![\"KAT.](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/13-1759631636-q80-2.webp\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson clashed with CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins in a fiery interview that exposed the Democrats\u2019 radical push to extend government benefits to illegal immigrants.<\/p>\n
Johnson didn\u2019t hold back, making it clear that Democrats are prioritizing those who cross the border unlawfully over American citizens struggling to make ends meet.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey have insisted that they want to give free health care to illegal aliens,\u201d Johnson said during the exchange. \u201cThat is something the American people reject.\u201d<\/p>\n
Collins tried to interrupt and fact-check him in real time, but Johnson doubled down on the issue.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s not true,\u201d Collins retorted, claiming that federal law bars most immigrants without legal status from receiving healthcare benefits.<\/p>\n
Johnson pushed back: \u201cLook at their policy proposals. Look at what they\u2019ve demanded. They have insisted that your tax dollars go to people who are not even supposed to be in this country.\u201d<\/p>\n
This tense back-and-forth highlighted the core divide in America\u2019s immigration debate: whether taxpayers should foot the bill for those who broke the law to enter.<\/p>\n
The New York Post reported that Johnson made similar remarks in another heated exchange with ABC\u2019s George Stephanopoulos, reinforcing that this is a consistent Republican position.<\/p>\n
Johnson said, \u201cThe Democrats are willing to shut the government down over this. They put the interests of illegal aliens above the interests of American citizens.\u201d<\/p>\n
His words struck a chord with conservative audiences who have long argued that Democrats are weaponizing immigration for political gain.<\/p>\n
Collins, visibly frustrated, tried to paint Johnson\u2019s comments as misinformation.<\/p>\n
But Johnson\u2019s stance was clear: Democrats will not secure the border because their political future depends on mass immigration.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe can\u2019t afford it, and Americans know we can\u2019t afford it,\u201d Johnson said.<\/p>\n
The interview became a viral moment, with conservatives applauding Johnson for standing firm in enemy territory.<\/p>\n
Social media erupted with praise for his takedown of Collins, who has become a symbol of liberal media bias.<\/p>\n
Even as Collins tried to shift the conversation, Johnson held the line.<\/p>\n
He reminded viewers that every dollar spent on illegals is a dollar taken from American veterans, seniors, and children.<\/p>\n
AP News admitted in a fact-check that Democrats have supported expanding certain state-level healthcare programs to cover undocumented residents.<\/p>\n
This supports Johnson\u2019s broader point: Democrats want to normalize giving benefits to people who enter the U.S. illegally.<\/p>\n
Johnson\u2019s fight with Collins is just one skirmish in the broader war over America\u2019s border.<\/p>\n
The Biden administration has left the border wide open, and now under President Trump\u2019s return, Republicans are fighting to fix the mess.<\/p>\n
Johnson\u2019s critics in the liberal press called his remarks \u201cfalse,\u201d but his allies called it \u201ctruth bombs.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe are not going to bend to their demands,\u201d Johnson said firmly.<\/p>\n
BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED\u2026<\/p>\n
Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.<\/p>\n
This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.<\/p>\n
Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.<\/p>\n
According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals\u2019 involvement in Epstein\u2019s criminal network.<\/p>\n
She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.<\/p>\n
\u201cEven if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,\u201d Luna told Fox News. \u201cWe have been more than patient.\u201d<\/p>\n
These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein\u2019s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.<\/p>\n
Luna\u2019s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.<\/p>\n
The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ\u2019s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,\u201d Luna said. \u201cThis is corruption at the highest level.\u201d<\/p>\n
Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. \u201cHad this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,\u201d one conservative commentator noted.<\/p>\n
For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America\u2019s elite circles. The financier\u2019s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.<\/p>\n
Now, Luna\u2019s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.<\/p>\n
What\u2019s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals\u2014politicians, celebrities, and global financiers\u2014who participated in or enabled Epstein\u2019s crimes.<\/p>\n
In this context, Luna\u2019s SHRED Act isn\u2019t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.<\/p>\n
