{"id":20124,"date":"2025-11-24T09:00:58","date_gmt":"2025-11-24T09:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/12-ashley-biden-files-for-divorce-from-husband-after-13-years\/"},"modified":"2025-11-24T09:00:58","modified_gmt":"2025-11-24T09:00:58","slug":"12-ashley-biden-files-for-divorce-from-husband-after-13-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/?p=20124","title":{"rendered":"12.Ashley Biden Files For Divorce From Husband After 13 Years"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Screenshot_21-1-5.png\" alt=\"12.Ashley Biden Files For Divorce From Husband After 13 Years\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width:100%; height:auto;\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Ashley Biden, the daughter of former President Joe Biden, has filed for divorce from her plastic surgeon husband, Dr. Howard Krein, after over 13 years of marriage, according to court records.<\/p>\n<p>The 44-year-old ex-first daughter filed the paperwork in Philadelphia\u2019s Court of Common Pleas on Monday, according to The Post.<\/p>\n<p>Biden\u2019s Instagram post on the same day showed a photo of her walking through a park and flashing a thumbs up, set to the tune \u201cFreedom\u201d by Beyonc\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>She also posted a quote that read, \u201cNew life, new beginnings, means new boundaries. New ways of being that won\u2019t look or sound like they did before.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The cause of the separation was not immediately obvious. Divorce records are not made public in Philadelphia. Two years after her late older brother, Beau Biden, introduced them, Biden and Krein tied the knot in Greenville, Delaware, in June 2012.<\/p>\n<p>Ashley acknowledged her wedding on the national stage while presenting her father at the Democratic National Convention last year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAt the time, my dad was vice president, but he was also that dad who literally set up the entire reception. He was riding around in his John Deere 4-wheeler, fixing the place settings, arranging the plants, and by the way, he was very emotional,\u201d she told the crowd.<\/p>\n<p>Joe Biden himself is also facing brutal news this week.<\/p>\n<p>House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer says his investigation into Joe Biden\u2019s mental decline could be used to challenge some of the former president\u2019s pardons and executive orders, arguing staff have failed to prove Biden knew what he was signing in his final months in office.<\/p>\n<p>The Kentucky Republican\u00a0told\u00a0\u201cJust the News\u201d that Biden\u2019s frequent use of the autopen raises serious legal concerns.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s questionable whether or not it\u2019s legal to use an autopen on a legal document, but what\u2019s not questionable is if the President of the United States had no idea what was being signed with using the autopen in his name,\u201d Comer said. \u201cThen, you know, that\u2019s not legal. We could see criminal charges against some.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Comer said his committee\u2019s evidence could also be used to call into question some of Biden\u2019s clemency acts, noting that the president\u2019s poor summer 2024 debate performance \u201cgave rise to questions about his mental capacity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Biden dropped out of the race one month later and endorsed Kamala Harris.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think at the end of the day, our investigation \u2026 could be used as evidence in trying to overturn some of those pardons and some of the executive orders, because the autopen was used so frequently \u2026 after that debate,\u201d Comer said.<\/p>\n<p>Former Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz told\u00a0Just the News\u00a0in March that such challenges would \u201cend up in court.\u201d He explained there would be two main issues: \u201cOne, the nature of what was signed \u2013 was it a pardon, or was it a bill from Congress, for example. And second, the nature of the autopen.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Dershowitz said the Constitution states of bills: \u201c\u2018If he approves, he shall sign it.\u2019 So it says, \u2018sign it.\u2019 Sign it. So an autopen would raise a real problem if he signed it by autopen, which is not a real signature.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On pardons, he said, \u201cit will still raise the issue: Did he actually pardon? Or did somebody else just write the signature without really getting approval from President Biden?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Biden\u2019s first debate of the 2024 campaign season was described as \u201chalting\u201d and \u201cdisoriented,\u201d with former Obama adviser David Axelrod saying, \u201cI think there was a sense of shock actually, how he came out at the beginning of this debate\u2026 I think the panic had set in.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Republicans had long questioned Biden\u2019s mental capacity.<\/p>\n<p>Special Counsel Robert Hur\u2019s February 2025 report on Biden\u2019s handling of classified documents noted he \u201cwould likely present himself\u2026 as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.\u201d Hur said Biden could not recall the years he was vice president or the year his son Beau died.<\/p>\n<p>Last month, Biden defended his decisions regarding pardons to The New York Times, stating, \u201cI made every decision\u201d on pardons; however, aides confirmed that he \u201cdid not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rep. LaMonica McIver appeared in federal court Tuesday as she continued to fight a three-count indictment accusing her of impeding and interfering with federal officers at a Newark, New Jersey, ICE detention facility in May.<\/p>\n<p>Her attorneys argued she is being selectively and vindictively prosecuted because her political views clash with the Trump administration, CNN\u00a0reported.