![\"LL.REPORT:](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Screenshot_370-4.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
New disclosures from the government\u2019s \u201cCrossfire Hurricane\u201d investigation into the 2016 election, otherwise known as alleged \u201cTrump-Russia collusion,\u201d have revealed a stunning admission from top Obama-era officials.<\/p>\n
A newly declassified memo, released Friday by Director of Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, shows that U.S. intelligence officials concluded Russia did not play a significant role in Donald Trump\u2019s victory over Hillary Clinton.<\/p>\n
Paul Sperry, a senior reporter for Real Clear Investigations, took to X to report that sources informed him that there are damning text messages and emails showing coordination between the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton\u2019s 2016 campaign aides.<\/p>\n
In an escalating political battle, President Donald Trump on Thursday formally joined the chorus of Republican lawmakers calling for the expulsion of U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) from Congress.<\/p>\n
His remarks followed a storm of controversy triggered by an interview Omar gave to far-left commentator Mehdi Hasan, in which she appeared to defend the assassination of conservative figure Charlie Kirk.<\/p>\n
In the interview, Omar described Kirk as a radical, suggesting that his inflammatory rhetoric may have contributed to the violent act. Omar’s comments were perceived by many as an endorsement of violence, or at the very least, a downplaying of the severity of the tragedy.<\/p>\n
The interview has sparked widespread condemnation from Republicans, who now say that Omar\u2019s actions warrant expulsion from Congress, while Democrats are rallying to her defense, citing her right to free speech and the controversial nature of the political debate at hand.<\/p>\n
Omar\u2019s appearance on Hasan\u2019s show, which aired on the far-left network MSNBC, quickly became a lightning rod for criticism. During the conversation, Omar pointed to Kirk\u2019s history of inflammatory remarks, including comments made about school shootings and racial justice.<\/p>\n
She said, \u201cBut what I do know for sure is that Charlie Kirk was someone who once said, \u2018Guns save lives\u2019 after a school shooting.\u201d She also referenced Kirk\u2019s downplaying of George Floyd\u2019s murder by Minneapolis police, as well as his dismissive stance on slavery and Juneteenth, a holiday commemorating the emancipation of enslaved people in the U.S.<\/p>\n
Omar\u2019s comments, however, were widely criticized for taking Kirk\u2019s words out of context. She claimed Kirk had belittled important civil rights issues, but critics argued that her characterization was misleading and unfairly distorted Kirk\u2019s views.<\/p>\n
At one point during the interview, Omar disagreed with Hasan\u2019s characterization of Kirk as merely someone seeking \u201ca civil debate.\u201d Omar dismissed this idea as \u201ca complete rewriting of history,\u201d adding, \u201cYeah, there\u2019s nothing more effed up than to completely pretend that his words and actions have not been recorded and in existence for the last decade or so.\u201d<\/p>\n
For many on the right, these words were seen as an endorsement of violence. They pointed out that Omar had effectively demonized Kirk in such a way that it was easy to see why a radical might target him.<\/p>\n
Omar’s lack of clear condemnation for the assassination, combined with her incendiary comments about Kirk\u2019s views, set off a wave of criticism from conservatives.<\/p>\n
President Trump wasted no time in weighing in on the matter. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump condemned Omar’s comments and called for her immediate expulsion from Congress.<\/p>\n
\u201cI think she should be impeached. I think she\u2019s terrible,\u201d Trump declared. \u201cIs she originally from Somalia? So how are they doing it? How\u2019s their government? Do they have a president? Do they have a council? Do they have anything? Do they have police?\u201d<\/p>\n
