{"id":3225,"date":"2025-11-12T20:48:59","date_gmt":"2025-11-12T20:48:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/senator-ted-cruz-moves-to-block-george-soros-from-secretly-bankrolling-protests-across-america\/"},"modified":"2025-11-12T20:48:59","modified_gmt":"2025-11-12T20:48:59","slug":"senator-ted-cruz-moves-to-block-george-soros-from-secretly-bankrolling-protests-across-america","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/?p=3225","title":{"rendered":"Senator Ted Cruz MOVES to BLOCK George Soros from secretly bankrolling protests across America"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Senator<\/p>\n

In a bold strike against what he calls \u201castroturfed chaos,\u201d Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) has reignited his push for the Stop Financial Underwriting of Nefarious Demonstrations and Extremist Riots (Stop FUNDERs) Act, directly targeting billionaire philanthropist George Soros and his network for allegedly bankrolling a wave of anti-Trump protests sweeping the nation. The legislation, first introduced in July but gaining fresh urgency amid the explosive \u201cNo Kings\u201d rallies, would amend the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act to classify funding violent or coordinated riots as a predicate offense\u2014potentially unleashing a torrent of federal prosecutions, asset seizures, and overnight account freezes on implicated donors and organizations.<\/p>\n

Cruz, fresh off a fiery Fox News appearance where he laid out the \u201creceipts\u201d on Soros\u2019 involvement, declared on X: \u201cThere\u2019s considerable evidence that George Soros and his network are funding the \u2018No Kings\u2019 rallies. That\u2019s exactly why I\u2019ve introduced the Stop FUNDERs Act. It lets law enforcement prosecute those funding acts of political violence.\u201d The senator\u2019s podcast,\u00a0<\/p>\n

The Stop FUNDERs Act would supercharge the DOJ\u2019s arsenal, adding \u201crioting\u201d under the federal Anti-Riot Act to RICO\u2019s list of racketeering crimes. This means prosecutors could pursue joint liability against funders, hit them with conspiracy charges, and seize assets mid-operation\u2014turning checkbooks into crime scenes. Co-sponsors like Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) hailed it as a bulwark against \u201cradical left-wing groups who fund acts of violence, coordinate attacks against law enforcement, and spearhead the destruction of property.\u201d Heritage Action\u2019s Steve Chartan echoed the sentiment: \u201cThis bill targets those inciting violent riots nationwide, ensuring First Amendment rights for peaceful protest while cracking down on the paymasters of anarchy.\u201d<\/p>\n

Soros, the Hungarian-born financier whose foundations have donated over $32 billion to progressive causes globally, has long been a lightning rod for conservative ire. Critics, including President Trump, have accused him of underwriting everything from campus antisemitic unrest to anti-ICE demonstrations and now the \u201cNo Kings\u201d pushback against Trump\u2019s second-term agenda. \u201cFollow the money. Cut off the money,\u201d Cruz urged on\u00a0<\/p>\n

The timing couldn\u2019t be more charged. As \u201cNo Kings\u201d organizers\u2014branded by Cruz as \u201cSoros operatives\u201d\u2014ramp up for Saturday\u2019s nationwide showdown, reports of heightened security at protest sites underscore the stakes. Conservative outlets like Fox News and Townhall have amplified the narrative, citing Capital Research Center analyses that, while finding no direct evidence of Soros knowingly backing illegal acts, highlight the indirect flow of funds to activist hubs. On X, #StopFUNDERs is trending, with users sharing clips of Cruz\u2019s takedown and memes dubbing Soros the \u201cpuppet master of mayhem.\u201d<\/p>\n

Democrats, predictably, are crying foul. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a \u201cNo Kings\u201d participant, slammed the bill as \u201cMcCarthyite overreach\u201d designed to \u201cchill free speech.\u201d The ACLU warned it \u201cdangerously lowers the bar for government investigations into peaceful demonstrations,\u201d potentially ensnaring everyday donors in sprawling probes. Open Society Foundations fired back: \u201cNeither George Soros nor the Open Society Foundations fund protests, condone violence, or foment it in any way. Claims to the contrary are false.\u201d Progressive voices on X decry it as a \u201cfascist fantasy,\u201d pointing to the bill\u2019s acronym\u2014implying even \u201cnefarious\u201d nonviolent demos could fall under scrutiny.<\/p>\n

Yet, with Republicans holding the Senate and a sympathetic DOJ under Attorney General Pam Bondi, passage seems plausible. Trump has floated similar RICO threats against \u201cleft-wing groups,\u201d and insiders whisper of IRS audits targeting Soros-linked entities. If enacted, the bill could ripple far beyond protests: freezing accounts tied to election interference claims or border chaos funding. As one GOP strategist put it, \u201cThis isn\u2019t just about Soros\u2014it\u2019s about sovereignty. No foreign billionaire gets to buy America\u2019s streets.\u201d<\/p>\n

Cruz\u2019s gambit taps into a deep well of public frustration. Polls show 58% of Americans believe big-money influence corrupts activism, per a recent Rasmussen survey. From Texas to the heartland, constituents are rallying behind the senator\u2019s battle cry: Drain the funders\u2019 swamp. Whether this freezes Soros\u2019 empire overnight or sparks a First Amendment firestorm, one thing\u2019s clear\u2014Ted Cruz has thrown down the gauntlet, and the echoes are shaking Pennsylvania Avenue.<\/p>\n

