![\"C49.Trump](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/584917378_122221035704123475_1199536501701825158_n-1763647226-q80-1.webp\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
A New Chapter in America\u2019s Energy Story
In a sweeping move that redefines the nation\u2019s energy landscape, President Donald Trump on Thursday overturned a signature Biden-era restriction on oil and gas exploration across millions of acres of federal land in Alaska. The action\u2014one of the most consequential energy decisions of Trump\u2019s current term\u2014opens more than 13 million acres of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPRA) to potential development, effectively dismantling a 2024 rule issued under former President Joe Biden.<\/p>\n
The NPRA, a vast 23-million-acre expanse on Alaska\u2019s North Slope, was originally set aside by Congress in 1923 as an emergency fuel reserve for the U.S. Navy. It remains the largest block of untapped public land in the country, rich in oil, natural gas, and mineral deposits. For decades, it has stood at the center of America\u2019s recurring debate over energy independence versus environmental preservation.<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s order marks a decisive turn in that debate. The Department of the Interior, led by Secretary Doug Burgum, announced the final rule reversal early Thursday, calling it a \u201crestoration of common sense and sovereignty\u201d over American energy resources.<\/p>\n
\u201cBy rescinding the 2024 rule, we are following the direction set by President Trump to unlock Alaska\u2019s energy potential, create jobs for North Slope communities, and strengthen American energy security,\u201d Burgum said. \u201cThis action restores balanced management and ensures responsible development that benefits both Alaska and the nation.\u201dThe rule change will be published in the Federal Register on Friday, but the announcement itself has already ignited a national conversation\u2014one that bridges economics, environmental ethics, and geopolitics.<\/p>\n
From Biden\u2019s Restrictions to Trump\u2019s Reversal
In 2024, the Biden administration issued a sweeping conservation rule that barred new drilling leases on 10.6 million acres within the NPRA and tightened restrictions on another 2 million acres, citing concerns about climate change, caribou migration, and subsistence hunting. It was hailed by environmental groups as a victory for conservation and Indigenous sovereignty.<\/p>\n
But industry leaders and many Alaskan officials saw the move as a chokehold on the state\u2019s economy. Oil production taxes and royalties fund much of Alaska\u2019s public services, including healthcare, education, and rural development. Under Biden\u2019s rule, developers faced permitting gridlock and declining investment confidence.<\/p>\n
\u201cWashington\u2019s decisions were strangling our communities,\u201d said Nagruk Harcharek, president of Voice of the Arctic I\u00f1upiat, an organization representing Alaska Native corporations and North Slope villages. \u201cWe rely on responsible energy development to support our way of life. Without it, our schools, clinics, and infrastructure crumble.\u201d<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s rescission directly responds to that criticism. It reopens roughly half the NPRA to new leasing and exploration while maintaining some environmental safeguards, particularly around Teshekpuk Lake\u2014one of the most ecologically sensitive areas in the Arctic.<\/p>\n
For Trump, the rollback is both symbolic and strategic. It reinforces his \u201cAmerica First Energy\u201d agenda, a central pillar of his policy since his first term, emphasizing fossil-fuel dominance, deregulation, and domestic production as the cornerstone of economic strength<\/p>\n
Energy Security Meets Economic Realities
The Trump administration\u2019s announcement comes at a pivotal moment for the U.S. economy. Despite record-high domestic oil production\u2014surpassing 13 million barrels per day in late 2025\u2014energy prices remain volatile, driven by international tensions, supply disruptions, and rising global demand for natural gas.<\/p>\n
Trump has repeatedly blamed Biden\u2019s earlier climate regulations for inflationary energy costsand reduced industrial competitiveness. The White House\u2019s statement on Thursday framed the Alaska decision as a direct measure to reduce household and business energy bills.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is about putting American workers, consumers, and families first,\u201d the statement read. \u201cEvery barrel produced here at home means less dependence on hostile regimes abroad and lower costs at the pump.\u201d<\/p>\n