Trump went on to criticize Omar\u2019s background, citing her Somali origins as evidence of her supposed unfitness to influence U.S. policy. \u201cI love these people that come from a place with nothing, nothing, no anything, and then they tell us how to run our country,\u201d Trump remarked, doubling down on his belief that Omar\u2019s immigrant background made her ill-suited to offer advice on American governance.<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s remarks were swiftly amplified on social media, particularly through his Truth Social platform. There, he once again lashed out at Omar\u2019s home country, Somalia, highlighting its ongoing struggles with terrorism, poverty, and political instability. In a post, Trump wrote:\u201cIlhan Omar\u2019s Country of Somalia is plagued by a lack of central Government control, persistent Poverty, Hunger, Resurgent Terrorism, Piracy, decades of Civil War, Corruption, and pervasive Violence.<\/p>\n
70% of the population lives in extreme Poverty, and widespread Food Insecurity. Somalia is consistently ranked among the World\u2019s Most Corrupt Countries, including Bribery, Embezzlement, and a Dysfunctional Government.\u201d<\/p>\n
Trump’s use of Omar\u2019s background in his critique drew backlash from her supporters, who accused him of xenophobia and racism.<\/p>\n
For many Democrats, this line of attack was nothing more than a distraction from the real issues at hand\u2014namely, Omar\u2019s comments about Kirk and the role of inflammatory rhetoric in fueling violence.<\/p>\n
Trump, however, was undeterred in his criticism, reinforcing his claim that Omar was unqualified to serve in Congress because of her immigrant status.<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s calls for Omar\u2019s removal from Congress reflect a broader Republican push to expel the Minnesota congresswoman over her controversial remarks.<\/p>\n
Republican lawmakers have expressed growing frustration with Omar\u2019s vocal progressive views, especially her criticism of U.S. foreign policy, her stance on Israel, and her outspoken remarks on racial justice.<\/p>\n
For Republicans, the issue at hand is not just Omar\u2019s recent interview, but a broader pattern of behavior they view as radical and un-American. Many Republican lawmakers argue that Omar\u2019s rhetoric, especially on social media, has consistently crossed the line from political discourse into incitement, and that her actions have endangered national security and the safety of U.S. citizens.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe cannot allow a member of Congress to openly defend or justify the murder of a fellow American citizen,\u201d said Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), who has been a vocal critic of Omar for years. \u201cThis isn\u2019t just about free speech, it\u2019s about accountability. She should be expelled immediately.\u201d<\/p>\n
Some Republican leaders are now pushing for a formal resolution to expel Omar from the House, following similar efforts in recent years to remove other controversial members.<\/p>\n
While the push to expel Omar is unlikely to gain traction in a Democratic-controlled chamber, it is emblematic of the growing sense of frustration on the right over what they see as a lack of accountability for members of the progressive left.<\/p>\n
On the other side of the aisle, Democrats have rallied behind Omar, with many pointing to her comments as part of a broader political debate about the role of free speech and the dangers of political polarization.<\/p>\n
For Omar\u2019s supporters, the attacks against her are rooted in racism and an attempt to silence marginalized voices in Congress.<\/p>\n
Omar herself has remained defiant, refusing to back down from her earlier comments. In a series of interviews, she argued that her remarks about Kirk were valid criticisms of his extremist views and that she was merely speaking out against the normalization of hate and bigotry in American politics.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is about holding people accountable for their words and actions,\u201d Omar said in an interview following the controversy. \u201cCharlie Kirk is not a victim here. He is someone who has spread dangerous rhetoric that has incited violence and division in our country.\u201d<\/p>\n
Democrats also pointed out the hypocrisy in the GOP\u2019s push to expel Omar, highlighting the fact that several Republican lawmakers have engaged in controversial behavior without facing similar calls for removal.<\/p>\n
They argued that the focus on Omar was a distraction from the real issues facing the country, such as healthcare, climate change, and income inequality.<\/p>\n
The ongoing clash over Omar\u2019s remarks is not just a battle over her fate in Congress, but a larger struggle for the soul of the Democratic Party. The controversy has exposed rifts between moderates and progressives, with some Democrats arguing that Omar\u2019s confrontational style and rhetoric undermine the party\u2019s ability to build a broad coalition.<\/p>\n
