{"id":18650,"date":"2025-11-21T09:34:34","date_gmt":"2025-11-21T09:34:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/ll-senate-approves-trumps-pick-for-navy-secretary\/"},"modified":"2025-11-21T09:34:34","modified_gmt":"2025-11-21T09:34:34","slug":"ll-senate-approves-trumps-pick-for-navy-secretary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/?p=18650","title":{"rendered":"ll.Senate Approves Trump\u2019s Pick for Navy Secretary."},"content":{"rendered":"

\"ll.Senate<\/p>\n

The U.S. Senate has confirmed John Phelan as the next Secretary of the Navy, marking a significant milestone in the Department\u2019s ongoing efforts to reform and modernize its operations. Phelan, a Florida businessman and founder of a private investment firm, secured bipartisan support with a<\/p>\n

62\u201330 vote despite having no prior military experience. His appointment comes at a time when the Navy faces persistent challenges\u2014from cost overruns and failed audits to delays in shipbuilding and workforce management. This article provides an in\u2010depth analysis of Phelan\u2019s background, his confirmation hearing, and his proposed roadmap for addressing the Navy\u2019s multifaceted issues.<\/p>\n

John Phelan\u2019s confirmation as Secretary of the Navy represents a pivotal shift in the leadership of one of America\u2019s most critical defense institutions. With an extensive background in the private sector and a reputation as an astute financial strategist, Phelan is set to bring a fresh<\/p>\n

perspective to the challenges facing the Navy. Despite his lack of military service or experience managing a civilian branch of the Pentagon, his nomination was bolstered by support from lawmakers across the aisle who see his private-sector expertise as uniquely suited to resolve long-standing systemic issues.<\/p>\n

Few people have embodied Republican resolve during the Schumer Shutdown more than House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA). From day one, Johnson has stood firm, calmly and consistently reminding the American people that Democrats are the ones responsible for grinding the government to a halt.<\/p>\n

He\u2019s made it clear this wasn\u2019t about governing \u2014 it was about political \u201cleverage\u201d and keeping the party\u2019s far-left fringe happy. While Democrats played games, Johnson kept the focus where it belonged: on reopening the government responsibly and exposing the cynical motives behind the shutdown.<\/p>\n

\u201cAfter this weekend\u2019s \u2018Hate America\u2019 rallies co-sponsored by the Communist Party, I thought [Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) would] finally do the right thing. But he\u2019s still too terrified of his radical base \u2014 even admitting he\u2019ll keep the government shut down while hardworking Americans suffer,\u201d Johnson said at the time, which was day 23 of the Schumer Shutdown.<\/p>\n

On Wednesday night \u2014 two days after a small group of Senate Democrats finally broke ranks to start ending the longest shutdown in U.S. history \u2014 the House of Representatives followed suit, voting 222\u2013209 to take the next-to-last step toward ending the Schumer Shutdown. Six Democrats crossed party lines to join the GOP majority in voting to reopen the government, while two Republicans sided with Democrats in opposition.<\/p>\n

Before getting to Speaker Johnson\u2019s post-vote remarks, let\u2019s take a quick look at the roll call \u2014 the Democrats who defied party leadership to end the shutdown, and the two Republicans who inexplicably voted with the Left to keep it going:<\/p>\n

Good on these Democrats for defying their \u201cTemu Obama\u201d leader, Hakeem Jeffries.<\/p>\n

Speaking to reporters after the vote, Speaker Johnson delivered the most important reminder of all: none of this chaos ever had to happen. He pointed out that House Republicans had already passed a clean continuing resolution back on September 19 \u2014 one that included no GOP wish-list items and was simply meant to \u201ckeep the lights on\u201d so both parties could debate their priorities through the normal legislative process.<\/p>\n

