![\"12.MAJOR](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Screenshot_232-1763768605-q80.webp\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The pressure campaign surrounding the Epstein files just hit a whole new level.<\/p>\n
Bill and Hillary Clinton have now been officially referred to the Department of Justice for potential arrest after they refused to sit for their scheduled depositions before the House Oversight Committee. Their October testimony was delayed over \u201cscheduling conflicts,\u201d and they\u2019ve since continued to stonewall investigators demanding answers about their long-documented relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.<\/p>\n
Lawmakers say the refusal is unacceptable \u2014 and that no one gets to duck a lawful subpoena, especially not two of the most politically connected figures in modern history.<\/p>\n
The referral is now in DOJ hands, and if they choose to act, this could become one of the biggest accountability fights Washington has seen in decades.<\/p>\n
Democrats opened Pandora\u2019s box with the Epstein files.<\/p>\n
Now the fallout is landing squarely on their own icons.<\/p>\n
RELATED:<\/p>\n
Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA) has managed to tick off half her own party, sparking a House vote Monday night to rebuke Rep. Chuy Garc\u00eda (D-IL) for engineering a glide path for his chief of staff to take his seat.Gluesenkamp Perez is blasting Garc\u00eda for what she calls \u201celection subversion,\u201d a charge that\u2019s infuriated Democrats who say she\u2019s torpedoing party unity at the worst possible time.<\/p>\n
One House Democrat griped to Axios that \u201cpeople were extremely frustrated last week\u201d when Gluesenkamp Perez forced the vote just as the House cleared a government funding bill most Democrats detested.<\/p>\n
A senior Democrat piled on, telling Axios lawmakers are \u201cvery pissed\u201d the flap is creating fresh infighting right before an expected vote on releasing the Epstein files.<\/p>\n
Leadership plans to smother her resolution with a motion to table, lawmakers said. The two-page measure scolds Garc\u00eda for dropping his reelection bid right before Illinois\u2019 filing deadline, clearing the field for his chief of staff, Patty Garc\u00eda, who is now the lone candidate on the primary ballot.<\/p>\n
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said he \u201cstrongly\u201d backs Garc\u00eda and dismissed Gluesenkamp Perez\u2019s move as a \u201cso-called motion of disapproval.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRepresentative Garc\u00eda\u2019s actions are beneath the dignity of his office and incompatible with the spirit of the United States Constitution,\u201d the resolution declares.<\/p>\n
Garc\u00eda\u2019s fellow Illinois colleague, Jan Schakowsky, erupted in support for her longtime pal after Gluesenkamp Perez filed the resolution, screeching on the House floor.<\/p>\n
WATCH:<\/p>\n
His office rushed talking points to colleagues on Monday, insisting he \u201cfollowed all requirements and deadlines under Illinois law\u201d and warning that the vote \u201ccreates distraction and divisiveness among Democrats.\u201d<\/p>\n
But not everyone is falling in line. Several moderates told Axios they might buck leadership and back Gluesenkamp Perez when the procedural vote hits the floor.<\/p>\n
Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME), a close ally of Gluesenkamp Perez, made his own feelings clear, noting he announced his retirement months before his state\u2019s deadline.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf I know I\u2019m going to get done then I should get done so that there is time and space for people to make the decision to offer their name. \u2026 Every day that I now wait is taking time away from someone else,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
A Los Angeles tow truck driver faces a federal charge after allegedly towing an Immigration and Customs Enforcement vehicle during an Aug. 15 arrest operation.<\/p>\n
Bobby Nunez, accused of laughing and filming as he hauled away the ICE vehicle, could face up to 10 years in prison if convicted, according to a federal complaint obtained by Fox News Digital. Agents had been attempting to arrest an undocumented immigrant at the time, with their emergency lights activated and vehicles boxing in the target.<\/p>\n
\u201cApparently he thought it would be funny to interfere with our immigration enforcement operations. Now he can laugh behind bars while he faces justice. Nunez is looking at up to 10 years in federal prison if convicted,\u201d Acting United States Attorney Bill Essayli posted to X on Tuesday.<\/p>\n
Prosecutors say Nunez also swung open the passenger door of the suspect\u2019s car, striking an officer, as a chaotic scene unfolded. A viral video posted by Rep. Bill Essayli (R-Calif.) showed the immigrant being arrested while another officer chased the tow truck on foot.<\/p>\n
