![\"ll.Chuck](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Screenshot_1-1762848065-q80.webp\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Chuck Schumer\u2019s Remark About the Epstein Files Sparks Political Firestorm<\/p>\n
It was a moment that few in Washington saw coming \u2014 a flash of candor from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer that immediately set the political world ablaze.<\/p>\n
During an impromptu exchange with reporters on Monday, Schumer was pressed on a question that has hovered over American political discourse for years: Why haven\u2019t the Jeffrey Epstein files been fully released?<\/p>\n
\u00a0
Schumer\u2019s response, perhaps meant to deflect blame, instead opened a political Pandora\u2019s box.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy wouldn\u2019t they have been released the last four years when President Biden was in office?\u201d a reporter asked.<\/p>\n
Schumer replied, \u201cThat\u2019s the question every American is asking \u2014 not every American, but so many Americans are asking. What the hell is Donald Trump hiding? Why doesn\u2019t he want them released?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u00a0
In that one exchange, Schumer appeared to inadvertently acknowledge that the files could have been released during the Biden administration \u2014 a point critics immediately seized upon.<\/p>\n
Within hours, the clip spread across social media platforms, sparking intense debate among journalists, politicians, and the public. Was Schumer admitting that Democrats had suppressed the release of the Epstein documents? Or was he merely misdirecting blame toward Trump to cover for his own party\u2019s inaction?<\/p>\n
Whatever the intent, the moment was quickly labeled by commentators as \u201ca rare flash of truth in Washington\u2019s fog of spin.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Background: Epstein\u2019s Shadow Over American Politics
The name Jeffrey Epstein has haunted American power circles for decades. The financier-turned-predator cultivated friendships with some of the most influential figures in the world \u2014 from Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew to Donald Trump and Ehud Barak.<\/p>\n
\u00a0
Epstein\u2019s 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, followed by his mysterious death in a Manhattan jail cell, only deepened public suspicion that his network reached into the highest levels of government and finance.<\/p>\n
\u00a0
Since then, the demand for full transparency \u2014 for the \u201cEpstein Files\u201d containing names, communications, and travel logs \u2014 has become a bipartisan rallying cry. Yet, despite repeated promises from both parties, large portions of those records remain sealed or heavily redacted.<\/p>\n
Critics across the political spectrum believe the delay is deliberate.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s a deep fear on both sides about what might come out,\u201d said Dr. Marjorie Fields, a political historian at NYU. \u201cEpstein\u2019s connections spanned Democrats, Republicans, royals, academics, and billionaires. It\u2019s the one scandal that touches nearly every elite institution.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u00a0
Trump Pushes for Full Disclosure
While Schumer was still defending his remarks, Donald Trump jumped into the fray. On his Truth Social account Sunday evening \u2014 hours before Schumer\u2019s press conference \u2014 Trump urged both House and Senate Republicans to vote in favor of releasing every remaining Epstein file.<\/p>\n
\u00a0
\u201cThey can do whatever they want. We\u2019ll give them everything,\u201d Trump told reporters later that day. \u201cThe American people deserve to see it all.\u201d<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s statement was more than rhetorical. According to aides, he has instructed the Justice Department and the FBI to cooperate fully with congressional inquiries into the Epstein network.<\/p>\n
\u00a0
The former president has long claimed that the Epstein saga has been weaponized by Democrats to smear him. His allies argue that if genuine evidence existed linking Trump to Epstein\u2019s trafficking crimes, the Biden administration would have made it public during the 2024 election campaign.<\/p>\n
\u00a0
\u201cIf Trump had been guilty of anything, they would have leaked it already,\u201d said Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.). \u201cThe fact that they didn\u2019t tells you everything you need to know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u00a0
Schumer\u2019s Misstep: A Political Self-Own
What made Schumer\u2019s comments so explosive wasn\u2019t just what he said \u2014 it was what he implied.<\/p>\n
