![\"Dems](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/186-1763178762-q80.webp\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The White House on Wednesday denounced Democrats for what it called a \u201cselective and bad-faith\u201d release of Jeffrey Epstein documents after emails surfaced showing celebrity biographer Michael Wolff privately advised Epstein to attack Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign to gain \u201cpolitical cover.\u201d<\/p>\n
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the newly released materials were \u201ca deliberate distraction from the Democrats\u2019 shutdown fiasco\u201d and accused the minority of \u201cmanufacturing a smear against President Trump.\u201d<\/p>\n
Leavitt said the \u201cunnamed victim\u201d referenced in Epstein\u2019s 2011 correspondence was the late Virginia Giuffre, who had repeatedly stated Trump \u201cwas not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever and couldn\u2019t have been friendlier\u201d in their limited interactions. She added that Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago decades ago for harassing female employees and called the document release \u201ca desperate effort to rewrite history.\u201d<\/p>\n
Republicans on the House Oversight Committee echoed the White House\u2019s statement, accusing Democrats of \u201ccherry-picking documents to generate headlines\u201d while withholding other records that name prominent Democratic officials. A GOP committee spokesperson said Democrats \u201cshould stop politicizing this investigation and focus on full transparency and justice for the victims.\u201d<\/p>\n
The controversy erupted hours after Democrats released a new batch of documents from the ongoing bipartisan Epstein investigation, including 2016 email exchanges between Epstein and Michael Wolff, the journalist known for his anti-Trump bestsellers Fire and Fury and Siege.<\/p>\n
The emails show Wolff repeatedly advising Epstein to use anti-Trump messaging to repair his image as scrutiny mounted over his earlier sex-trafficking conviction and connections to powerful figures.<\/p>\n
In early 2016, Wolff told Epstein that both The New York Times and the Hillary Clinton campaign were investigating his ties to Trump and advised him to \u201cpreempt\u201d the narrative. Weeks later, Wolff wrote that \u201cbecoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don\u2019t have now.\u201d<\/p>\n
He warned that James Patterson\u2019s upcoming book \u201cFilthy Rich,\u201d about Epstein\u2019s crimes, would draw intense attention because of the election and said the \u201cTrump-Clinton angle will amplify the attention tenfold.\u201d<\/p>\n
When Epstein asked how to handle questions about Trump, Wolff replied that if Trump denied visiting Epstein\u2019s home or flying on his plane, it would provide \u201cvaluable PR and political currency.\u201d Wolff said Epstein could \u201chang him in a way that generates a positive benefit,\u201d or \u201csave him\u201d if it appeared Trump would win, \u201cgenerating a debt.\u201d<\/p>\n
The emails also show Wolff asking Epstein to connect him with Tom Barrack, who chaired Trump\u2019s inaugural committee, and Kathy Ruemmler, a former Obama administration prosecutor, while researching his later book on Trump\u2019s presidency. He also asked whether Bill Clinton would confirm that he had never been to Epstein\u2019s private island \u2014 something Clinton has repeatedly denied.<\/p>\n
The two men remained in contact through May 2019, months before Epstein\u2019s arrest on federal sex-trafficking charges. Epstein died in jail that August, officially ruled a suicide.<\/p>\n
Democrats on the committee, led by Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA), said the new disclosures underscored the need for the Department of Justice to release all Epstein files. Garcia said the Oversight Committee \u201cwill not stop until we get justice for the victims\u201d and argued that \u201cthe more Donald Trump tries to cover up the Epstein files, the more we uncover.\u201d<\/p>\n
Republican leaders rejected that claim, calling the release a \u201cpolitical stunt\u201d meant to distract from the administration\u2019s recent battles with Congress.<\/p>\n
The House is preparing to vote on a discharge petition that would force the DOJ to release the Epstein records in full. The measure is expected to gain enough signatures to proceed once newly sworn-in Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ) signs on.<\/p>\n
Epstein, a financier with ties to Trump, Clinton, and Prince Andrew, was first convicted in 2008. He was arrested again in 2019 on federal trafficking charges but died before trial. His longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell is now serving a 20-year sentence for aiding his operation.<\/p>\n
The Wolff correspondence adds a new political dimension to the investigation, showing that one of Trump\u2019s most prominent critics in the media was privately advising Epstein on how to weaponize anti-Trump sentiment for personal rehabilitation during the height of the 2016 election.<\/p>\n
