![\"Supreme](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Screenshot_225-1758094712-q80-1.webp\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
President Donald Trump has picked up a big win at the U.S. Supreme Court on a key issue driving his presidency.<\/p>\n
The court annulled a lower court injunction that was obstructing the president from revoking the protected legal status of hundreds of thousands of migrants presently living in the United States.<\/p>\n
The ruling was 8\u20131 in support of the president\u2019s position, with the sole dissent originating from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, appointed by former President Joe Biden.<\/p>\n
The ruling facilitates the Trump administration\u2019s efforts to revoke Biden-era Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for approximately 300,000 Venezuelan migrants residing in the U.S.. It permits the administration to proceed with the immediate deportation of these migrants, as asserted by the administration\u2019s legal representatives.<\/p>\n
During his address to the Supreme Court last month, U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer asserted that the lower court had exceeded its jurisdiction.<\/p>\n
He stated that \u201cthe district court\u2019s reasoning is untenable,\u201d asserting that the program \u201cinvolves particularly discretionary, sensitive, and foreign-policy-laden judgments of the Executive Branch concerning immigration policy.\u201d<\/p>\n
Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Kristi Noem rescinded Temporary Protected Status in a February memo, with an effective date in April.<\/p>\n
On October 3, 2023, Venezuela was again recognized for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) owing to exceptional and temporary circumstances that hinder the safe repatriation of Venezuelan nationals.<\/p>\n
Following an assessment of the prevailing situation in the country and consultations with relevant U.S. government agencies, the Secretary of Homeland Security has concluded that Venezuela no longer satisfies the criteria for the 2023 designation.<\/p>\n
It has been concluded that allowing the designated Venezuelan nationals to remain temporarily in the United States is against the national interest.<\/p>\n
The memo stated, \u201cConsequently, the 2023 TPS designation for Venezuela is being revoked.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOn March 9, 2021, Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas designated Venezuela for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) due to his assessment of \u2018extraordinary and temporary conditions\u2019 in Venezuela that hindered the safe return of its nationals, asserting that allowing these individuals to remain temporarily in the United States aligns with U.S. national interests,\u201d it stated.<\/p>\n
The memo stated, \u201cOn September 8, 2022, former Secretary Mayorkas prolonged the Venezuela 2021 TPS designation for 18 months.\u201d<\/p>\n
On October 3, 2023, Secretary Mayorkas prolonged the Venezuela 2021 TPS designation for an additional 18 months, expiring on September 10, 2025.<\/p>\n
He also designated Venezuela for 18 months, referring to this decision as a \u2018redesignation\u2019 (Venezuela 2023 designation), which expires on April 2, 2025, thereby establishing two distinct and concurrent Venezuelan TPS designations. Refer to the Extension and Redesignation of Venezuela for Temporary Protected Status.<\/p>\n
On January 17, 2025, Secretary Mayorkas announced an extension of Venezuela\u2019s TPS status from 2023 for an additional 18 months.<\/p>\n
The notification was predicated on Secretary Mayorkas\u2019s assessment on January 10, 2025, that the criteria for the designation remained satisfied. Refer to INA 244(b)(3)(A), (C), and 8 U.S.C. 1254a(b)(3)(A), (C).<\/p>\n
In the January 2025 announcement, Secretary Mayorkas neither explicitly extended nor terminated the 2021 designation for Venezuela.<\/p>\n
The announcement made it easier for all eligible Venezuelan TPS recipients to apply for TPS by the new deadline of October 2, 2026, regardless of whether they were under the 2021 or 2023 designations, as stated in the DHS memo.<\/p>\n
On January 28, 2025, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem annulled former Secretary Mayorkas\u2019s decision from January 10, 2025, reinstating the prior status quo.<\/p>\n
U.S. District Judge Edward Chen of the Northern District of California suspended Noem\u2019s initiative in March, finding that the depiction of migrants as potential criminals was \u201cunfounded and replete with racism.\u201d<\/p>\n
As of late October 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) says that more than 527,000 people have been deported (removed) since Trump took office on January 20, 2025.<\/p>\n
DHS says there were 1.6 million voluntary leaves out of a total of about 2 million departures.<\/p>\n
The agency believes these numbers will continue to increase on a monthly and yearly average with more funding and resources.<\/p>\n