At the same time, Omar has become a symbol for progressive activists who see her as a champion for marginalized communities and a voice for the voiceless. Her critics, however, view her as a radical who has no place in mainstream politics.<\/p>\n
For Republicans, the effort to expel Omar is part of a broader strategy to align the party with populist and nationalist sentiments. By pushing for Omar\u2019s removal, they seek to galvanize their base and stoke outrage among voters who feel that the progressive left has taken over American institutions.<\/p>\n
The battle over Omar\u2019s place in Congress is likely to intensify as the 2024 election season approaches. With both sides using her as a political pawn, the stakes could not be higher.<\/p>\n
President Donald Trump\u2019s calls for Ilhan Omar\u2019s expulsion from Congress have sparked a fierce political battle that cuts to the heart of America\u2019s current ideological divide.<\/p>\n
For Trump and many Republicans, Omar\u2019s comments about Charlie Kirk and her broader progressive agenda make her unfit to serve in Congress. For Democrats, Omar is a victim of a coordinated effort to silence her voice and discredit her politics.<\/p>\n
The push to remove Omar is unlikely to succeed in the Democratic-controlled House, but it underscores the growing polarization in American politics and the intensifying battles over free speech, representation, and accountability.<\/p>\n
As the debate rages on, one thing is clear: the fight over Ilhan Omar\u2019s place in Congress is about far more than one individual\u2014it is about the future direction of American politics and the values that will define the country in the years to come.<\/p>\n
New York Attorney General Letitia James was indicted on federal bank fraud charges after prosecutors alleged she lied on a mortgage application to obtain favorable loan terms on a Virginia property she later rented out.<\/p>\n
The indictment, returned by a federal grand jury, centers on a single-family home in Norfolk, Virginia, that James co-purchased in August 2020 for roughly $137,000. Most of the purchase was financed with a $109,600 loan that prohibited the home from being used as a rental or investment property, according to prosecutors.<\/p>\n
By misrepresenting the property as a second home, James received a lower interest rate and saved \u201capproximately $18,933 over the life of the loan,\u201d prosecutors said in a five-page filing.<\/p>\n
Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director William Pulte referred the case to the Department of Justice earlier this year, prompting a criminal probe that led to Thursday\u2019s indictment.<\/p>\n
According to financial disclosure forms reviewed by the\u00a0<\/p>\n
New York Post,\u00a0James repeatedly listed the Norfolk property as an \u201cinvestment\u201d from 2020 through 2023 in filings with the New York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government. In 2024, she changed the classification to \u201creal property,\u201d just weeks after the FHFA referral was made.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe indicted attorney general also estimated the value of the property anywhere between $150,000 and $200,000,\u201d the Post reported.<\/p>\n
Despite the loan\u2019s clear prohibition against rental use, prosecutors allege James used the property as a rental investment and earned thousands of dollars in income that she failed to report on multiple disclosure forms.<\/p>\n
In her 2020 disclosure, James did list an \u201cinvestment real property\u201d in Norfolk that generated between $1,000 and $5,000 in revenue, but it is unclear if that referred to the same home named in the indictment.<\/p>\n
According to prosecutors, James agreed to a \u201cSecond Home Rider\u201d when taking out the loan, which required her to occupy the home as her secondary residence and forbade any rental or shared ownership arrangement.<\/p>\n
\u201cDespite these representations,\u201d the indictment reads, \u201cthe Norfolk property was not occupied or used by James as a secondary residence and was instead used as a rental investment property.\u201d<\/p>\n
Prosecutors also said James made false statements on her homeowners\u2019 insurance application, claiming the home would be \u201cowner occupied,\u201d and on her federal tax filings, where she classified the house as \u201crental real estate\u201d and reported \u201cthousand(s) of dollars in rents received.\u201d<\/p>\n
The federal indictment charges James with two counts: bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution. If convicted on both counts, she faces up to 60 years in prison and fines totaling as much as $2 million.<\/p>\n
