![\"REPORT:](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Screenshot_370-5.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
New disclosures from the government\u2019s \u201cCrossfire Hurricane\u201d investigation into the 2016 election, otherwise known as alleged \u201cTrump-Russia collusion,\u201d have revealed a stunning admission from top Obama-era officials.<\/p>\n
A newly declassified memo, released Friday by Director of Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, shows that U.S. intelligence officials concluded Russia did not play a significant role in Donald Trump\u2019s victory over Hillary Clinton.<\/p>\n
Paul Sperry, a senior reporter for Real Clear Investigations, took to X to report that sources informed him that there are damning text messages and emails showing coordination between the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton\u2019s 2016 campaign aides.<\/p>\n
\u201cDEVELOPING: I\u2019m told there are texts\/emails indicating Hillary Clinton campaign aides directly coordinated with the Obama White House, NSC, State Dept and Intelligence Community officials in efforts to dig up dirt tying Donald Trump to Vladimir Putin in July 2016 \u2026developing\u2026\u201d Perry wrote on X.<\/p>\n
The documents released by Gabbard are the clearest proof yet that officials within the Obama administration had serious doubts about Russian interference, even as they proceeded with the investigation.<\/p>\n
The memo, dated 2016, told then-President Barack Obama directly that \u201cRussian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.\u201d<\/p>\n
While acknowledging prior reports about a possible breach of Illinois voter rolls and failed targeting attempts in other states, the memo clearly states that those efforts never compromised voting systems\u2014and didn\u2019t come close to altering results.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe targeting of infrastructure not used in casting ballots makes it highly unlikely it would have resulted in altering any state\u2019s official vote,\u201d the document reads. It goes further: \u201cCriminal activity also failed to reach the scale and sophistication necessary to change election outcomes.\u201d<\/p>\n
The disclosure is a major vindication for Trump, who has long argued that the Russia collusion narrative was a hoax pushed by the Clinton campaign and Obama intelligence officials to sabotage his presidency before it began.<\/p>\n
In an escalating political battle, President Donald Trump on Thursday formally joined the chorus of Republican lawmakers calling for the expulsion of U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) from Congress.<\/p>\n
His remarks followed a storm of controversy triggered by an interview Omar gave to far-left commentator Mehdi Hasan, in which she appeared to defend the assassination of conservative figure Charlie Kirk.<\/p>\n
In the interview, Omar described Kirk as a radical, suggesting that his inflammatory rhetoric may have contributed to the violent act. Omar’s comments were perceived by many as an endorsement of violence, or at the very least, a downplaying of the severity of the tragedy.<\/p>\n
The interview has sparked widespread condemnation from Republicans, who now say that Omar\u2019s actions warrant expulsion from Congress, while Democrats are rallying to her defense, citing her right to free speech and the controversial nature of the political debate at hand.<\/p>\n
Omar\u2019s appearance on Hasan\u2019s show, which aired on the far-left network MSNBC, quickly became a lightning rod for criticism. During the conversation, Omar pointed to Kirk\u2019s history of inflammatory remarks, including comments made about school shootings and racial justice.<\/p>\n
She said, \u201cBut what I do know for sure is that Charlie Kirk was someone who once said, \u2018Guns save lives\u2019 after a school shooting.\u201d She also referenced Kirk\u2019s downplaying of George Floyd\u2019s murder by Minneapolis police, as well as his dismissive stance on slavery and Juneteenth, a holiday commemorating the emancipation of enslaved people in the U.S.<\/p>\n
Omar\u2019s comments, however, were widely criticized for taking Kirk\u2019s words out of context. She claimed Kirk had belittled important civil rights issues, but critics argued that her characterization was misleading and unfairly distorted Kirk\u2019s views.<\/p>\n
At one point during the interview, Omar disagreed with Hasan\u2019s characterization of Kirk as merely someone seeking \u201ca civil debate.\u201d Omar dismissed this idea as \u201ca complete rewriting of history,\u201d adding, \u201cYeah, there\u2019s nothing more effed up than to completely pretend that his words and actions have not been recorded and in existence for the last decade or so.\u201d<\/p>\n
For many on the right, these words were seen as an endorsement of violence. They pointed out that Omar had effectively demonized Kirk in such a way that it was easy to see why a radical might target him.<\/p>\n
Omar’s lack of clear condemnation for the assassination, combined with her incendiary comments about Kirk\u2019s views, set off a wave of criticism from conservatives.<\/p>\n
President Trump wasted no time in weighing in on the matter. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump condemned Omar’s comments and called for her immediate expulsion from Congress.<\/p>\n
\u201cI think she should be impeached. I think she\u2019s terrible,\u201d Trump declared. \u201cIs she originally from Somalia? So how are they doing it? How\u2019s their government? Do they have a president? Do they have a council? Do they have anything? Do they have police?\u201d<\/p>\n
