{"id":353,"date":"2025-11-11T05:47:13","date_gmt":"2025-11-11T05:47:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/breaking-news-kash-patel-takes-down-jamie-raskin-in-congress\/"},"modified":"2025-11-11T05:47:13","modified_gmt":"2025-11-11T05:47:13","slug":"breaking-news-kash-patel-takes-down-jamie-raskin-in-congress","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/?p=353","title":{"rendered":"Breaking News!!! Kash Patel Takes Down Jamie Raskin in Congress"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
Washington, D.C. \u2014<\/strong> In a scene more gripping than any political thriller, the House Judiciary Committee erupted into chaos yesterday as Kash Patel, former chief investigator, unveiled a mountain of evidence implicating Congressman Jaime Raskin in a web of corruption, cover-ups, and ethical violations. The hearing, broadcast live across every major network, left Raskin\u2014once hailed as a constitutional scholar and defender of democracy\u2014utterly speechless and facing the prospect of federal prison.<\/p>\n
It began innocuously enough: Patel entered the committee room, six boxes of documents stacked behind him, the culmination of five months of relentless investigation. The air was tense, the room packed with reporters, lawmakers, and spectators eager for drama but unprepared for the spectacle that would unfold.<\/p>\n
At the center of it all sat Jaime Raskin, the Maryland congressman, his signature bow tie and wire-rimmed glasses reflecting the camera lights. Surrounded by high-priced lawyers and communications advisors, Raskin wore the confidence of a man who believed himself untouchable.<\/p>\n
But that confidence was shattered in minutes.<\/p>\n
Before the chairman could call the hearing to order, Raskin demanded the floor. \u201cThis committee is being used for political persecution,\u201d he declared, voice booming with the practiced authority of a law professor. \u201cAnother Trump lackey, another witch hunt, another attack on those of us who dared to defend democracy.\u201d<\/p>\n
His supporters erupted in applause. Raskin, feeding off the energy, recounted his decades teaching constitutional law and his role in defending the Capitol on January 6th. \u201cTruth doesn\u2019t bend to power,\u201d he insisted. \u201cJustice doesn\u2019t bow to tyrants. And I will not be silenced.\u201d<\/p>\n
It was a masterful performance\u2014but Patel was unmoved.<\/p>\n
Patel quietly opened his briefcase, the click of its latches echoing in the sudden hush. From it, he produced a single folder and began his methodical dismantling of Raskin\u2019s legacy.<\/p>\n
\u201cCongressman Raskin,\u201d Patel said, voice low but clear, \u201cI appreciate your opening statement. Very passionate, very theatrical, very rehearsed. But I\u2019m not here to debate constitutional theory. I\u2019m here because you committed crimes\u2014multiple felonies\u2014while hiding behind the Constitution you claim to revere.\u201d<\/p>\n
Raskin scoffed, but Patel pressed on, revealing a confidential FBI memo from January 15, 2021\u2014nine days after the Capitol riot. The memo, signed by Raskin himself, stated unequivocally:\u00a0No evidence of coordinated insurrection. Spontaneous riot. Not planned coup attempt.<\/p>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/em><\/p>\n
Yet, as Patel showed, Raskin spent the following weeks on national television, claiming the opposite: that the attack was coordinated, planned, and orchestrated by President Trump. The contradiction was damning.<\/p>\n
As Patel laid out the timeline\u2014FBI briefing, Raskin\u2019s signature, subsequent media appearances\u2014the committee room grew tense. Raskin\u2019s face drained of color. Murmurs rippled through the gallery, and even loyal supporters began to look unsettled.<\/p>\n
Patel continued, producing emails and internal memos showing how Raskin buried contradictory testimony, suppressed video evidence, and manipulated the narrative for political gain. Notably, Patel revealed that Raskin\u2019s own staff had flagged Capitol Police Sergeant Torres\u2019 testimony as \u201cproblematic\u201d because it contradicted the coordinated attack narrative. Raskin\u2019s response? \u201cArchive it. Focus on testimony that supports the narrative.\u201d<\/p>\n
The drama escalated when Sergeant Torres, a 23-year veteran of the Capitol Police, stood up in the gallery. His voice trembling, Torres described how he had been reassigned to parking lot duty after refusing to alter his testimony at Raskin\u2019s urging. Patel then played a recording\u2014legally obtained in Maryland\u2014of Raskin pressuring Torres to \u201cemphasize different aspects\u201d and warning him about the consequences for his career.<\/p>\n