By acknowledging that many Americans are asking why the files weren\u2019t released under Biden, Schumer inadvertently validated a long-standing criticism of the Democratic leadership: that they avoided full transparency for fear of political fallout.<\/p>\n
\u00a0
\u201cHe said the quiet part out loud,\u201d tweeted conservative commentator Megyn Kelly. \u201cIf the Biden White House had nothing to hide, why not release everything when they had the chance?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u00a0
Even some centrist journalists noted that Schumer\u2019s phrasing suggested unease. He appeared to catch himself mid-sentence, quickly shifting focus to Trump and accusing him of secrecy.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s the question every American is asking \u2026 what the hell is Trump hiding?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u00a0
But factually, Trump wasn\u2019t in office when most of the Epstein-related documents could have been declassified. Between 2021 and 2025, that authority rested entirely with President Joe Biden\u2019s Department of Justice and Attorney General Merrick Garland.<\/p>\n
\u00a0
This apparent contradiction gave Republicans ample ammunition.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s astonishing,\u201d said Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY). \u201cSchumer just admitted the files could have been released under Biden. Then he tried to blame Trump, who wasn\u2019t even president. That\u2019s gaslighting at its finest.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Broader Political Fallout
Schumer\u2019s remarks come at a time when Democrats are already struggling to regain footing after the 41-day government shutdown, which ended without major policy concessions. The episode left swing voters disillusioned \u2014 especially in key battleground states like Georgia and Wisconsin.<\/p>\n
In a focus group conducted by Engagious\/Sago, seven of thirteen Biden-to-Trump voters in Georgia said Democrats \u201clooked worse than Republicans\u201d after the shutdown.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey gave in to the Republicans,\u201d said Trilya M., 53, of Loganville. \u201cThey did not stand their ground, and now it\u2019s going to affect people who rely on the Affordable Care Act.\u201d<\/p>\n
For these voters, the Epstein controversy only reinforces perceptions of hypocrisy and elitism \u2014 that powerful Democrats shield their own while preaching accountability.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey always project that they\u2019re the party of the people,\u201d said Elijah T., 33, of Conyers. \u201cBut when something like Epstein comes up, they close ranks. It\u2019s like they don\u2019t really care.\u201d<\/p>\n
Inside the \u201cEpstein Files\u201d Debate
The Epstein files consist of a sprawling archive: tens of thousands of pages of emails, flight manifests, visitor logs, and legal correspondence seized by federal investigators.<\/p>\n
Portions have been made public through lawsuits against Epstein\u2019s associates, including Ghislaine Maxwell. But large sections \u2014 particularly those referencing unindicted public figures \u2014 remain sealed under protective court orders.<\/p>\n
Transparency advocates have long argued that the government\u2019s selective release fuels mistrust.<\/p>\n
\u201cEvery redaction is a breeding ground for speculation,\u201d said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. \u201cThe only way to restore confidence is full disclosure \u2014 no matter whose name appears in those documents.\u201d<\/p>\n
The renewed push to unseal the files gained traction earlier this year after several Democratic staffers claimed to have seen unreleased communications referencing prominent officials. Some of those materials were reportedly shared with the House Oversight Committee, which last week published a tranche of heavily redacted emails.<\/p>\n
Democrats claimed those emails showed connections between Trump and Epstein, though multiple journalists found the evidence \u201cthin to nonexistent.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe documents don\u2019t tie Trump to Epstein\u2019s crimes,\u201d said an investigative correspondent for Reuters. \u201cAt best, they show social contact from years before Epstein\u2019s 2008 conviction \u2014 the same as Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, and others.\u201d<\/p>\n
A Divided Congress and a Public Losing Patience
The question now is whether Schumer\u2019s misstep will pressure Congress into finally acting. A bipartisan proposal known as the Epstein Transparency Act is already circulating in the Senate, with co-sponsors from both parties.<\/p>\n
The bill would require the Justice Department to release all non-sensitive Epstein-related documents within 90 days, except those directly tied to ongoing investigations or victims\u2019 privacy.<\/p>\n