The judge presiding over James\u2019 mortgage fraud case on Friday rejected a motion seeking to compel federal prosecutors to maintain a log of all their communications with the media.<\/p>\n
Defense attorney Abbe Lowell had filed the request last week, following James\u2019 arraignment on charges of bank fraud and making false statements. The motion cited a report alleging that U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan exchanged a series of encrypted Signal messages with a reporter regarding the case,\u00a0<\/p>\n
the New York Post reported.<\/p>\n
\u201c[T]he defendant does not demonstrate that it is necessary for the Court to order the government to track communications with the media in any particular form,\u201d wrote US District Judge Jamar Walker in his six-page order.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe defendant\u2019s request that the government be required to keep a communication log is DENIED,\u201d the Biden-appointed judge ruled.<\/p>\n
Walker further wrote that while Halligan\u2019s Signal chat with Lawfare senior editor Anna Bower earlier this month was \u201cunusual,\u201d he nevertheless declined to offer an opinion \u201con whether they were improper in any sense, either legal or ethical.\u201d<\/p>\n
Halligan\u2019s Signal messages to the reporter were configured to automatically disappear after eight hours, The Post reported.<\/p>\n
The judge did not address whether Halligan\u2019s communications \u2014 which reportedly disputed a New York Times story revealing that James\u2019 grandniece told a grand jury she had never paid rent on the Norfolk, Va., property at the center of the case \u2014 constituted material subject to discovery requirements.<\/p>\n
James pleaded not guilty last week to one count of bank fraud and one count of making a false statement to a financial institution.<\/p>\n
House Republicans are exploring legal and constitutional strategies to block New York City mayoral front-runner Zohran Mamdani from being sworn into office if he wins Tuesday\u2019s election, citing the Constitution\u2019s post\u2013Civil War \u201cinsurrection clause,\u201d according to multiple sources familiar with the discussions.<\/p>\n
The effort,\u00a0first reported\u00a0by the New York Post, is being led in part by the New York Young Republican Club, which argues that Mamdani\u2019s past statements calling to \u201cresist ICE\u201d and his ties to left-wing organizations could qualify as \u201cgiving aid or comfort to the enemies\u201d of the United States \u2014 language drawn directly from Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.<\/p>\n
That provision, enacted in 1868, bars from public office any person who has \u201cengaged in insurrection or rebellion\u201d against the United States, or who has provided \u201caid or comfort\u201d to its enemies.<\/p>\n
The clause was originally intended to prevent former Confederate officials from holding office but has recently re-emerged in political debates over ballot eligibility.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is a real and legitimate push to see the insurrectionist Zohran Mamdani either a) removed from the ballot or b) removed from office if he is to win on Tuesday,\u201d said Stefano Forte, president of the New York Young Republican Club.<\/p>\n
Several House Republicans are said to be reviewing whether the clause could be enforced through new legislation or congressional action following next week\u2019s election. The idea mirrors the legal arguments used in Colorado last year to try to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the state\u2019s ballot \u2014 a move the Supreme Court ultimately overturned, ruling that Congress, not individual states, has the constitutional authority to enforce Section 3.<\/p>\n
The Court\u2019s decision has emboldened some GOP lawmakers who believe the ruling effectively places responsibility for such enforcement in the hands of Congress, where Republicans currently hold a narrow 219\u2013213 majority in the House.<\/p>\n
According to two congressional aides, Republican leaders may consider holding a post-election vote to declare Mamdani ineligible for office under the clause. Such a measure would face significant procedural and legal hurdles, including a likely filibuster in the Democrat-controlled Senate and near-certain court challenges.<\/p>\n