Homeland Security Investigations later identified Nunez with the help of TikTok videos, authorities said. The complaint was signed off by United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie Christensen.<\/p>\n
The arrest comes amid heightened tensions in Los Angeles, where a federal judge this week said the Trump administration deploying the National Guard to quell June\u2019s anti-ICE protests was illegal, despite the fact that Guard units have been deployed to quell riots many times over the decades.<\/p>\n
Also, for his part, Essayli ripped the federal court\u2019s ruling, stating that the presumption that military units were enforcing laws was bogus and incorrect.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe military will remain in Los Angeles. This is a false narrative and a misleading injunction. The military has never engaged in direct law enforcement operations here in LA,\u201d Essayli replied. \u201cThey protect our federal employees our properties so our federal agents can safely enforce federal laws in the face of the thugs being unleashed and encouraged by state and local politicians.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/span>A bizarre and chaotic scene in Los Angeles has now escalated into a major federal case. A local tow truck driver, identified as Bobby Nunez, is facing federal charges after he allegedly interfered with an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrest operation by towing away one of the agency\u2019s vehicles. The incident occurred on August 15 during what federal authorities described as a critical enforcement action targeting an undocumented immigrant.<\/p>\n According to a federal complaint obtained by Fox News Digital and later confirmed by the U.S. Attorney\u2019s Office, Nunez is accused of laughing and filming the incident as he hauled away the ICE vehicle, effectively undermining the operation. If convicted, Nunez could face up to 10 years in federal prison, a potential punishment reflecting the seriousness of obstructing federal law enforcement activities.<\/p>\n The case has already attracted national attention, sparking heated political debate, viral videos, and renewed scrutiny over the intersection of immigration enforcement, local resistance, and public distrust of federal agencies operating in Los Angeles.<\/p>\n The Incident: Chaos on the Streets of Los Angeles<\/p>\n On August 15, federal immigration officers were conducting an operation to apprehend an undocumented immigrant in Los Angeles. Officials stated that the suspect was boxed in by ICE vehicles, which had their emergency lights flashing to signal an ongoing enforcement action.<\/p>\n At some point during the tense encounter, Nunez allegedly pulled up with his tow truck and began hooking one of the ICE vehicles to his rig. Witnesses claim he was laughing, filming the act with his phone, and shouting taunts at the officers.<\/p>\n As if that were not enough, prosecutors say Nunez escalated the situation further by swinging open the passenger-side door of the immigrant\u2019s vehicle, which struck an officer. The scene quickly descended into chaos, with federal officers attempting to maintain custody of the immigrant while simultaneously dealing with the interference from Nunez.<\/p>\n A bystander video later posted by Rep. Bill Essayli (R-Calif.) on X (formerly Twitter) shows the moment federal officers wrestled the immigrant into custody while another officer attempted to chase down the tow truck on foot as it dragged the ICE vehicle away. The video went viral within hours, sparking a storm of commentary across social media platforms.<\/p>\n Identification Through TikTok<\/p>\n Federal investigators moved quickly to identify the man behind the wheel of the tow truck. According to the complaint, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) was able to link Nunez to the incident using TikTok videos. Nunez reportedly maintained a social media presence where he frequently posted content mocking law enforcement and federal immigration authorities.<\/p>\n Screenshots and recordings of his posts were shared widely, many of which appeared to celebrate his act of defiance on August 15. Federal prosecutors say this digital trail was key in tracking him down and building the case.<\/p>\n The formal complaint was reviewed and signed by United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie Christensen, paving the way for Nunez\u2019s arrest.<\/p>\n Federal Prosecutors Respond<\/p>\n The Department of Justice wasted little time in sending a strong message about the case. Acting United States Attorney Bill Essayli condemned the incident in no uncertain terms.<\/p>\n \u201cApparently he thought it would be funny to interfere with our immigration enforcement operations. Now he can laugh behind bars while he faces justice. Nunez is looking at up to 10 years in federal prison if convicted,\u201d Essayli posted on X.