![\"Pysu](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-81-1024x583-2.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Former President Barack Obama is at the center of potentially damning new details uncovered by a government watchdog organization that will no doubt create new questions surrounding the death of the former first couple\u2019s chef earlier this fall.<\/p>\n
The findings, which Judicial Watch discovered through Freedom of Information Act filings, also involved Secret Service agents assigned to the Obamas\u2019 Martha\u2019s Vineyard residence, according to Fox News host Jesse Watters.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd now we are finding out the Secret Service did not perform well the day Obama\u2019s chef drowned in Martha\u2019s Vineyard,\u201d Watters began. \u201cJudicial Watch got its hands on documents that revealed the female companion that was paddle-boarding with [chef] Tafari Campbell when he died, goes by Ms. Taylor.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd when Ms. Taylor tried to get Secret Service\u2019s help to find Tafari right after he went under, two agents tried to start one of the boats, but had difficulties lowering the motor, so another agent went to get the keys for their Secret Service boat, and then when they got them, the boat wasn\u2019t working either,\u201d Watters revealed, citing the Judicial Watch materials.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo they wasted precious time on boats that didn\u2019t work. Until they commandeered the groundskeeper\u2019s boat, and by that time, there was no sign of Tafari Campbell,\u201d the host continued before tying the former president to the new findings.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnother interesting nugget from those documents was that when Ms. Taylor sat for her interview with the police, it was conducted in Barack Obama\u2019s office. It appears that he sat in on their interview,\u201d Watters claimed. \u201cThat is not proper procedure. Your boss sits in the room and watches you during your police interrogation?<\/p>\n
\u201cYour boss, Barack Obama, sits next to the one person who witnesses the other employee\u2019s death? Wait. Maybe they do things differently in the Vineyard. We definitely know Secret Service does things differently,\u201d he added<\/p>\n
Watters has been all over this story since Campbell tragically drowned near the Obama\u2019s home over the summer.<\/p>\n
In mid-October, then-newly released documents obtained through a FOIA request revealed that, while more information about Campbell\u2019s death, they have also led to additional questions.<\/p>\n
\u201cAccording to the report, Obama was on the scene shortly after Campbell went missing,\u201d Watters said. \u201cThe report also states an unnamed female staffer jumped into the water when Tafari fell off his board, but it was already too late. He disappeared.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe also now know that Secret Service has surveillance footage of Campbell from Obama\u2019s compound moments before he entered the water,\u201d the host said.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo we\u2019re going to see if we can get that, and we may have that for you. Again, we\u2019re very, very sorry for Tafari\u2019s family. That was a serious, serious tragedy,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
That information was also obtained by Judicial Watch and posted to the organization\u2019s website. Many of the key figures and places in the report were redacted, however.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe documents were produced to Judicial Watch in response to a July 25, 2003, Massachusetts Public Records Law request for all records relating to the death of Campbell,\u201d the group said.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe documents show Campbell\u2019s family told police that he had taken swimming lessons in 2019 but described his ability as \u2018not a great swimmer.\u2019 The drowning occurred in Edgartown Great Pond, which Massachusetts Environmental Police estimated \u2018to be approximately seven to eight feet deep,\u2019\u201d it said.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe records also show a female eyewitness, an Obama employee whose name is redacted, told state police that she saw Campbell \u2018fall off his paddleboard, began splashing and became extremely panicked, yelling for help and subsequently went underwater very quickly.\u2019 By the time she reached his paddleboard, the witness said Campbell had \u2018disappeared into the extremely murky\u2019 water,\u201d Judicial Watch added.<\/p>\n
The group also said that, according to the records, \u201cBarack Obama arrived at the emergency response scene via motorcade.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe next morning, the eyewitness was interviewed in the Obama residence, seemingly with Barack Obama again present,\u201d Judicial Watch noted.<\/p>\n
For years, one name haunted the political establishment \u2014 a man once praised as incorruptible, later accused of weaponizing the highest law enforcement agency in the nation.<\/p>\n
