![\"SHOCKING:](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/images-1.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Conservative commentator Stephen Crowder is once again putting Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) back in the spotlight, repeating claims that the congresswoman married her brother to help him immigrate to the United States.<\/p>\n
\u201cHere\u2019s a fun fact. You married your brother!\u201d Crowder said in a recent video, citing documents he claims to have reviewed. His remark reignited the long-running controversy that Omar has consistently dismissed as a smear campaign.<\/p>\n
Crowder, who has made a career out of challenging the left, argued that the evidence surrounding Omar\u2019s 2009 marriage to Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, a British citizen, raises serious red flags. \u201cMarital records don\u2019t lie,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Omar has repeatedly denied the allegations, saying in 2019: \u201cThese baseless rumors are absolutely false and offensive.\u201d She has maintained that her marriage history is being weaponized by political opponents.<\/p>\n
Still, conservative voices like Crowder remain unconvinced. \u201cIf it wasn\u2019t her brother, why has she gone to such lengths to hide records?\u201d Crowder asked his audience, pointing to gaps in Omar\u2019s public disclosures.<\/p>\n
Omar\u2019s 2009 marriage ended in 2017 when she and Elmi officially divorced. The timeline has fueled speculation among critics who argue that the marriage was never legitimate in the first place.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe evidence keeps piling up,\u201d Crowder said. \u201cAnd every time, the mainstream press looks the other way.\u201d His frustration echoes the views of many on the right who believe the media has protected Omar from real scrutiny.<\/p>\n
Omar herself has described the rumors as part of a larger racist and Islamophobic campaign against her. \u201cIt\u2019s disgusting to lie about immigrants in this way,\u201d she told the\u00a0Star Tribune<\/p>\n <\/em>\u00a0in 2019.<\/p>\n Yet critics note that Omar has avoided answering direct questions about her marriage history. \u201cShe\u2019s dodged every attempt to get to the bottom of this,\u201d Crowder said.<\/p>\n Conservative lawmakers have also pressed for clarity. In 2019, Rep. Steve King (R-IA) said: \u201cIf she didn\u2019t do this, why not just provide the proof? If she did, the American people deserve to know.\u201d<\/p>\n Omar\u2019s defenders argue that the allegations are nothing more than conspiracy theories designed to delegitimize one of the first Muslim women in Congress. \u201cThis is a smear,\u201d Omar said, insisting that the right is targeting her because of who she is.<\/p>\n Crowder isn\u2019t buying it. \u201cThis isn\u2019t about race. This isn\u2019t about religion. This is about immigration fraud,\u201d he said, accusing Omar of using identity politics as a shield.<\/p>\n The documents at the center of the controversy come from marriage certificates and school records tied to Omar and Elmi. Conservative outlets have long claimed these records suggest a familial relationship.<\/p>\n \u201cWhen the paperwork doesn\u2019t match up, when the timelines don\u2019t make sense, the burden of proof falls on her,\u201d Crowder said.<\/p>\n Omar\u2019s spokesman told the\u00a0Minneapolis Star Tribune<\/em>\u00a0in 2019: \u201cThere\u2019s no truth at all to this story. This has been debunked multiple times.\u201d<\/p>\n But as Crowder pointed out: \u201cIf it\u2019s been debunked, where\u2019s the evidence? Show us the DNA test. Show us the documents.\u201d<\/p>\n Conservative frustration has only grown as media watchdogs refuse to pursue the issue. \u201cThey call everything a conspiracy theory,\u201d Crowder said, \u201cuntil it turns out to be true.\u201d<\/p>\n The controversy gained traction in 2016 when blogger Scott Johnson of\u00a0Power Line<\/em>\u00a0first raised questions about Omar\u2019s marriage records. Since then, critics have pointed to inconsistencies that remain unresolved.<\/p>\n Crowder cited Johnson\u2019s reporting in his video, saying: \u201cThese aren\u2019t wild accusations. This is based on actual reporting, on records. Why won\u2019t Omar face the facts?\u201d<\/p>\n Omar\u2019s defenders say the allegations rely on misunderstandings of Somali naming conventions and family structures. But critics argue that this explanation is evasive.<\/p>\n \u201cIf the explanation is that complicated, it usually means someone\u2019s hiding something,\u201d Crowder said.<\/p>\n Some Minnesota voters have expressed concern. \u201cIf she lied on immigration forms, that\u2019s serious,\u201d one voter told\u00a0<\/p>\n Crowder insists that this is not a personal vendetta but a matter of integrity. \u201cIf a sitting congresswoman committed immigration fraud, the public deserves accountability,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n Omar continues to reject the allegations, but the pressure from Crowder and other conservative voices shows no sign of slowing. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to drop this,\u201d Crowder declared.<\/p>\n BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED\u2026<\/p>\n Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.<\/p>\n This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.<\/p>\n Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.<\/p>\n According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals\u2019 involvement in Epstein\u2019s criminal network.<\/p>\n She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.<\/p>\n \u201cEven if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,\u201d Luna told Fox News. \u201cWe have been more than patient.\u201d<\/p>\n These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein\u2019s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.<\/p>\n Luna\u2019s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.<\/p>\n The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ\u2019s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,\u201d Luna said. \u201cThis is corruption at the highest level.\u201d<\/p>\n Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. \u201cHad this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,\u201d one conservative commentator noted.<\/p>\n For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America\u2019s elite circles. The financier\u2019s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.<\/p>\n Now, Luna\u2019s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.<\/p>\n What\u2019s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals\u2014politicians, celebrities, and global financiers\u2014who participated in or enabled Epstein\u2019s crimes.<\/p>\n In this context, Luna\u2019s SHRED Act isn\u2019t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.<\/p>\n Despite Luna\u2019s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ\u2019s handling of Epstein evidence.<\/p>\n Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.<\/p>\n This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.<\/p>\n Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ\u2019s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.<\/p>\n The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna\u2019s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.<\/p>\n BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For\u2026<\/p>\n Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.<\/p>\n Speaking from his post as one of President Trump\u2019s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is a live federal investigation. We\u2019ve asked ICE to take immediate action,\u201d Homan said during a televised interview.<\/p>\n The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC\u2019s office.<\/p>\n According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.<\/p>\n Homan stressed that AOC\u2019s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.<\/p>\n \u201cThis goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There\u2019s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,\u201d he stated.<\/p>\n Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.<\/p>\n AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as \u201cracist\u201d and \u201coppressors.\u201d<\/p>\n Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.<\/p>\n \u201cIf a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that\u2019s a clear violation of federal law,\u201d Homan declared.<\/p>\n Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.<\/p>\n Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.<\/p>\n House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn\u2019t apply to them,\u201d said Rep. Andy Biggs.<\/p>\n Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.<\/p>\n But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.<\/p>\n \u201cThis isn\u2019t about politics. It\u2019s about national security and public trust,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,\u201d Homan confirmed.<\/p>\n Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.<\/p>\n Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.<\/p>\n \u201cWe must restore the rule of law,\u201d he concluded. \u201cNo one, no matter how powerful, is above it.\u201d<\/p>\n BREAKING: The FBI Launches Criminal Investigation Into..<\/p>\n It\u2019s finally happening.<\/p>\n John Brennan and James Comey\u2014two of the most powerful Obama-era intelligence chiefs\u2014are now facing criminal investigations.<\/p>\n Their role in pushing the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion narrative derailed a presidency and deceived the nation.<\/p>\n Sources inside the Justice Department confirm that former CIA Director Brennan is under investigation for allegedly lying to Congress.<\/p>\n Ex-FBI Director Comey is also the subject of an ongoing probe.<\/p>\n Their roles in the origin and manipulation of the Trump-Russia hoax are being scrutinized, years after millions of Americans demanded accountability.