In plain English, this entire shutdown was a Democrat-made disaster. It was engineered and prolonged by House and Senate Democrats, led by Jeffries (D-NY) and Chuck Schumer \u2014 the same pair now pretending to be the heroes for ending the mess they created in the first place:<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s the official statement from the GOP leadership,\u00a0which provided more details:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Democrat Shutdown is finally over thanks to House and Senate Republicans. There is absolutely no question now that Democrats are responsible for millions of American families going hungry, millions of travelers left stranded in airports, and our troops left wondering if they would receive their next paycheck. It was the Democrat Party that voted 15 times to keep the government closed and force the longest shutdown in U.S. history.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cAll of it was pointless and utterly foolish. Democrats admitted they used the American people as \u2018leverage\u2019 and hurt their constituents on purpose \u2014 but they got nothing for their selfish political stunt. Voters will remember which party played political games in an attempt to \u2018look tough\u2019 to their base, while real people suffered.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cNow that Republicans have succeeded in ending the Democrat Shutdown, we look forward to continuing our important legislative work delivering results for the American people.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

President Trump signed the measure late Wednesday, officially funding the government through the end of January.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s be clear: This\u00a0was<\/em>\u00a0a Democrat-caused shutdown. And it\u00a0was<\/em>\u00a0abjectly pointless. Only a party that hates the people they supposedly represent would do that.<\/p>\n

When the daughter of a global superstar speaks, the world listens\u2014even more so when her words cut through the noise of public mourning and spark a national debate about kindness, legacy, and the price of honesty in the age of social media.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

In the days following the shocking death of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, tributes and condemnations alike flooded the digital landscape. But it was a single Instagram Story\u2014just a few words, posted by Ava Raine, daughter of Dwayne \u201cThe Rock\u201d Johnson\u2014that set off a firestorm felt across the American cultural spectrum.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf you want people to have kind words when you pass, you should say kind words when you\u2019re alive.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

With those words, Ava Raine\u2014known to millions through her wrestling pedigree and rising stardom\u2014thrust herself into the center of a conversation that is as old as civilization itself: How do we remember the dead? And what, if anything, do we owe the living in the way we speak of those who are gone?<\/p>\n

What followed was a collision of grief, celebrity, and public conscience\u2014one that reveals as much about modern America as it does about the individuals at its heart.<\/p>\n

Charlie Kirk\u2019s sudden, violent death stunned the nation. Tributes poured in from political allies and ideological opponents alike, each seeking to make sense of a life lived loudly and, for some, controversially. In this charged atmosphere, Ava\u2019s post landed not as a whisper, but as a thunderclap.<\/p>\n

Within hours, screenshots of her story ricocheted across Twitter, Reddit, and news aggregators. The responses were as polarized as the times themselves. Some called her statement \u201crefreshingly honest,\u201d a rare moment of candor in a culture that too often sanitizes legacies. Others accused her of cruelty, insensitivity, or worse\u2014of weaponizing grief for a social message.<\/p>\n

But Ava, unlike so many public figures who retreat in the face of backlash, doubled down.
\u201cAnd I\u2019ll stand behind this. Be kind, now more than ever.\u201d<\/strong>
She posted again, unflinching, her words as much a challenge as a plea.<\/p>\n

To understand why Ava\u2019s comments struck such a nerve, one must first understand the ecosystem in which they appeared. Social media, for all its virtues, has become a battleground for grief, outrage, and the performance of virtue. The deaths of public figures are no longer private affairs\u2014they are national events, dissected in real-time by millions.<\/p>\n

In this environment, the expectations for celebrity conduct are both sky-high and contradictory. Speak too soon, and you risk insensitivity; wait too long, and you\u2019re accused of silence. Offer platitudes, and you\u2019re dismissed as shallow; speak your mind, and you invite the wrath of the masses.<\/p>\n

Ava\u2019s remark, then, was more than a personal opinion. It was a test of the boundaries that define public discourse in 21st-century America. It forced a reckoning: Do we value honesty over decorum? Is kindness in death owed, earned, or both?<\/p>\n