<\/p>\n<p>Judge Jamel Semper did not rule on McIver\u2019s motion to dismiss the charges but raised concerns about Department of Homeland Security statements online referencing the incident.<\/p>\n<p>The judge said it was prejudicial for \u201cfact-free\u201d social media posts from government officials to remain public while McIver\u2019s case is pending, warning they could taint a future jury pool.<\/p>\n<p>Semper noted that some government posts included information \u201ccounter to the indictment,\u201d such as claims that McIver trespassed and that the incident was tied to Antifa activity.<\/p>\n<p>Prosecutor Mark McCarren told the court that DHS press releases about the incident have already been removed and said he would push to have the remaining social media posts taken down.<\/p>\n<p>One post still visible on the official DHS X account suggested members of Congress \u201cstormed\u201d the facility gate.<\/p>\n<p>McIver, who was indicted in June, faces charges connected to what prosecutors describe as an attempt to physically interfere with the arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka outside the facility.<\/p>\n<p>At the time, McIver was visiting the ICE site with Democratic Reps. Rob Menendez and Bonnie Watson Coleman for an oversight inspection as part of her work on the House Homeland Security Committee.<\/p>\n<p>Defense attorneys said ICE employees delayed access to the lawmakers and obstructed their oversight visit.<\/p>\n<p>Officials removed Baraka from the facility when he tried to join the group, and he was later arrested outside for trespassing alongside protesters. The charge was later dropped.<\/p>\n<p>Prosecutors allege McIver \u201cslammed\u201d her forearm into an ICE agent and grabbed him in an attempt to restrain him while also striking another officer as she returned inside the secure area.<\/p>\n<p>They said they plan to rely on surveillance and body camera footage showing a scuffle lasting just over a minute if the trial proceeds as scheduled on November 10.<\/p>\n<p>McIver\u2019s attorney, Paul Fishman, argued that any actions she took were covered by the Constitution\u2019s Speech or Debate Clause because she was performing official legislative duties.<\/p>\n<p>Judge Semper questioned whether an alleged assault outside the facility gate could be considered part of congressional business.<\/p>\n<p>McIver\u2019s defense team described the prosecution as retaliatory and politically motivated, calling it \u201cpart of a broader partisan agenda of ending \u2018wokeness.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p>President Donald Trump has previously commented on the case, saying the \u201cdays of woke are over.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Fishman said McIver\u2019s case stands in contrast to Trump\u2019s past pardons of individuals charged in the January 6 Capitol riot.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cShe was charged with something she never would\u2019ve been charged with if she was a Republican,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Semper challenged the defense on that point, noting that the other Democratic lawmakers present during the May 9 incident were not charged.<\/p>\n<p>Fishman said McIver was shoved by an ICE agent and caught in a confrontation she did not start.<\/p>\n<p>McIver expressed concern on X, saying she has heard prosecutors suggest she could face up to 17 years in prison.\u201cHearing prosecutors say I could get 17 years in jail for showing up to do my job, for protecting the people that I represent, who have elected me to protect them\u2014it is stressful,\u201d she wrote. \u201cSome nights are sleepless, but we have to stand up for each other.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>War Secretary Pete Hegseth delivered a fiery address to America\u2019s top generals, declaring a new era for the U.S. military\u2014one centered on strength, discipline, and victory, not political correctness.<\/p>\n<p>He made it clear that the Pentagon\u2019s days of indulging in woke policies, diversity mandates, and lowered standards are over.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFrom this moment forward, the only mission of the newly restored Department of War is this: warfighting, preparing for war, and preparing to win, unrelenting and uncompromising in that pursuit,\u201d Hegseth declared.<\/p>\n<p>The speech, delivered to senior officers at Marine Corps Base Quantico, was a direct rebuke of decades of policies that emphasized diversity and inclusion over military readiness.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon \u2026 It\u2019s a bad look, and it\u2019s not who we are!\u201d Hegseth said, receiving loud applause from the assembled brass.<\/p>\n<p>He outlined a set of sweeping reforms that would apply across every branch of the armed forces. Physical standards will be uniform, gender-neutral, and uncompromising.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cStandards must be uniform, gender neutral, and high \u2014 if not, they\u2019re not standards,\u201d he told the audience.<\/p>\n<p>From now on, every service member will take a physical fitness test twice a year, and daily physical training will be mandatory.<\/p>\n<p>Hegseth made clear that this training would not be \u201clight stretching or hot yoga\u201d but \u201creal hard PT\u201d designed to sharpen warriors for combat.<\/p>\n<p>He blasted the weakening of the armed forces through the rise of DEI requirements, identity politics, and what he described as \u201cgender delusion.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo more identity months, DEI offices, dudes in dresses, no more climate change worship, no more division, distraction or gender delusion, no more debris \u2026 we are done with that s-,\u201d Hegseth thundered.