![\"MUST](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Article-1-AD-2-7.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Former Vice President Kamala Harris has just admitted what conservatives have known for years \u2014 Joe Biden\u2019s presidency was never about progress or innovation, but about protecting Democrat donors and union bosses. Her rare public criticism of Biden over his 2021 decision to exclude Elon Musk from a White House electric vehicle event is a stunning confession that exposes the corruption, arrogance, and anti-American priorities of the left.<\/p>\n
Speaking at Fortune\u2019s\u00a0Most Powerful Women Summit<\/em>\u00a0in Washington, D.C., Harris said it was a \u201cbig mistake\u201d not to invite Musk, the man who revolutionized the electric vehicle industry and helped put America back on top of the global innovation map.<\/p>\n \u201cI thought it was a big mistake to not invite Elon Musk when we did a big EV event,\u201d Harris said. \u201cHere he is, the major American manufacturer of extraordinary innovation in this space.\u201d<\/p>\n Her statement, while long overdue, is a complete vindication for conservatives who have repeatedly warned that Biden\u2019s administration operates on political favoritism, not merit. When the White House held its EV summit in 2021, executives from General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis were invited \u2014 but not Musk. The reason? Tesla wasn\u2019t unionized.<\/p>\n That\u2019s right \u2014 the Biden administration deliberately excluded the most successful American EV manufacturer because Elon Musk refused to bow down to Big Labor. Then-White House press secretary Jen Psaki tried to spin it by saying the event was limited to \u201cthe three largest employers of the United Auto Workers,\u201d a clear admission that political loyalty, not innovation, determined who got a seat at the table.<\/p>\n When asked if Tesla\u2019s exclusion was punishment for being non-union, Psaki smugly said, \u201cI\u2019ll let you draw your own conclusion.\u201d Millions of Americans did \u2014 and they concluded that Biden\u2019s \u201cBuild Back Better\u201d agenda was nothing more than a political slush fund for Democrat allies.<\/p>\n Musk, who sold more electric cars than Ford, GM, and Chrysler combined, tweeted, \u201cYeah, seems odd that Tesla wasn\u2019t invited.\u201d The post went viral, and Americans saw right through the charade \u2014 Biden was rewarding his union cronies while punishing the most innovative entrepreneur of our time.<\/p>\n Kamala Harris\u2019s recent comments confirm what conservatives like President Donald J. Trump had been saying: the left doesn\u2019t care about progress unless they can control it.<\/p>\n \u201cSo, I thought that was a mistake,\u201d Harris added. \u201cI don\u2019t know Elon Musk, but I have to assume that that was something that hit him hard and had an impact on his perspective.\u201d<\/p>\n It did more than that \u2014 it changed the course of American politics. Musk, once politically independent, began to see through the hypocrisy of the left and eventually became one of President Trump\u2019s strongest backers. By 2024, Musk had contributed nearly $300 million to Republican-aligned groups through\u00a0<\/p>\n According to sources close to Musk, his decision to back Trump wasn\u2019t about politics \u2014 it was about protecting innovation, freedom, and meritocracy from the grip of bureaucrats and union puppets.<\/p>\n Biden, meanwhile, poured salt in the wound by crediting GM\u2019s Mary Barra with having \u201celectrified the entire automobile industry.\u201d The claim was laughable \u2014 Tesla had already dominated the EV market for years. That single statement reportedly \u201cinfuriated\u201d Musk, and rightly so.<\/p>\n Even when Biden\u2019s team tried to patch things up by arranging private calls with Musk, it was too late. The damage was done, and the message was clear: if you don\u2019t play by the left\u2019s rules, you get punished.<\/p>\n The Tesla snub became a defining symbol of everything wrong with the Biden administration \u2014 a regime obsessed with identity politics, union loyalty, and virtue signaling rather than achievement and results.<\/p>\n Harris\u2019s admission, whether intentional or not, is a damning indictment of the very administration she helped lead. She\u2019s now promoting her memoir,\u00a0107 Days<\/em>, where she calls Biden\u2019s re-election campaign \u201creckless\u201d and criticizes his misplaced priorities. It\u2019s clear that even Democrats are jumping ship as the Biden legacy continues to sink.<\/p>\n \u201cWhen we made the decision as an administration to put the infrastructure bill and the CHIPS Act first, I actually think that was a mistake,\u201d Harris confessed during the event.<\/p>\n The former vice president\u2019s sudden honesty reveals a fractured Democratic Party, divided between those trying to salvage their reputations and those doubling down on failed policies.<\/p>\n Conservatives, however, see this as proof that President Trump\u2019s America First vision was right all along. \u201cPresident Trump has always prioritized results over politics,\u201d said a senior White House official. \u201cUnlike Biden, he celebrates those who actually innovate, create jobs, and make America strong again.