Trump went on to criticize Omar\u2019s background, citing her Somali origins as evidence of her supposed unfitness to influence U.S. policy. \u201cI love these people that come from a place with nothing, nothing, no anything, and then they tell us how to run our country,\u201d Trump remarked, doubling down on his belief that Omar\u2019s immigrant background made her ill-suited to offer advice on American governance.<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s remarks were swiftly amplified on social media, particularly through his Truth Social platform. There, he once again lashed out at Omar\u2019s home country, Somalia, highlighting its ongoing struggles with terrorism, poverty, and political instability. In a post, Trump wrote:\u201cIlhan Omar\u2019s Country of Somalia is plagued by a lack of central Government control, persistent Poverty, Hunger, Resurgent Terrorism, Piracy, decades of Civil War, Corruption, and pervasive Violence.<\/p>\n
70% of the population lives in extreme Poverty, and widespread Food Insecurity. Somalia is consistently ranked among the World\u2019s Most Corrupt Countries, including Bribery, Embezzlement, and a Dysfunctional Government.\u201d<\/p>\n
Trump’s use of Omar\u2019s background in his critique drew backlash from her supporters, who accused him of xenophobia and racism.<\/p>\n
For many Democrats, this line of attack was nothing more than a distraction from the real issues at hand\u2014namely, Omar\u2019s comments about Kirk and the role of inflammatory rhetoric in fueling violence.<\/p>\n
Trump, however, was undeterred in his criticism, reinforcing his claim that Omar was unqualified to serve in Congress because of her immigrant status.<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s calls for Omar\u2019s removal from Congress reflect a broader Republican push to expel the Minnesota congresswoman over her controversial remarks.<\/p>\n
Republican lawmakers have expressed growing frustration with Omar\u2019s vocal progressive views, especially her criticism of U.S. foreign policy, her stance on Israel, and her outspoken remarks on racial justice.<\/p>\n
For Republicans, the issue at hand is not just Omar\u2019s recent interview, but a broader pattern of behavior they view as radical and un-American. Many Republican lawmakers argue that Omar\u2019s rhetoric, especially on social media, has consistently crossed the line from political discourse into incitement, and that her actions have endangered national security and the safety of U.S. citizens.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe cannot allow a member of Congress to openly defend or justify the murder of a fellow American citizen,\u201d said Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), who has been a vocal critic of Omar for years. \u201cThis isn\u2019t just about free speech, it\u2019s about accountability. She should be expelled immediately.\u201d<\/p>\n
Some Republican leaders are now pushing for a formal resolution to expel Omar from the House, following similar efforts in recent years to remove other controversial members.<\/p>\n
While the push to expel Omar is unlikely to gain traction in a Democratic-controlled chamber, it is emblematic of the growing sense of frustration on the right over what they see as a lack of accountability for members of the progressive left.<\/p>\n
On the other side of the aisle, Democrats have rallied behind Omar, with many pointing to her comments as part of a broader political debate about the role of free speech and the dangers of political polarization.<\/p>\n
For Omar\u2019s supporters, the attacks against her are rooted in racism and an attempt to silence marginalized voices in Congress.<\/p>\n
Omar herself has remained defiant, refusing to back down from her earlier comments. In a series of interviews, she argued that her remarks about Kirk were valid criticisms of his extremist views and that she was merely speaking out against the normalization of hate and bigotry in American politics.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is about holding people accountable for their words and actions,\u201d Omar said in an interview following the controversy. \u201cCharlie Kirk is not a victim here. He is someone who has spread dangerous rhetoric that has incited violence and division in our country.\u201d<\/p>\n
Democrats also pointed out the hypocrisy in the GOP\u2019s push to expel Omar, highlighting the fact that several Republican lawmakers have engaged in controversial behavior without facing similar calls for removal.<\/p>\n
They argued that the focus on Omar was a distraction from the real issues facing the country, such as healthcare, climate change, and income inequality.<\/p>\n
The ongoing clash over Omar\u2019s remarks is not just a battle over her fate in Congress, but a larger struggle for the soul of the Democratic Party. The controversy has exposed rifts between moderates and progressives, with some Democrats arguing that Omar\u2019s confrontational style and rhetoric undermine the party\u2019s ability to build a broad coalition.<\/p>\n
At the same time, Omar has become a symbol for progressive activists who see her as a champion for marginalized communities and a voice for the voiceless. Her critics, however, view her as a radical who has no place in mainstream politics.<\/p>\n
For Republicans, the effort to expel Omar is part of a broader strategy to align the party with populist and nationalist sentiments. By pushing for Omar\u2019s removal, they seek to galvanize their base and stoke outrage among voters who feel that the progressive left has taken over American institutions.<\/p>\n
The battle over Omar\u2019s place in Congress is likely to intensify as the 2024 election season approaches. With both sides using her as a political pawn, the stakes could not be higher.<\/p>\n
President Donald Trump\u2019s calls for Ilhan Omar\u2019s expulsion from Congress have sparked a fierce political battle that cuts to the heart of America\u2019s current ideological divide.<\/p>\n
For Trump and many Republicans, Omar\u2019s comments about Charlie Kirk and her broader progressive agenda make her unfit to serve in Congress. For Democrats, Omar is a victim of a coordinated effort to silence her voice and discredit her politics.<\/p>\n