<\/p>\n<p>The War Secretary also emphasized discipline and grooming standards. \u201cNo more beards, long hair, superficial individual expression \u2026 We don\u2019t have a military full of Nordic pagans,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>In his speech, Hegseth explained that his mission is to restore the warrior ethos that made the U.S. military the most powerful fighting force in the world.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFrankly, it\u2019s tiring to look out at combat formations \u2026 and see fat troops. Likewise, it\u2019s completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>He stressed that America\u2019s enemies are watching, and weakness in appearance and standards only emboldens them.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe have a sacred duty to ensure that our warriors are led by the most capable and qualified combat leaders \u2026 In many ways, this speech is about fixing decades of decay, some of it obvious, some of it hidden,\u201d Hegseth warned.<\/p>\n<p>The War Secretary also confirmed that he has already removed senior officers who had been promoted under the old DEI system.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe have already fired a number of senior officers \u2026 the previous chairman \u2026 other members of the Joint Chiefs \u2026 combatant commanders,\u201d he stated.<\/p>\n<p>Hegseth explained his philosophy of leadership, telling generals to trust their instincts and prioritize combat readiness.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen in doubt, assess the situation, follow your gut \u2026 make a change,\u201d he advised.<\/p>\n<p>For Hegseth, these reforms are not optional. He said that those who cannot meet the new standards should step aside.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf women \u2014 and weak men \u2014 don\u2019t make the grade, so be it,\u201d he declared.<\/p>\n<p>And in perhaps the most striking line of his address, Hegseth warned: \u201cIf the words I\u2019m speaking today are making your heart sink, then you should do the honorable thing and resign.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>His vision is clear: a fighting force stripped of woke distractions, lean, lethal, and focused on warfighting.<\/p>\n<p>As Hegseth concluded, he left no room for doubt. \u201cWe are done with that sh-,\u201d he said again, this time to thunderous applause from the generals who will now be tasked with carrying out his orders.<\/p>\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color has-large-font-size wp-elements-891a9f5b1fe7c016aee74e3fc2657c57\">BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.<\/p>\n<p>This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.<\/p>\n<p>Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.<\/p>\n<p>According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals\u2019 involvement in Epstein\u2019s criminal network.<\/p>\n<p>She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEven if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,\u201d Luna told Fox News. \u201cWe have been more than patient.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein\u2019s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.<\/p>\n<p>Luna\u2019s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.<\/p>\n<p>The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ\u2019s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,\u201d Luna said. \u201cThis is corruption at the highest level.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. \u201cHad this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,\u201d one conservative commentator noted.<\/p>\n<p>For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America\u2019s elite circles. The financier\u2019s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.<\/p>\n<p>Now, Luna\u2019s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals\u2014politicians, celebrities, and global financiers\u2014who participated in or enabled Epstein\u2019s crimes.<\/p>\n<p>In this context, Luna\u2019s SHRED Act isn\u2019t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.<\/p>\n<p>Despite Luna\u2019s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ\u2019s handling of Epstein evidence.<\/p>\n<p>Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.<\/p>\n<p>This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.<\/p>\n<p>Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ\u2019s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.<\/p>\n<p>The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna\u2019s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.<\/p>\n<p class=\"has-x-large-font-size\">BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking from his post as one of President Trump\u2019s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is a live federal investigation. We\u2019ve asked ICE to take immediate action,\u201d Homan said during a televised interview.<\/p>\n<p>The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC\u2019s office.<\/p>\n<p>According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.<\/p>\n<p>Homan stressed that AOC\u2019s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There\u2019s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,\u201d he stated.<\/p>\n<p>Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.<\/p>\n<p>AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as \u201cracist\u201d and \u201coppressors.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that\u2019s a clear violation of federal law,\u201d Homan declared.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ashley Biden, the daughter of former President Joe Biden, has filed for divorce from her plastic surgeon husband, Dr. Howard Krein, after over 13 years of marriage, according to court records. The&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":20123,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20124","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-breaking-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20124"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20124\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/20123"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}