”
The children had been held captive for years, moved from place to place, subjected to psychological control and isolation. Some were locked in “reflection rooms” — pits designed to break their spirits through silence and darkness.
Survivors Speak: Aaron Develin and Jonah’s Stories
Aaron Develin, another survivor, stayed behind to maintain order among the captives but eventually escaped. He revealed that after a fire destroyed part of the sanctuary, the children were scattered and hidden in new locations, their memories suppressed.
Jonah, a boy no older than ten, was found living in isolation within the camp. He spoke of obedience, forgetting real names, and the cruel control exerted by their captors — a man called Father Elijah, whose presence instilled fear.
The Mysterious “Garden” and Room Six: Secrets Sealed Away
Lana’s team discovered a sealed chamber known as “Room Six,” filled with photographs of children in uniforms and a mural depicting a girl running through the woods — a symbol of hope and resistance.
Inside the room, hundreds of photos captured the captive children’s lives, while the walls bore tally marks counting days and punishments. The evidence pointed to a systematic effort to erase their identities and memories.
The Fight to Remember: Cassia’s Legacy and Maya Ellison
Cassia, the girl who painted the mural, was not just a victim but a witness and a beacon of hope. After disappearing during the captivity, she resurfaced years later as Maya Ellison, a quiet bookstore owner in Morning Lake with no memory of her past.
Lana’s confrontation with Maya revealed the trauma of forgotten identities and the power of memory to heal. Maya’s workshops for local youth became a sanctuary for those seeking safety and acknowledgment.
The Unfolding Truth: A Foundation for the Lost
With survivors like Norah, Kimmy, Maya, and Aaron coming forward, Lana filed an official report titled The Morning Lake 15: A Case Reopened. The survivors aimed to start a foundation dedicated to lost children — those whose names had been erased but whose stories demanded to be told.
The town of Morning Lake slowly began to heal, but the scars of the past remained deeply etched in the hearts of those who lived through the nightmare.
The Final Tunnel: A Hidden Network of Captivity
Lana and her team discovered a hidden hatch in the forest leading to a network of tunnels and rooms — a chilling preservation site where some children were kept in silence for years.
Inside, they found a small recorder containing a desperate message: a child’s voice pleading for someone to remember the truth and bring light to the darkness.
What the Morning Lake 15 Teaches Us: Memory, Survival, and Justice
The story of the Morning Lake 15 is a haunting reminder of the resilience of the human spirit in the face of unimaginable horror. It raises profound questions about memory, identity, and the lengths some will go to erase both.
This case also highlights the importance of never forgetting missing children, the need for vigilance, and the power of survivors’ voices to illuminate hidden atrocities.
Why This Story Captivates and Holds Readers
What makes the Morning Lake 15 saga so gripping is not just the mystery of disappearance but the emotional depth of survival against all odds. The slow unraveling of secrets, the connections between past and present, and the fight to reclaim stolen identities create a narrative that pulls readers in and refuses to let go.
The intimate portrayal of Lana’s dedication, the survivors’ fragmented memories, and the chilling descriptions of captivity immerse readers in a world where hope and horror coexist.
How You Can Support Missing Children and Survivors
Raise awareness about missing children and cold cases in your community.
Support organizations dedicated to child protection and recovery efforts.
Advocate for stronger laws and resources to combat child trafficking and abuse.
Listen to survivors and amplify their stories to foster understanding and healing.
Conclusion: The Morning Lake 15 — Remembering the Forgotten
The discovery of the buried bus and the return of survivors like Norah Kelly and Kimmy Lang have reopened wounds but also ignited hope. The Morning Lake 15 were never just missing — they were silenced, hidden, and erased. Now, their stories demand to be heard.
As Lana Whitaker and the survivors continue their quest for truth and justice, the world is reminded that no name should ever be forgotten, and no child left behind.
Texas A&M University is under fire after administrators were accused of silencing a conservative student who objected to transgender curriculum, sparking outrage across the country under President Trump’s leadership.
The controversy erupted when a student objected on religious grounds to a professor’s lesson on transgender issues in a children’s literature class.
Instead of respecting her views, school officials allegedly threatened her, violating her rights to free expression.
Rep. Brian Harrison, a Texas Republican, told Fox News: “Instead of removing the professor over the summer, he and his team threatened and tried to silence a student who likely had her constitutional rights violated as she was kicked out of class.”
The professor, Melissa McCoul, was eventually fired, and the dean and department head were demoted. But conservatives say the punishment came only after public backlash.
Fox News reported: “Texans are being taxed out of their homes, and their money is being weaponized against them, their values, and their children.”
Harrison blasted the scandal, saying: “After serving under President Trump, I was shocked after I got elected in ’21 to learn that the Texas government might be the biggest funder of DEI and LGBTQ indoctrination in America.”
The Texas A&M Board of Regents has now ordered an audit of all courses across the system.
Board Chairman Bill Mahomes said: “The Texas A&M University System Board of Regents will not tolerate actions that damage the reputation of our institutions.”
Texas Scorecard confirmed that the student objected due to her Christian beliefs.
University President Mark Welsh tried to defend the administration, saying: “This isn’t about academic freedom; it’s about academic responsibility.”
But conservatives argued that Welsh’s response was simply an attempt to cover up indoctrination.
Fox News stressed that under Trump, universities are facing more scrutiny over taxpayer-funded radicalism.
Harrison added: “Our children are being indoctrinated with radical leftist ideology on the taxpayers’ dime.”
The scandal has been seen as part of a wider national problem where conservative students face harassment on campuses dominated by liberal professors.
Conservatives applauded Trump’s ongoing fight to dismantle DEI initiatives nationwide, which they see as the root of incidents like this.
The firing of McCoul was seen as an admission that the lesson was inappropriate.
But parents and students still worry whether conservatives are truly safe at Texas A&M.
Fox News called the case “a textbook example of liberal universities silencing dissent.”
Trump supporters argue this shows exactly why higher education must be reformed under his administration.
The backlash has put Texas A&M under heavy scrutiny from both state and federal leaders.
Taxpayers are now demanding accountability for their money being used to push radical ideology.
Rep. Harrison summarized the frustration: “Texans deserve universities that teach facts, not indoctrination.”