<\/p>\n Brennan is accused of pushing the phony Steele dossier into official intelligence assessments.<\/p>\n CIA Russia experts warned the document was so flawed it didn\u2019t meet even \u201cthe most basic tradecraft standards.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cJasmine Crockett didn\u2019t just insult Trump,\u201d Leavitt said during her White House briefing. \u201cShe smeared over 70 million Americans who believe in freedom, God, secure borders, and the Constitution. Calling them mentally ill is not just false\u2014it\u2019s dangerous.\u201d<\/p>\n Brennan ignored the warnings and formalized his demand in writing, insisting the fake dossier be included anyway.<\/p>\n James Comey, for his part, did the same.<\/p>\n The CIA\u2019s review makes clear: FBI leadership under Comey pressured the intelligence community to embed the Steele dossier in their final report on Russian election interference.<\/p>\n The FBI \u201crepeatedly pushed\u201d for its inclusion.<\/p>\n These two didn\u2019t just make bad calls. They rigged the process.<\/p>\n Even worse, Brennan later told Congress under oath that the Steele dossier \u201cwasn\u2019t part of the corpus of intelligence\u201d used in the Russia assessment.<\/p>\n But a newly surfaced email shows that he pushed the dossier hard, despite being warned it could destroy the report\u2019s credibility.<\/p>\n And why did they push it so aggressively? Because it wasn\u2019t about national security.<\/p>\n It was about kneecapping President Trump before he was even sworn in.<\/p>\n \u201cThis was Obama, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan deciding, \u2018We\u2019re going to screw Trump,\u2019\u201d former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told the press.<\/p>\n \u201cThey all knew what they were doing.\u201d<\/p>\n Millions of tax dollars were wasted. Reputations were destroyed.<\/p>\n \u201cJasmine Crockett should visit a Trump rally before shooting her mouth off,\u201d Leavitt challenged.<\/p>\n \u201cShe\u2019ll meet grandmothers, veterans, farmers, teachers, truckers\u2014all proud Americans who just want their country back. These are the people she called mentally ill. What an absolute disgrace.\u201d<\/p>\n And for what? To push Hillary Clinton\u2019s opposition research as gospel truth.<\/p>\n Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt.<\/p>\n Fusion hired British ex-spy Christopher Steele. Steele gave them fiction.<\/p>\n Senator Josh Hawley demanded action: \u201cIf Brennan and Comey lied to Congress or weaponized their agencies against a political opponent, they should be prosecuted\u2014no exceptions, no excuses.\u201d<\/p>\n This scandal is bigger than Watergate.<\/p>\n It poisoned public trust, warped the 2016 election aftermath, and set the tone for years of baseless attacks on a sitting president.<\/p>\n The investigations are underway.<\/p>\n Now the question is, will the justice system do its job, or will the same people who buried the truth for years bury it again?<\/p>\n Brennan and Comey must be held accountable.<\/p>\n No one is above the law, not even the architects of one of the most dishonest political smear campaigns in American history.<\/p>\n BREAKING: Joe Biden Admits to New York Times That\u2026<\/p>\n Joe Biden admitted to The New York Times that he did not personally sign off on every pardon and commutation issued during his presidency, an acknowledgment that has sparked intense debate over how involved he truly was in carrying out one of the most consequential powers of the office.<\/p>\n \u201cI made every decision on the categories and top-level individuals, but the mechanics were left to staff,\u201d Biden told the Times. That sentence alone sent shockwaves through political and legal communities.<\/p>\n According to the New York Post, Biden\u2019s White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients authorized the use of the autopen to execute a sweeping set of clemency actions on January 19, 2025. This included about 2,500 pardons and 1,500 commutations.<\/p>\n The New York Post confirmed, \u201cBiden admitted that he didn\u2019t review every clemency case individually and that his chief of staff, Jeff Zients, authorized the use of the autopen.\u201d<\/p>\n The same report added, \u201cThe autopen application, which Biden also used to sign some legislation, allowed staff to speed up paperwork processing.\u201d<\/p>\n While Biden insisted, as quoted in ABC News, that he personally made \u201cevery decision,\u201d he conceded that he did not individually sign off on each document, saying, \u201cI approved each of the clemency decisions before they were issued.\u201d<\/p>\n The Daily Beast quoted Biden dismissing Republican criticism: \u201cThat is utter BS,\u201d he said, responding to allegations that he had no hand in the clemency spree.<\/p>\n Still, Biden\u2019s comments confirmed the worst fears of critics who have questioned his cognitive fitness and decision-making capacity. As Time reported, the final flurry of clemency actions was conducted with Biden out of public view.