A new front in the national debate over crime, punishment, and judicial accountability has opened with Congressman Randy Fine of Florida announcing legislation that would target judges who repeatedly release violent criminals who go on to commit additional crimes.The proposal comes in direct response to the shocking murder of Iryna Zarutska in Charlotte, a killing allegedly carried out by repeat offender Decarlos Brown Jr., whose lengthy record of arrests and releases has sparked outrage across the country.Fine, a Republican lawmaker known for his hardline stances on law and order, did not mince words when unveiling his proposal.<\/p>\n
Those 12+ judges that released Decarlos Brown Jr. should have their day in court too,\u201d Fine declared in a statement. He painted a picture of judges shielded by armed court officers while ordinary citizens bear the consequences of their leniency.\u201cIt\u2019s easy to release criminals when you\u2019re protected by an armed bailiff at all times. The rest of us aren\u2019t so lucky.\u201d<\/p>\n
The legislation, still being drafted, would establish procedures for investigating and prosecuting judges who release violent offenders who later commit crimes.Supporters argue it is an overdue measure to restore accountability in a system that they believe too often favors criminals over victims.Critics are likely to respond with concerns about undermining judicial independence and politicizing the bench, but for now, Fine\u2019s proposal has already struck a nerve.<\/p>\n
At the heart of Fine\u2019s legislation is the case of Decarlos Brown Jr., a repeat offender whose name has become synonymous with systemic failure.According to reports, Brown had appeared before more than a dozen judges over the years, each of whom opted to release him despite a history of violent behavior.Those decisions, critics say, paved the way for tragedy when Brown allegedly murdered Zarutska, a woman described by family and friends as kind, vibrant, and full of promise.<\/p>\n
Her killing has become a rallying cry for those who argue that the justice system is tilting too far toward leniency, allowing dangerous individuals to slip through the cracks.For Fine, it was the breaking point. He framed his legislation as both a tribute to Zarutska and a wake-up call to the judiciary. \u201cWhen judges make reckless decisions that cost innocent people their lives, there must be consequences,\u201d he insisted.The bill proposes creating a framework for oversight that goes beyond traditional judicial review. While details remain under development, Fine explained that judges who release violent offenders later implicated in new crimes would face investigation and possible sanction.Sanctions could range from removal from the bench to criminal prosecution, depending on the severity of negligence found.The goal, Fine emphasized, is not to punish judges for every bad outcome but to ensure they weigh public safety more heavily when considering bail, parole, or sentencing decisions.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe are not talking about mistakes made in good faith,\u201d he said. \u201cWe are talking about judges who repeatedly turn loose violent criminals despite clear warning signs. That is not justice. That is negligence.\u201dSupporters of the bill argue that it would restore public trust in the judicial system by holding judges accountable in the same way that police officers, prosecutors, and lawmakers are accountable for their actions.<\/p>\n
Critics warn that the bill could have a chilling effect, discouraging judges from exercising independent judgment for fear of political backlash.Fine expressed optimism that his bill would pass \u201cwith ease\u201d in a Republican-controlled environment. He suggested that public concern over rising violent crime would make opposition politically risky.\u201cThe people want accountability,\u201d Fine said. \u201cThis legislation should pass with ease. Yet, we already know how Democrats are likely to vote.\u201dHis remarks reflect a broader partisan divide over criminal justice. Republicans have generally pressed for tougher laws and stricter sentencing, emphasizing victims\u2019 rights and public safety.<\/p>\n
Democrats, while not monolithic, have often championed reforms aimed at reducing incarceration rates, addressing systemic bias, and providing second chances for offenders.Fine\u2019s bill, therefore, not only proposes a specific policy change but also sets up a symbolic battle over competing visions of justice. Republicans are expected to frame the debate as one of protecting citizens from violent criminals, while Democrats may raise alarms about eroding the separation of powers and undermining due process.<\/p>\n
One of the central criticisms of Fine\u2019s proposal will inevitably revolve around judicial independence. For centuries, the American system has prized the ability of judges to rule without fear of personal reprisal.The prospect of prosecuting judges for their decisions represents a seismic shift, critics say, one that could fundamentally alter the balance between law and politics.Legal scholars have already begun weighing in, warning of the potential for abuse. If judges face prosecution for releasing defendants who later reoffend, they argue, the safest course of action will always be to deny release\u2014regardless of the facts or the law.<\/p>\n