In a scathing critique, Tom Homan, the former Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), took aim at California Governor Gavin Newsom after the governor refused to direct his state authorities to collaborate with ICE and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).<\/p>\n
Homan, known for his outspoken views on immigration and border security, did not hold back in his condemnation of Newsom\u2019s refusal to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement agencies, accusing him of embarrassing the position he holds.<\/p>\n
The remarks came as part of Homan\u2019s broader criticism of Newsom\u2019s policies surrounding immigration and law enforcement, particularly his stance against working with federal immigration authorities.<\/p>\n
According to Homan, the governor\u2019s actions are not only a disservice to the people of California but also a direct threat to public safety, especially considering the high number of criminal immigrants ICE and DHS have apprehended in the state.<\/p>\n
Homan\u2019s criticism was sharp, calling Newsom an \u201cembarrassment\u201d to the office he holds. Speaking directly to Newsom\u2019s refusal to cooperate with ICE, Homan stated, “If he had an ounce of integrity, he would be calling President Trump and thanking him for making LA safer.”<\/p>\n
The implication of this statement is clear: Homan believes that the policies under the Trump administration, which focused heavily on enforcing immigration laws and removing criminal immigrants from the streets, have contributed significantly to public safety in California.<\/p>\n
Homan\u2019s comments went further, as he pointed out that Newsom should be thankful for the efforts of ICE, who have arrested thousands of criminal individuals in California, many of whom he claims were public safety threats.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe\u2019d be calling the head of ICE and thanking them for the thousands of criminals, public safety threats they\u2019ve taken off the streets of California,\u201d Homan said, emphasizing the role that ICE has played in addressing criminal activity linked to illegal immigration.<\/p>\n
According to Homan, Newsom\u2019s refusal to work with federal authorities and acknowledge the impact of their actions could be seen as a lack of leadership and responsibility.<\/p>\n
“If the data proves it, anybody can look at the data who we\u2019ve arrested in California, he ought to be thanking us,” Homan stated.<\/p>\n
For Homan, the data is clear: federal immigration enforcement is a key player in reducing crime and protecting communities in California, and Newsom\u2019s rejection of this cooperation could jeopardize the safety of residents in the state.<\/p>\n
The former ICE director also noted that Newsom should be holding himself accountable to the people of California by prioritizing their safety over political allegiances.<\/p>\n
Homan\u2019s words were a direct challenge to the governor\u2019s approach, suggesting that by refusing to engage with federal authorities, Newsom was putting his own political agenda ahead of the safety and well-being of his constituents.<\/p>\n
In his statement, Homan did not shy away from drawing a comparison between the approach of the Trump administration and Newsom\u2019s stance on immigration.<\/p>\n
He referred to the policies under President Trump, which focused on stricter immigration enforcement and the removal of criminal immigrants, as essential in making cities like Los Angeles safer.<\/p>\n
Homan\u2019s point was that Newsom\u2019s refusal to cooperate with ICE and DHS undermines the effectiveness of these policies and, by extension, puts the safety of California residents at risk.<\/p>\n
Furthermore, Homan singled out South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, a Republican, who has been a staunch supporter of federal immigration enforcement.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe\u2019d be calling Secretary Noem, thanking her,\u201d Homan said, referencing Noem\u2019s support for the Trump administration\u2019s immigration policies and her ongoing advocacy for stronger border enforcement.<\/p>\n
Homan\u2019s inclusion of Noem in his remarks highlighted the contrast between the leadership styles of Newsom and other Republican governors, who he argues are more aligned with the priorities of federal immigration enforcement.<\/p>\n
At the heart of the dispute between Homan and Newsom lies the broader debate over the role of state and local governments in federal immigration enforcement.<\/p>\n
California, under Newsom\u2019s leadership, has been a major proponent of sanctuary policies, which limit local law enforcement’s cooperation with federal immigration authorities.<\/p>\n
These policies are designed to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation and provide them with certain protections under state law.<\/p>\n