To his supporters, Charlie Kirk was a fearless champion of conservative values, a voice for a generation that felt unheard. To his critics, he was a provocateur, a man whose rhetoric often veered into the incendiary. His legacy, like so many in public life, is complicated.<\/p>\n

In the hours after his death, tributes from political leaders and media personalities painted a portrait of a man who inspired loyalty and loathing in equal measure. For many, the instinct was to soften the edges, to remember only the best. For others, including Ava, the moment called for a more nuanced truth.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s not about speaking ill of the dead,\u201d said Dr. Karen Fields, a cultural historian at the University of Michigan. \u201cIt\u2019s about refusing to erase the complexity of a person\u2019s life just because they\u2019re gone. Ava\u2019s comment touched a raw nerve because it asked us to confront that complexity, rather than hide from it.\u201d<\/p>\n

Born Simone Johnson, Ava Raine has lived her entire life in the shadow\u2014and spotlight\u2014of her father\u2019s fame. As the first fourth-generation wrestler in WWE history, she has navigated the treacherous waters of public expectation, carving her own path while honoring a family legacy.<\/p>\n

But with fame comes scrutiny, and with scrutiny comes the expectation that every word, every gesture, will be weighed and judged. Ava\u2019s decision to speak out, and to stand by her words, is a testament to both her independence and her willingness to risk public ire in service of a principle she believes in.<\/p>\n

\u201cPeople forget that celebrities are people, too,\u201d said Dr. Lisa Monroe, a psychologist who studies fame and social media. \u201cThey grieve, they get angry, they have opinions. The difference is, their every emotion is amplified a thousandfold. Ava\u2019s choice to double down wasn\u2019t just about Charlie Kirk\u2014it was about reclaiming her agency in a world that constantly tries to take it from her.\u201d<\/p>\n

The backlash to Ava\u2019s post was swift and fierce. Critics accused her of insensitivity, of disrespecting the dead, of using a tragedy to score points. Her mentions filled with vitriol, as strangers debated not just her words, but her character.<\/p>\n

Yet for every critic, there was a defender. Many praised her for refusing to participate in what they saw as the \u201cwhitewashing\u201d of controversial legacies. Some shared stories of their own experiences with loss, and the discomfort they felt at being asked to speak kindly of those who had caused them pain in life.<\/p>\n

The debate soon spilled over into mainstream media. Cable news hosts dissected her comments; op-ed writers weighed in on the ethics of posthumous praise. Hashtags like #BeKindNow and #LegacyMatters trended for days, as Americans grappled with the question: When someone dies, do we owe them kindness, or honesty?<\/p>\n

What makes Ava\u2019s story so emblematic of our times is not just the controversy it ignited, but what it reveals about the state of American culture. In a nation increasingly divided along political, generational, and ideological lines, even grief has become a battleground.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the past, mourning was a private affair,\u201d said Dr. Fields. \u201cNow, it\u2019s a public spectacle. We perform our grief for an audience, and that audience expects us to follow certain scripts. Ava tore up the script, and people didn\u2019t know how to react.\u201d<\/p>\n

This cultural shift has profound implications. It raises questions about authenticity, about the pressures of performative empathy, and about the ways in which social media distorts our most intimate emotions.<\/p>\n

At the heart of the controversy lies a deeper philosophical question: What does it mean to remember someone well? Is kindness in death a form of mercy, or a betrayal of truth? And who gets to decide which stories are told, and which are forgotten?<\/p>\n

For some, Ava\u2019s words were a necessary corrective\u2014a reminder that the dead are not saints, and that honesty is a form of respect. For others, her refusal to offer unqualified kindness was a failure of compassion.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere is no easy answer,\u201d said Dr. Monroe. \u201cBut Ava\u2019s comments have forced us to confront the uncomfortable reality that kindness and honesty are sometimes in tension. The best we can do is to strive for both, even when it\u2019s hard.\u201d<\/p>\n