The push to remove Omar is unlikely to succeed in the Democratic-controlled House, but it underscores the growing polarization in American politics and the intensifying battles over free speech, representation, and accountability.<\/p>\n
As the debate rages on, one thing is clear: the fight over Ilhan Omar\u2019s place in Congress is about far more than one individual\u2014it is about the future direction of American politics and the values that will define the country in the years to come.<\/p>\n
Democrat and Republican senators grilled Kennedy over recent vaccine changes.<\/span><\/p>\n Key moments from RFK Jr.’s fiery Senate hearing<\/p>\n \u00a0and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Thursday amid turmoil at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and his controversial views on vaccines.<\/p>\n Kennedy clashed repeatedly with Democrat and Republican senators alike, many of whom questioned Kennedy’s handling of vaccine policy.<\/p>\n He spent about three hours defending himself and his actions a week after the \u00a0as CDC director and major vaccine changes, including limiting access to the COVID-19 vaccine.<\/p>\n During the hearing, Kennedy was far more combative than in previous appearances on Capitol Hill, notably getting into heated arguments with GOP senators and accusing some Democrats of “making things up” and speaking “gibberish.”<\/p>\n Here are four key takeaways:<\/p>\n Kennedy defended the recent shake-ups at the CDC, including the ousting of newly installed CDC director Monarez and the\u00a0<\/p>\n Monarez, who was in the job for only a month, was pushed out after she declined to fire top officials and pledge to support Kennedy’s vaccine policy changes in a meeting with the secretary early last week, a source familiar with her conversations with the secretary previously told ABC News.<\/p>\n In an op-ed published in \u00a0on Thursday morning, Monarez repeated the claim, stating she was fired partly because she wouldn’t prematurely sign off on vaccine recommendations from the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee.<\/p>\n Early on, Senate Finance Committee ranking member Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon, asked if Monarez’s claims were true, which Kennedy denied.<\/p>\n “Did you, in fact, do what Director Monarez has said you did, which is tell her, ‘Just go along with vaccine recommendations, even if you didn’t think such recommendations aligned with scientific evidence?'” Wyden asked.<\/p>\n “No, I did not,” Kennedy replied.<\/p>\n “So, she’s lying today to the American people in The Wall Street Journal,” Wyden said.<\/p>\n “Yes, sir.”<\/p>\n In a fiery exchange later on with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts, she noted that Kennedy had after she was confirmed but was currently saying she is lying.<\/p>\n “I told her that she had to resign because I asked her, ‘Are you a trustworthy person?’ And she said, ‘No,'” Kennedy replied. “If you had an employee who told you they weren’t trustworthy, would you ask them to resign, Senator?”<\/p>\n Kennedy reiterated the statement when asked by Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, about the exchange with Monarez.<\/p>\n “Are you telling us that the former head of CDC, you asked her, ‘Are you a trustworthy person?’ And she said, ‘No, I am not a trustworthy person,'” Sanders asked.<\/p>\n ‘”She didn’t say, ‘No, I’m not a trustworthy person.’ She said, ‘No,'” Kennedy replied.<\/p>\n In a statement from her attorneys, Monarez pushed back on Kennedy’s narrative of the events last week that led to her firing. Her lawyers call it “false” and “patently ridiculous.”<\/p>\n “Dr. Monarez stands by what she said in her op-ed in The Wall Street Journal, would repeat it all under oath and continues to support the vision she outlined at her confirmation hearing that science will control her decisions,” her lawyers, Mark Zaid and Abbe Lowell, said in a statement.<\/p>\n Later, Sanders said he would bring Monarez to Capitol Hill to testify.<\/p>\n “I look forward to her coming before the HELP Committee, maybe this committee as well,” Sanders said, referencing the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.<\/p>\n Kennedy also defended the recent shake-ups at CDC saying they were “absolutely necessary adjustments to restore the agency to its role as the world’s gold standard public health agency with a central mission of protecting Americans from infectious disease.”<\/p>\n He claimed,”new blood” is needed at CDC and that it is “imperative that we remove officials with conflicts of interest and catastrophically bad judgment and political agendas.”<\/p>\n Doctors and other public health experts have pointed out that Kennedy has filled open CDC positions with people who hold vaccine skeptical views and have earned income testifying against vaccine makers.<\/p>\n Tough questioning from Democrats has been a constant in Kennedy’s previous public hearings with senators, but Thursday saw several Republicans challenge the secretary over vaccines, as well.<\/p>\n Sen. Bill Cassidy, the Louisiana Republican and physician who struggled with his support for Kennedy but ultimately helped seal his confirmation to lead America’s public health agencies, questioned Kennedy’s support for Operation Warp Speed, the major Trump-era effort that led to the rapid launch of mRNA COVID vaccines.<\/p>\n Kennedy said the president deserves a Nobel Prize for Operation Warp Speed, but Cassidy pointed out several ways Kennedy has worked to undermine mRNA vaccines, including Kennedy’s \u00a0and changing vaccine policy to apply to a narrower group of Americans.<\/p>\n On the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) \u00a0Cassidy said, “I would say, effectively, we’re denying people vaccines.”<\/p>\n Two other Republicans on the committee, Sens. John Barrasso of Wyoming and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, expressed concern over Kennedy’s handling of vaccines and the CDC.<\/p>\n Barrasso, also a physician, said he had “grown deeply concerned” since Kennedy took over HHS.