Despite Luna\u2019s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ\u2019s handling of Epstein evidence.<\/p>\n
Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.<\/p>\n
This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.<\/p>\n
Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ\u2019s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.<\/p>\n
The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna\u2019s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.<\/p>\n
The Supreme Court has cleared the path for the Trump administration to deport a group of immigrants held at a U.S. military base in Djibouti to South Sudan.<\/p>\n
The order came less than two weeks after the high court temporarily stayed a ruling by U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy, whose order barred the federal government from deporting immigrants to \u201cthird countries\u201d\u2014those not explicitly named in their removal orders\u2014without first ensuring, through a series of safeguards, that the individuals would not face torture upon deportation.<\/p>\n
Murphy\u2019s May 21 ruling found that the government violated his April 18 order by attempting to deport eight men to South Sudan. The U.S. has evacuated all non-emergency personnel from South Sudan, and the State Department advises against travel there due to \u201ccrime, kidnapping, and armed conflict.\u201d<\/p>\n
The flight carrying the immigrants bound for South Sudan instead landed in nearby Djibouti, where the men have since been held at a U.S. military base.<\/p>\n
On May 27, the Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court to stay Murphy\u2019s April 18 order, seeking permission to proceed with \u201cthird country\u201d removals while the legal battle over the practice unfolds.<\/p>\n
U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer contended that Murphy\u2019s \u201cjudicially created procedures are currently wreaking havoc on the third-country removal process\u201d and \u201cdisrupt[ing] sensitive diplomatic, foreign policy, and national-security efforts.\u201d
Lawyers representing the immigrants facing potential third-country removals urged the justices to uphold Murphy\u2019s order. They emphasized that the government could still proceed with these deportations, but Murphy\u2019s order \u201csimply requires\u201d the Trump administration \u201cto comply with the law\u201d in doing so.<\/p>\n
Several hours after the Supreme Court responded to the Trump administration\u2019s first request, made on June 23, Murphy then claimed that his May 21 order remained unaffected by the high court\u2019s decision.<\/p>\n
The Trump administration returned to the Supreme Court the following day, requesting that the justices clarify the federal government\u2019s authority to proceed with deporting the immigrants currently held in Djibouti. Sauer urged the court to act swiftly to address what he called Murphy\u2019s \u201cunprecedented defiance\u201d of the court\u2019s authority.<\/p>\n
In Thursday\u2019s brief, an unsigned 7-2 opinion, the majority indicated that the court\u2019s \u201cJune 23 order stayed the April 18 preliminary injunction in full. The May 21 remedial order cannot now be used to enforce an injunction that our stay rendered unenforceable.\u201d<\/p>\n
Two of the Supreme Court\u2019s liberals, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented, while the third liberal, Justice Elena Kagan, sided with the court\u2019s conservative majority.<\/p>\n
She noted that she had previously disagreed with the Supreme Court\u2019s original ruling permitting third-country removals to proceed. \u201cBut a majority of this court saw things differently, and I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this court has stayed,\u201d she wrote.<\/p>\n
The eight illegal immigrants include individuals from Cuba, Vietnam, and Laos, reports noted.<\/p>\n
Sotomayor\u2019s dissent contended that \u201c[w]hat the Government wants to do, concretely, is send the eight noncitizens it illegally removed from the United States from Djibouti to South Sudan, where they will be turned over to the local authorities without regard for the likelihood that they will face torture or death.\u201d<\/p>\n
She argued that the court should not have considered the government\u2019s request at all, as the government should have made its arguments in the lower courts first. Moreover, she suggested that the Supreme Court\u2019s \u201ccontinued refusal to justify its extraordinary decisions in this case, even as it faults lower courts for failing to properly divine their import, is indefensible.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson clashed with CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins in a fiery interview that exposed the Democrats\u2019 radical push to extend government benefits to illegal immigrants. Johnson didn\u2019t hold…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":19061,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19062","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19062"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19062\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/19061"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19062"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19062"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}