Trump has indicated he would sign the bill immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey can do whatever they want,\u201d Trump said on Sunday. \u201cWe\u2019ll give them everything. The American people have waited long enough.\u201d<\/p>\n
Schumer, however, has not endorsed the proposal. Instead, he has doubled down on his accusation that Trump is \u201cplaying politics\u201d with the issue \u2014 a claim critics view as ironic, given his own party\u2019s delay in addressing it.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis isn\u2019t about politics,\u201d countered Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO). \u201cThis is about truth. Every year those files stay sealed, the American people lose more faith in their institutions.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Public Mood: Deep Distrust
Across the nation, polls show a growing sense of frustration over government secrecy. In a recent Gallup survey, 72% of respondents said they believed federal agencies \u201croutinely hide important information from the public.\u201d<\/p>\n
Among those who identified Epstein\u2019s network as a \u201cmajor scandal,\u201d 81% said both parties were complicit in suppressing evidence.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s not left versus right anymore,\u201d said political analyst Laura Ingram. \u201cIt\u2019s insiders versus outsiders \u2014 the governed versus the governors.\u201d<\/p>\n
That sentiment is particularly potent among independents and disaffected voters who swung between Biden and Trump in recent elections. Many of them view the Epstein case as symbolic of elite corruption that transcends ideology.<\/p>\n
\u201cPeople see this as proof that there\u2019s one set of rules for the powerful and another for everyone else,\u201d said Dr. Nathan Silver, a political sociologist. \u201cIt feeds directly into the populist narrative \u2014 and both Trump and Owens [Candace Owens] are capitalizing on it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Beyond Epstein: The Credibility Crisis in Washington
Schumer\u2019s accidental admission is just the latest flashpoint in a larger credibility crisis engulfing Washington. From COVID-19 origins to Ukraine aid to FBI surveillance, Americans increasingly question whether the political class can tell the truth without calculation.<\/p>\n
For Schumer, a veteran lawmaker known for his discipline and message control, the slip-up was uncharacteristic. But it resonated precisely because it seemed unfiltered \u2014 an unguarded moment of honesty about what millions already suspect: that transparency is treated as a liability, not a duty.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat one sentence told the whole story,\u201d said conservative columnist Ben Domenech. \u201cThey had four years to release the Epstein files and didn\u2019t. Now they want to distract by blaming Trump. It\u2019s politics as usual, and people are tired of it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Even within Democratic circles, some aides privately acknowledge that Schumer\u2019s comments were \u201cunhelpful.\u201d One senior staffer told Axios:<\/p>\n
\u201cIt was a self-inflicted wound. The last thing we needed was to remind voters that we controlled DOJ for four years and didn\u2019t move the needle on Epstein.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Broader Implications
The renewed debate over Epstein\u2019s files comes as Washington grapples with several overlapping crises \u2014 from an ongoing budget standoff to international unrest. Yet, this story cuts deeper, because it speaks to something more fundamental: the public\u2019s belief that truth itself has become partisan.<\/p>\n
When Schumer questioned what Trump might be \u201chiding,\u201d he unwittingly reignited that cynicism. Many Americans no longer believe anyone in power \u2014 Democrat or Republican \u2014 truly wants transparency.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re watching a political blame game instead of justice,\u201d said Patricia Lyons, a Florida mother whose daughter participated in Turning Point USA events. \u201cThey talk about Epstein like he\u2019s a ghost story, not a real man who hurt real people.\u201d<\/p>\n
For victims and their families, the endless politicization of the case is exhausting. Several advocacy groups have pleaded with both parties to stop turning the scandal into a campaign issue and simply release the records.<\/p>\n
Swing Voters and the Next Election Cycle
If there\u2019s one lesson from recent focus groups, it\u2019s that public patience is running thin.<\/p>\n