<\/p>\n The severity of the potential sentence reflects the federal government\u2019s zero-tolerance approach toward those who obstruct federal officers in the line of duty. While obstructing state or local law enforcement can already carry heavy penalties, interfering with federal operations\u2014especially during a live arrest scenario\u2014is treated as a grave offense.<\/p>\n Political and Legal Context<\/p>\n This case unfolds against a backdrop of heightened tensions in Los Angeles surrounding immigration enforcement and the role of federal agencies. Earlier in the same week, a federal judge ruled that the Trump administration\u2019s 2020 decision to deploy the National Guard during anti-ICE protests was unlawful.<\/p>\n The decision reignited long-standing debates over federal versus local authority and the role of military forces in domestic law enforcement.<\/p>\n For his part, Essayli criticized the court\u2019s ruling sharply, insisting that the narrative of military overreach was misleading.<\/p>\n \u201cThe military will remain in Los Angeles. This is a false narrative and a misleading injunction. The military has never engaged in direct law enforcement operations here in LA,\u201d Essayli said. \u201cThey protect our federal employees and our properties so our federal agents can safely enforce federal laws in the face of the thugs being unleashed and encouraged by state and local politicians.\u201d<\/p>\n The remarks underscore the broader tensions between federal agencies tasked with immigration enforcement and local governments, many of which have declared themselves \u201csanctuary cities\u201d that limit cooperation with ICE.<\/p>\n Public Reactions<\/p>\n Social Media Explosion<\/p>\n The viral video of the tow truck incident spread rapidly across platforms like X, TikTok, and Instagram, generating millions of views within days.<\/p>\n Supporters of Nunez hailed him as a folk hero standing up against what they see as unjust immigration enforcement. Some users praised his boldness, comparing him to civil rights activists who engaged in acts of civil disobedience.<\/p>\n Critics, however, accused him of recklessly endangering lives and undermining lawful operations. Many argued that whatever one\u2019s opinion on ICE, interfering with an active arrest crosses a dangerous line.<\/p>\n Community Divide<\/p>\n In Los Angeles\u2014a city with one of the largest immigrant populations in the United States\u2014the case has struck a nerve.<\/p>\n Immigrant rights groups argued that the aggressive presence of federal agents in neighborhoods creates fear and disrupts families. For them, Nunez\u2019s actions symbolized resistance to what they view as unjust policies.<\/p>\n On the other hand, law enforcement advocates emphasized the rule of law, pointing out that the suspect ICE was targeting had already violated immigration laws and that Nunez endangered officers in the process.<\/p>\n Legal Ramifications<\/p>\n Nunez has been charged under federal statutes that criminalize obstruction and interference with federal law enforcement. The potential maximum sentence of 10 years reflects the seriousness with which such charges are treated.<\/p>\n Legal experts say prosecutors are likely to pursue the case aggressively, both to set an example and to deter others from attempting similar stunts.<\/p>\n \u201cFederal agencies don\u2019t want to see a trend where citizens feel emboldened to physically disrupt enforcement actions,\u201d said one former federal prosecutor. \u201cIf this becomes normalized, it could compromise officer safety and the integrity of federal operations.\u201d<\/p>\n Nunez\u2019s defense attorneys, however, are expected to argue that his actions\u2014while disruptive\u2014did not amount to intentional obstruction of justice. They may also highlight First Amendment concerns given his filming and public commentary during the incident.<\/p>\n A History of Clashes<\/p>\n This is not the first time ICE operations have collided with resistance in Los Angeles. The city has been a hotbed of activism against immigration enforcement for decades.<\/p>\n In 2019, protesters physically blocked ICE buses attempting to transport detainees. During the summer of 2020, amid nationwide protests, anti-ICE demonstrations frequently escalated into clashes with federal officers.<\/p>\n The deployment of National Guard units to Los Angeles during that time remains controversial, with critics accusing the Trump administration of militarizing a civilian conflict.<\/p>\n The Nunez case now adds a fresh chapter to this fraught history, blending elements of civil disobedience, viral internet culture, and direct interference with law enforcement.<\/p>\n What Comes Next<\/p>\n Nunez is expected to make his initial court appearance in the coming weeks, where prosecutors will outline the charges in detail. His defense team may seek to downplay the seriousness of the offense or negotiate for a reduced sentence.