Critics of sanctuary policies, like Homan, argue that these measures embolden criminals and undermine public safety by preventing federal agencies like ICE from doing their job.<\/p>\n
Homan and others contend that when local governments refuse to cooperate with ICE, they essentially allow dangerous criminals to remain in communities, potentially putting law-abiding citizens at risk.<\/p>\n
On the other side of the debate, supporters of sanctuary policies argue that they are essential for building trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement.<\/p>\n
By limiting cooperation with ICE, they believe that immigrants, especially those who are undocumented, will be more likely to report crimes, cooperate with law enforcement, and seek assistance without the fear of deportation.<\/p>\n
These advocates emphasize the importance of treating immigrants fairly and humanely, regardless of their legal status, and argue that working with ICE creates fear and distrust within immigrant communities.<\/p>\n
Newsom\u2019s stance has garnered both support and criticism. Many of his Democratic supporters applaud his commitment to protecting immigrant rights, viewing sanctuary policies as a vital safeguard for vulnerable communities.<\/p>\n
However, critics, including Homan, argue that Newsom\u2019s approach is misguided and dangerous, as it limits the ability of federal immigration authorities to remove criminal immigrants from the streets and prevent further harm to the public.<\/p>\n
While Newsom has not directly responded to Homan\u2019s latest remarks, the former ICE director\u2019s comments seem to indicate a growing frustration with the governor\u2019s refusal to work with federal authorities.<\/p>\n
Homan, who has long been a vocal advocate for tougher immigration enforcement, made it clear that he would continue to hold Newsom and other politicians who oppose federal immigration policies accountable for the consequences of their decisions.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re gonna be in LA today, we\u2019re gonna be in LA tomorrow, we\u2019re gonna be in every California city. We\u2019ll be in San Diego, I was in San Diego,\u201d Homan said, signaling his intent to continue raising awareness about the impact of sanctuary policies and the importance of federal cooperation with local law enforcement.<\/p>\n
His words suggest that he and other members of the pro-enforcement community will be ramping up their efforts in California, focusing on both public education and direct action in cities across the state.<\/p>\n
In the meantime, Newsom is likely to continue defending his policies, arguing that protecting immigrants, particularly undocumented ones, is an essential part of California\u2019s values and commitment to fairness.<\/p>\n
The political standoff between Newsom and Homan underscores the ongoing ideological divide in the United States over how best to handle immigration, crime, and law enforcement.<\/p>\n
The clash between Homan and Newsom reflects the broader national divide over immigration policy, which remains one of the most contentious issues in U.S. politics.<\/p>\n
On one side are those who advocate for strict enforcement of immigration laws and believe that sanctuary policies endanger public safety. On the other side are those who emphasize the need for comprehensive immigration reform that treats undocumented immigrants with dignity and provides them with opportunities to live and work legally in the U.S.<\/p>\n
As the debate continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether Homan\u2019s outspoken criticism will have any effect on Newsom\u2019s stance or if the governor will remain committed to his sanctuary policies.<\/p>\n
What is clear, however, is that the issue of immigration will continue to shape political discourse in California and across the country for the foreseeable future.<\/p>\n
In conclusion, Tom Homan\u2019s callout of Gavin Newsom highlights the deep divisions within the U.S. on immigration policy and the role of local governments in enforcing federal laws.<\/p>\n
As both sides prepare for an ongoing battle over immigration reform, the safety of communities and the protection of immigrant rights remain at the forefront of the national conversation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The White House on Wednesday denounced Democrats for what it called a \u201cselective and bad-faith\u201d release of Jeffrey Epstein documents after emails surfaced showing celebrity biographer Michael Wolff privately advised Epstein to…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":19777,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19778","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-breaking-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19778","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19778"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19778\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/19777"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}