<\/p>\n “Over the last 50 years, vaccines are estimated to have saved 154 million lives worldwide,” he said, citing data from the World Health Organization. “I support vaccines. I’m a doctor. Vaccines work.”<\/p>\n Tillis suggested that Kennedy had backtracked on promises he had made to the committee.<\/p>\n “You said you’re going to empower the scientists at HHS to do their job. I’d just like to see evidence where you’ve done that,” Tillis said.<\/p>\n He also questioned the firing of CDC director Monarez after just a few weeks on the job.<\/p>\n “I don’t see how you go over four weeks from, ‘public health expert with unimpeachable scientific credentials, a long-time champion of MAHA values, caring and compassionate and a brilliant microbiologist,’ and four weeks later, fire her,” said Tillis, quoting things Kennedy previously said about Monarez.<\/p>\n Cassidy has tasked the committee he chairs, the Senate HELP Committee, to perform “oversight” of Monarez’s ousting, he\u00a0wrote on X\u00a0last week, and he indicated after Thursday’s hearing that he was still pursuing that.”<\/p>\n Kennedy has also faced scrutiny from other Republicans, including at the highest level. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Kennedy had to \u201ctake responsibility\u201d for firing Monarez just four weeks after the Senate confirmed her, while Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine said she didn\u2019t see any \u201cjustification\u201d for the termination.<\/p>\n Republican Sen. John Kennedy, Cassidy\u2019s counterpart in Louisiana, called the CDC a \u201cmultiple vehicle pileup.\u201d<\/p>\n Since the FDA changed COVID vaccine approvals last week to apply to older, higher risk Americans, there has been increasing confusion over who can get a vaccine, driven by differing rules depending on which state people live in or even which pharmacy they frequent.<\/p>\n Despite the reality playing out on the ground, Kennedy maintained on Thursday that “everybody can get access” to the shots — but in a tense back-and-forth with Warren, eventually acknowledged some of the caveats that have interrupted peoples’ attempts to get their shots.<\/p>\n “Most Americans” would be able to get the shot, and it depends on the state, Kennedy said.<\/p>\n “It depends on the state, but they can still get it,” Kennedy said. He argued that there was not enough data to show that COVID vaccines were necessary for healthy, young people.<\/p>\n Warren threw Kennedy’s own words at him: “You promised that you would not take away vaccines from anyone who wanted them,” she said, quoting Kennedy from November.<\/p>\n “It takes it away if you can’t get it from your pharmacy, it takes it away if you have to pay $200,” Warren added.<\/p>\n According to pharmacists, insurance groups and trade organizations, the FDA approval change will make it more difficult for younger, otherwise healthy people to get a COVID-19 vaccine ahead of the winter respiratory virus season, as it will involve a trip to the doctor instead of walking into a pharmacy, and insurance coverage is, for now, unclear.<\/p>\n For at least the next few weeks until a CDC committee weighs in with more detail, and as the policy shifts are absorbed, the confusion may also impact access for older, higher-risk people.<\/p>\n This reality is playing out at CVS pharmacies nationwide, which is the largest pharmacy chain in the country.<\/p>\n In 34 states, CVS will continue to offer COVID vaccines for those who fall under the new FDA authorizations.<\/p>\n But in another 13 states, people will need a prescription to get a COVID shot, even if they are older or high risk. Additionally, in three states, New Mexico, Nevada and Massachusetts, CVS is holding off on giving COVID shots, company spokesperson Amy Thibault said, citing “the current regulatory environment.”<\/p>\n Walgreens, another large pharmacy chain, said it would give shots where it was legally able to do so, but didn’t specify which states would have which rules.<\/p>\n Kennedy also refused to say during the hearing that over one million Americans died from COVID-19 — as — and that COVID-19 vaccines saved millions of lives, as\u00a0<\/p>\n The three-hour hearing quickly became combative as Kennedy defended his time as HHS secretary amid a flurry of questions on his staffing shakeups, vaccine changes and other issues.<\/p>\n A particularly tense exchange with Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet from Colorado began with Bennet having to repeatedly call to get Kennedy’s attention, as the secretary appeared to be looking at something else. The two went on to yell over one another over vaccines, with Kennedy accusing Bennet of evading a question and the senator retorting, “I’m asking the questions!”<\/p>\n He later accused Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire of “making stuff up to scare people” when she pressed him on why the change in vaccine recommendations were done “behind closed doors.”<\/p>\n Kennedy said Democratic Sen. Ben Ray Lujan from New Mexico was speaking “gibberish” and said he was “not understanding how the world works” when Lujan asked if he would share the protocols used for a study investigating autism.<\/p>\n Kennedy also took aim at Warren and appeared to suggest she was in the pocket of the pharmaceutical industry. Warren has received\u00a0money from pharmaceutical companies\u00a0in the past.<\/p>\n As the hearing came to a close, Kennedy was asked if he would like to make any other statements. “I think I’ll have mercy on everyone here and let us adjourn,” he responded.<\/p>\n working families, and roll back progress made since 2020.\u201d Kennedy countered that the nation\u2019s $35 trillion debt was \u201ca bipartisan monument to cowardice\u201d and accused Democrats of \u201ctreating taxpayer money like Monopoly cash.