In Georgia \u2014 a crucial battleground \u2014 independent voters who flipped from Biden to Trump in 2024 told moderators that they view the Epstein controversy as emblematic of a broader rot in Washington.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey [Democrats] keep talking about transparency and justice, but when it comes down to it, they protect their own,\u201d said Brian B., 61, of Norcross. \u201cSchumer just proved it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Others expressed exhaustion with both parties.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey all lie,\u201d said Christine L., 54, of Peachtree City. \u201cIt\u2019s like a soap opera that never ends. The truth is never the priority.\u201d<\/p>\n
Still, Trump\u2019s proactive stance on the Epstein files appears to have resonated. According to Axios\u2019 analysis of the Georgia focus group, eight of the thirteen participants said they approved of the administration\u2019s overall performance since his return to office in January.<\/p>\n
Even some who criticized Trump\u2019s tone said his call for transparency \u201cfelt authentic.\u201d<\/p>\n
Conclusion: The Question That Won\u2019t Go Away
Senator Chuck Schumer\u2019s offhand remark has once again thrust the Epstein saga into the center of American politics \u2014 not as a question of morality alone, but of trust.<\/p>\n
His attempt to deflect the issue back toward Trump inadvertently reminded the nation that, for four years under Biden, the Democratic administration had the power to release the Epstein files \u2014 and didn\u2019t.<\/p>\n
Now, the political cost of that hesitation may be coming due.<\/p>\n
Whether or not Schumer intended to, his words crystallized a growing national sentiment: that truth in Washington isn\u2019t revealed \u2014 it slips out, usually by accident.<\/p>\n
Until the Epstein documents are released in full, speculation will persist, and faith in the system will continue to erode. As one political observer put it succinctly on Monday night:<\/p>\n
\u201cSchumer didn\u2019t just make a gaffe. He reminded everyone why nobody trusts this town anymore.\u201d<\/p>\n
Senator John Kennedy is once again cutting through Washington\u2019s theatrics with brutal honesty.<\/p>\n
The Louisiana Republican accused Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of staging political drama instead of doing his job to reopen the government.<\/p>\n
In an interview with Fox Business host Larry Kudlow, Kennedy described the shutdown as a \u201cpolitical performance,\u201d not a genuine policy disagreement.<\/p>\n
He said Schumer is more concerned with keeping up appearances for his party\u2019s radical wing than with serving the American people.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt will end eventually,\u201d Kennedy said, \u201cwhen Senator Schumer goes to six or eight of his members and Democrats and says, \u2018Do me a favor. Vote to open it back up. I may have to criticize you. I\u2019m not going to vote with you, but I need a way out of this.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n
Kennedy made clear that Schumer\u2019s priority isn\u2019t compromise \u2014 it\u2019s saving face.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe\u2019s gonna tell \u2018em, \u2018Now, look, I gotta vote no. And I gotta dogcuss you a little bit. We gotta have some play acting and make this look good. And then we come out of the shutdown,\u2019\u201d Kennedy said, describing how Schumer will secretly orchestrate the outcome he publicly opposes.<\/p>\n
According to Kennedy, the government shutdown is less about real disagreements and more about political optics. Schumer, he said, is acting out a script to appease the far-left members of his caucus \u2014 what Kennedy calls the \u201cmoon wing\u201d of the Democratic Party.<\/p>\n
\u201cI know him. Well, this shutdown is not about policy. It\u2019s about politics,\u201d Kennedy said.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd Senator Schumer, this is what\u2019s going on. He is trying to get the moon wing, the socialist wing of the Democratic Party, which is in control, to love him. And they will never love him.\u201d<\/p>\n
That blunt assessment paints a damning picture of the Democratic leadership. Schumer, Kennedy argues, is beholden to extremists who refuse to compromise, even at the expense of the country.<\/p>\n
The Louisiana senator said Schumer\u2019s strategy is simple: keep the government closed until Republicans and President Trump agree to hand over billions in new spending \u2014 spending that Democrats will control. \u201cWhat he\u2019s saying,\u201d Kennedy explained, \u201cis we\u2019re going to keep government shut down until you Republicans and President Trump give the Democrats $1.5 trillion, and they\u2019re going to tell us how to spend it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Kennedy ridiculed the idea that Schumer is fighting for \u201cthe people.\u201d In his view, Schumer is fighting for power, money, and media attention \u2014 and the shutdown is just another stage for him to perform on.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe\u2019s boning if it looks contrived,\u201d Kennedy warned. \u201cHe can\u2019t look like he\u2019s having a mutiny.\u201d That\u2019s why, Kennedy says, Schumer must choreograph his next steps carefully, pretending to fight while quietly coordinating votes behind the scenes.<\/p>\n
