{"id":20417,"date":"2025-11-25T04:03:23","date_gmt":"2025-11-25T04:03:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/38-breaking-fbi-reveals-new-information-on-trump-assassin-thomas-crooks\/"},"modified":"2025-11-25T04:03:23","modified_gmt":"2025-11-25T04:03:23","slug":"38-breaking-fbi-reveals-new-information-on-trump-assassin-thomas-crooks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/?p=20417","title":{"rendered":"38.BREAKING: FBI Reveals New Information on Trump Assassin, Thomas Crooks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-37.png\" alt=\"38.BREAKING: FBI Reveals New Information on Trump Assassin, Thomas Crooks\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width:100%; height:auto;\" \/><\/p>\n<p>As investigators dig into the background of Thomas Matthew Crooks, the shooter responsible for the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, shocking details have emerged that paint a disturbing picture of radical identity obsession, online extremism, and cultural decay.<\/p>\n<p>New reports confirm that Crooks identified as non-binary and used \u201cthey\/them\u201d pronouns. Even more unsettling is his long-documented fascination with \u201cfurry\u201d culture, an online subculture that blends animal identities with cartoonish sexuality and fantasy role-play.<\/p>\n<p>According to the New York Post, Crooks maintained multiple DeviantArt accounts featuring explicit furry-themed artwork, some with violent or fetishistic overtones. Friends and acquaintances noted his immersion in the subculture, which he appeared to treat as an alternate identity.<\/p>\n<p>Sources also revealed that Crooks expressed admiration for extremist ideologies and often posted disturbing messages online. This included fantasies of violence and revenge.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHe was mentally unwell, and nobody did anything,\u201d said one former classmate. \u201cBut the school didn\u2019t want to deal with it. They were afraid of being called transphobic.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This cultural rot is what happens when society abandons traditional values and embraces identity politics above all else. Instead of addressing mental illness or destructive behavior, educators and peers were pressured to \u201caffirm\u201d Crooks\u2019 every whim.<\/p>\n<p>The left\u2019s obsession with gender identity and fringe subcultures allowed Crooks to spiral further into alienation. His embrace of furry culture\u2014a world often associated with sexual deviance and online radicalization\u2014was ignored.<\/p>\n<p>Investigators are now combing through years of Crooks\u2019 internet history. Initial findings suggest he was involved in multiple anonymous forums that glorified violence and mocked conservative figures.<\/p>\n<p>This wasn\u2019t just a troubled teen. It was a person allowed to stew in online poison, shielded by political correctness and cultural permissiveness.<\/p>\n<p>Crooks\u2019 ties to furry content and gender identity politics don\u2019t just raise questions about his motives\u2014they expose a deeper rot in today\u2019s youth culture.<\/p>\n<p>Conservatives have long warned about the dangers of unchecked identity obsession, where young people are encouraged to adopt fluid personas rather than stable values.<\/p>\n<p>Mental health professionals who prioritize ideological affirmations over medical evaluations are complicit in tragedies like this. Crooks should have been evaluated, monitored, and treated. Instead, he was celebrated for his \u201cbravery.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The media\u2019s silence on Crooks\u2019 identity issues speaks volumes. If this were a conservative-leaning shooter, headlines would be dominated by ideological outrage. But because the facts cut against the progressive narrative, they are being buried.<\/p>\n<p>Social media platforms, where Crooks posted much of his disturbing content, have yet to be held accountable. Despite flagging political posts by conservatives, they allowed Crooks to marinate in delusion unchecked.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe warning signs were there,\u201d said Rep. Paul Gosar. \u201cBut the system was too scared to act.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s now growing pressure on law enforcement to explain how Crooks, despite these glaring red flags, managed to get within shooting distance of a presidential candidate.<\/p>\n<p>Was it gross negligence? Or was it yet another example of the federal security apparatus failing to prioritize threats that don\u2019t align with left-wing hysteria?<\/p>\n<p>The shooter\u2019s social alienation, fueled by radical internet culture and affirmed by a woke society, offers a grim warning. This is what happens when reality is surrendered to fantasy.<\/p>\n<p>Conservative leaders are calling for urgent cultural reform. That includes removing gender ideology from schools, defunding programs that promote radical identity politics, and restoring moral clarity in youth education.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe need to stop teaching kids to hate themselves and their country,\u201d said Vice President J.D. Vance. \u201cWe need to start teaching discipline, respect, and patriotism.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color has-large-font-size wp-elements-891a9f5b1fe7c016aee74e3fc2657c57\">BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.<\/p>\n<p>This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.<\/p>\n<p>Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.<\/p>\n<p>According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals\u2019 involvement in Epstein\u2019s criminal network.<\/p>\n<p>She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEven if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,\u201d Luna told Fox News. \u201cWe have been more than patient.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein\u2019s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.