Such an environment could lead to overcrowded prisons, clogged dockets, and erosion of civil liberties.Fine counters that judicial independence is not absolute and must be balanced against accountability. \u201cNo one is above the law,\u201d he argued. \u201cNot criminals, not politicians, and not judges. Independence cannot be a shield for incompetence or negligence that costs innocent lives.\u201dThe debate over Fine\u2019s bill comes at a time when violent crime continues to dominate public concern. High-profile cases of repeat offenders committing heinous acts after being released on bail or parole have stoked anger across the political spectrum.From major cities to small towns, voters are demanding tougher measures to ensure dangerous criminals remain off the streets.The Zarutska case has become emblematic of this frustration. Media coverage has focused not only on Brown\u2019s alleged crime but also on the system that repeatedly gave him another chance.<\/p>\n
For many, Fine\u2019s bill represents a necessary corrective\u2014a way to ensure that future judges think twice before releasing someone with a record of violence.The road to passing Fine\u2019s bill will be contentious. Hearings are expected to draw heated testimony from victims\u2019 families, legal experts, and advocacy groups. Law-and-order organizations are likely to rally behind the proposal, while civil liberties groups prepare to mount strong opposition.In Congress, the measure could become a lightning rod for broader debates about the role of the judiciary, the rise of violent crime, and the future of criminal justice reform.Fine has already signaled that he will not shy away from making the issue partisan, casting Democrats as soft on crime if they oppose the bill.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is about saving lives,\u201d he declared. \u201cIf Democrats want to stand with violent offenders instead of innocent victims, let them explain that to the American people.\u201dAs the legislation moves forward, it will test not only the political will of Congress but also the boundaries of the American justice system. The idea of prosecuting judges for their rulings is unprecedented and, to some, alarming.Yet the anger generated by Zarutska\u2019s murder has created a political climate where bold measures can gain traction.For Fine, the issue is clear-cut: accountability for everyone, including those in black robes. For his opponents, the proposal risks undermining the very foundation of judicial independence. Between these two poles lies a debate that could reshape how America balances justice, safety, and liberty in the years to come.<\/p>\n
The murder of Iryna Zarutska has become more than a personal tragedy. It is now a symbol of systemic failure and a catalyst for sweeping legislative change.Congressman Randy Fine\u2019s bill represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold judges directly accountable for the decisions they make.Whether it becomes law or not, the proposal has already succeeded in thrusting the judiciary into the center of America\u2019s ongoing debate over crime and punishment.As the battle lines form, one question looms over the debate: should judges be untouchable in their independence, or should they, like everyone else, face consequences when their actions have deadly results?The answer will determine not only the fate of Fine\u2019s bill but also the future of the American justice system itself.<\/p>\n
War Secretary Pete Hegseth delivered a fiery address to America\u2019s top generals, declaring a new era for the U.S. military\u2014one centered on strength, discipline, and victory, not political correctness.<\/p>\n
He made it clear that the Pentagon\u2019s days of indulging in woke policies, diversity mandates, and lowered standards are over.<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom this moment forward, the only mission of the newly restored Department of War is this: warfighting, preparing for war, and preparing to win, unrelenting and uncompromising in that pursuit,\u201d Hegseth declared.<\/p>\n
The speech, delivered to senior officers at Marine Corps Base Quantico, was a direct rebuke of decades of policies that emphasized diversity and inclusion over military readiness.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon \u2026 It\u2019s a bad look, and it\u2019s not who we are!\u201d Hegseth said, receiving loud applause from the assembled brass.<\/p>\n
He outlined a set of sweeping reforms that would apply across every branch of the armed forces. Physical standards will be uniform, gender-neutral, and uncompromising.<\/p>\n
\u201cStandards must be uniform, gender neutral, and high \u2014 if not, they\u2019re not standards,\u201d he told the audience.<\/p>\n
From now on, every service member will take a physical fitness test twice a year, and daily physical training will be mandatory.<\/p>\n
Hegseth made clear that this training would not be \u201clight stretching or hot yoga\u201d but \u201creal hard PT\u201d designed to sharpen warriors for combat.<\/p>\n