Independent analysts agree the move could stimulate billions in new investment across the North Slope, where exploration companies have waited years for regulatory clarity. The return of federal lease auctions, industry experts say, could create tens of thousands of jobs and generate hundreds of millions in royalty revenues for both federal and state coffers.<\/p>\n
Energy economist Dr. Laura Kline of the University of Texas notes: \u201cThis is not just about Alaska\u2014it\u2019s about signaling to markets that the U.S. intends to remain the global leader in hydrocarbon supply. That reassurance affects everything from LNG export terminals in Texas to fuel prices in Ohio.\u201d<\/p>\n
Alaska\u2019s Energy Infrastructure: A Legacy Reignited
Central to the policy shift is the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS)\u2014an 800-mile engineering marvel that for nearly half a century has been the backbone of America\u2019s northern oil production.<\/p>\n
Built between 1974 and 1977, the pipeline connects Prudhoe Bay\u2019s oil fields on the Arctic coast to the port of Valdez, traversing mountains, tundra, and permafrost. At its peak in the 1980s, TAPS carried over 2 million barrels of oil per day. But as North Slope output declined, throughput fell to under 500,000 barrels\u2014raising concerns that low volumes could eventually threaten the pipeline\u2019s operational viability.<\/p>\n
The renewed drilling in the NPRA, industry leaders argue, could breathe new life into this infrastructure. \u201cThe pipeline is Alaska\u2019s lifeline,\u201d said John Hendrix, former energy advisor to the state\u2019s governor. \u201cWithout a steady flow, maintenance becomes more expensive and risks of shutdown grow. New production keeps it viable, keeps Alaskans employed, and keeps America\u2019s energy artery open.\u201d<\/p>\n
TAPS is managed by the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, a consortium of major energy firms. The company issued a cautious statement welcoming the administration\u2019s decision, noting that while environmental standards must be respected, \u201cthe operational and economic stability of Alaska\u2019s energy system depends on sustained production.\u201d<\/p>\n
Environmental Opposition and Legal Challenges Ahead
Predictably, environmental advocacy groups reacted with alarm. Organizations like the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Sierra Club, and Earthjustice condemned Trump\u2019s rollback, pledging immediate legal action.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis decision represents one of the largest environmental rollbacks in modern U.S. history,\u201d said Rebecca Salazar, Arctic program director for Earthjustice. \u201cOpening millions of acres of pristine wilderness to drilling is a direct assault on the planet\u2019s climate stability.\u201d<\/p>\n
Critics argue that expanded drilling undermines U.S. commitments under international climate accords and risks further endangering Arctic ecosystems already stressed by rapid warming. They also warn that fossil fuel expansion diverts investment away from renewable energy innovation.<\/p>\n
Legal experts anticipate that lawsuits will hinge on the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)and potential violations of the Endangered Species Act. Plaintiffs are expected to challenge the adequacy of the administration\u2019s environmental review and allege that rescinding Biden\u2019s rule constitutes an \u201carbitrary and capricious\u201d action under administrative law.<\/p>\n
However, the Trump administration appears ready for battle. Interior Department attorneys have spent months preparing for litigation, crafting what they describe as an \u201cairtight procedural record\u201d documenting economic need, environmental mitigation measures, and broad public consultation.<\/p>\n
\u201cCourts defer to agencies when procedures are followed meticulously,\u201d noted environmental law scholar Robert Haskins of Georgetown University. \u201cIf Interior checked every box, plaintiffs may face an uphill climb.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Broader Economic Context: From \u201cGreen Transition\u201d to \u201cEnergy Dominance\u201d<\/p>\n
The policy reversal also signals a broader philosophical shift\u2014from Biden\u2019s \u201cclean energy transition\u201d to Trump\u2019s renewed emphasis on energy abundance and affordability.<\/p>\n
During his term, Biden prioritized cutting emissions, introducing aggressive climate targets, and pouring federal subsidies into wind, solar, and electric vehicles. Yet critics say those measures, while well-intentioned, left the nation vulnerable to energy shortfalls and rising costs, particularly as AI-driven data centers and electric infrastructure expanded faster than renewable capacity.<\/p>\n