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, the case will likely continue to dominate public discourse, especially as videos and memes related to the incident circulate online.<\/p>\n For federal authorities, the incident represents both a public relations challenge and an opportunity to reinforce the consequences of obstructing federal agents. For activists, it is a rallying point in their ongoing campaign against ICE\u2019s presence in Los Angeles.<\/p>\n Conclusion<\/p>\n The arrest of Bobby Nunez, a tow truck driver accused of towing away an ICE vehicle during a live arrest operation, highlights the volatile intersection of law enforcement, politics, and public opinion in Los Angeles. What began as a shocking and almost comical act of defiance has now transformed into a serious federal case carrying the possibility of a decade behind bars.<\/p>\n As the legal process unfolds, the incident will continue to raise questions about the limits of protest, the responsibilities of federal agents, and the deep divisions in American society over immigration enforcement.<\/p>\n In the polarized landscape of Los Angeles\u2014and the United States at large\u2014the Nunez case is more than just a legal proceeding. It is a flashpoint in the broader national debate over who enforces the law, who resists it, and what happens when those two forces collide in full public view.<\/p>\n tragedy struck in Gainesville, Georgia, when 23-year-old Hannah Simmons was driving her nine-month-old daughter, Alannah, to a routine medical checkup. Alongside them was Hannah\u2019s best friend. On the way, Hannah lost control of the vehicle, colliding head-on with a truck. The impact was fatal, claiming the lives of all three instantly and leaving their families in unimaginable grief.<\/p>\n As emergency responders worked at the scene, 19-year-old Anisa Gannon happened to be driving to her job nearby. With traffic at a standstill, she took a quick photo of the accident site to explain her delay to her employer. At first, the image seemed ordinary. But later, Anisa noticed something extraordinary \u2014 a distinct beam of light shining directly toward the wrecked car.<\/p>\n When she shared the photo with the victims\u2019 families, the image took on profound meaning. For them, the radiant beam felt more than coincidental; it appeared to symbolize peace and transcendence. Anisa\u2019s aunt described it as looking like \u201ca pathway to heaven.\u201d Hannah\u2019s mother, Jodi Simmons, echoed that belief, saying she felt the light was a sign that her daughter, granddaughter, and friend were being guided to a better place.<\/p>\n While some observers suggest the beam could simply be a reflection or natural effect, the families choose to see it as a message of comfort in their darkest hour. For those grieving such sudden loss, the photo has become more than just an image \u2014 it is a reminder of hope, faith, and the enduring belief that love continues beyond life itself.<\/p>\n Apple TV+ has delivered several hits, but few have had the long-lasting impact of\u00a0For All Mankind<\/em>. This alternate-history sci-fi series has gained a devoted following with its gripping plot, emotional storytelling, and what-if scenarios about the space race. As Season 4 left fans on a high note, many are now asking the burning question: Will there be a season 5 of For All Mankind? Here\u2019s everything we know so far about<\/p>\n Before diving into the new season, let\u2019s recap what makes this series so compelling.<\/p>\n The series masterfully combines historical events with fictional twists, offering a gripping narrative that blends drama, science fiction, and geopolitical intrigue.<\/p>\n The good news is: Yes, there will be a Season 5 of\u00a0For All Mankind<\/em>! Apple TV+ officially renewed the series following the success and critical acclaim of Season 4. The announcement has fans buzzing with excitement as the show’s universe continues to expand across decades and planets.<\/p>\n The creators, Ronald D. Moore, Matt Wolpert, and Ben Nedivi, have all expressed interest in exploring more of the 21st century and beyond in future seasons. Given the show’s time jumps each season, Season 5 is expected to fast-forward another 8\u201310 years.<\/p>\n While an exact release date for For All Mankind Season 5 has not been confirmed yet, early predictions point to a late 2025 premiere. Historically, new seasons of the show have followed a 1.5 to 2-year gap between releases. Given that Season 4 premiered in late 2023, Season 5 is likely to follow suit in late 2025 or early 2026.<\/p>\n Filming timelines, post-production needs, and ongoing creative development will also affect the release date, but Apple TV+ has a reputation for quality over speed\u2014so fans can rest assured it\u2019ll be worth the wait.