He blasted the weakening of the armed forces through the rise of DEI requirements, identity politics, and what he described as \u201cgender delusion.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo more identity months, DEI offices, dudes in dresses, no more climate change worship, no more division, distraction or gender delusion, no more debris \u2026 we are done with that s-,\u201d Hegseth thundered.<\/p>\n
The War Secretary also emphasized discipline and grooming standards. \u201cNo more beards, long hair, superficial individual expression \u2026 We don\u2019t have a military full of Nordic pagans,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
In his speech, Hegseth explained that his mission is to restore the warrior ethos that made the U.S. military the most powerful fighting force in the world.<\/p>\n
\u201cFrankly, it\u2019s tiring to look out at combat formations \u2026 and see fat troops. Likewise, it\u2019s completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
He stressed that America\u2019s enemies are watching, and weakness in appearance and standards only emboldens them.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe have a sacred duty to ensure that our warriors are led by the most capable and qualified combat leaders \u2026 In many ways, this speech is about fixing decades of decay, some of it obvious, some of it hidden,\u201d Hegseth warned.<\/p>\n
The War Secretary also confirmed that he has already removed senior officers who had been promoted under the old DEI system.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe have already fired a number of senior officers \u2026 the previous chairman \u2026 other members of the Joint Chiefs \u2026 combatant commanders,\u201d he stated.<\/p>\n
Hegseth explained his philosophy of leadership, telling generals to trust their instincts and prioritize combat readiness.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen in doubt, assess the situation, follow your gut \u2026 make a change,\u201d he advised.<\/p>\n
For Hegseth, these reforms are not optional. He said that those who cannot meet the new standards should step aside.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf women \u2014 and weak men \u2014 don\u2019t make the grade, so be it,\u201d he declared.<\/p>\n
And in perhaps the most striking line of his address, Hegseth warned: \u201cIf the words I\u2019m speaking today are making your heart sink, then you should do the honorable thing and resign.\u201d<\/p>\n
His vision is clear: a fighting force stripped of woke distractions, lean, lethal, and focused on warfighting.<\/p>\n
As Hegseth concluded, he left no room for doubt. \u201cWe are done with that sh-,\u201d he said again, this time to thunderous applause from the generals who will now be tasked with carrying out his orders.<\/p>\n
BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED\u2026<\/p>\n
Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.<\/p>\n
This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.<\/p>\n
Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.<\/p>\n
According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals\u2019 involvement in Epstein\u2019s criminal network.<\/p>\n
She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.<\/p>\n
\u201cEven if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,\u201d Luna told Fox News. \u201cWe have been more than patient.\u201d<\/p>\n
These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein\u2019s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.<\/p>\n
Luna\u2019s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.<\/p>\n
The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ\u2019s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,\u201d Luna said. \u201cThis is corruption at the highest level.\u201d<\/p>\n
Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. \u201cHad this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,\u201d one conservative commentator noted.<\/p>\n
For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America\u2019s elite circles. The financier\u2019s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.<\/p>\n
Now, Luna\u2019s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.<\/p>\n
What\u2019s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals\u2014politicians, celebrities, and global financiers\u2014who participated in or enabled Epstein\u2019s crimes.<\/p>\n
In this context, Luna\u2019s SHRED Act isn\u2019t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.<\/p>\n
Despite Luna\u2019s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ\u2019s handling of Epstein evidence.<\/p>\n
Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.<\/p>\n
This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.<\/p>\n
Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ\u2019s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.<\/p>\n
The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna\u2019s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.<\/p>\n
BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For\u2026<\/p>\n
Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.<\/p>\n