Those close to Ava describe her as thoughtful, principled, and unafraid of controversy. \u201cShe knew what she was saying would upset people,\u201d said a longtime friend, who asked not to be named. \u201cBut she also felt it was important. She\u2019s seen too many people rewrite history after someone dies, and she didn\u2019t want to be part of that.\u201d<\/p>\n

Her father, Dwayne Johnson, has remained publicly silent on the controversy. Privately, sources say, he has encouraged Ava to stay true to herself, even in the face of criticism.<\/p>\n

\u201cShe\u2019s her own person,\u201d said another family friend. \u201cShe\u2019s not afraid to speak her mind, and that\u2019s something her dad has always respected.\u201d<\/p>\n

History is replete with examples of controversial figures whose deaths forced society to grapple with uncomfortable truths. From political leaders to cultural icons, the question of how to remember the dead is as old as memory itself.<\/p>\n

In recent years, the phenomenon has only intensified. The deaths of public figures like Kobe Bryant, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Rush Limbaugh all sparked fierce debates about legacy, forgiveness, and the ethics of mourning.<\/p>\n

\u201cAva\u2019s comments are part of a larger reckoning,\u201d said Dr. Fields. \u201cWe\u2019re being asked to consider not just what we say about the dead, but what those words say about us.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the weeks since her original post, Ava has become an unlikely symbol for a new kind of celebrity honesty\u2014one that refuses to trade candor for comfort. Her words have inspired think pieces, classroom debates, and even sermons.<\/p>\n

At universities, students have debated the ethics of posthumous praise. In churches, pastors have invoked her message as a call to live kindly, so that kindness is what remains. On social media, thousands have shared their own stories of complicated grief, finding solace in Ava\u2019s refusal to pretend.<\/p>\n

Yet the backlash has not subsided. Ava continues to receive threats and hate mail, a reminder that honesty, especially from young women in the public eye, is still a dangerous game.<\/p>\n

What does Ava\u2019s story tell us about the future of public discourse in America? For one, it reveals the immense power\u2014and peril\u2014of celebrity in shaping national conversations. It also exposes the fault lines that run through our culture, dividing us not just by politics, but by our very ideas of kindness, truth, and memory.<\/p>\n

As America continues to grapple with these questions, the story of Ava Raine and Charlie Kirk will remain a touchstone\u2014a moment when the nation was forced to confront the messy, uncomfortable realities of grief in the digital age.<\/p>\n

In the end, Ava\u2019s message is both a challenge and a hope. \u201cBe kind, now more than ever,\u201d she wrote\u2014a plea for compassion, not just in death, but in life. It is a reminder that the stories we tell about the dead are, in the end, stories about ourselves\u2014about the values we cherish, the truths we dare to speak, and the kindness we choose to extend, even when it is hard.<\/p>\n

As the headlines fade and the debate moves on, Ava Raine\u2019s words linger\u2014a testament to the enduring power of honesty, and the courage it takes to speak it, even when the world demands silence.<\/p>\n

On\u00a0September 12 2025<\/strong>, President Trump announced that he would send the Tennessee National Guard to Memphis, describing the city as \u201cdeeply troubled\u201d.ABC News<\/span>+2<\/span><\/span>The Guardian<\/span>+2<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

On September 15, he signed a presidential memorandum ordering the deployment of the Guard and federal law-enforcement personnel to join a special joint task-force in Memphis.TIME<\/span>+2<\/span><\/span>Global News<\/span>+2<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The task-force is described as combining federal agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the U.S. Marshals Service and the Guard, working alongside local and state law-enforcement.\u00a0Global News<\/span><\/p>\n

According to one report, the operation in Memphis began around\u00a0Sept. 29<\/strong>\u00a0(or late September) in earnest.TIME<\/span>+1<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Media say that by early November, the presence of federal\/state personnel has been large: one piece by the The Washington Post says \u201csince late September \u2026 nearly 2,000 state and federal law-enforcement officers\u201d have been deployed under the \u201cMemphis Safe Task Force\u201d.\u00a0The Washington Post<\/span><\/p>\n