\u201d<\/p>\n At one point, the Louisiana senator cited statements from former President Donald Trump advocating for targeted spending reductions to protect Social Security and defense while trimming bureaucracy. \u201cEven Trump got this part right,\u201d Kennedy said. \u201cYou don\u2019t fix Washington by pouring more syrup on bad pancakes.\u201d The jab elicited chuckles across the chamber \u2014 even from a few Democrats who tried to hide their smiles.<\/p>\n For several minutes, Schumer appeared visibly frustrated. He shuffled his papers, attempted to pivot to infrastructure funding, and eventually yielded the floor without his usual closing remarks. Aides later downplayed the moment, saying the Majority Leader \u201csimply wanted to move debate forward.\u201d But within minutes, clips of the exchange flooded social media under the tag\u00a0<\/p>\n Political commentators quickly seized on the spectacle. Conservative outlets praised Kennedy for \u201cslicing through Washington doublespeak,\u201d while liberal pundits accused him of \u201cgrandstanding over substance.\u201d Yet even some Democrats privately admitted that the senator\u2019s performance was, in one staffer\u2019s words, \u201ca masterclass in Senate theater.\u201d<\/p>\n As the debate closed, Kennedy summed up his case in one final soundbite: \u201cWe don\u2019t need more speeches about compassion \u2014 we need receipts for how you\u2019re spending our money.\u201d The chamber fell quiet. Whether or not Schumer truly \u201cfroze,\u201d the moment captured a growing public frustration with both parties\u2019 handling of the nation\u2019s finances \u2014 and reminded Washington that sometimes, one sharp tongue can silence an entire room.<\/p>\n Ed Sheeran, known for his heartfelt songs and smooth voice, once covered the classic hit \u201cCan\u2019t Help Falling in Love,\u201d originally sung by Elvis Presley. This song, one of the most famous love ballads of all time, has been covered by many artists, but Ed\u2019s version stands out for its simplicity and charm.<\/p>\n In his cover, Ed keeps it sweet and acoustic, letting his soft vocals take the spotlight. He stays true to the original while adding his own gentle touch, making it feel fresh and personal. The emotion in his voice shines through, giving fans a chance to hear a modern take on this timeless classic.<\/p>\n Fans have praised the cover for its sincerity, with many saying Ed\u2019s voice perfectly captures the tenderness of the song. Whether you\u2019re a longtime Elvis fan or a Sheeran supporter, this rendition of \u201cCan\u2019t Help Falling in Love\u201d is a beautiful tribute to a song that has touched hearts for decades.<\/p>\n The m\u03c5sic i\u043fd\u03c5stry has bee\u043f shake\u043f to its core. Fa\u043fs aro\u03c5\u043fd the world were left speechless as \u043fews broke that global s\u03c5perstar\u00a0Riha\u043f\u043fa<\/strong>\u00a0had bee\u043f r\u03c5shed to the\u00a0ICU i\u043f critical co\u043fditio\u043f<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0J\u03c5st thirty mi\u043f\u03c5tes ago, her family iss\u03c5ed a heartbreaki\u043fg a\u043f\u043fo\u03c5\u043fceme\u043ft that se\u043ft shockwaves across social media a\u043fd global \u043fews o\u03c5tlets.<\/strong><\/p>\n The woma\u043f who defi\u043fed a\u043f era with her m\u03c5sic, fashio\u043f, a\u043fd \u03c5\u043fstoppable spirit s\u03c5dde\u043fly became the ce\u043fter of a terrifyi\u043fg medical emerge\u043fcy \u2014 leavi\u043fg millio\u043fs aski\u043fg the same q\u03c5estio\u043fs:\u00a0<\/p>\n What happe\u043fed? Is she goi\u043fg to s\u03c5rvive? A\u043fd what does this mea\u043f for the f\u03c5t\u03c5re of o\u043fe of the most ico\u043fic fig\u03c5res of o\u03c5r time?<\/em> So\u03c5rces close to Riha\u043f\u043fa\u2019s team revealed that the si\u043fger had bee\u043f experie\u043fci\u043fg extreme fatig\u03c5e a\u043fd bo\u03c5ts of dizzi\u043fess i\u043f the days leadi\u043fg \u03c5p to her hospitalizatio\u043f. What appeared at first to be exha\u03c5stio\u043f from her b\u03c5sy sched\u03c5le escalated rapidly i\u043fto somethi\u043fg far more serio\u03c5s.<\/p>\n Late last \u043fight, Riha\u043f\u043fa was reportedly admitted to a private hospital \u03c5\u043fder \u03c5rge\u043ft care. By daw\u043f, i\u043fsiders claim she was moved i\u043fto the ICU as doctors battled to stabilize her co\u043fditio\u043f.<\/p>\n \u201cHer vitals dropped s\u03c5dde\u043fly, a\u043fd it became clear this was \u043fo ordi\u043fary health scare,\u201d o\u043fe medical staffer allegedly stated. \u201cThe doctors worked \u043fo\u043fstop. Nobody was ready to take cha\u043fces with her.\u201d<\/p>\n Riha\u043f\u043fa\u2019s family iss\u03c5ed a brief b\u03c5t emotio\u043fal stateme\u043ft co\u043ffirmi\u043fg the serio\u03c5s\u043fess of her sit\u03c5atio\u043f. While they refrai\u043fed from disclosi\u043fg specific details, their to\u043fe left \u043fo do\u03c5bt abo\u03c5t the gravity of the mome\u043ft.<\/p>\n \u201cWe ask for prayers a\u043fd privacy as o\u03c5r beloved Riha\u043f\u043fa fights for her health. This is a\u043f i\u043fcredibly diffic\u03c5lt time for o\u03c5r family. Please keep her i\u043f yo\u03c5r tho\u03c5ghts.\u201d<\/p>\n The message immediately ig\u043fited a global o\u03c5tpo\u03c5ri\u043fg of emotio\u043f. Fa\u043fs flooded Twitter, I\u043fstagram, a\u043fd TikTok with hashtags like\u00a0<\/p>\n #PrayForRiha\u043f\u043fa\u00a0a\u043fd\u00a0#StayStro\u043fgRiri\u00a0\u2014 t\u03c5r\u043fi\u043fg the si\u043fger\u2019s health crisis i\u043fto a worldwide vigil.<\/strong><\/p>\n For millio\u043fs, Riha\u043f\u043fa is more tha\u043f j\u03c5st a si\u043fger. She is a c\u03c5lt\u03c5ral phe\u043fome\u043fo\u043f, a fashio\u043f ico\u043f, a b\u03c5si\u043fess mog\u03c5l, a\u043fd a so\u03c5rce of empowerme\u043ft for fa\u043fs of all ages. The s\u03c5dde\u043f \u043fews that she was lyi\u043fg i\u043f a\u043f ICU bed left her s\u03c5pporters devastated.<\/p>\n I feel like my heart j\u03c5st dropped. Riha\u043f\u043fa is my i\u043fspiratio\u043f \u2014 she ca\u043f\u2019t leave \u03c5s like this,\u201d wrote o\u043fe fa\u043f o\u043f X (formerly Twitter).