Now, that same man faces a criminal indictment.<\/p>\n
And in the hours after the news broke, a powerful message echoed across Fox News:\u00a0\u201cThe weaponization of the legal system has ended.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/em><\/p>\n Those words came from Attorney General\u00a0Pam Bondi<\/strong><\/p>\n , who appeared on\u00a0Hannity<\/em>\u00a0Friday night \u2014 a segment that instantly went viral, not only for her fiery tone but for what it symbolized.<\/p>\n A turning point. A reckoning. The end of an era that had once placed former FBI Director\u00a0<\/p>\n James Comey<\/strong>\u00a0at the center of American politics.<\/p>\n When the Justice Department confirmed the indictment Thursday afternoon, it sent shockwaves through Washington.<\/p>\n Comey \u2014 the man whose public image once rested on a reputation for integrity \u2014 now stood accused of\u00a0<\/p>\n lying to Congress<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0obstructing an investigation<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Two felony counts. For many Americans, especially those who had followed the saga of the Russia probe from the beginning, the moment felt surreal.<\/p>\n How had the country gone from lionizing James Comey as a defender of democracy to seeing him booked on federal charges?<\/p>\n Bondi\u2019s answer was blunt.<\/p>\n \u201cYou shouldn\u2019t be nervous any longer,\u201d she told Sean Hannity. \u201cBecause Donald Trump is in office \u2014 and the weaponization has ended.\u201d<\/p>\n Her words cut through the noise.<\/p>\n Bondi\u2019s statement wasn\u2019t just a soundbite \u2014 it was a declaration.<\/p>\n For years, conservatives had accused the FBI and DOJ of becoming political weapons, targeting Trump and his allies while protecting the Washington elite.<\/p>\n Comey, who once led the FBI during some of the most divisive political investigations in modern history, had become a symbol of that imbalance.<\/p>\n Now, Bondi was promising accountability.<\/p>\n \u201cWhether you\u2019re a former FBI director, whether you\u2019re a former head of an intel community, whether you\u2019re a current state or local elected official, whether you\u2019re a billionaire funding organizations to try to keep Donald Trump out of office \u2014 everything is on the table,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Her message was clear: no one, not even a man who once ran the FBI, would be above the law.<\/p>\n It\u2019s been almost a decade since Comey first dominated national headlines.<\/p>\n In 2016, he was the man who publicly reopened the investigation into Hillary Clinton\u2019s private email server just days before the presidential election \u2014 a move that infuriated Democrats and stunned the media.<\/p>\n Months later, he became the man who helped ignite the Russia investigation, authorizing the use of the\u00a0Steele dossier<\/strong>, a collection of unverified claims about then-candidate Donald Trump\u2019s alleged ties to Moscow.<\/p>\n That dossier, now widely discredited, became the backbone of\u00a0Crossfire Hurricane<\/strong>, the FBI\u2019s 2016 probe into Trump\u2019s campaign.<\/p>\n The investigation dragged on for years, damaging public trust and deepening the partisan divide.<\/p>\n When Trump fired Comey in May 2017, the political world erupted. His dismissal became the catalyst for the appointment of Special Counsel\u00a0Robert Mueller<\/strong>, whose two-year investigation ended without charging Trump or any of his aides with collusion.<\/p>\n But the damage was done \u2014 and Comey\u2019s name became forever linked to one of the most controversial chapters in U.S. political history.<\/p>\n According to the indictment filed Thursday, Comey faces two federal charges:<\/p>\n One count of making a false statement<\/strong>\u00a0within the jurisdiction of Congress<\/p>\n One count of obstruction<\/strong>\u00a0of a congressional investigation<\/p>\n Prosecutors allege that Comey lied under oath when he claimed during a 2020 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that he had not authorized anyone at the FBI to act as an anonymous source for media leaks.<\/p>\n They also accuse him of obstructing a congressional inquiry into the origins of the Russia investigation by concealing evidence and misleading lawmakers about the FBI\u2019s use of the Steele dossier.<\/p>\n If convicted, Comey could face up to 10 years in federal prison.<\/p>\n But beyond the legal implications, the indictment has reignited a national debate \u2014 one that stretches far beyond the courtroom.<\/p>\n When news broke that Michelle Obama, former First Lady and global icon, was suing Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana for defamation, Washington\u2019s political ground seemed to quake. No longer was this a matter of partisan sniping or social media feuds. This was a real legal filing, with Michelle\u2019s name stamped at the top, dragging a seasoned Republican senator into court over words she claimed crossed the line.