Kennedy\u2019s description of this \u201cplay acting\u201d matches what many Americans have long suspected: that the partisan battles on the Senate floor are largely theater designed to manipulate the public.<\/p>\n
Schumer, Kennedy said, is obsessed with being seen as strong by the socialist faction of his party \u2014 even though that same faction will never accept him. \u201cHe\u2019d be better off doing what he did back in March and just calling it like he saw it and keeping government open,\u201d Kennedy added.<\/p>\n
The senator\u2019s comments came after Schumer led most Democrats in voting down the Republicans\u2019 spending bill earlier in the week, prolonging the shutdown. Kennedy said that move was pure political posturing.<\/p>\n
\u201cSchumer knows exactly what he\u2019s doing,\u201d Kennedy said. \u201cHe\u2019s trying to look tough for his base while still leaving himself a backdoor exit.\u201d<\/p>\n
Kennedy argued that Schumer is being held hostage by his own party\u2019s extremists \u2014 the same people who demand funding for what Kennedy called \u201cwasteful foreign projects\u201d and ideological programs.<\/p>\n
The Louisiana senator said Democrats are fighting to reinstate spending for overseas LGBTQ initiatives, electric buses in Rwanda, Palestinian media operations, and sterilization programs abroad \u2014 all things Republicans already removed from the budget.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe\u2019s not fighting for the American taxpayer,\u201d Kennedy said. \u201cHe\u2019s fighting for his image and for foreign projects nobody asked for.\u201d<\/p>\n
BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED\u2026<\/p>\n
Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.<\/p>\n
This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.<\/p>\n
Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.<\/p>\n
According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals\u2019 involvement in Epstein\u2019s criminal network.<\/p>\n
She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.<\/p>\n
\u201cEven if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,\u201d Luna told Fox News. \u201cWe have been more than patient.\u201d<\/p>\n
These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein\u2019s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.<\/p>\n
Luna\u2019s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.<\/p>\n
The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ\u2019s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,\u201d Luna said. \u201cThis is corruption at the highest level.\u201d<\/p>\n
Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. \u201cHad this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,\u201d one conservative commentator noted.<\/p>\n
For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America\u2019s elite circles. The financier\u2019s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.<\/p>\n
Now, Luna\u2019s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.<\/p>\n
What\u2019s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals\u2014politicians, celebrities, and global financiers\u2014who participated in or enabled Epstein\u2019s crimes.<\/p>\n
In this context, Luna\u2019s SHRED Act isn\u2019t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.<\/p>\n
Despite Luna\u2019s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ\u2019s handling of Epstein evidence.<\/p>\n
Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.<\/p>\n
This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.<\/p>\n
Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ\u2019s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.<\/p>\n
The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna\u2019s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Chuck Schumer\u2019s Remark About the Epstein Files Sparks Political Firestorm It was a moment that few in Washington saw coming \u2014 a flash of candor from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer that…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":18830,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18831","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18831","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18831"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18831\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/18830"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}