<\/p>\n While the cast for Season 5 hasn’t been officially confirmed, several key characters are expected to return:<\/p>\n Joel Kinnaman as Ed Baldwin \u2013 the aging astronaut and central figure of the series.<\/p>\n Wrenn Schmidt as Margo Madison \u2013 now exiled in Russia, her future arc is a major plot point.<\/p>\n Krys Marshall as Danielle Poole \u2013 a trailblazer in space exploration.<\/p>\n Edi Gathegi as Dev Ayesa \u2013 a visionary entrepreneur from Season 4.<\/p>\n Given the show’s structure and time jumps,\u00a0For All Mankind Season 5<\/em>\u00a0may also introduce a new generation of characters as children from earlier seasons take on leadership roles in space missions and politics.<\/p>\n With each new season,\u00a0For All Mankind<\/em>\u00a0jumps ahead in time and ventures deeper into space. Season 4 focused heavily on the Mars colony and the challenges of long-term survival on the red planet. Season 5 may continue exploring Mars or even take us to Jupiter\u2019s moons or Saturn\u2019s orbit, as humanity\u2019s quest for space colonization accelerates.<\/p>\n Key plot questions for Season 5 include:<\/p>\n Will Margo return to the U.S. after her exile?<\/p>\n How will international tensions evolve with multiple nations on Mars?<\/p>\n Will new private space companies rise to challenge NASA?<\/p>\n The alternate history approach keeps fans guessing, which is part of what makes this series so binge-worthy.<\/p>\n The fanbase for<\/p>\n With Season 5 on the horizon, fans are eager to see how the show addresses contemporary themes like climate change, AI, and international cooperation through its futuristic lens.<\/p>\n All seasons of\u00a0For All Mankind<\/em>\u00a0are available exclusively on Apple TV+, making it one of the platform\u2019s flagship original series. If you haven\u2019t caught up yet, now is the perfect time to binge the first four seasons and prepare for what\u2019s next.<\/p>\n Whether you\u2019re a sci-fi enthusiast or just a fan of great storytelling,\u00a0For All Mankind Season 5<\/em>\u00a0is shaping up to be a must-watch. Although the exact release date of Season 5 hasn\u2019t been revealed, excitement is building as the show prepares to leap even further into the future. With compelling characters, bold storylines, and big ideas, this series continues to push the boundaries of what television can achieve.<\/p>\n So if you’ve been wondering, \u201cWill there be a Season 5 of For All Mankind?\u201d \u2014 the answer is a resounding\u00a0yes<\/em>. And it’s going to be out of this world.<\/p>\n Something explosive is happening in California. For decades, the state has been the crown jewel of Democratic dominance\u2014Hollywood glitz, Silicon Valley wealth, and a supermajority that seemed untouchable. But now, cracks are forming. From San Francisco\u2019s boarded-up shops to Los Angeles\u2019s crime-ridden streets, anger is boiling over. The once-unshakable Democratic machine is starting to wobble, and Californians are asking a question no one thought possible:\u00a0<\/p>\n Under Governor Gavin Newsom, California was supposed to be the shining model of progressive leadership. Instead, it\u2019s facing a wave of economic and political turmoil that has businesses and families running for the exits.<\/p>\n Businesses are fleeing in droves.<\/strong>\u00a0From small family-owned shops to tech giants, companies say they can\u2019t keep up with crushing regulations, high taxes, and constant red tape. Texas, Arizona, and Florida are opening their arms\u2014and California is bleeding jobs and investment.<\/p>\n Crime is exploding.<\/strong>\u00a0Major cities are plagued by rising homelessness, open-air drug markets, and lawlessness. Citizens are scared. Investors are leaving. And confidence in leadership is evaporating.<\/p>\n Trust in government is collapsing.<\/strong><\/p>\n For everyday Californians, the message is simple: this isn\u2019t working anymore.<\/p>\n One of the biggest symbols of the disconnect between leadership and citizens came from a single word:\u00a0Latinx<\/em>.<\/p>\n For years, Newsom proudly embraced the progressive label\u2014using terms like \u201cLatinx\u201d in speeches to signal his allegiance to the activist left. But the backlash from Hispanic communities was swift and unforgiving. Polls show that the overwhelming majority of Latino Californians reject the term, seeing it as elitist and out of touch.<\/p>\n Now, Newsom is quietly backing away from the language he once championed, trying to rewrite history and pretend he never said it. But Californians remember. They see a politician more interested in word games than real solutions.<\/p>\n If Newsom\u2019s image problem weren\u2019t bad enough, Proposition 50 is raising alarms across the state. The proposal would\u00a0reverse California\u2019s independent redistricting reforms<\/strong>, essentially giving politicians the power to redraw maps however they see fit.