![\"C.Leaked](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/1736974686749_n_tur_jake_sherman_pam_bondi_senate_confirmation_hearing_trump_ag_pick_250115_1920x1080-1hzqc7.webp\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Newly unearthed congressional letters have confirmed the worst fears of Trump supporters \u2014 that the January 6th Committee was never about \u201cdefending democracy\u201d but about weaponizing government power to destroy President Donald J. Trump.<\/p>\n
The shocking letters, released by congressional investigators, show direct coordination between disgraced former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Special Counsel Jack Smith, the Biden Justice Department\u2019s top political hitman.<\/p>\n
Authored by Cheney and then\u2013Committee Chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the two documents reveal that the anti-Trump duo quietly handed over materials from their so-called investigation before Republicans took back the House in 2023.<\/p>\n
The letters, dated December 2022, confirm that the Jan. 6 panel transferred at least 16 interviews and deposition transcripts to Smith\u2019s office. These included attached exhibits, text messages, and even spreadsheets detailing Trump administration communications.<\/p>\n
One of the letters explicitly stated the committee\u2019s intention to make all gathered evidence \u201cavailable to the Department of Justice.\u201d That statement alone shatters any illusion of separation between the congressional probe and Smith\u2019s ongoing witch hunt.<\/p>\n
Within just four days, Cheney and Thompson wrote again to Smith, this time proudly announcing they had sent text messages from Trump\u2019s then\u2013Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and confidential documents from attorney John Eastman.<\/p>\n
\u201cAlong with the latter, we are producing a staff-created spreadsheet of the Meadows texts that contain additional information from privilege logs,\u201d they bragged, showing a complete disregard for privacy and executive privilege.<\/p>\n
The pair even promised to send \u201cadditional evidence on a rolling basis,\u201d effectively making the Jan. 6 Committee an unofficial branch of the Biden Department of Justice.<\/p>\n
According to the House Judiciary Committee, these newly revealed communications prove that the partisan panel worked \u201chand-in-hand\u201d with Smith to politically target Trump and his associates.<\/p>\n
Smith, who was personally appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland, would go on to indict Trump twice \u2014 once over a records dispute with the National Archives, and again over Trump\u2019s challenge to the 2020 election results.<\/p>\n
The collusion between Cheney\u2019s committee and Smith\u2019s prosecutors shows that the Jan. 6 operation was part of a coordinated effort to criminalize political opposition.<\/p>\n
It also raises serious questions about the ethics of lawmakers sharing privileged materials with a prosecutor before their own investigation had even formally concluded.<\/p>\n
Many Republicans are now calling it one of the most blatant abuses of congressional power in modern American history.<\/p>\n
Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), who is leading the current probe into the Jan. 6 Committee\u2019s activities, says the revelations confirm that the previous panel may have engaged in \u201ccriminal or unethical behavior.\u201d<\/p>\n
Loudermilk\u2019s new investigation is focused on allegations that the committee deleted files, manipulated evidence, and conducted itself as an arm of the Democratic Party rather than a neutral fact-finding body.<\/p>\n
Adding to the outrage, both Cheney and Thompson reportedly received\u00a0preemptive pardons<\/strong>\u00a0from President Joe Biden for any actions tied to the Jan. 6 investigation.<\/p>\n That revelation has sparked fury among conservatives, who view the pardons as a blatant attempt to shield political allies from accountability.<\/p>\n The original Jan. 6 Committee was hand-selected by then\u2013Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who barred pro-Trump lawmakers from serving on it \u2014 ensuring the panel\u2019s conclusions were politically one-sided from the start.<\/p>\n Cheney, who lost her seat in a landslide after turning on Trump, used her position to promote the Democrat narrative that the former president was responsible for the Capitol riot.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, Thompson oversaw the committee\u2019s public hearings, which featured selectively edited footage, staged testimony, and heavily scripted \u201cevidence\u201d designed to manipulate public opinion.<\/p>\n Now, the release of these letters confirms that behind the scenes, the same individuals who claimed to be seeking \u201ctruth\u201d were secretly feeding information to federal prosecutors.<\/p>\n Even worse, that information would later form the backbone of Smith\u2019s politically motivated indictments against President Trump.<\/p>\n The entire saga paints a disturbing picture of government collusion \u2014 where congressional Democrats, anti-Trump Republicans, and DOJ officials conspired to weaponize the legal system against a sitting and future president.<\/p>\n For millions of Americans, these revelations only reaffirm what they have long believed: that the Jan. 6 investigation was a partisan hit job masquerading as justice.<\/p>\n The Supreme Court delivered a strong and necessary rebuke to judicial overreach this week, siding with the Trump administration in its battle to uphold fiscal responsibility during the government shutdown.<\/p>\n In a move that protected the separation of powers, the High Court temporarily blocked a lower court\u2019s outrageous attempt to force the Trump administration to pay full Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits despite the absence of appropriated funds.<\/p>\n This was not just a legal victory\u2014it was a constitutional one. President Donald Trump\u2019s administration correctly argued that it cannot spend what Congress has not authorized, and the Court agreed.<\/p>\n At issue was a Rhode Island judge\u2019s demand that the administration raid limited contingency funds to provide full SNAP benefits in the middle of a government shutdown that Democrats have prolonged.<\/p>\n That judge\u2019s order would have set a dangerous precedent: allowing the judiciary to force the executive branch to fund entitlements beyond what Congress appropriates. Trump\u2019s team rightly challenged it.<\/p>\n The administration stood firm. It refused to play into Democrat theatrics and declared that SNAP would be funded based on what legally exists\u2014not what progressive judges or left-wing activists wish for.