<\/p>\n Cable networks scrambled for coverage; courthouse steps filled with protesters and supporters from both camps. The stakes were clear: if Michelle won, she would set a new precedent for protecting public figures from reckless public statements. If Kennedy prevailed, the case would reinforce the power of elected officials to question even the most untouchable icons.<\/p>\n But as the trial unfolded, it became apparent that this was not just a legal battle\u2014it was a collision of legacies.<\/p>\n The New Orleans courthouse was electric with anticipation. Michelle Obama arrived with her trademark poise, surrounded by a team of high-powered attorneys. Her composure was legendary, her public image carefully curated over years of advocacy and diplomacy.<\/p>\n Across the aisle, Senator Kennedy sat with a calm resolve. Known for his blunt honesty, Kennedy had built his career on speaking uncomfortable truths, often ruffling feathers on both sides of the aisle. His defense was simple: his comments about Michelle were not slander, but questions\u2014questions he argued were necessary for transparency in public life.<\/p>\n As the clerk called the case, every eye turned toward the front. This was not just another lawsuit. It was a test of reputations, a duel between two radically different philosophies on power and accountability.<\/p>\n Michelle\u2019s legal team painted Kennedy as reckless, a man whose words blurred the line between truth and fiction. \u201cThis is not about politics,\u201d her lead attorney declared. \u201cIt is about accountability. It is about protecting the integrity of a public figure.\u201d<\/p>\n Kennedy\u2019s defense, led by attorney Marcus Hail, countered with fire. \u201cThis case is not about protecting dignity. It\u2019s about silencing a voice\u2014a voice that has asked tough questions about influence and power. Senator Kennedy did not invent anything. He said what millions of Americans were already asking.\u201d<\/p>\n The tension was palpable. Legal experts debated the burden of proof for defamation, while journalists dissected every gesture, every whispered aside between attorneys. The outcome would not only decide the fate of two powerful individuals but would serve as a referendum on the limits of free speech in American politics.<\/p>\n For weeks, the trial seemed locked in a stalemate. Michelle\u2019s team presented evidence of Kennedy\u2019s remarks, arguing they were calculated to inflict harm. Kennedy\u2019s defense hammered home the importance of scrutiny and transparency, claiming that punishing public criticism would weaken democracy itself.<\/p>\n But everything changed when Marcus Hail called an unexpected witness to the stand: Thomas Riley, a former adviser involved in several high-profile charitable initiatives.<\/p>\n Riley\u2019s testimony lasted less than ten seconds, but its impact was seismic.<\/p>\n \u201cYes,\u201d Riley said, when asked if Michelle Obama had been directly involved in negotiations that were later shielded from public scrutiny. \u201cShe was present during several closed-door meetings. She didn\u2019t just sit silently. She spoke. She advised. In some cases, she pushed deals forward.\u201d<\/p>\n The courtroom fell silent. Reporters scrambled to file stories. Even the jury seemed stunned by the revelation. For years, Michelle\u2019s image had been one of graceful detachment from Washington\u2019s chaos. Riley\u2019s words shattered that narrative, suggesting a level of involvement\u2014and influence\u2014that her team had long denied.<\/p>\n Within minutes, Riley\u2019s nine-second testimony was clipped, subtitled, and broadcast across every major news outlet. Cable anchors replayed it in slow motion; commentators dissected every syllable. Hashtags tied to the trial trended worldwide.<\/p>\n Outside the courthouse, chaos reigned. Protesters surged against barricades, chanting louder than ever. Police presence doubled to keep tempers from boiling over. Inside, Kennedy\u2019s team celebrated quietly, knowing Riley\u2019s words had flipped the narrative.<\/p>\n For Michelle Obama, the impact was devastating. Her attorneys scrambled to discredit Riley, calling him a disgruntled ex-associate. But the damage was done. The image of the former First Lady as uninvolved and above the fray had been irrevocably cracked.<\/p>\n The public reaction was immediate and intense. Some rushed to Michelle\u2019s defense, arguing that Riley\u2019s testimony was unreliable. Others hailed Kennedy as a champion of free speech, praising his courage to stand up to power.<\/p>\n On social media, videos of Kennedy walking confidently down the courthouse steps went viral, paired with captions like \u201cfearless\u201d and \u201cunbowed.\u201d Clips of Michelle leaving under heavy security circulated with hashtags suggesting secrecy and scandal.<\/p>\n Even late-night television weighed in. One host quipped, \u201cWhen your 9-second cameo in a courtroom destroys a defamation case, you deserve a medal\u2014or at least a Netflix special.\u201d<\/p>\n After days of deliberation, the jury returned its verdict: in favor of Senator John Kennedy. The courtroom erupted in muffled cheers. Michelle Obama sat frozen, her composure unbroken, but her eyes flickered with the recognition that her case\u2014and her gamble\u2014had collapsed.