The committee room exploded. Reporters shouted, advisers wept, and Raskin\u2019s wife, Sarah Bloom Raskin, walked out, her face pale and resolute.<\/p>\n
Patel\u2019s investigation didn\u2019t stop at cover-ups. He revealed a detailed financial timeline showing the Raskin family\u2019s income spiking to $5.4 million over four years\u2014coinciding with impeachment proceedings and the January 6th investigation.<\/p>\n
Sarah Bloom Raskin\u2019s legal fees from progressive advocacy groups tripled. Raskin\u2019s children launched consulting firms, netting nearly half a million dollars from organizations tied to anti-Trump activities. Raskin himself earned over $2 million in book advances and $3 million for paid speeches, some fetching as much as $50,000 apiece.<\/p>\n
As Patel presented text messages showing Raskin coordinating with media outlets to push the \u201cinsurrection\u201d narrative, the committee fractured. Representative Jared Golden of Maine stood up, voice shaking, and accused Raskin of lying to Congress and the American people. \u201cI cast one of the most important votes of my career based on your lies. I\u2019m calling for your expulsion from Congress.\u201d<\/p>\n
Three other Democrats followed him out. The dam was breaking.<\/p>\n
Patel listed eight felony charges against Raskin: obstruction of justice, perjury, conspiracy to deprive civil rights, witness tampering, and unauthorized disclosure of classified information. The potential sentence: 85 years in federal prison.<\/p>\n
Patel produced Raskin\u2019s own textbook on constitutional law and read aloud passages condemning prosecutorial misconduct and suppression of exculpatory evidence. \u201cYou became the tyranny,\u201d Patel said softly. \u201cYou became everything you taught your students to fight against.\u201d<\/p>\n
Former students entered the room, announcing that American University was removing Raskin\u2019s name from its law program and recalling his textbooks.<\/p>\n
The hearing ended with FBI agents serving subpoenas to Raskin and his family. Outside, hundreds of protesters\u2014Raskin\u2019s own constituents\u2014demanded accountability. Social media exploded. #RaskinLied trended worldwide.<\/p>\n
Raskin\u2019s wife announced her cooperation with authorities and filed for separation. His children returned consulting fees and sought immunity. His staffers packed boxes, some looting supplies. His senior aide admitted to years of cover-ups, now regretted.<\/p>\n
Raskin was left alone, his legacy dismantled piece by piece. In the coming days, he would be expelled from Congress, indicted on eight federal felonies, disbarred, and stripped of his honors. His books were pulled from shelves, his name erased from buildings, his family gone.<\/p>\n
As the sun set over Washington, Raskin sat in darkness, awaiting the consequences of his choices. The constitutional scholar had become the constitutional criminal.<\/p>\n
In the months that followed, the Justice Department reopened over 200 January 6th cases, providing exculpatory evidence to defense attorneys. Seventy-three convictions were overturned or sentences reduced. Congress passed new ethics rules\u2014the \u201cRaskin Rule\u201d\u2014to prevent future abuses.<\/p>\n
A year later, Kash Patel reflected, \u201cThis didn\u2019t need to happen. Raskin had opportunities to tell the truth, to do the right thing. He chose corruption over integrity, money over justice. Justice was served. It always is, eventually.\u201d<\/p>\n
Jaime Raskin now serves his sentence at FCI Cumberland in Maryland. He will be eligible for release in 2071, at age 106. His Wikipedia page is a cautionary tale: \u201cJames Raskin is a former US representative convicted of eight federal felonies related to suppressing evidence and corrupting congressional investigations.\u201d<\/p>\n
America watched as justice unfolded, a reminder that no one\u2014not even the most celebrated defenders of democracy\u2014is above the law.<\/p>\n
JUST IN: The U.S. Senate has voted\u00a050\u201346\u00a0to\u00a0terminate\u00a0former President Donald Trump\u2019s tariffs on Canadian imports, marking a significant shift in U.S.-Canada trade relations. The vote has sparked a heated debate, particularly among those who strongly supported Trump\u2019s \u201cAmerica First\u201d trade policies.<\/p>\n