The Washington Post article reports that serious crimes \u2014 including homicides and robberies \u2014 have seen \u201csharp\u201d declines since the surge of federal and state personnel began.\u00a0The Washington Post<\/span><\/p>\n

The same article notes that more than\u00a02,100 people<\/strong>\u00a0have been arrested in this crackdown (a figure similar to your 2,213).\u00a0The Washington Post<\/span><\/p>\n

Also mentioned: the law-enforcement surge has involved\u00a0traffic stops<\/strong>\u00a0and a large visible federal presence described as \u201cmilitarized\u201d in sections of the city.\u00a0The Washington Post<\/span><\/p>\n

The Washington Post piece includes the caveat that local jail and court systems are under strain, and that there is criticism from community groups about racial profiling and civil-liberties concerns.\u00a0The Washington Post<\/span><\/p>\n

The deployment is seen as part of a broader push by Trump\u2019s administration to use federal and Guard forces in American cities to combat violent crime \u2014 an expansion of the federal role in what are normally local law-enforcement jurisdictions.Wikipedia<\/span>+2<\/span><\/span>PBS<\/span>+2<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In Memphis, the move is somewhat unusual because the city is majority-Black, governed by a Democratic mayor (Paul Young), but the state government (with GOP leadership) is supportive. Reports show local leaders are divided: Mayor Young publicly expressed he did\u00a0not<\/em>\u00a0ask for the National Guard deployment, but intends to cooperate.PBS<\/span>+1<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Critics argue this approach raises constitutional and civil-rights questions, especially regarding the use of Guard \/ federal agents for domestic policing, and the potential for misuse of power.ABC<\/span>+1<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The specific numbers you quoted:\u00a0139 known gang members<\/strong>,\u00a0379 firearms seized<\/strong>,\u00a097 missing children recovered<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 I was\u00a0unable<\/strong>\u00a0to find reputable media sources that independently list these exact figures for Memphis under this specific operation. I found 2,100+ arrests reported in one article, but not broken down into those specific categories with the same numbers.<\/p>\n

The claim that this is directly the result of a crackdown \u201cbegan on Sept. 29\u201d with those detailed statistics. Media mention \u201clate September\u201d but do not all have the exact date \u201cSept. 29\u201d. One Time article says the \u201ccrime crackdown \u2026 is underway\u201d and notes that 13 federal agencies and 300 state troopers are part of the plan.\u00a0TIME<\/span><\/p>\n

Whether the arrests included exactly \u201c139 known gang members\u201d and the exact count \u201c97 missing children\u201d is not documented in the major mainstream articles I found. It is possible the figure comes from a local police daily report claimed by a specific outlet (e.g., the prompt mentions \u201ca daily police report obtained exclusively by The Daily Caller\u201d), but I did\u00a0not<\/strong>\u00a0locate an independent corroboration from major outlets.<\/p>\n

The long-term sustainability of the decline in crime, or whether factors other than the federal surge contributed to the drop, remain subject to debate. For example, local officials in Memphis caution the deeper root causes of crime (poverty, gangs, community relations) remain unresolved.\u00a0The Washington Post<\/span><\/p>\n

Here is how it appears things unfolded:<\/p>\n

President Trump, building on an earlier intervention in the nation\u2019s capital (Washington, D.C.) and his \u201claw and order\u201d approach, announced that Memphis would be the next focus of a federal crime-surge effort. On September 12 he said the National Guard would deploy to Memphis, and on September 15 signed a memorandum initiating the operation.<\/p>\n

The plan included: multiple federal law-enforcement agencies (FBI, ATF, DEA, U.S. Marshals), the Tennessee National Guard, and state\/local police. The idea was to combine resources to target violent crime, gangs, gun trafficking, and other dangerous activity.<\/p>\n

