Vice President JD Vance has issued a searing critique of California Governor Gavin Newsom, condemning his rhetoric that allegedly encourages violence against law enforcement.
The comments come after a recent wave of attacks on federal officers, including the Dallas ICE shooting that left shell casings marked “ANTI ICE.”
Hindustan Times reported that Vance said, “If your political rhetoric encourages violence against law enforcement, you can go straight to hell and you have no place in the political conversation.”
The Republican leader did not mince words, making clear that political posturing has real-life consequences.
Vance’s remarks were directed at Newsom and other Democratic leaders who have publicly criticized ICE and law enforcement in California.
Fox LA noted, “Vance criticized Newsom and other Democrats following the Dallas ICE facility shooting, blaming their rhetoric.”
For years, Democrats in California have taken a hardline stance against law enforcement while promoting sanctuary policies that protect criminals.
“Words matter,” Vance said. “When leaders demonize police and ICE officers, they are effectively giving permission to radicals to act.”
The Vice President’s statement reflects growing frustration among conservatives who see escalating violence as a direct result of political rhetoric.
Yahoo News reported that Vance’s message resonated with many Americans who have grown tired of the left blaming law enforcement for societal problems.
“There is no excuse for encouraging attacks on officers,” Vance added. “We must hold those in power accountable for the environment they create.”
Newsom’s critics argue that his progressive policies have created a culture of impunity for criminal behavior in California.
“The governor has repeatedly made statements that embolden radicals,” Vance said. “This has consequences, as we’ve seen.”
Vance’s comments came during a press briefing where he emphasized the importance of protecting law enforcement personnel.
Hindustan Times quoted Vance saying, “California’s leaders cannot continue to play politics while officers are targeted in the line of duty.”
The Vice President also warned that left-wing rhetoric often crosses the line into tacit endorsement of violence.
“When you publicly denounce those who enforce the law, you make them targets,” Vance said.
Conservative media outlets have widely shared Vance’s comments, praising his direct approach in confronting left-wing leaders.
“This is not about politics; this is about protecting the people who protect us,” Vance emphasized.
The Vice President also addressed recent protests in California, stating that they have too often turned violent and targeted law enforcement.
“Leaders must be responsible for the tone they set,” he said. “You cannot encourage riots and then feign innocence when things go too far.”
BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…
Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.
This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.
Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.
According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals’ involvement in Epstein’s criminal network.
She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.
“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”
These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.
Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.
The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.
“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”
Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.
For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.
Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.
What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.
In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.
Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.
Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.
Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.
This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.
Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.
The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.
Less than 24 hours after the fatal shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, California Senator Adam Schiff is facing growing criticism for a fiery political address that critics say politicized a tragedy and introduced extreme rhetoric at a time of national mourning.Kirk, 31, was gunned down on the campus of Utah Valley University on Wednesday, sending shockwaves through the political community and prompting tributes from figures across the ideological spectrum.While much of the nation expressed sorrow and called for unity, Schiff used his Thursday remarks to launch into a partisan broadside against Republicans, warning of what he called “a road to dictatorship” if current government funding negotiations collapse.“Now, maybe that’s what the Republicans want,” Schiff said, referring to a potential government shutdown. “They’re withholding in violation of law, rescinding funds, also in an unlawful way… maybe they just want to shut the whole thing down.”The comments, delivered during a press conference originally meant to address looming budget deadlines, quickly spiraled into a broader condemnation of Republican policy and governance.Schiff claimed that GOP-backed legislation would strip millions of Americans of their healthcare, force hospital closures, and increase insurance premiums by up to 75 percent.
But it was his language surrounding authoritarianism and the state of the nation that has sparked the most backlash.“We are seeing things in this country we never would have imagined,” Schiff said. “When we’re seeing the administration use its coercive power to cripple universities… to silence the media… this is the road to dictatorship.”
The remarks came just hours after details emerged from the ongoing investigation into Kirk’s assassination. The suspect, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, is currently in federal custody after turning himself in.According to Utah Governor Spencer Cox, Robinson’s motives may have been ideologically driven. A family member told investigators that Robinson had spoken negatively of Kirk, stating he believed the activist was “full of hate and spreading hate.”Robinson reportedly learned of Kirk’s scheduled appearance at UVU days before the attack and had expressed growing political intensity in the months leading up to the shooting.Schiff’s timing and tone drew swift condemnation from Republican lawmakers, conservative media outlets, and Kirk’s supporters. Many accused the senator of politicizing a tragedy and stoking division during a moment that demanded reflection and unity.