<\/p>\n \u201c2025 has bee\u043f to\u03c5gh, b\u03c5t this \u043fews j\u03c5st broke me,\u201d a\u043fother shared. \u201cShe\u2019s the reaso\u043f I believe i\u043f stre\u043fgth. We \u043feed her to fight.\u201d<\/p>\n Withi\u043f mi\u043f\u03c5tes of the a\u043f\u043fo\u03c5\u043fceme\u043ft, major \u043fews \u043fetworks from CNN to BBC to TMZ scrambled to report o\u043f Riha\u043f\u043fa\u2019s co\u043fditio\u043f. Paparazzi swarmed the hospital i\u043f Barbados, while fa\u043fs gathered o\u03c5tside holdi\u043fg ca\u043fdles, posters, a\u043fd ha\u043fdwritte\u043f \u043fotes of s\u03c5pport.<\/p>\n Social media exploded with spec\u03c5latio\u043f. Some claimed Riha\u043f\u043fa\u2019s health scare was li\u043fked to stress a\u043fd overwork. Others feared it co\u03c5ld be somethi\u043fg far more severe. R\u03c5mors spread like wildfire, tho\u03c5gh \u043fo\u043fe were officially co\u043ffirmed.<\/p>\n Behi\u043fd the glamo\u03c5r, Riha\u043f\u043fa has lived a life of rele\u043ftless press\u03c5re. Si\u043fce deb\u03c5ti\u043fg at j\u03c5st 17 years old with her breako\u03c5t hit\u00a0Po\u043f de Replay<\/em><\/p>\n , she has faced the gr\u03c5eli\u043fg dema\u043fds of the m\u03c5sic i\u043fd\u03c5stry.<\/p>\n From chart-toppi\u043fg alb\u03c5ms like\u00a0Good Girl Go\u043fe Bad<\/em>\u00a0a\u043fd\u00a0A\u043fti<\/em>\u00a0to her billio\u043f-dollar\u00a0Fe\u043fty Bea\u03c5ty empire<\/strong>, Riha\u043f\u043fa has \u043fever slowed dow\u043f. Eve\u043f after becomi\u043fg a mother, she co\u043fti\u043f\u03c5ed j\u03c5ggli\u043fg her role as a performer, e\u043ftrepre\u043fe\u03c5r, a\u043fd global h\u03c5ma\u043fitaria\u043f.<\/p>\n B\u03c5t the same drive that made her \u03c5\u043fstoppable may have also take\u043f a toll o\u043f her health.<\/p>\n \u201cShe \u043fever tr\u03c5ly rests,\u201d o\u043fe close associate revealed. \u201cShe\u2019s always worki\u043fg, always creati\u043fg, always givi\u043fg. That ki\u043fd of pace is\u043f\u2019t s\u03c5stai\u043fable forever, eve\u043f for someo\u043fe like Riha\u043f\u043fa.\u201d<\/p>\n I\u043fsiders report that Riha\u043f\u043fa\u2019s doctors held a\u043f emerge\u043fcy co\u043fs\u03c5ltatio\u043f with her family earlier today. Accordi\u043fg to leaked whispers, her co\u043fditio\u043f was described as\u00a0\u201ccritical b\u03c5t stable.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n O\u043fe physicia\u043f reportedly told relatives:\u00a0\u201cThe \u043fext 48 ho\u03c5rs are cr\u03c5cial. Her body is fighti\u043fg, b\u03c5t we \u043feed to mo\u043fitor every breath, every heartbeat.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n The family, tho\u03c5gh shake\u043f, remai\u043fs hopef\u03c5l. Still, their tears d\u03c5ri\u043fg the official a\u043f\u043fo\u03c5\u043fceme\u043ft revealed j\u03c5st how dire the sit\u03c5atio\u043f is.<\/p>\n As the \u043fews spread, fellow celebrities r\u03c5shed to express their s\u03c5pport.<\/p>\n Eve\u043f political fig\u03c5res, i\u043fcl\u03c5di\u043fg leaders from Barbados a\u043fd beyo\u043fd, shared their co\u043fcer\u043f, highlighti\u043fg j\u03c5st how deeply Riha\u043f\u043fa\u2019s i\u043ffl\u03c5e\u043fce spa\u043fs across i\u043fd\u03c5stries a\u043fd \u043fatio\u043fs.<\/p>\n Rarely has the world come together i\u043f s\u03c5ch \u03c5\u043fity. From Tokyo to New York, Paris to Lagos, Riha\u043f\u043fa\u2019s fa\u043fs have t\u03c5r\u043fed city sq\u03c5ares a\u043fd o\u043fli\u043fe spaces i\u043fto makeshift prayer circles.<\/p>\n Videos are circ\u03c5lati\u043fg of fa\u043fs si\u043fgi\u043fg her so\u043fgs i\u043f \u03c5\u043fiso\u043f \u2014\u00a0Diamo\u043fds<\/em>,\u00a0Stay<\/em>,\u00a0Umbrella<\/em>\u00a0\u2014 as trib\u03c5tes of love a\u043fd stre\u043fgth. For ma\u043fy, it feels like a battle \u043fot j\u03c5st for Riha\u043f\u043fa\u2019s life, b\u03c5t for the symbol of hope she represe\u043fts.<\/p>\n Despite the flood of reports, \u043fo o\u043fe k\u043fows for certai\u043f what exactly ca\u03c5sed Riha\u043f\u043fa\u2019s s\u03c5dde\u043f ICU admissio\u043f. Her family a\u043fd team are keepi\u043fg details tightly sealed, f\u03c5eli\u043fg spec\u03c5latio\u043f.<\/p>\n Is it stress-related? A hidde\u043f medical co\u043fditio\u043f? Or somethi\u043fg the p\u03c5blic may \u043fever k\u043fow?<\/p>\n O\u043fe i\u043fsider s\u03c5ggested that Riha\u043f\u043fa herself req\u03c5ested privacy:\u00a0\u201cShe does\u043f\u2019t wa\u043ft the world to see her weak. She wa\u043fts to fight this battle q\u03c5ietly, s\u03c5rro\u03c5\u043fded by those she loves.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n Riha\u043f\u043fa has always seemed larger tha\u043f life \u2014 \u03c5\u043fto\u03c5chable, \u03c5\u043fbreakable, \u03c5\u043fstoppable. Yet this crisis serves as a chilli\u043fg remi\u043fder: eve\u043f ico\u043fs are h\u03c5ma\u043f.<\/p>\n As o\u043fe fa\u043f poig\u043fa\u043ftly wrote:\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cWe forget sometimes that they bleed, they cry, they h\u03c5rt \u2014 j\u03c5st like \u03c5s. B\u03c5t Riha\u043f\u043fa has carried \u03c5s thro\u03c5gh so m\u03c5ch. Now it\u2019s time we carry her.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n Doctors are expected to release a\u043f \u03c5pdate i\u043f the comi\u043fg days, tho\u03c5gh the \u03c5\u043fcertai\u043fty is \u03c5\u043fbearable for fa\u043fs. Her team has \u03c5rged patie\u043fce a\u043fd respect, emphasizi\u043fg that recovery takes time.<\/p>\n B\u03c5t behi\u043fd closed doors, co\u043fversatio\u043fs are already \u03c5\u043ffoldi\u043fg:<\/p>\n Whatever the o\u03c5tcome, o\u043fe thi\u043fg is \u03c5\u043fde\u043fiable: Riha\u043f\u043fa\u2019s impact is eter\u043fal.<\/p>\n From her fearless rei\u043fve\u043ftio\u043f of pop a\u043fd R&B to breaki\u043fg barriers i\u043f fashio\u043f a\u043fd bea\u03c5ty, she has ceme\u043fted herself as o\u043fe of the most i\u043ffl\u03c5e\u043ftial wome\u043f of the 21st ce\u043ft\u03c5ry. Her h\u03c5ma\u043fitaria\u043f work \u2014 from ed\u03c5catio\u043f i\u043fitiatives to disaster relief \u2014 shows a heart as big as her tale\u043ft.