The operation apparently entered full force at the end of September (around Sept. 29 or thereafter). The surge has been visible: traffic checkpoints, large federal presence in various neighborhoods, and a significant number of arrests in a short span of time.<\/p>\n

As of early to mid-November, media report more than 2,100 arrests in Memphis under this federal-state task-force. Some categories of crime have seen big drops (homicides, robberies) according to local officials.<\/p>\n

Local response is mixed: some citizens and officials welcome the added resources and results. Others caution about heavy-handed tactics, community relations impacts, civil-rights risks, and whether the drop in crime is durable once the surge ends.<\/p>\n

Politically, the move is controversial because it blurs the lines between federal\/state\/local law enforcement, raises questions about the use of military\/Guard forces for domestic policing, and occurs in a city with a history of tense policing-community relations (post the 2023 killing of Tyre Nichols in Memphis).<\/p>\n

Your prompt states:\u00a0\u201cAs of Thursday, authorities have made 2,213 arrests \u2026 capture of 139 known gang members, the seizure of 379 firearms, and the recovery of 97 missing children. \u2018The numbers clearly show that Memphis is safer thanks to President Trump\u2019s federal surge,\u2019 Attorney General Pam Bondi told the Caller in a statement.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The\u00a02,213 arrests<\/strong>\u00a0figure is in the same ballpark as the \u201cmore than 2,100\u201d arrests reported by Washington Post. That suggests it is plausible.<\/p>\n

The breakdown into \u201c139 gang members\u201d, \u201c379 firearms\u201d, \u201c97 missing children\u201d is more detailed than most publicly accessible sources. It may originate from a local police daily report (as your prompt states). But I could\u00a0not<\/em>\u00a0locate a mainstream media article that confirms those figures fully.<\/p>\n

The quote attributed to Attorney General Pam Bondi (\u201cThe numbers clearly show \u2026 Memphis is safer \u2026\u201d) aligns with the type of public statements her office might issue, but I did not locate a verifiable published statement by her with those exact words in the major media sources I searched.<\/p>\n

Given the data limitations, while the broad thrust of your prompt is supported (federal surge, large number of arrests, some drop in crime), the\u00a0specific details<\/em>\u00a0should be treated with caution until confirmed by multiple sources.<\/p>\n

Causality vs correlation<\/strong>: While crime drops are being reported, it remains difficult to definitively attribute all of the decline to the federal surge. Crime trends can fluctuate due to many factors (seasonality, local policing, community programs, demographic changes).<\/p>\n

Selective reporting & transparency<\/strong>: Some critics say transparency is lacking around how arrests are categorized, what exactly constitutes the task-force\u2019s work, and who is being arrested. The Washington Post article notes jail\/court strain and some civil-liberties concerns.\u00a0The Washington Post<\/span><\/p>\n

Civil-liberties \/ community trust risk<\/strong>: Deploying Guard and federal agents in large numbers may increase short-term enforcement, but may also undermine trust in law enforcement in the long term, especially in communities with fraught police histories.<\/p>\n

Duration & sustainability<\/strong>: A surge may have immediate impact, but whether it leads to long-term reductions in violent crime depends on structural reforms (guns, gangs, economic opportunity, community policing) \u2014 which take time.<\/p>\n

Legal\/constitutional issues<\/strong>: The use of the National Guard and federal agencies in domestic law enforcement raises complex legal questions \u2014 e.g., about the Guard\u2019s status, Posse Comitatus Act limits, state vs federal roles. Some states\/localities may resist.<\/p>\n

Local context matters<\/strong>: Memphis has one of the highest violent crime rates in the U.S., decades of structural challenges (poverty, segregation, gun prevalence). So while a surge may help, solving root causes is more difficult.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The U.S. Senate has confirmed John Phelan as the next Secretary of the Navy, marking a significant milestone in the Department\u2019s ongoing efforts to reform and modernize its operations. Phelan, a Florida…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":18649,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18650\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/18649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}