<\/p>\n<p>Luna\u2019s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.<\/p>\n<p>The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ\u2019s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,\u201d Luna said. \u201cThis is corruption at the highest level.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. \u201cHad this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,\u201d one conservative commentator noted.<\/p>\n<p>For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America\u2019s elite circles. The financier\u2019s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.<\/p>\n<p>Now, Luna\u2019s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals\u2014politicians, celebrities, and global financiers\u2014who participated in or enabled Epstein\u2019s crimes.<\/p>\n<p>In this context, Luna\u2019s SHRED Act isn\u2019t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.<\/p>\n<p>Despite Luna\u2019s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ\u2019s handling of Epstein evidence.<\/p>\n<p>Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.<\/p>\n<p>This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.<\/p>\n<p>Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ\u2019s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.<\/p>\n<p>The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna\u2019s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.<\/p>\n<p class=\"has-x-large-font-size\">BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking from his post as one of President Trump\u2019s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is a live federal investigation. We\u2019ve asked ICE to take immediate action,\u201d Homan said during a televised interview.<\/p>\n<p>The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC\u2019s office.<\/p>\n<p>According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.<\/p>\n<p>Homan stressed that AOC\u2019s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There\u2019s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,\u201d he stated.<\/p>\n<p>Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.<\/p>\n<p>AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as \u201cracist\u201d and \u201coppressors.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that\u2019s a clear violation of federal law,\u201d Homan declared.<\/p>\n<p>Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.<\/p>\n<p>Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.<\/p>\n<p>House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn\u2019t apply to them,\u201d said Rep. Andy Biggs.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.<\/p>\n<p>But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.<\/p>\n<p>APPLAUSE ERUPTS as Sen. Hawley BLASTS Woke Military Rules!, \u201cHOW DOES BANNING HE\/SHE WIN A WAR??\u201dAPPLAUSE ERUPTS as Sen. Hawley BLASTS Woke Military Rules: \u201cHow Does Banning He\/She Win A War??\u201d<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"2\">A U.S. Senate hearing quickly turned into a high-octane confrontation after Senator\u00a0<strong>Josh Hawley<\/strong>\u00a0(R-MO) called out senior military leaders for two critical failures: the persistent neglect of substandard military family housing, and the bizarre emergence of localized \u201cwoke\u201d policies attempting to ban common pronouns and descriptors within the Air Force.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"3\">Hawley, refusing to accept vague assurances, exposed a critical disconnect between the military\u2019s stated commitment to soldier welfare and the frustrating reality faced by families at bases like Fort Leonard Wood. He then zeroed in on a controversial email directive from an Air Force base, challenging the military to explain how such policies contribute to\u00a0<strong>lethality<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0<strong>recruiting<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"4\">The hearing served as a raw demonstration of a lawmaker prioritizing combat readiness and family safety over bureaucratic excuses and politically motivated language policing.<\/p>\n<p>I. The Scandal of Substandard Housing: Fort Leonard Wood\u2019s Failure<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"7\">Senator Hawley began the hearing by directly confronting the Army\u2019s representative, addressing the dire situation regarding aging homes at\u00a0<strong>Fort Leonard Wood<\/strong>\u00a0in his home state of Missouri. Hawley\u2019s questioning was based not on reports, but on personal observation.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"8\">\u201cI was just there a few weeks ago. I toured the homes myself. I spoke to residents. I spoke to spouses. I spoke to children who lived in the homes.\u00a0<strong>These homes need to be replaced,<\/strong>\u201d Hawley stated.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"9\">His concern was amplified by the Army\u2019s lack of a concrete plan. He pressed the General on how the\u00a0<strong>\u201clack of availability of quality military housing\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0affects recruiting and retention.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"10\">The General responded with vague assurances of a\u00a0<strong>\u201cwhole package\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0investment covering housing, daycare centers, and spousal employment.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"11\">Hawley immediately pushed back on the ambiguity: \u201c<strong>Well, you say a whole package. When will we be seeing this package?<\/strong>\u201c<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"12\">The General could only offer to \u201ctake that question for the record.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The \u201cRoyal Pain\u201d Pledge<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"14\">Hawley\u2019s frustration boiled over, citing a pattern of broken promises from the Army leadership.