Trump, by contrast, has promised to \u201cunleash American energy\u201d through oil, gas, nuclear, and even advanced coal technologies. In speeches, he has framed fossil fuels not as relics but as pillars of national resilience and global influence.<\/p>\n
\u201cEnergy is wealth. Energy is power,\u201d Trump said at a Houston rally earlier this year. \u201cWe\u2019re going to produce it here, ship it from here, and sell it on our terms\u2014not beg for it from anyone else.\u201d<\/p>\n
Supporters argue this policy shift is pragmatic, not ideological. With global oil demand projected to rise for at least another decade, they contend that cutting domestic supply merely shifts production\u2014and emissions\u2014to less regulated nations.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf we don\u2019t drill it, someone else will,\u201d said Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska). \u201cThe difference is that we do it cleaner, safer, and with better labor and environmental standards than anyone else on Earth.\u201d<\/p>\n
Indigenous Perspectives: Between Tradition and Modernization
Among Alaska\u2019s Indigenous communities, reactions to the Trump administration\u2019s decision are mixed but nuanced.<\/p>\n
For many in the North Slope Borough, oil development has funded a generation of self-governance. Taxes and royalties have financed modern schools, hospitals, and sanitation systems in a region where logistical costs are staggering.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe are not anti-environment,\u201d said Mayor Charles Brower of Utqia\u0121vik (formerly Barrow). \u201cWe are pro-survival. Oil development gave us heat, jobs, and opportunity. Without it, our children face an uncertain future.\u201d<\/p>\n
Still, other Alaska Native voices remain skeptical. The Gwich\u2019in Steering Committee, representing communities farther south, expressed concern about cumulative ecological impacts. \u201cWe are stewards of this land,\u201d said committee member Sarah James. \u201cThe Arctic is not just a resource\u2014it\u2019s our home.\u201d<\/p>\n
Trump officials insist that the administration will maintain \u201crigorous consultation\u201d with tribal governments and incorporate traditional knowledge into environmental reviews. Whether that promise satisfies skeptics remains to be seen.<\/p>\n
Industry Response: A Surge of Optimism
Within hours of the announcement, energy markets responded with cautious enthusiasm. Shares of ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, and Hilcorp, all of which have active leases or exploration interests in Alaska, rose modestly in after-hours trading.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is a confidence signal,\u201d said Mark Cross, senior analyst at Wood Mackenzie. \u201cIt tells investors the U.S. government once again sees oil and gas as assets, not liabilities.\u201d<\/p>\n
Industry groups hailed the reversal as a return to energy realism. The American Petroleum Institute (API) called it \u201ca decisive step toward long-term energy affordability and security.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe world\u2019s demand for oil and gas is not declining; it\u2019s growing,\u201d API President Mike Sommers said. \u201cPolicies must reflect that reality. Today\u2019s decision moves us closer to an energy policy that supports growth, jobs, and innovation.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Global Context: Energy as Geopolitical Leverage
Beyond domestic economics, the decision reverberates globally. Trump has framed energy production as a strategic weapon in foreign policy, arguing that America\u2019s ability to export oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) reduces the leverage of authoritarian regimes like Russia, Iran, and Venezuela.<\/p>\n
\u201cEvery time we produce more energy at home, the dictators and warlords of the world lose power,\u201d Trump said earlier this month.<\/p>\n
Analysts agree that expanding Arctic output could help stabilize global supply chains, particularly if geopolitical tensions in the Middle East or Eastern Europe escalate. \u201cEnergy independence is no longer a slogan\u2014it\u2019s a shield,\u201d said Col. Michael Andrews, former Pentagon energy advisor.<\/p>\n
Environmental Innovation Within Expansion