Speaking from his post as one of President Trump\u2019s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is a live federal investigation. We\u2019ve asked ICE to take immediate action,\u201d Homan said during a televised interview.<\/p>\n
The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC\u2019s office.<\/p>\n
According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.<\/p>\n
Homan stressed that AOC\u2019s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There\u2019s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,\u201d he stated.<\/p>\n
Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.<\/p>\n
AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as \u201cracist\u201d and \u201coppressors.\u201d<\/p>\n
Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that\u2019s a clear violation of federal law,\u201d Homan declared.<\/p>\n
Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.<\/p>\n
Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.<\/p>\n
House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn\u2019t apply to them,\u201d said Rep. Andy Biggs.<\/p>\n
Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.<\/p>\n
But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis isn\u2019t about politics. It\u2019s about national security and public trust,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,\u201d Homan confirmed.<\/p>\n
Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.<\/p>\n
Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n
Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe must restore the rule of law,\u201d he concluded. \u201cNo one, no matter how powerful, is above it.\u201d<\/p>\n
BREAKING: The FBI Launches Criminal Investigation Into..<\/p>\n
It\u2019s finally happening.<\/p>\n
John Brennan and James Comey\u2014two of the most powerful Obama-era intelligence chiefs\u2014are now facing criminal investigations.<\/p>\n
Their role in pushing the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion narrative derailed a presidency and deceived the nation.<\/p>\n
Sources inside the Justice Department confirm that former CIA Director Brennan is under investigation for allegedly lying to Congress.<\/p>\n
Ex-FBI Director Comey is also the subject of an ongoing probe.<\/p>\n
Their roles in the origin and manipulation of the Trump-Russia hoax are being scrutinized, years after millions of Americans demanded accountability.<\/p>\n
Brennan is accused of pushing the phony Steele dossier into official intelligence assessments.<\/p>\n
CIA Russia experts warned the document was so flawed it didn\u2019t meet even \u201cthe most basic tradecraft standards.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cJasmine Crockett didn\u2019t just insult Trump,\u201d Leavitt said during her White House briefing. \u201cShe smeared over 70 million Americans who believe in freedom, God, secure borders, and the Constitution. Calling them mentally ill is not just false\u2014it\u2019s dangerous.\u201d<\/p>\n
Brennan ignored the warnings and formalized his demand in writing, insisting the fake dossier be included anyway.<\/p>\n
James Comey, for his part, did the same.<\/p>\n
The CIA\u2019s review makes clear: FBI leadership under Comey pressured the intelligence community to embed the Steele dossier in their final report on Russian election interference.<\/p>\n
The FBI \u201crepeatedly pushed\u201d for its inclusion.<\/p>\n
These two didn\u2019t just make bad calls. They rigged the process.<\/p>\n
Even worse, Brennan later told Congress under oath that the Steele dossier \u201cwasn\u2019t part of the corpus of intelligence\u201d used in the Russia assessment.<\/p>\n
But a newly surfaced email shows that he pushed the dossier hard, despite being warned it could destroy the report\u2019s credibility.<\/p>\n
And why did they push it so aggressively? Because it wasn\u2019t about national security.<\/p>\n
It was about kneecapping President Trump before he was even sworn in.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis was Obama, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan deciding, \u2018We\u2019re going to screw Trump,\u2019\u201d former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told the press.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey all knew what they were doing.\u201d<\/p>\n
Millions of tax dollars were wasted. Reputations were destroyed.<\/p>\n
\u201cJasmine Crockett should visit a Trump rally before shooting her mouth off,\u201d Leavitt challenged.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe\u2019ll meet grandmothers, veterans, farmers, teachers, truckers\u2014all proud Americans who just want their country back. These are the people she called mentally ill. What an absolute disgrace.\u201d<\/p>\n
And for what? To push Hillary Clinton\u2019s opposition research as gospel truth.<\/p>\n
Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt.<\/p>\n
Fusion hired British ex-spy Christopher Steele. Steele gave them fiction.<\/p>\n
Senator Josh Hawley demanded action: \u201cIf Brennan and Comey lied to Congress or weaponized their agencies against a political opponent, they should be prosecuted\u2014no exceptions, no excuses.\u201d<\/p>\n
This scandal is bigger than Watergate.<\/p>\n