Washington, D.C. \u2014<\/strong>
The marble corridors of Capitol Hill have seen their share of drama, but rarely does a story unfold with the urgency and symbolism of what happened as dusk settled on October 24, 2025. House Speaker Mike Johnson, the powerful Republican leader, was striding out of the chamber when he was met not by applause, but by a federal lawsuit\u2014served in real time, in full view of the nation.<\/p>\n

The suit was not just a legal maneuver. It was a thunderclap, echoing the frustration and fury of more than 800,000 Arizonans whose voice in Congress had been silenced for nearly a month. At its heart stood Adelita Grijalva, the Democratic Congresswoman-elect for Arizona\u2019s 7th District, and Kris Mayes, Arizona\u2019s Attorney General, who together decided enough was enough.<\/p>\n

For 28 days, Arizona\u2019s 7th District has been a ghost in the halls of power. Grijalva, elected by a landslide, has waited\u2014her victory undisputed, her qualifications clear. Yet, Speaker Johnson and his MAGA allies have refused to swear her in, locking the doors of democracy in her face.<\/p>\n

The reason? Political calculus. Grijalva\u2019s signature would be the pivotal 218th vote on a discharge petition that could force the release of the infamous Epstein files\u2014documents both parties have tiptoed around for years. For Johnson, the math was simple: keep Grijalva out, keep the secrets in.<\/p>\n

But for Arizona\u2019s Attorney General Kris Mayes, the math was unconstitutional\u2014and intolerable.
\u201cLet\u2019s be blunt,\u201d<\/em>\u00a0Mayes declared.\u00a0\u201cThis is taxation without representation. We fought a revolution over this principle, and we will not stand by while 800,000 Arizonans are denied their voice.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/em><\/p>\n

The lawsuit, filed in the Federal District Court in Washington, D.C., is both a demand and a warning. It accuses Johnson and the House of Representatives of unlawfully denying Grijalva her rightful office, violating the Constitution and the democratic process.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf the Speaker could simply refuse to swear in a duly elected member,\u201d<\/em>\u00a0the complaint reads,\u00a0\u201che could thwart the will of the people indefinitely, turning democracy into a hostage of partisan gamesmanship.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

In a press conference, Grijalva\u2019s frustration was palpable:
\u201cI cannot serve my constituents. I cannot access a budget, open a district office, or help families grappling with flooding and veterans\u2019 benefits. More than 812,000 Arizonans are being taxed, but they have no representation in Congress. This is not just a political spat\u2014it\u2019s a constitutional crisis.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Johnson\u2019s team has offered a carousel of excuses: the House is in \u201cpro-forma session,\u201d there\u2019s no \u201cpomp and circumstance,\u201d or it\u2019s simply not the right time. But the facts betray the spin.
Two Republican members were sworn in without delay under similar circumstances earlier this year. The only difference? They weren\u2019t the deciding vote on the Epstein files.<\/p>\n

The precedent Johnson claims\u2014citing Speaker Pelosi\u2019s collaborative scheduling with new members\u2014is a distortion. Never before has the Speaker outright refused to swear in a member for purely political reasons.
\u201cMike Johnson is lying to the American people,\u201d<\/em>\u00a0Mayes said.\u00a0\u201cHe swore in Republicans in May, lickety split. He could swear in Grijalva right now. He just refuses.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The consequences are not theoretical. Grijalva\u2019s district is without constituent services. No help for Social Security issues, no support for veterans, no response to natural disasters.
\u201cMy father died seven months ago,\u201d<\/em>\u00a0Grijalva shared, voice trembling.\u00a0\u201cUntil September, our office served the people. Now, it\u2019s empty. I\u2019m traveling on my own dime, without a budget. Arizona\u2019s 7th is invisible to Congress.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The lawsuit isn\u2019t just about one seat\u2014it\u2019s about every Arizonan, Democrat, Republican, or independent, left voiceless by political obstruction.<\/p>\n

Mayes and Grijalva have asked the court for a declaratory judgment\u2014swift, decisive action to restore representation.
\u201cWe want a judge to say: if Johnson won\u2019t do his job, someone else can swear Grijalva in. The Constitution doesn\u2019t give the Speaker the power to silence a state,\u201d<\/em>\u00a0Mayes explained.<\/p>\n

The urgency is real. With a government shutdown looming, millions face uncertainty. Yet, Congress is paralyzed\u2014not by gridlock, but by a deliberate act of exclusion.<\/p>\n

This standoff is more than an Arizona story. It\u2019s a warning to every voter, every district, every citizen who believes in the sanctity of the ballot box.
If a Speaker can block a duly elected member at will, what stops them from shutting down representation for anyone, anytime? What\u2019s left of democracy when the rules are rewritten for partisan gain?<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019re fighting for a principle bigger than any party,\u201d<\/em>\u00a0Mayes said.\u00a0\u201cTaxation without representation cannot stand\u2014not in 1776, not in 2025.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

As the lawsuit moves forward, the nation watches. Will the courts defend the people\u2019s right to representation? Or will political gamesmanship triumph over constitutional order?<\/p>\n

For Adelita Grijalva, for Arizona, and for every American, this is more than a legal battle. It\u2019s a test of whether democracy is real\u2014or just a slogan.<\/p>\n

On Capitol Hill, the echoes of revolution are alive again. The outcome will shape not just one district, but the very soul of the republic.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a bold strike against what he calls \u201castroturfed chaos,\u201d Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) has reignited his push for the Stop Financial Underwriting of Nefarious Demonstrations and Extremist Riots (Stop FUNDERs) Act,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3224,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t