<\/p>\n Critics call it a blatant power grab\u2014an attempt to manipulate democracy and silence voters at a time when Democrats are losing their grip. Instead of respecting the will of the people, Newsom\u2019s allies are trying to rewrite the rules to guarantee themselves control.<\/p>\n One political analyst didn\u2019t mince words: \u201cIt\u2019s the kind of maneuver you\u2019d expect in a corrupt third-world government, not in California. They\u2019re terrified of losing power\u2014and this is how they\u2019re fighting back.\u201d<\/p>\n While Newsom battles on one front, Los Angeles Mayor\u00a0Karen Bass<\/strong>\u00a0is crumbling on another. Her city is in chaos. Crime is rampant. Homelessness is spiraling. Streets are dirty, businesses are shuttered, and residents are fed up.<\/p>\n Instead of offering real solutions, Bass has leaned on one shocking move: telling\u00a0business owners themselves<\/em>\u00a0to take responsibility for cleaning up the city.<\/p>\n Let that sink in. The Mayor of Los Angeles\u2014one of the largest cities in the world\u2014has shifted the burden of fixing her failures onto struggling shopkeepers and entrepreneurs.<\/p>\n To critics, it\u2019s proof of total incompetence. One local business leader put it bluntly: \u201cWe\u2019re paying the taxes. We\u2019re following the rules. And now she wants us to play janitor for a city government that can\u2019t get its act together? Enough is enough.\u201d<\/p>\n What makes the anger burn hotter is the sense that the media is covering for Democratic leaders. When scandals erupt, when businesses flee, when crime skyrockets\u2014the blame is shifted. Excuses are made. And anyone who dares to criticize Bass or Newsom risks being branded a racist, a bigot, or an extremist.<\/p>\n But that tactic is wearing thin. Californians aren\u2019t buying it anymore. Increasingly, they see through the spin. They know the difference between racism and incompetence, between political smears and genuine criticism.<\/p>\n And they\u2019re speaking out.<\/p>\n From San Diego to Sacramento, from Orange County suburbs to rural farming towns, a movement is building. Citizens are rallying at town halls, pushing back against skyrocketing taxes, and demanding accountability. Conservative activism in California is no longer a whisper\u2014it\u2019s a roar.<\/p>\n The energy is unmistakable. Parents are confronting school boards over radical curriculum. Small business owners are banding together to protest destructive regulations. And communities are organizing to fight back against rising crime.<\/p>\n What was once unthinkable\u2014California turning red\u2014is now being whispered in every political circle.<\/p>\n This isn\u2019t just about California. If the bluest state in the nation shows signs of rebellion, it could send shockwaves across America. For Democrats, losing California would be catastrophic\u2014not just politically, but symbolically. For Republicans, it would be the comeback story of the century.<\/p>\n Of course, California hasn\u2019t flipped yet. Democrats still hold enormous institutional power. But history shows that political earthquakes start small\u2014fueled by ordinary people who finally decide they\u2019ve had enough.<\/p>\n And in California, that moment might be now.<\/p>\n California has always been a land of reinvention, a place where the impossible suddenly becomes possible. Today, that spirit is alive again\u2014but in politics.<\/p>\n Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass may think they\u2019ve secured their grip on power, but cracks are forming in their foundation. Businesses are gone. Streets are broken. Trust is shattered.<\/p>\n And the people are rising.<\/p>\n Is California really turning red? Only time will tell. But one thing is certain:\u00a0the revolt has begun.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0Disclaimer: This article is based on commentary, public reactions, and ongoing debates surrounding California politics. It reflects opinions and interpretations of current events for informational and entertainment purposes.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The pressure campaign surrounding the Epstein files just hit a whole new level. Bill and Hillary Clinton have now been officially referred to the Department of Justice for potential arrest after they…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":18750,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18751","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18751","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18751"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18751\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/18750"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18751"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18751"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18751"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}