It poisoned public trust, warped the 2016 election aftermath, and set the tone for years of baseless attacks on a sitting president.<\/p>\n
The investigations are underway.<\/p>\n
Now the question is, will the justice system do its job, or will the same people who buried the truth for years bury it again?<\/p>\n
Brennan and Comey must be held accountable.<\/p>\n
No one is above the law, not even the architects of one of the most dishonest political smear campaigns in American history.<\/p>\n
BREAKING: Joe Biden Admits to New York Times That\u2026<\/p>\n
Joe Biden admitted to The New York Times that he did not personally sign off on every pardon and commutation issued during his presidency, an acknowledgment that has sparked intense debate over how involved he truly was in carrying out one of the most consequential powers of the office.<\/p>\n
\u201cI made every decision on the categories and top-level individuals, but the mechanics were left to staff,\u201d Biden told the Times. That sentence alone sent shockwaves through political and legal communities.<\/p>\n
According to the New York Post, Biden\u2019s White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients authorized the use of the autopen to execute a sweeping set of clemency actions on January 19, 2025. This included about 2,500 pardons and 1,500 commutations.<\/p>\n
The New York Post confirmed, \u201cBiden admitted that he didn\u2019t review every clemency case individually and that his chief of staff, Jeff Zients, authorized the use of the autopen.\u201d<\/p>\n
The same report added, \u201cThe autopen application, which Biden also used to sign some legislation, allowed staff to speed up paperwork processing.\u201d<\/p>\n
While Biden insisted, as quoted in ABC News, that he personally made \u201cevery decision,\u201d he conceded that he did not individually sign off on each document, saying, \u201cI approved each of the clemency decisions before they were issued.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Daily Beast quoted Biden dismissing Republican criticism: \u201cThat is utter BS,\u201d he said, responding to allegations that he had no hand in the clemency spree.<\/p>\n
Still, Biden\u2019s comments confirmed the worst fears of critics who have questioned his cognitive fitness and decision-making capacity. As Time reported, the final flurry of clemency actions was conducted with Biden out of public view.<\/p>\n
Time added context, noting, \u201cEmails show Biden\u2019s chief of staff, Jeff Zients, approved the use of the autopen to execute clemency documents on the president\u2019s behalf.\u201d<\/p>\n
In the same article, the legal implications were underscored: \u201cWhile it is legally permissible, it is extremely rare for a president to use an autopen to sign something as consequential as a clemency order.\u201d<\/p>\n
Republican leaders swiftly seized on the opportunity to highlight Biden\u2019s detachment. House Oversight Chair James Comer was quoted as saying, \u201cThis isn\u2019t just about a signature. It\u2019s about transparency, accountability, and who really was making decisions in that White House.\u201d<\/p>\n
Comer continued, as cited in ABC News, \u201cWe are investigating whether this use of the autopen was a way to obscure Biden\u2019s declining capacity and whether any of the beneficiaries had connections to the administration.\u201d<\/p>\n
The legal debate over autopen use isn\u2019t new, but Biden\u2019s large-scale application is unprecedented. According to Time, \u201cIt has never been used on this scale or for something with the constitutional gravity of a pardon.\u201d<\/p>\n
Even some Democrats were privately concerned. One DNC strategist, speaking anonymously to Politico, said, \u201cIt feeds the narrative that Biden isn\u2019t all there.\u201d<\/p>\n
The same strategist added, \u201cIf he wasn\u2019t fully engaged on something as serious as clemency, what else was he rubber-stamping?\u201d<\/p>\n
In response to concerns, the Daily Beast reported that Biden maintained, \u201cEach recipient was vetted and met the established standards for clemency.\u201d<\/p>\n
But skepticism remains. As Time highlighted, \u201cThe Justice Department is now investigating whether any of the pardons were improperly influenced.\u201d<\/p>\n
This adds to a growing list of concerns among voters and lawmakers alike. ABC News reported that the clemency decisions were made with \u201cspeed and secrecy,\u201d raising transparency questions.<\/p>\n
Donald Trump, seizing the moment, weighed in: \u201cHe didn\u2019t have the guts or the capacity to do his job,\u201d he said during a recent rally, as quoted in The Daily Beast.<\/p>\n
Trump added, \u201cYou don\u2019t get to hide behind a machine when you\u2019re playing with the law.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
President Donald Trump has picked up a big win at the U.S. Supreme Court on a key issue driving his presidency. The court annulled a lower court injunction that was obstructing the…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12936,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12937","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t