Interestingly, Trump officials are pairing the rollback with promises of technological safeguards. The Interior Department announced it will incentivize \u201cnext-generation drilling\u201d that minimizes surface disturbance and methane leakage, using carbon capture, reinjection, and digital monitoring systems.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe narrative that environmental protection and energy expansion are incompatible is outdated,\u201d Secretary Burgum said. \u201cWe\u2019re harnessing innovation to make sure Alaska leads in both production and preservation.\u201d<\/p>\n
This hybrid rhetoric\u2014economic expansion couched in environmental stewardship\u2014reflects the administration\u2019s attempt to broaden its coalition, appealing not just to oil-state Republicans but also to moderates worried about climate impacts.<\/p>\n
Political Fallout: The Energy Divide Deepens
The timing of Trump\u2019s move is politically charged. With the 2026 midterms on the horizon, energy policy has emerged as a defining wedge between Republicans and Democrats.<\/p>\n
Progressives warn that expanded drilling will accelerate climate change and alienate younger voters. Conservatives counter that green mandates have inflated utility bills and driven inflation.<\/p>\n
Polling from the Pew Research Center suggests Americans remain split: 49% favor prioritizing renewables, 46% prioritize fossil fuel production to stabilize prices. Among independents, support for expanded oil drilling has climbed sharply in the past year.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis issue will define the next decade of politics,\u201d said Dr. Raymond Cruz, a political scientist at George Mason University. \u201cIt\u2019s not just about energy\u2014it\u2019s about identity, jobs, and the future of the American Dream.\u201d<\/p>\n
Looking Ahead: A New Energy Frontier
As the dust settles, the implications of Trump\u2019s decision will unfold over years. Lease sales could begin as early as 2026, followed by seismic surveys, environmental assessments, and exploratory drilling. If viable reserves are confirmed, production could ramp up in the early 2030s\u2014coinciding with peak global demand projections.<\/p>\n
For Alaska, that could mean billions in new revenue. For Washington, a revived argument over how to balance climate responsibility with economic necessity. And for the world, a reminder that the United States\u2014whatever the administration\u2014remains an energy superpower capable of reshaping global markets with a single policy stroke.<\/p>\n
Conclusion: Energy Realism Returns
With Thursday\u2019s sweeping action, President Trump has reaffirmed his administration\u2019s belief that American energy production is not the problem\u2014it\u2019s the solution. The decision to reopen 13 million acres of Alaskan wilderness marks more than a policy reversal; it is a philosophical declaration that economic strength, national security, and affordable energy remain inseparable.<\/p>\n
Whether history judges this as visionary leadership or environmental regression will depend on outcomes yet unseen. But one truth endures: the story of American energy is far from over. It is a saga written in oil and ambition, shaped by presidents, pipelines, and the endless northern frontier where resource and responsibility meet beneath the Arctic sky.<\/p>\n
The political landscape in Washington was rocked this week as Democratic Congresswoman Ilhan Omar found herself at the center of a heated controversy following remarks she made about conservative activist Charlie Kirk, whose assassination has sent shockwaves through the nation\u2019s political circles.<\/p>\n
The fallout comes amid growing calls from Republican lawmakers for Omar\u2019s removal from her committee assignments, citing her comments as inflammatory and divisive at a time when the country is grappling with the tragic loss of one of the right\u2019s most influential voices.<\/p>\n
Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, was widely regarded as a transformative figure in conservative politics, especially among young voters. His assassination, still under investigation, has ignited a fierce debate about political rhetoric, polarization, and the future direction of both major parties.<\/p>\n
As news of Kirk\u2019s death broke, outlets like The Wall Street Journal described him as \u201cthe man who helped Republicans break through to young voters,\u201d while students and colleagues hailed him as \u201cprobably the most influential person in our generation.\u201d Kirk\u2019s ability to mobilize youth and energize grassroots activism made him a formidable force, and his absence leaves a palpable void in conservative circles.<\/p>\n
Longtime GOP strategist Mark Halperin observed, \u201cDemocrats are still not grasping that influence or its fallouts.\u201d Halperin noted that many in the Democratic Party underestimated Kirk\u2019s significance, failing to appreciate the deep bond he forged with young conservatives and the political consequences of his assassination.<\/p>\n