In addition to the potential 14th Amendment challenge, House Republicans are pressuring the Justice Department to review Mamdani\u2019s path to U.S. citizenship, claiming he may have violated the terms of his naturalization oath.Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) sent a letter Monday to Attorney General Pam Bondi, urging her to investigate what he described as \u201cstatements inconsistent with the oath of allegiance required of new citizens.\u201d Ogles cited Mamdani\u2019s 2018 naturalization and accused him of \u201crefusal to disavow violent anti-American rhetoric.\u201d<\/p>\n
He reiterated those allegations in a post on X, claiming Mamdani \u201ccame to the U.S. from Uganda to turn America into an Islamic theocracy.\u201d<\/p>\n
In his letter, Ogles argued that Mamdani\u2019s past remarks and political affiliations amount to a \u201cbroader pattern of conduct inconsistent with the oath of allegiance.\u201d<\/p>\n
He urged the Justice Department to examine whether denaturalization proceedings are warranted, referencing existing immigration law that prohibits membership in communist or totalitarian organizations for new citizens.<\/p>\n
Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) also joined the campaign, accusing Mamdani of omitting material information from his citizenship application, including membership in the Democratic Socialists of America and comments defending the \u201cHoly Land Five,\u201d a group of Palestinian-American leaders convicted in 2008 for funneling money to Hamas.<\/p>\n
\u201cNew York City falls to communism next week, and they will have nobody but themselves to blame,\u201d Fine wrote on X, referencing the upcoming mayoral election.<\/p>\n
Mamdani, currently a member of the New York State Assembly representing Astoria, Queens, denied the accusations and said Republican lawmakers are trying to weaponize the law against a political opponent.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo matter how many times these Republican Congress members or the president of this country calls me a Communist, it doesn\u2019t make it true,\u201d Mamdani said in comments to The Post last weekend.<\/p>\n
A Justice Department spokeswoman confirmed receipt of Ogles\u2019 letter but said responses to congressional correspondence have been delayed due to the ongoing government shutdown.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Department does not comment on the status of ongoing or potential investigations,\u201d the spokeswoman said.<\/p>\n
To anyone who\u2019s never had a dog: believe me, they have the same soul as we do\u2014just in a different body.<\/strong>\u00a0When my dogs passed away, I felt their souls leaving. It was devastating. That kind of love never leaves you. Recently, tragedy struck when\u00a0James William \u201cWill\u201d Warner<\/strong>, a 22-year-old from Shelbyville, Tennessee, was found shot and killed. His girlfriend was also shot but survived with serious injuries.<\/p>\n Will\u2019s mother, Christy Warner, described the moment she found out as a total collapse: \u201cMy whole world was broken into a million pieces.\u201d Will was remembered as full of life and deeply loved. His family didn\u2019t even get a chance to say a proper goodbye due to how sudden everything happened. \u201cWe were robbed of every bit of closure,\u201d Christy said.<\/p>\n He was buried at Mt. Lebanon Cemetery, surrounded by grieving loved ones\u2014but one moment touched everyone the most. His loyal dog,\u00a0Ace<\/strong>, laid on the fresh grave, refusing to leave his best friend\u2019s side. That image said everything:\u00a0dogs love us with a loyalty that goes beyond life itself<\/strong>. Will and Ace shared a deep bond\u2014one that even death couldn\u2019t break.<\/p>\n His uncle, Tennessee state Rep. Todd Warner, called it a senseless tragedy: \u201cIt\u2019s a tragic end to something that never should\u2019ve happened.\u201d\u00a0Rest in peace, Will. You were loved deeply\u2014especially by Ace, who never left your side.<\/strong><\/p>\n This story reminds us just how powerful the love of a dog can be. All they want is a home\u2014and they will stay loyal until the very end.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" New disclosures from the government\u2019s \u201cCrossfire Hurricane\u201d investigation into the 2016 election, otherwise known as alleged \u201cTrump-Russia collusion,\u201d have revealed a stunning admission from top Obama-era officials. A newly declassified memo, released…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":20720,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20721","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-breaking-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t