<\/p>\n This is what real leadership looks like. Trump\u2019s America First agenda does not bend the knee to judicial activism or budgetary blackmail.<\/p>\n Despite liberal outrage, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued an administrative stay on the lower court\u2019s order\u2014confirming that the administration has the right to appeal and pause unlawful mandates.<\/p>\n The Supreme Court\u2019s move ensures that unelected judges cannot usurp Congress\u2019s power of the purse by forcing emergency expenditures that have no basis in law.<\/p>\n For weeks, Democrats have weaponized government shutdown politics, using essential services like SNAP as political hostages to demand concessions on unrelated spending.<\/p>\n The Trump administration has offered commonsense solutions. Fund critical programs through proper channels, reopen government, and stop holding the American people hostage.<\/p>\n Instead, left-wing courts tried to shame the administration into unlawfully raiding contingency funds. That is not governance \u2014 that is economic sabotage.<\/p>\n This administration is protecting taxpayers, defending constitutional limits, and ensuring programs like SNAP are funded through legitimate appropriations \u2014 not judicial diktats.<\/p>\n President Trump has shown time and again that his administration won\u2019t be bullied into lawlessness, even when Democrats and their judicial allies demand it.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s not forget: this crisis was caused by congressional Democrats who refused to pass a clean funding bill. They chose shutdown over compromise.<\/p>\n Now, they want to blame Trump for their failure to govern? That\u2019s not just dishonest \u2014 it\u2019s disgraceful.<\/p>\n The USDA had already begun working to distribute partial SNAP payments using what limited resources were available, showing the administration\u2019s commitment to support struggling families within the law.<\/p>\n But Democrats don\u2019t want solutions. They want spectacles. They\u2019d rather stir outrage than engage in serious governance.<\/p>\n States like Pennsylvania, Oregon, and California rushed to comply with the judge\u2019s ruling \u2014 not because they had to, but because they wanted to score political points against the administration.<\/p>\n Yet Trump held the line. His administration\u2019s appeal to the Supreme Court was not about denying aid \u2014 it was about defending the rule of law.<\/p>\n And once again, Trump was right. The Court understood that real leadership means respecting constitutional boundaries, not rewriting them from the bench.<\/p>\n Justice Jackson\u2019s stay gives the administration breathing room to make its case, and protects the executive branch from being railroaded by a hyper-political lower court.<\/p>\n This moment highlights exactly why Trump\u2019s judicial appointments mattered\u2014because constitutional sanity must prevail when government overreach runs wild.<\/p>\n In a heated and dramatic House Judiciary Committee hearing, Republican Congressman Jim Jordan made explosive allegations against former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, claiming that Schiff leaked classified information to harm former President Donald Trump. This revelation came during a session focused on oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and highlighted the ongoing political tensions surrounding the agency and its leadership.<\/p>\n The hearing began with a moment of reflection as Chairman Jim Jordan acknowledged the tragic death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, who was recently assassinated. Jordan praised Kirk for his commitment to defending the First Amendment and his fight for American values. He invoked the scripture from 2 Timothy 4:7, emphasizing Kirk\u2019s dedication to \u201cfight the good fight, finish the course, keep the faith.\u201d<\/p>\n Jordan\u2019s somber remarks set the tone for the hearing, which quickly shifted to the serious allegations against Schiff. Ranking member of the committee also expressed horror at Kirk\u2019s assassination, highlighting the need for unity against political violence in America. The committee\u2019s shared grief underscored the gravity of the discussions that would follow.<\/p>\n As the hearing progressed, Jim Jordan introduced a whistleblower with 23 years of experience in the intelligence community. This whistleblower, a Democrat staffer, alleged that Schiff pressured them to leak classified information. Jordan raised critical questions about why the head of the intelligence committee would encourage the leaking of such sensitive material.<\/p>\n According to the whistleblower, the leaked information was intended to be used to indict President Trump. This revelation prompted Jordan to draw parallels between Schiff\u2019s actions and those of former FBI Director James Comey, who had also been accused of leaking classified information. Jordan cited an inspector general\u2019s report that claimed Comey violated FBI policy by disclosing classified information, suggesting that both Schiff and Comey were motivated by a desire to undermine Trump\u2019s presidency.<\/p>\n Jordan\u2019s accusations did not stop there. He delved into the origins of the intelligence community\u2019s assessment regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election, claiming that it was manipulated to fit a particular narrative. He pointed to a meeting at the White House on December 9, 2016, where officials decided to change the assessment from stating that Russia did not impact the election vote count to claiming that Russia was attempting to influence the election.<\/p>\n He presented emails from Admiral Mike Rogers, then head of the NSA, expressing concerns about the intelligence assessment. In response, Jordan highlighted an email from James Clapper, then Director of National Intelligence, urging his colleagues to \u201cbe on the same page\u201d and emphasizing the need to support the report, even if it meant compromising their normal procedures.<\/p>\n Jordan asserted that the discredited Steele dossier, funded by the Clinton campaign, played a significant role in shaping the intelligence community\u2019s narrative about Russian interference. He accused Schiff and others of using this dubious information to further their political agenda, thereby undermining the legitimacy of Trump\u2019s presidency.<\/p>\n The hearing took a dramatic turn as Jordan recounted the events of January 6, 2017, when Comey and other intelligence officials briefed then-President-elect Trump about the discredited dossier. Jordan argued that this briefing was intended to give credibility to the false information and set the stage for further investigations into Trump\u2019s ties to Russia.