The controversy erupted after Omar responded to Kirk\u2019s staff and supporters in a series of statements that critics say dehumanized the slain activist and his legacy.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is nothing more\u2014The answer [is to] pretend that his words and actions have not been recorded, and in existence for the last decade,\u201d Omar said. \u201cThese people are full of bleeped, and it\u2019s important for us to call them out.\u201d<\/p>\n
Her remarks were quickly seized upon by Republican lawmakers, who accused Omar of contributing to the kind of rhetoric that leads to political violence. \u201cIt\u2019s that kind of dehumanization that led to his assassination, to his murder,\u201d said conservative commentator Lisa Boothe during a segment on Fox News\u2019 \u201cAmerica Reports.\u201d Boothe argued that Kirk was targeted not only for his political beliefs but also for his Christian faith, describing his death as \u201ca spiritual battle that supersedes the political one.\u201d<\/p>\n
The exchange highlighted the deepening polarization in American politics, with both sides blaming the other for escalating rhetoric and violence. Boothe went further, stating, \u201cBullets are flying in one direction. The left is the party that is engaging in this political terrorism\u2014from the attempted assassination of Steve Scalise to President Trump to the assassination of Charlie Kirk.\u201d<\/p>\n
Democratic Senator John Fetterman offered a contrasting perspective, urging caution against blanket condemnation. \u201cWe can\u2019t just be \u2018Trump is always wrong\u2019 or we\u2019re going to set the country on fire,\u201d Fetterman said. \u201cA lot of Americans disagree with you\u2014that does not mean that they are fascists or want to shred the Constitution.\u201d<\/p>\n
The backlash against Omar has been swift. Republican leaders in the House have called for her removal from key committees, arguing that her comments violate standards of decorum and contribute to a toxic political environment. \u201cWe cannot tolerate this kind of rhetoric from members of Congress, especially in the wake of such a tragedy,\u201d said House Minority Leader Steve Scalise, himself a survivor of political violence.<\/p>\n
Supporters of Omar defend her right to speak out, pointing to her history of advocacy on issues of gun safety and social justice. Omar herself doubled down on her criticism, saying, \u201cI don\u2019t think a single person who has dedicated their entire career to preventing gun safety legislation from getting passed in this House has any right to blame anybody else but themselves for what is happening.\u201d<\/p>\n
As the debate rages, attention has turned to the future of Turning Point USA, the organization Kirk founded. Halperin speculated that Kirk\u2019s death could galvanize the group, potentially transforming it into a powerful wing of the Republican National Committee. \u201cIf they do and they run it well, that could be a private, party-affiliated powerhouse unlike anything we\u2019ve ever seen in American politics,\u201d Halperin said.<\/p>\n
The organization has already seen an outpouring of support from conservatives across the country, with many pledging to continue Kirk\u2019s mission of engaging young voters and challenging liberal orthodoxy.<\/p>\n
The controversy surrounding Omar\u2019s comments and the broader reaction to Kirk\u2019s assassination underscore the challenges facing America as it navigates an era of intense political division. Calls for unity and reconciliation have been met with skepticism, as accusations of \u201cpolitical terrorism\u201d and \u201cdehumanization\u201d fly from both sides of the aisle.<\/p>\n
Boothe\u2019s remarks on Fox News struck a chord with many viewers: \u201cWe are seeing a wickedness and evilness in this country, people dancing on the grave of a great man, a great father, a great husband, someone who just wanted to do good in this country.\u201d<\/p>\n
As Congress debates Omar\u2019s fate and the nation mourns Kirk\u2019s loss, the question remains: Can America find a way to move beyond the hatred and polarization that have come to define its politics?<\/p>\n
In the coming days, House leadership is expected to hold hearings on Omar\u2019s committee assignments, with both parties bracing for a contentious fight. Meanwhile, Turning Point USA is planning a nationwide series of rallies and events to honor Kirk\u2019s legacy and renew its commitment to conservative activism.<\/p>\n
Whether this moment will serve as a catalyst for change or further entrench the divisions remains to be seen. What is clear is that the assassination of Charlie Kirk\u2014and the reaction it has provoked\u2014will reverberate through American politics for years to come<\/p>\n