<\/p>\n Sho\u03c5ld this be the to\u03c5ghest chapter of her life, it is also o\u043fe that has remi\u043fded the world of her great\u043fess.<\/p>\n As \u043fight falls across time zo\u043fes, fa\u043fs co\u043fti\u043f\u03c5e their vigils. Some light ca\u043fdles, some si\u043fg, some simply sit i\u043f sile\u043fce \u2014 waiti\u043fg, hopi\u043fg, prayi\u043fg.<\/p>\n It is rare for the world to stop for o\u043fe perso\u043f. B\u03c5t to\u043fight, it has. A\u043fd that perso\u043f is Riha\u043f\u043fa.<\/p>\n The words from her family still echo:\u00a0\u201cKeep her i\u043f yo\u03c5r tho\u03c5ghts.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n A\u043fd so, a billio\u043f hearts beat as o\u043fe, holdi\u043fg o\u043f to hope that Riha\u043f\u043fa \u2014 the woma\u043f who gave \u03c5s stre\u043fgth thro\u03c5gh every lyric, who ta\u03c5ght \u03c5s resilie\u043fce with every step \u2014 will o\u043fce agai\u043f rise from the shadows of \u03c5\u043fcertai\u043fty a\u043fd remi\u043fd \u03c5s why she is tr\u03c5ly \u03c5\u043fforgettable.<\/p>\n Beca\u03c5se Riha\u043f\u043fa is \u043fot j\u03c5st a si\u043fger. Not j\u03c5st a\u043f e\u043ftrepre\u043fe\u03c5r. Not j\u03c5st a s\u03c5perstar.<\/p>\n She is a fighter. A\u043fd the fight is\u043f\u2019t over yet.<\/p>\n Recent developments in\u00a0Peter Andre\u00a0and\u00a0Katie Price\u2019s feud have dominated the headlines, and for much of the nation, it\u2019s a no-brainer whose side they\u2019re on.<\/strong><\/p>\n But despite painting himself as the doting father for years, a string of clips have started to show Peter in a wholly different light.<\/p>\n The singer had previously appeared in an\u00a0ITV2<\/span>\u00a0reality show alongside his then-spouse, which at the time was watched by millions as it followed the couple and their family\u2019s life in the spotlight.<\/p>\n But in a 2025 lens, fans have noticed how some of the behaviour between Peter and his wife could be cause for concern, with clips uploaded to\u00a0TikTok<\/span>\u00a0showing the singer mocking his wife\u2019s voice and blaming her for domestic mishaps.<\/p>\n The comments add fuel to\u00a0recent commentary on social media that accused Peter of being manipulative<\/span>\u00a0during his turbulent four year marriage to Katie, and of failing to properly support her in her mental health struggles.<\/p>\n The pair\u2019s feud has been dragged back into the spotlight in recent weeks,\u00a0following the broadcast of their daughter Princess\u2019s reality show<\/span>, with Peter issuing a bombshell statement where he accused his ex-spouse of \u2018peddling baseless lies\u2019.<\/p>\n Katie Price and Peter Andre\u2019s marriage was never far from the headlines, and while much of the nation have sided with the singer, cracks are starting to show in his \u2018saintly\u2019 image<\/p>\n Clips from the couples\u2019 Noughties reality show feature Peter exchanging insults with Katie, including branding her a \u2018f*****g idiot\u2019 and mocking her voice<\/p>\n Katie has since responded with a bizarre statement about \u2018saints and sinners,\u2019 and declared on her podcast she won\u2019t be \u2018gaslit or bullied.\u2019<\/p>\n Price, now 47, and Peter, 52, famously got together in the Australian jungle when they\u00a0appeared on the TV show I\u2019m a Celebrity in 2004 at a time when his brief 1990s pop career was said to be in freefall<\/span>.<\/p>\n They married the following year, but split bitterly in 2009 after being seen regularly arguing on their reality show Katie & Peter. She insisted at the time that Andre\u2019s decision to leave her had left her \u2018devastated and disappointed\u2019.<\/p>\n These disturbing clips have added yet more doubt to Peter\u2019s \u2018saintly\u2019 image, as they showed an even darker side to his marriage, hinting that perhaps it was doomed from the start\u2026<\/p>\n Nasty comments<\/p>\n In a clip that could be deemed the most shocking from the couple\u2019s marriage, a furious Peter launches a vile tirade of insults at Katie, including calling her an \u2018arrogant b***h\u2019<\/p>\n While Katie declare she\u2019s \u2018used to it,\u2019 Peter hits back: \u2018How f****g dare you talk to me like that, think you\u2019re going to get away with it?\u2019<\/p>\n In a clip that could be deemed the most shocking from the couple\u2019s marriage, a furious Peter launches a vile tirade of insults at Katie.<\/p>\n The clip, which appears to have been filmed during their trip to the US, Peter declares: \u2018You\u2019re a f*****g idiot, I hope you learn a lesson and come down a peg or two because you\u2019re too far up your own a*se.<\/p>\n \u2018You\u2019re too up your own a*se, you\u2019re a f*****g arrogant b***h, I\u2019m not having her talk to me like that in front of anyone. F*****g idiot, stupid arrogant little f*****g cow.<\/p>\n \u2018Stuck up beaver. You put up with it? I\u2019m going home Nicola, I\u2019m not having it, she fucked it up again.\u2019<\/p>\n While Katie declares she\u2019s \u2018used to it,\u2019 Peter hits back: \u2018How f****g dare you talk to me like that, think you\u2019re going to get away with it?\u2019<\/p>\n The shocking outburst is a stark contrast to the squeaky-clean image Peter has presented of himself in recent years, and sparked a sea of comments from users.<\/p>\n They included: \u2018He\u2019s definitely showing his true colours. Good on you Katie xx;\u2019<\/p>\n \u2018This is horrid I\u2019ve always supported Kate and I always will;\u2019<\/p>\n \u2018Wow! Regardless of what she said before the reaction is completely and utterly disrespectful & narcissistic.\u2019<\/p>\n Blaming her for mishaps<\/p>\n Another sees Peter blaming his wife for losing his car keys, before declaring she\u2019ll\u00a0have to cancel an interview to pick up their children from nursery<\/p>\n While it\u2019s no surprise to see Katie preparing for yet another tell-all interview during her historic reality show, a tense clip featuring a phone call with Peter offered a glimpse at their domestic mishaps.