<\/p>\n Time added context, noting, \u201cEmails show Biden\u2019s chief of staff, Jeff Zients, approved the use of the autopen to execute clemency documents on the president\u2019s behalf.\u201d<\/p>\n In the same article, the legal implications were underscored: \u201cWhile it is legally permissible, it is extremely rare for a president to use an autopen to sign something as consequential as a clemency order.\u201d<\/p>\n Republican leaders swiftly seized on the opportunity to highlight Biden\u2019s detachment. House Oversight Chair James Comer was quoted as saying, \u201cThis isn\u2019t just about a signature. It\u2019s about transparency, accountability, and who really was making decisions in that White House.\u201d<\/p>\n Comer continued, as cited in ABC News, \u201cWe are investigating whether this use of the autopen was a way to obscure Biden\u2019s declining capacity and whether any of the beneficiaries had connections to the administration.\u201d<\/p>\n The legal debate over autopen use isn\u2019t new, but Biden\u2019s large-scale application is unprecedented. According to Time, \u201cIt has never been used on this scale or for something with the constitutional gravity of a pardon.\u201d<\/p>\n Even some Democrats were privately concerned. One DNC strategist, speaking anonymously to Politico, said, \u201cIt feeds the narrative that Biden isn\u2019t all there.\u201d<\/p>\n The same strategist added, \u201cIf he wasn\u2019t fully engaged on something as serious as clemency, what else was he rubber-stamping?\u201d<\/p>\n In response to concerns, the Daily Beast reported that Biden maintained, \u201cEach recipient was vetted and met the established standards for clemency.\u201d<\/p>\n But skepticism remains. As Time highlighted, \u201cThe Justice Department is now investigating whether any of the pardons were improperly influenced.\u201d<\/p>\n This adds to a growing list of concerns among voters and lawmakers alike. ABC News reported that the clemency decisions were made with \u201cspeed and secrecy,\u201d raising transparency questions.<\/p>\n Donald Trump, seizing the moment, weighed in: \u201cHe didn\u2019t have the guts or the capacity to do his job,\u201d he said during a recent rally, as quoted in The Daily Beast.<\/p>\n Trump added, \u201cYou don\u2019t get to hide behind a machine when you\u2019re playing with the law.\u201d<\/p>\n Seven out of ten people now believe that the Democratic Party is \u201cout of touch\u201c with the actual issues of many Americans, according to a\u00a0recent survey, which presents a frightening image for the party as it enters 2026. The results are based on a large survey conducted between November 2024 and June 2025 by the center-left research firm Welcome, which polled over half a million people. The findings show a growing gap between the Democratic Party\u2019s platform and the interests of moderates, minorities, and working-class voters\u2014the very group that formerly drove its success.<\/p>\n 70% of voters think Democrats are focused on specialized social issues like \u201cprotecting the rights of undocumented immigrants\u201d and \u201cprotecting the rights of LGBTQ+ Americans,\u201d ignoring more pressing issues like public safety, border security, and inflation, according to the\u00a0Deciding to Win report. Only 51% of respondents believed Democrats were out of touch in 2013, but that percentage has now risen by over 20 points. In comparison, opinions of the Republican Party have marginally improved during the same time frame, falling from 70% in 2013 to 65% now.<\/p>\n Democrats need to reorient themselves to be politically viable, the research advises frankly. The group added, \u201cDemocrats must concentrate less on climate change, democracy, abortion, and identity and cultural issues and more on the issues that voters believe we prioritize too little: the economy, the cost of living, health care, border security, and public safety.\u201d Additionally, it called on the party to \u201cmoderate our positions on issues where our agenda is unpopular,\u201d specifically those related to crime, immigration, and energy policy.<\/p>\n While 59% of voters disagree, only 39% believe the Democratic Party now has the correct priorities. According to the poll,\u00a0Democrats are overwhelmingly in favor of focusing on securing the border (53%), lowering everyday costs (79%), making health care affordable (74%), creating jobs and economic growth (74%), lowering middle-class taxes (66%), lowering crime (56%), and protecting Social Security and Medicare (82%). Priorities including defending illegal immigrants (23%), raising social program funding (24%), and promoting LGBTQ+ rights (25%), on the other hand, came in last.<\/p>\n Democrats seem to have suffered greatly among minority and blue-collar voters as a result of that disparity.