<\/p>\n Kennedy did not gloat. He simply closed his eyes for a moment, as if to say, \u201cI held the line.\u201d<\/p>\n Outside, he addressed the crowd briefly. \u201cThis wasn\u2019t about me,\u201d he said, his voice echoing through the microphones. \u201cThis was about the right to speak, the right to ask hard questions, and the responsibility we all have to demand honesty from those in power. If we give that up, we give up our democracy.\u201d<\/p>\n His words traveled far beyond New Orleans. Editorials praised his courage; even critics admitted Kennedy stood firm under pressure. Michelle Obama stayed silent, but the public had already judged in Kennedy\u2019s favor.<\/p>\n The trial was no longer just about defamation. It was about truth, perception, and the price of trying to use the courts as a weapon. The lesson was clear: words matter. They can wound or heal, but silencing them is more dangerous than facing them.<\/p>\n Kennedy\u2019s calm exit symbolized victory not just for him, but for the principle of free speech itself. He had stood against power\u2014and power blinked first.<\/p>\n As the dust settles, America is left grappling with the fragile balance between reputation and expression. The echoes of those nine seconds will reverberate for years, shaping debates about truth, accountability, and the right to speak freely.<\/p>\n Michelle Obama\u2019s legacy may have been cracked, but the conversation she sparked will endure. And for John Kennedy, the trial was more than a legal victory\u2014it was a reaffirmation of the power of fearless speech in a democracy that depends on it.<\/p>\n Mike Johnson\u2019s confirmation ends weeks of political deadlock and opens a new chapter for congressional leadership. His narrow approval followed tense negotiations, with lawmakers and citizens alike hoping it signals renewed stability in Washington.<\/p>\n A disciplined and methodical figure, Johnson is praised by supporters as a steady hand focused on fiscal responsibility and national defense. Critics, however, warn that his conservative approach may deepen divides rather than bridge them. His leadership will immediately be tested by urgent fiscal debates and policy decisions affecting millions of Americans.<\/p>\n Reactions nationwide reflect both hope and caution. Many see Johnson\u2019s rise as an opportunity to restore purpose and cooperation in government, while others fear renewed partisanship. Whether his tenure brings unity or further division will depend on his ability to balance principle with pragmatism in the challenging months ahead.<\/p>\n The official confirmation of\u00a0Mike Johnson\u00a0marks a defining moment in the evolving story of American politics. Rising from relative obscurity to one of the most powerful positions in Washington, Johnson now faces the monumental challenge of leading a deeply divided nation through an era of political tension, economic uncertainty, and shifting global power dynamics.<\/p>\n \u00a0A Leader Shaped by Conviction and Faith<\/p>\n Mike Johnson has long been known for his deeply rooted conservative beliefs and his unwavering commitment to constitutional principles. His career reflects a consistent focus on defending what he views as traditional American values \u2014 faith, family, and freedom. Supporters see him as a principled leader with a moral compass that could bring integrity and discipline back to Washington politics. Critics, however, question whether his rigid ideology might limit his ability to reach across the aisle and find bipartisan solutions.<\/p>\n Johnson\u2019s background as a constitutional lawyer and his long-standing advocacy for religious freedom are expected to influence his legislative agenda. He has often spoken about America\u2019s need to return to its founding ideals \u2014 emphasizing limited government, fiscal restraint, and respect for individual liberties.<\/p>\n \u00a0Economic and Fiscal Challenges Ahead<\/p>\n At the forefront of Johnson\u2019s new role lies one of America\u2019s most pressing issues: the economy. With rising national debt, inflation concerns, and ongoing debates over government spending, Johnson has vowed to restore fiscal discipline. His approach is expected to include reducing federal expenditures, promoting economic efficiency, and encouraging private-sector growth.<\/p>\n However, achieving these goals won\u2019t be easy. He will need to navigate complex negotiations with both parties to pass a sustainable budget plan while avoiding further government shutdowns \u2014 a test that will likely define the early months of his tenure.<\/p>\n Rebuilding Trust in Government<\/p>\n In an era where public confidence in government institutions is at an all-time low, Johnson\u2019s ability to\u00a0restore credibility and transparency\u00a0could shape his legacy. He has promised to increase accountability in Congress and prioritize legislation that directly benefits working-class Americans.<\/p>\n His challenge will be to demonstrate that leadership grounded in faith and principle can also be pragmatic and inclusive \u2014 capable of addressing issues such as healthcare reform, border security, and education without alienating moderate voters.