“Charlie Kirk was just murdered and within hours Adam Schiff is up there ranting about Republicans being dictators,” said Senator Josh Hawley. “This is beyond tone-deaf—it’s dangerous.”Others pointed to the rising temperature in American politics, questioning whether language like Schiff’s contributes to a culture where ideological differences escalate into violence.“This kind of rhetoric is what fans the flames,” said commentator Laura Ingraham. “We’ve just seen a young man assassinated for his beliefs, and instead of condemning political violence outright, Schiff launches into a tirade about healthcare and dictatorship.”On social media, #SchiffDisgrace and #UnfitToLead began trending by Friday morning. Conservatives shared clips from the press conference alongside videos from Kirk’s recent speeches, arguing that Schiff’s focus on policy battles just hours after a politically motivated murder was not only inappropriate but morally repugnant.Schiff, a longtime lightning rod for political controversy, has not backed down from his statements.
His office issued a brief response to the backlash, emphasizing that the senator was discussing the broader stakes of the budget debate and not speaking about the Kirk case directly.“Senator Schiff’s comments were focused on ensuring that Americans do not lose access to healthcare and that government abuses are not normalized,” the statement read. “Any attempt to suggest he was referencing the tragic killing of Mr. Kirk is false and politically motivated.”However, the context of the speech and the timing of the remarks made it nearly impossible for critics to separate the two. Kirk’s name may not have been mentioned, but for many Americans still processing the shock of his assassination, the use of language like “coercive power,” “extortion,” and “dictatorship” felt incendiary.Even some Democrats voiced unease.
“I agree with much of what Senator Schiff is trying to accomplish,” said Rep. Jared Golden, a moderate Democrat from Maine. “But we have to be extremely careful in how we speak to the public right now. Emotions are raw. People are scared. They need leadership, not escalation.”New details continue to emerge about Tyler Robinson, the suspect in Kirk’s killing. The 22-year-old Utah native reportedly lived in Provo and was enrolled in community college courses at the time of the shooting.Friends and family have described him as quiet, politically aware, and increasingly vocal about his disdain for what he considered “far-right propaganda.”“He thought Charlie Kirk represented everything wrong with the country,” one former classmate told investigators, according to a source familiar with the case.According to the FBI, Robinson used a hunting rifle and fired a single shot from a distance, striking Kirk in the chest as he left a lecture hall. Eyewitnesses described panic and confusion as students and attendees scrambled for cover.
A law enforcement official confirmed that Robinson turned himself in after contacting a family friend, who then reached out to a local police department. At the time of his surrender, he reportedly admitted to the shooting and cited ideological motives.Utah Governor Spencer Cox confirmed that the state will seek the death penalty.“There is no place in our state or our country for this kind of violence,” Cox said. “We will pursue justice to the fullest extent of the law.”Kirk’s death has rocked the conservative world. As the founder of Turning Point USA, he was seen as one of the most influential voices for young conservatives, credited with energizing college campuses and shaping GOP strategies for youth outreach.His widow, Erika Kirk, delivered a viral speech at a memorial event Thursday night, vowing that her husband’s mission would continue.“They killed Charlie because he preached a message of patriotism, faith, and of God’s merciful love,” she said. “You have no idea the fire that you have ignited within this wife.
The cries of this widow will echo around the world like a battle cry.”The video has been shared millions of times, with conservatives rallying behind the hashtag #CarryCharliesTorch.President Trump also weighed in during an appearance on Fox News, confirming that Robinson was in custody and calling for the death penalty.“What he did, Charlie Kirk, he was the finest person.
He didn’t deserve this,” Trump said. “Everybody liked him.”The tragedy has reignited a broader national debate over the role of rhetoric in politics, particularly during high-stakes moments like budget negotiations, election cycles, and crises.Critics argue that incendiary language from public officials—on both sides—contributes to a culture where political disagreement is no longer just combative but potentially deadly.Adam Schiff’s defenders argue that he has long sounded the alarm about threats to democracy, and that now, more than ever, Democrats must speak forcefully.But for those mourning Kirk, the timing of Schiff’s remarks offered a glimpse into how far apart Americans remain—not just ideologically, but emotionally and morally.“There was a moment for silence, for grace, for unity,” said conservative author Dana Loesch. “Schiff ignored that moment. And the country is worse off for it.”As Kirk’s supporters prepare for his funeral and national conservatives brace for what may be a long political fight over the meaning of his death, Schiff’s comments will likely remain a flashpoint—one more reminder of how fragile America’s political fabric has become.