![\"RHOSLC](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Britani-and-Brooke-Bateman.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Britani Bateman\u2018s daughter Olivia Bateman shared more details behind their feud, hinted at playing \u201ctelephone,\u201d and revealed which \u201cinformation was wrong.\u201d She also explained the real reason she and her sister didn\u2019t film the Real Housewives of Salt Lake City in the past.<\/p>\n
When Britani joined the show in season 5, she shared that she wasn\u2019t speaking to her daughters, including her teenage daughter, Olivia. Neither of the girls filmed that season. But in a recent episode, Olivia shared her version of events. According to her, Britani became less involved in their lives after marrying Olivia\u2019s former stepdad. Olivia claimed history repeated itself with Britani\u2019s on-off boyfriend, Jared Osmond, who Britani has broken up with multiple times.<\/p>\n
On The Bravo Investigator, Olivia was asked about Britani\u2019s suggestion that Olivia and her sister couldn\u2019t film because of Bronwyn Newport. (According to Britani, Bronwyn allegedly told her best friends \u2014 who then allegedly told the daughters \u2014 that Britani was trash-talking them on camera. Britani said this is why her daughters ghosted her.)<\/p>\n
\u201cI would love to clear this up. Okay, because my mom keeps bringing it up when we\u2019ve already talked it out,\u201d said Olivia. \u201cWe\u2019ve already figured out where all the miscommunications were.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo basically, it was just a long telephone game that got passed down to me and my sister, and the information was wrong,\u201d she continued. \u201cAs things happen, we were being told that our mom was saying horrible things about us on season five, and that she was blaming her divorce on us, and she was saying we don\u2019t talk to her because we\u2019re jealous of her. All of this was not true.\u201d<\/p>\n
According to Olivia, the people who shared this information were not \u201cdoing the wrong thing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey were just like, \u2018Hey \u2026 we\u2019re looking out for you. This is what we heard. Like, it\u2019s not necessarily true. This is just the rumor \u2014 is that these things were said on the show. So if it comes out, like I just want to warn you,’\u201d she recalled. \u201cMy mom loves to say that Bronwyn\u2019s the reason we don\u2019t talk to her when that\u2019s never, ever, ever been true. We were already not talking and estranged when we got this information.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid it make things a little bit worse? Yeah,\u201d Olivia added. \u201cAnd it made us not want to film because \u2026 I was like, \u2018Oh my gosh. Like we sound like horrible people. We sound like we\u2019re like little monsters and brats.\u2019 And so like yeah, it made us not want to film. It made our relationship a little bit worse, but it\u2019s not the reason, you know \u2026 It\u2019s like she\u2019s pointing fingers to everybody else who had nothing to do with it.\u201d<\/p>\n
But Olivia said she now has a \u201clot more empathy\u201d for her mom\u2019s on-off relationship with Jared \u2014 as Olivia herself recently went through a breakup, and she knows it isn\u2019t \u201cso easy.\u201d<\/p>\n
The long-running civil lawsuit against Alec Baldwin stemming from the fatal 2021 Rust shooting has reached a breaking point. The actor is now facing unprecedented legal jeopardy after attorneys for gaffer Serge Svetnoy revealed a crucial piece of evidence in court: Baldwin allegedly refused to appear for a legally required deposition, yet was photographed attending a taping of Dancing with the Stars to support his wife, Hilaria Baldwin.<\/p>\n
This blatant display of personal convenience over judicial obligation has reportedly infuriated the presiding judge, leading to an alleged threat to not only impose a colossal $3 MILLION FINE but to escalate the penalty by making it a CRIMINAL legal precedent, citing Baldwin’s conduct as a profound disregard for the rule of law.<\/p>\n
For months, Svetnoy’s legal team has been attempting to secure Baldwin’s deposition\u2014key testimony for the civil suit where Svetnoy claims he suffered severe emotional distress after witnessing the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.<\/p>\n
On November 12, Svetnoy\u2019s lawyer revealed the shocking pattern of evasion: \u201cIn every instance, [Alec and the other defendants] claimed to be unavailable or simply refused to testify.\u201d The documents specifically point out the hypocrisy of Baldwin’s excuses:<\/p>\n
The lawyer wrote: “Despite claiming to have work commitment throughout most of September 2025, Alec, 67, would travel to and appear in Los Angeles, California, at the taping of an episode of Dancing With the Stars to support his wife.”<\/p>\n
This act of prioritizing a televised celebrity appearance over a court-ordered duty has been presented as definitive proof of Baldwin’s BLATANT disregard for justice.<\/p>\n
Sources close to the Los Angeles Superior Court claim the judge was incensed by the evidence of the evasion. While the $3 million figure is tied to potential punitive damages in the civil suit, the judge allegedly threatened to use this case as an opportunity to set a dramatic CRIMINAL legal precedent for non-compliance with subpoenas.<\/p>\n
The judicial threat is reportedly twofold:<\/p>\n
Maximum Penalty: The judge is said to be demanding Baldwin face the MAXIMUM penalty for civil contempt, which could include massive fines and even potential incarceration if the contempt is deemed willful.<\/p>\n
Criminal Precedent: By linking the $3M financial penalty to the deliberate evasion, the court could send a chilling message to high-profile defendants, essentially classifying a calculated refusal to testify\u2014particularly when balanced against non-essential public appearances\u2014as an obstruction of justice that warrants unprecedented and potentially criminal consequences.<\/p>\n
Svetnoy’s attorney quoted Albert Einstein in the filing, stating, \u201c\u2018The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.\u2019 [Svetnoy] now moves [to] break this cycle of insanity.\u201d The court appears ready to grant that break\u2014with catastrophic consequences for the actor.<\/p>\n
The legal fallout from the Rust tragedy continues to mount, but this latest development threatens to redefine the legal repercussions for celebrity defendants who believe their fame exempts them from court-ordered duties.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Britani Bateman\u2018s daughter Olivia Bateman shared more details behind their feud, hinted at playing \u201ctelephone,\u201d and revealed which \u201cinformation was wrong.\u201d She also explained the real reason she and her sister didn\u2019t…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":14956,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14957","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t