<\/p>\n \u00a0A Divided Nation Looks for Direction<\/p>\n Perhaps the greatest test of Mike Johnson\u2019s leadership will be his capacity to unite a fractured political landscape. With the 2024 presidential election on the horizon, partisanship in Washington remains fierce. Johnson must find a way to balance the expectations of his party\u2019s conservative base with the broader demands of a diverse electorate seeking stability and progress.<\/p>\n If he succeeds, he could emerge as a\u00a0transformative figure\u00a0who bridges divides and restores order to a gridlocked system. If he fails, his tenure could deepen America\u2019s political polarization \u2014 a risk that many observers are watching closely.<\/p>\n \u00a0The Global Dimension<\/p>\n Beyond domestic policy, Johnson will also have to assert his leadership on the global stage. America\u2019s relationships with China, Russia, and its NATO allies are in flux, and the country\u2019s role in global security is being redefined. His stance on foreign policy, trade, and defense spending will reveal whether he intends to pursue a more isolationist or interventionist path.<\/p>\n \u00a0Looking Ahead<\/p>\n Mike Johnson\u2019s confirmation symbolizes both\u00a0renewal and uncertainty. It represents a chance for change \u2014 a promise to bring faith, discipline, and a new vision to the heart of American governance. But it also raises critical questions about the balance between ideology and practicality, conviction and compromise.<\/p>\n As America watches his first major moves in office, one thing is certain: Mike Johnson\u2019s leadership will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of the United States \u2014 not just for his term, but for a generation to come.<\/p>\n Rep. Tim Burchett drops a MOAB\u2014mother of all bombs\u2014confirming that Biden staffers were taking payoffs in exchange for autopen pardons.<\/p>\n I think we\u2019re on safe ground to say that we now know former President Joe Biden was not in any sort of fit mental state during his final year in office, and likely long before that. This is beyond dispute.<\/p>\n On Friday, we had the audio from Biden\u2019s interview with special counsel Robert Hur leak; if you haven\u2019t listened to it, it\u2019s devastating, since it depicts a man much farther gone mentally than the transcripts of the interview did, and the transcripts were already bad.<\/p>\n On Tuesday, the most thorough look into Biden\u2019s mental deterioration \u2014 \u201cOriginal Sin: President Biden\u2019s Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,\u201d by CNN\u2019s Jake Tapper and Axios\u2019 Alex Thompson \u2014 was released, confirming that even before his 2020 presidential run, serious questions about his mental capacity existed, and an inner circle of trusted staffers not only protected him but effectively made important decisions for him.<\/p>\n This all raises the question, then: What about everything signed with the autopen \u2014 the electronic device used to affix the president\u2019s signature to documents he\u2019s approved but will not personally put his John Hancock on \u2014 during the final years of Biden\u2019s presidency?<\/p>\n Tennessee GOP Rep. Tim Burchett would certainly like some answers about that, particularly health.<\/p>\n Promoted Content\u00a0BREAKING \/ CHUCK SCHUMER CALLS FOR \u201cFORCEFUL UPRISING\u201d AGAINST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION<\/p>\n CHUCK SCHUMER CALLS FOR \u201cFORCEFUL UPRISING\u201d AGAINST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION \u2014 YES, REALLY\u00a0 The same man who spent the past four years weaponizing the justice system, cheering lawfare, hoaxes, and political prosecutions\u2026 is now crying \u201ctyranny.\u201d<\/p>\n In a wild rant, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called on Americans to literally \u201cforcefully rise up\u201d against the Trump administration:<\/p>\n Schumer: \u201cIt is now just a hallmark of tyrannical, autocratic dictatorship societies that they use the prosecutorial department as a political weapon. It is a disgrace and every American\u2026 should be forcefully rising up against this.\u201d<\/p>\n You can\u2019t make this up.The party that:<\/p>\n Launched two fake impeachments\u00a0 Spied on a sitting president\u00a0 Censored citizens on social media\u00a0 Jailed political opponents\u00a0 And shut down the government to fund healthcare for illegal aliens\u00a0 \u2026is now pretending to be the victim of \u201cauthoritarianism.\u201d<\/p>\n Schumer doesn\u2019t want accountability \u2014 he wants an uprising because Trump is finally draining the swamp and enforcing the law equally.<\/p>\n If a Republican said what Schumer just did, the FBI would already be knocking on their door.<\/p>\n The Democratic Party has become a criminal enterprise, and Chuck Schumer just gave America the proof \u2014 on camera.