\u00a0Since 2012, the party\u2019s popularity has decreased by 11 points among Black voters without a college degree, 15 points among Asian voters without a college degree, and 16 points among Latino voters without a college degree. Whites with college degrees were the only group to increase their support, by just 4%.<\/p>\n Welcome arrived at the conclusion that \u201cwinning does not happen by accident.\u201d \u201cIt\u2019s a decision\u2014a decision to be methodical, strategic, and prepared to face challenging realities about the electorate.\u201d<\/p>\n Those \u201cdifficult truths\u201d might be reaching Democrats either too late or just in time.To join the Diamond and Silk Monthly Supporter Program, visit\u00a0http:\/\/SupportDiamondandSilk.com.Lindell TV,\u00a0VOCL,\u00a0ChatDit,\u00a0Rumble,\u00a0TruthSocial, and\u00a0Diamond and Silk Media\u00a0are all excellent ways to stay connected with Diamond and Silk<\/p>\n The percentage of Americans who believe the Democratic Party is \u201cout of touch\u201d has increased by double-digits over the last decade, with 70% indicating the party is\u00a0disconnected from the issues\u00a0that matter to voters.\u00a0<\/p>\n The\u00a0Democratic Party\u00a0is perceived as being overly-focused on \u201cProtecting the rights of undocumented immigrants\u201d and \u201cProtecting the rights of LGBTQ+ Americans\u201d \u2013 alienating voters who care more about secure borders and crime reduction, a\u00a0survey\u00a0released Monday by Welcome, a center-left group, found.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cTo win elections, Democrats need to make the following changes. First, we need to focus more on the issues voters do not think we prioritize enough (the economy, the cost of living, health care, border security, public safety), and focus less on the issues voters think we prioritize too highly (climate change, democracy, abortion, and identity and cultural issues),\u201d read the conclusion of Welcome\u2019s \u201cDeciding to Win\u201d survey.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cSecond, we need to moderate our positions on issues where our agenda is unpopular, including immigration, public safety, energy production, and some identity and cultural issues,\u201d the group noted.\u00a0<\/p>\n In 2013, 51% of voters viewed the Democratic Party as\u00a0\u201cout of touch,\u201d but the number surged to 70% in 2025, the pollster found.\u00a0<\/p>\n Meanwhile, the Republican Party improved \u2013 going from 70% viewing it as \u201cout of touch\u201d in 2013, to 65% in 2025.\u00a0<\/p>\n Welcome also highlighted polling showing only 39% of voters say the Democratic Party has the right priorities, while 59% of voters say Democrats do not.<\/p>\n The Democratic Party\u2019s priorities should be \u201cProtecting Social Security and Medicare\u201d (82%); \u201cLowering everyday costs\u201d (79%); \u201cMaking healthcare more affordable\u201d (74%); \u201cCreating jobs and economic growth\u201d (74%); \u201cCutting taxes on the middle class\u201d (66%); \u201cLowering the rate of crime\u201d (56%); and \u201cSecuring the border\u201d (53%), according to Welcome\u2019s massive survey of more than 500,000 Americans.\u00a0<\/p>\n The issues garnering the lowest level of support for Democratic prioritization included\u00a0protecting illegal immigrants\u00a0(23%),\u00a0hiking taxes\u00a0to increase spending on \u201csocial programs\u201d (24%) and protecting\u00a0LGBTQ rights (25%).<\/p>\n Voters viewed the Democratic Party as 26% more focused on illegal immigrant rights and 23% more focused on LGBTQ rights than they should be, in the survey conducted from Nov. 13, 2024 through June 18, 2025.\u00a0<\/p>\n The party was also rated as being 21% more focused on securing the borders than it needed to be.\u00a0<\/p>\n As a result of the party\u2019s failure to align with the priorities of voters, support for Democrats \u201chas declined significantly among working-class and minority voters since 2012,\u201d particularly from moderates and conservatives in these categories, the pollster found.\u00a0<\/p>\n Between 2012 and 2024, support for the Democratic Party only grew amongst college-educated white voters (+4%) and all college-educated voters (+2%).<\/p>\n Over the same period, the party hemorrhaged support from non-college-educated Latino voters (\u221216%), non-college-educated AAPI voters (\u221215%) and non-college-educated Black voters (\u221211%) among several other groups.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cIt is essential that we make these strategic shifts because it is essential that we win,\u201d Welcome\u2019s conclusions continued.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cBut winning does not happen by accident. Winning is a choice \u2014 a choice to be disciplined and strategic and to be willing to confront difficult truths about the electorate,\u201d the group added.<\/p>\n The galaxy is buzzing with anticipation\u2014Ahsoka Season 2 is officially on the horizon! After the resounding success of the first season, fans are eager to dive back into the Star Wars universe with everyone\u2019s favorite former Jedi, Ahsoka Tano. Whether you’re curious about the<\/p>\n Before diving into what’s next, let\u2019s quickly revisit where it all began.