New Yorkers Rally Against Zohran Mamdani as Anti-Communism Protests Sweep NYC<\/p>\n
New York City saw tense street demonstrations this week as protesters gathered outside City Hall and across parts of Manhattan to denounce Democratic Socialist Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, accusing him of promoting far-left ideology and \u201ccommunist\u201d values that, they claim, threaten the city\u2019s future.<\/p>\n
While some viral headlines exaggerated the event by claiming that New Yorkers had \u201ckicked Mamdani out of the city,\u201d the reality was a large, emotional protest \u2014 not an expulsion. The rallies reflected a growing wave of opposition against Mamdani\u2019s policies and rhetoric as he continues to gain national attention for his unapologetically socialist platform.<\/p>\n
The demonstration began early Tuesday, when hundreds of protesters carrying American flags and placards reading\u00a0\u201cNo to Communism in New York\u201d\u00a0and\u00a0\u201cWe Reject Radicalism\u201d\u00a0marched toward City Hall. Organized by a coalition of small business owners, police union supporters, and conservative community leaders, the march aimed to express frustration with what participants see as a growing influence of socialist and anti-capitalist movements within local politics.<\/p>\n
Some demonstrators accused Mamdani \u2014 a member of the Democratic Socialists of America and a vocal critic of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy \u2014 of being out of touch with working-class New Yorkers. \u201cWe built this city through hard work and opportunity,\u201d said Maria Gonzalez, a small-business owner from Queens. \u201cNow people like Mamdani want to destroy everything that makes New York thrive.\u201d<\/p>\n
Tensions rose briefly when Mamdani was confronted by a group of protesters during a public event in Midtown. Videos circulated online showing demonstrators shouting at the assemblyman, calling him \u201canti-American\u201d and \u201ca communist.\u201d Security quickly intervened, escorting Mamdani away from the crowd as chants of \u201cGo back to Queens!\u201d and \u201cNo Communism in NYC!\u201d echoed through the streets.<\/p>\n
In a statement later that evening, Mamdani condemned the protests as an attempt to silence political dissent. \u201cNew York is big enough for debate,\u201d he said. \u201cThose who label every effort to fight inequality as \u2018communism\u2019 are afraid of change. I\u2019m not going anywhere \u2014 I\u2019m staying right here to fight for working families.\u201d<\/p>\n
Political analysts note that Mamdani has become a lightning rod for controversy since entering the Assembly in 2021. His support for rent freezes, free public transportation, and calls to \u201cglobalize the intifada\u201d have drawn both praise and fierce criticism. His candidacy for New York City mayor in 2025 has further amplified divisions between progressives and moderates in the city\u2019s Democratic base.<\/p>\n
The protests highlight a broader ideological clash playing out across the United States \u2014 one between populist conservatism and a resurgent left that embraces democratic socialism. For many New Yorkers, Mamdani represents a new generation of politicians pushing the limits of progressive politics. For his opponents, he embodies the dangers of radicalism.By nightfall, police reported no major incidents, though videos of the marches spread widely online, fueling polarized debate nationwide. Whether the backlash will hurt Mamdani\u2019s political ambitions or strengthen his appeal among supporters remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that New York \u2014 often seen as a microcosm of America\u2019s political divide \u2014 continues to be a stage where ideology meets street-level passion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A New Chapter in America\u2019s Energy StoryIn a sweeping move that redefines the nation\u2019s energy landscape, President Donald Trump on Thursday overturned a signature Biden-era restriction on oil and gas exploration across…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":18296,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18297","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18297","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18297"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18297\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/18296"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18297"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18297"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}