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"15,0\">\u201cI think we\u2019re past the point of continuing to kick this down the road. Frankly, at Fort Leonard Wood, it was a problem a decade ago\u2026 I\u2019ve been in their houses. I\u2019ve been in their kitchens. I\u2019ve looked at their bathrooms where there\u2019s mold growing. I\u2019ve seen the substandard living conditions.\u00a0<strong>And it just isn\u2019t acceptable.<\/strong>\u201c<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"16\">Hawley then delivered a powerful statement to the military leadership:\u00a0<strong>\u201cI promise those service members that I\u2019d be a royal pain in the [you know what] until something changed. So, I\u2019m keeping that commitment.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"17\">He highlighted a specific instance of bureaucratic failure: \u201cI don\u2019t want to see are any more commitments from the army that they\u2019re going to spend x number of dollars\u2026 We\u2019re going to commit x number of dollars to Fort Leonard Wood, and then, as it turns out,\u00a0<strong>zero dollars were spent on housing.<\/strong>\u00a0I\u2019m still ticked off about that, and I don\u2019t want to see it happen again.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>II. The Pronoun Controversy: Banning \u201cHe\/She\u201d for Lethality<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"20\">The hearing took a sharp turn when Hawley pivoted to a reported controversy involving the Air Force\u2019s\u00a0<strong>Anderson Air Force Base<\/strong>\u00a0in Guam. He asked the General about an email that reportedly instructed leaders to prohibit the use of pronouns and descriptors.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"21\">Hawley read from a news report detailing the directive: \u201cLeaders of the base are instructed\u00a0<strong>do not use pronouns, age, race, etc.<\/strong>\u2026 The unauthorized examples of unauthorized language are\u00a0<strong>male, female, youngest, oldest, he, she.<\/strong>\u201c<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"22\">Hawley\u2019s core question challenged the policy\u2019s efficacy:\u00a0<strong>\u201cWhy is that? I mean, what what what\u2019s going on?\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Air Force Walk-Back<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"24\">The Air Force General immediately sought to minimize the report, claiming it was not official service policy.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"25\">\u201cThat is\u2026 an email from my understanding that went out locally from one of the commanders there,\u201d the General explained. \u201cIt is\u00a0<strong>not the Air Force policy to not use pronouns.<\/strong>\u00a0And so I think it was a social media\u2026 kurfuffle.\u201d<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"26\">Hawley accepted the clarification but highlighted the absurdity of the commander\u2019s logic.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"27\">\u201cI asked because part of the way it\u2019s been reported is that the rationale\u2026 is to help with\u00a0<strong>lethality<\/strong>\u00a0and also\u00a0<strong>recruiting<\/strong>,\u201d Hawley noted, his voice sharp with disbelief. He then delivered the line that drew significant attention:<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"28,0\"><strong>\u201cI just it was curious as heck how how not using he she can help with lethality and how it\u2019s helping with recruiting.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"29\">The General could only confirm that the policy was \u201cnot an official policy from the Department of the Air Force.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>III. A Dangerous Mindset Problem<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"32\">The confrontation exposed two distinct, competing priorities within the U.S. military command structure:<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"33,0,0\"><strong>Hawley\u2019s Focus:<\/strong>\u00a0Centered entirely on foundational issues of\u00a0<strong>military readiness, combat effectiveness, and family welfare<\/strong>\u00a0(e.g., stopping mold in kitchens, ensuring housing is not substandard).<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"33,1,0\"><strong>The Local Command\u2019s Focus:<\/strong>\u00a0Distracted by esoteric, non-military policies concerning language and social issues, driven by a belief that banning pronouns somehow aids in the core mission of warfighting and recruitment.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"34\">Critics argued that even if the pronoun ban was only a local email, the underlying mindset is dangerous. While global adversaries prepare for conflict and invest heavily in technology, a commander in the U.S. military thought language policing was a priority for improving combat strength.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"35\">The hearing ultimately reinforced Senator Hawley\u2019s commitment to addressing tangible problems affecting service members, demanding\u00a0<strong>results, not speeches<\/strong>\u00a0or \u201cfancy language.\u201d His voice was the most focused in the room on protecting the nation through common sense and military readiness, free from politically distracting internal debates.<\/p>\n<p>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As investigators dig into the background of Thomas Matthew Crooks, the shooter responsible for the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, shocking details have emerged that paint a disturbing picture of radical identity&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":20416,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-breaking-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20417"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20417\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/20416"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}