\u00a0Ahsoka<\/em>, a Disney+ original series, follows Ahsoka Tano, the beloved character first introduced in\u00a0Star Wars: The Clone Wars<\/em><\/p>\n Season 1 captivated both new and longtime Star Wars fans by introducing live-action versions of Sabine Wren, Ezra Bridger, and Grand Admiral Thrawn. The show ended on a cliffhanger, with Ahsoka stranded in a distant galaxy\u2014setting up massive stakes for Season 2.<\/p>\n One of the most frequently searched questions is: When is Ahsoka Season 2 coming out?<\/p>\n As of mid-2025, Lucasfilm has confirmed that Ahsoka Season 2 is in development, but an official release date has not been announced. However, industry insiders speculate that the release will likely fall in late 2026 or early 2027, depending on filming schedules and post-production timelines.<\/p>\n Given the visual scale and heavy special effects, Ahsoka Season 2 will likely follow the release pattern of other Star Wars shows like\u00a0The Mandalorian<\/em>, which typically have 12\u201318 months between seasons.<\/p>\n Key takeaway: While there’s no exact\u00a0Ahsoka Season 2 release date<\/em>\u00a0yet, fans can expect updates toward the end of 2025.<\/p>\n Another hot topic is the potential for an Ahsoka Season 2 trailer. Unfortunately, as of now, there is no official trailer available. However, filming is rumored to be starting soon, meaning we might get a teaser trailer by mid-2026\u2014perhaps revealed at<\/p>\n When the\u00a0Ahsoka Season 2 trailer<\/em>\u00a0does drop, expect glimpses of intense lightsaber battles, mysterious Force lore, and perhaps more of the enigmatic Baylan Skoll storyline left hanging after Season 1.<\/p>\n Tip for fans: Keep your eyes on Disney+ and the official Star Wars YouTube channel for teaser announcements.<\/p>\n Season 1 introduced mystical elements like the\u00a0World Between Worlds<\/em>\u00a0and ancient Force lore. In Season 2, showrunner Dave Filoni is expected to dig even deeper into these mystical aspects, especially with Ahsoka\u2019s spiritual journey continuing in a new galaxy.<\/p>\n Grand Admiral Thrawn, played by Lars Mikkelsen, is now a looming threat to the New Republic. Fans anticipate that Thrawn will start rallying forces, potentially tying directly into the upcoming Star Wars: Heir to the Empire film also being developed by Filoni.<\/p>\n Thrawn is not just a villain\u2014he\u2019s a master strategist. Season 2 will likely focus on the conflict between Thrawn\u2019s return and the fragile peace established post-Empire.<\/p>\n The reunion between Sabine Wren and Ezra Bridger was one of Season 1\u2019s most emotional payoffs. Season 2 is expected to further explore their bond and evolution. Sabine, who is now Force-sensitive, might undergo formal training under Ahsoka\u2014or clash with her.<\/p>\n Ezra\u2019s adjustment to returning to the known galaxy and what role he plays in resisting Thrawn will be another central thread.<\/p>\n While Disney has yet to announce the full cast of Ahsoka Season 2, here are the actors likely to return:<\/p>\n Rosario Dawson as Ahsoka Tano<\/p>\n Natasha Liu Bordizzo as Sabine Wren<\/p>\n Eman Esfandi as Ezra Bridger<\/p>\n Lars Mikkelsen as Grand Admiral Thrawn<\/p>\n Diana Lee Inosanto as Morgan Elsbeth (if flashbacks are involved)<\/p>\n A major question mark is the character of Baylan Skoll, originally portrayed by the late Ray Stevenson. Lucasfilm may choose to recast the role or write a new arc around it.<\/p>\n Ahsoka Season 2 may not be a standalone story. With Dave Filoni building a shared Star Wars timeline with\u00a0The Mandalorian<\/em>,\u00a0The Book of Boba Fett<\/em>, and\u00a0Skeleton Crew<\/em>, crossovers are highly likely. Expect potential cameos or tie-ins as Disney+ leads toward its major\u00a0Star Wars theatrical crossover event<\/em>.<\/p>\n Ahsoka Season 2 is shaping up to be a cornerstone of the live-action Star Wars universe. With new threats, deeper Force mythology, and beloved characters returning, it\u2019s no surprise fans are eagerly awaiting every update.<\/p>\n While the\u00a0Ahsoka Season 2 release date<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0trailer<\/em>\u00a0are still under wraps, the series continues to build buzz and excitement. Until then, fans can rewatch Season 1 on Disney+ and keep an eye on announcements from\u00a0Lucasfilm<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0Star Wars Celebration 2025<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Conservative commentator Stephen Crowder is once again putting Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) back in the spotlight, repeating claims that the congresswoman married her brother to help him immigrate to the United States….<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13654,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13655","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n