<\/p>\n Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul Commits Ultimate Betrayal Of President Donald Trump \u2013 PRIMARY This RINO<\/p>\n Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) announced that he will support his fellow libertarian-leaning colleague, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), in his upcoming primary race against a challenger endorsed by President Donald Trump.Trump threw his support last week behind Ed Gallrein, a former Navy SEAL and outspoken loyalist, after calling for a 2026 primary challenge to Massie. The congressman has repeatedly pressed the administration to release all remaining files related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, Fox News reported.<\/p>\n Tens of thousands of pages of Epstein files\u00a0have been released, however.Massie has frequently broken with Trump and GOP leadership on key issues, including voting against the president\u2019s summer spending bill and asserting that Trump must obtain congressional authorization before engaging in military action.<\/p>\n Paul, who has taken similar positions, also opposed the spending measure in the Senate and has criticized the administration for conducting military strikes without approval from Congress.<\/p>\n Paul is now endorsing Massie\u2019s re-election campaign and is committed to helping him retain his House seat.<\/p>\n \u201cThomas Massie is going to win,\u201d Paul told POLITICO. \u201cI\u2019m going to help him. I\u2019m going to be with him every step of the way.\u201d<\/p>\n Paul described Massie as an \u201cindependent voice\u201d within the Republican Party, noting his frequent breaks with GOP leadership. However, he emphasized that both he and Massie still back President Trump\u2019s agenda \u201csignificantly more\u201d than many other Republicans who have sought to align themselves closely with the president.<\/p>\n \u201cThe people who\u2019ve gotten close to him who want regime change in Venezuela and want to send more advanced weaponry to Ukraine, those are the interventionists from the interventionist wing of the party who have never been the ones really closely allied,\u201d Paul said. \u201cThese are the people who have always opposed Donald Trump.\u201d<\/p>\n Paul said he and Massie will continue to push for \u201cenumerated powers\u201d as well as \u201cbalanced budgets, low taxes and less foreign war.\u201d<\/p>\n The Kentucky senator warned that Trump\u2019s decision to single out Massie should concern all Republican lawmakers, emphasizing that taking positions contrary to the president\u2019s agenda could carry political repercussions.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s a warning sign,\u201d he said. \u201c\u2018Oppose me or any of my policies, and I\u2019ll come after you.\u2019 And I don\u2019t think that\u2019s good for the Republican Party, nor do I think it\u2019s good for the country.\u201d<\/p>\n The senator added that he is frustrated with being treated as the Republican Party\u2019s \u201cwhipping boy,\u201d saying many of his colleagues rely on him \u201cto do their job for them\u201d when they are unwilling to tell Trump that his nominees lack sufficient support in the Senate,\u00a0Fox News reported.<\/p>\n \u201cThey say, \u2018Oh, well, you\u2019re not afraid of the president. You go tell him his nominee can\u2019t make it,\u2019\u201d Paul said. \u201cSo, I\u2019m just tired of always being the whipping boy. I\u2019m tired of [being] the only one that has any guts to stand up and tell the president the truth.\u201d<\/p>\n Paul has also faced criticism from President Trump in recent months but has continued to stand his ground. Most recently, he has spoken out against the administration\u2019s military strikes on boats it claims\u2014based on intelligence\u2014were carrying narco-terrorists.<\/p>\n The senator expressed concern over the lack of due process and the potential for innocent people to be killed in such operations. He pointed to Coast Guard data indicating that a significant percentage of vessels boarded on suspicion of drug trafficking turn out to be innocent.<\/p>\n Earlier this week, Paul disclosed that he had not been invited to a White House luncheon with other Republican senators, reportedly due to his ongoing disagreements with President Trump. He noted, however, that he already had a \u201cLiberty Caucus Lunch\u201d scheduled with Rep. Thomas Massie at the same time.<\/p>\n Paul recently campaigned alongside Massie and said he intends to join him again on the campaign trail in the near future, Fox added.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Former President Barack Obama is at the center of potentially damning new details uncovered by a government watchdog organization that will no doubt create new questions surrounding the death of the former…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13771,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13772","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
One fallen icon.
And a nation watching.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/s.w.org\/images\/core\/emoji\/16.0.1\/svg\/1f525.svg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/s.w.org\/images\/core\/emoji\/16.0.1\/svg\/2705.svg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n