Several Republicans joined Democrats in voting to repeal the tariffs, drawing the ire of many conservative lawmakers. Among those who sided with the opposition were Senators Lisa Murkowski, Mitch McConnell, Susan Collins, and Rand Paul, all of whom broke ranks with their party\u2019s stance on trade. Their votes have become a flashpoint for criticism from Trump supporters.<\/p>\n
Despite the Senate\u2019s vote, the bill still faces a major hurdle: it must clear the House of Representatives before becoming law. However, given the political landscape, it\u2019s highly unlikely that the measure will pass the House, where the Republican majority remains more sympathetic to Trump\u2019s trade policies.<\/p>\n
The tariffs, which were a key part of Trump\u2019s strategy to bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. and address the trade imbalance with Canada, were intended to protect American industries from cheap imports. Trump\u2019s \u201cAmerica First\u201d approach to trade has been credited with reshaping the global trading landscape, and many of his supporters view the repeal as a step backward.<\/p>\n
Proponents of the tariffs argue that they were necessary to protect U.S. workers and strengthen the domestic economy. They see the vote to eliminate them as a blow to the legacy of Trump\u2019s administration, which emphasized American self-reliance and the protection of U.S. jobs through tough trade measures.<\/p>\n
Opponents of the tariffs, however, argue that they were detrimental to American consumers, raising prices on goods and disrupting supply chains. They contend that dismantling the tariffs could help reduce costs for U.S. businesses and consumers, and restore smoother trade relations with Canada.<\/p>\n
As the debate continues, Trump\u2019s supporters remain adamant that his \u201cAmerica First\u201d trade stance remains essential for U.S. prosperity. While this Senate vote may signal a shift in policy, the former president\u2019s influence on trade and economic policy is far from over.<\/p>\n
see more<\/p>\n
BREAKING:\u00a0Congressman\u00a0Brandon Gill\u00a0(R-TX) has officially begun drafting\u00a0Articles of Impeachment\u00a0against Judge\u00a0James Boasberg, sparking a growing movement within Congress. The push for accountability is gaining momentum rapidly, with lawmakers rallying behind the idea of holding judges to a higher standard.<\/p>\n
Rep.\u00a0Chip Roy\u00a0has already voiced strong support for the impeachment measure, signaling a shift in the Republican Party\u2019s stance toward judicial accountability. This move marks a significant step in efforts to hold members of the judiciary accountable for actions that many believe undermine the integrity of the court system.<\/p>\n
Judge Boasberg is accused of\u00a0weaponizing the bench\u00a0against conservative interests, and critics argue that he has aligned himself with the\u00a0Department of Justice\u2019s political agenda. His decisions have been viewed by many as a clear abuse of power, fueling outrage among conservatives who believe the judiciary should remain impartial and nonpartisan.<\/p>\n
The allegations against Boasberg have ignited a firestorm in Washington, as lawmakers across the country express their frustration with what they perceive as judicial overreach. The movement to impeach him is gaining traction, as more members of Congress join the call for his removal from the bench.<\/p>\n
The message coming out of Congress is loud and clear:\u00a0No one is above the law \u2014 not even a judge.\u00a0This initiative is seen as a critical step in reasserting checks and balances and ensuring that judges uphold the principles of justice without bias or political influence.<\/p>\n
The impeachment push also reflects broader concerns about the potential politicization of the judiciary. With the stakes higher than ever, many lawmakers argue that this is an opportunity to restore public trust in the justice system by holding judges accountable for their actions.<\/p>\n
As the movement continues to build, it\u2019s clear that this is just the beginning of a much larger effort to \u201cclean house\u201d and restore fairness to the American legal system. It\u2019s time to restore justice to the Justice System.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Washington, D.C. \u2014 In a scene more gripping than any political thriller, the House Judiciary Committee erupted into chaos yesterday as Kash Patel, former chief investigator, unveiled a mountain of evidence implicating…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":352,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-353","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
![\"Breaking](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/w21-5.png\")
<\/p>\n