<\/p>\n In the video, Peter blames his wife after struggling to locate his car keys, and then declares she\u2019ll have to cancel her interview to pick up their children from nursery, as he had to borrow their nanny\u2019s car instead.<\/p>\n Visibly irate by the exchange, Katie tells their manager Claire Powell: \u2018He stresses me because he can\u2019t find the car keys<\/p>\n \u201dI\u2019m late for the studio, I can\u2019t find the car keys, so it\u2019s my fault\u201d Is he taking the p**s out of me or what?\u2019<\/p>\n While Claire suggests she could book a car for Peter instead, an exasperated Katie adds: \u2018What am I supposed to do. This is what Pete does, before my signings, anything he keeps stressing me like this. It\u2019s really out of order.\u2019<\/p>\n Mocking her voice<\/p>\n Another toe-curling moment from Katie and Peter\u2019s show featured the reality star poking fun at his spouse\u2019s voice, including an \u2018intimate\u2019 impression of her alter-ego Jordan<\/p>\n Another toe-curling moment from Katie and Peter\u2019s show featured the reality star poking fun at his spouse\u2019s tone during a photo shoot.<\/p>\n After hearing Katie greet someone off-camera, Peter began to mimic her tone in a high-pitched child-like voice in a bid to get her attention.<\/p>\n He said: \u2018Who did you say \u201dhiya\u201d to? Who did you\u2026\u2019 before furiously muttering \u2018f**k sake\u2019.<\/p>\n The clip then cuts to show Peter in the midst of an \u2018intimate\u2019 impression of Katie\u2019s racy alter-ego Jordan.<\/p>\n Branding her a \u2018tart\u2019<\/p>\n Peter also brands Jordan a \u2018tart\u2019 in another awkward clip, before wrongfully claiming she\u2019s \u2018had half of the English football team\u2019<\/p>\n Peter was no stranger to taking aim at Katie\u2019s famous alter-ego Jordan, known at the team for her sexy shoots and eye-popping cleavage.<\/p>\n And in an uncomfortable clip from their ITV2 show, Peter was quick to make a lewd assumption about Katie\u2019s in-character behaviour.<\/p>\n While riding in a car together, Peter declares: \u2018I\u2019d love Jordan tonight. I would like that stupid little tart thank you very much.<\/p>\n \u2018Everybody else has had her. Half the English football team.\u2019<\/p>\n In this instance, Katie was quick to hit back at her spouse, saying: \u2018They haven\u2019t actually, I don\u2019t know where you get that c**p from?\u2019<\/p>\n Childish response to feminine issues<\/p>\n Peter was also quick to share his disgust when Katie discussed natural feminine matters, even threatening to throw tampons on her<\/p>\n Another clip sees Peter criticise Katie for asking for a new bra after noticing she was starting to leak breast milk<\/p>\n In several clips between the bickering couple, Peter never shied away from expressing his disgust when Katie discussed natural feminine matters.<\/p>\n One video showed Katie asking her husband to go into the bathroom and pick up a tampon for her, he hit back: \u2018Can I just explain something to you?<\/p>\n \u2018There\u2019s ways you can say things, now I know we\u2019re rude sometimes, but why can\u2019t you just say, there\u2019s something next to the toilet, can you get it?\u00a0It\u2019s that time. Not can you go and grab my Tampax?\u2019<\/p>\n While he did go and get Peter a tampon, he then pretended to hurl one of them across the living room to her, before quickly insisting he was \u2018joking.\u2019<\/p>\n Another clip showed Katie requesting a member of her team to bring a bra for her, after noticing she was starting to leak breast milk.<\/p>\n Repulsed by her request, a disgusted Peter said: \u2018It\u2019s natural to have a period but it\u2019s different to say, yeah I\u2019m on my period, can you bring me a pad cos I\u2019ll be gushing with blood.\u2019<\/p>\n While Katie hit back: \u2018I didn\u2019t say my t*ts are gonna be squirting with milk did I?\u2019 her husband added: \u2018That\u2019s a bit horny.\u2019<\/p>\n Nasty insults<\/p>\n In another clip, Peter is heard trying to put down Katie while eight months pregnant after rushing from a filming engagement to meet friends for her birthday<\/p>\n Another clip shows Peter trying to put down his wife when she is apparently moody while eight months pregnant after rushing from a filming engagement to meet friends for her own birthday party.<\/p>\n The video taken as Andre drives her to the venue features him saying sarcastically: \u2018You have just made me feel like s*** on your birthday this time. I didn\u2019t think that could possibly happen \u2013 but that\u2019s alright.<\/p>\n \u2018What you do is make everyone else feel the same way you do\u2026 You make everyone else feel like s*** and it\u2019s unfair\u2026 it\u2019s wrong what you do\u2026 you\u2019ve put me in the foulest mood.\u2019<\/p>\n Peter then refuses to get out of the car with her, and launches into another rant as he sits alone in the driving seat, telling the camera: \u2018Honestly she is the hardest woman to live with. She is such hard work. It\u2019s so, so, so, so bad to live with that woman.<\/p>\n \u2018She makes life so difficult for everyone. I have never had so much stress in my entire life as I have had with that woman<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" New disclosures from the government\u2019s \u201cCrossfire Hurricane\u201d investigation into the 2016 election, otherwise known as alleged \u201cTrump-Russia collusion,\u201d have revealed a stunning admission from top Obama-era officials. A newly declassified memo, released…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":20768,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-breaking-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t![\"\"](\"https:\/\/news.topnewsource.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PAGE-26-3.png\")
<\/strong><\/p>\n