\u201d<\/p>\n Harris\u2019s comments also highlight a growing realization among former Democrats that the left\u2019s obsession with \u201cwokeness\u201d and union loyalty has driven away some of the country\u2019s brightest minds. Elon Musk himself warned in 2023 that the \u201cwoke mind virus\u201d was destroying innovation and free thought.<\/p>\n And now, even Kamala Harris seems to agree \u2014 though she\u2019ll never admit it outright.<\/p>\n Her admission that Biden\u2019s policies alienated Musk \u2014 and helped push him into Trump\u2019s camp \u2014 shows how badly the Democrats miscalculated. What they saw as a political victory for unions became a rallying cry for conservatives.<\/p>\n Musk\u2019s support for Trump\u2019s reelection was not just financial \u2014 it was symbolic of the growing coalition of innovators, small business owners, and independent thinkers who are rejecting the left\u2019s suffocating control.<\/p>\n Trump himself praised Musk earlier this year, saying, \u201cElon is a true American innovator. He builds things. He creates jobs. He represents the future that the radical left wants to destroy.\u201d<\/p>\n BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED\u2026<\/p>\n Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.<\/p>\n This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.<\/p>\n Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.<\/p>\n According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals\u2019 involvement in Epstein\u2019s criminal network.<\/p>\n She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.<\/p>\n \u201cEven if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,\u201d Luna told Fox News. \u201cWe have been more than patient.\u201d<\/p>\n These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein\u2019s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.<\/p>\n Luna\u2019s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.<\/p>\n The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ\u2019s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,\u201d Luna said. \u201cThis is corruption at the highest level.\u201d<\/p>\n Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. \u201cHad this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,\u201d one conservative commentator noted.<\/p>\n For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America\u2019s elite circles. The financier\u2019s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.<\/p>\n Now, Luna\u2019s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.<\/p>\n What\u2019s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals\u2014politicians, celebrities, and global financiers\u2014who participated in or enabled Epstein\u2019s crimes.<\/p>\n In this context, Luna\u2019s SHRED Act isn\u2019t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.<\/p>\n Despite Luna\u2019s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ\u2019s handling of Epstein evidence.<\/p>\n Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.<\/p>\n This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.<\/p>\n Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ\u2019s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.<\/p>\n The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna\u2019s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.<\/p>\n BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For\u2026<\/p>\n Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.<\/p>\n Speaking from his post as one of President Trump\u2019s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is a live federal investigation. We\u2019ve asked ICE to take immediate action,\u201d Homan said during a televised interview.<\/p>\n The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC\u2019s office.<\/p>\n According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.<\/p>\n Homan stressed that AOC\u2019s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.<\/p>\n \u201cThis goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There\u2019s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,\u201d he stated.<\/p>\n Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.<\/p>\n AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as \u201cracist\u201d and \u201coppressors.\u201d<\/p>\n Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.<\/p>\n \u201cIf a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that\u2019s a clear violation of federal law,\u201d Homan declared.<\/p>\n Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.<\/p>\n Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.<\/p>\n House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn\u2019t apply to them,\u201d said Rep. Andy Biggs.<\/p>\n Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.<\/p>\n But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.<\/p>\n \u201cThis isn\u2019t about politics. It\u2019s about national security and public trust,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,\u201d Homan confirmed.<\/p>\n Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.<\/p>\n Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.<\/p>\n \u201cWe must restore the rule of law,\u201d he concluded. \u201cNo one, no matter how powerful, is above it.\u201d<\/p>\n BREAKING: The FBI Launches Criminal Investigation Into..<\/p>\n It\u2019s finally happening.<\/p>\n John Brennan and James Comey\u2014two of the most powerful Obama-era intelligence chiefs\u2014are now facing criminal investigations.<\/p>\n Their role in pushing the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion narrative derailed a presidency and deceived the nation.<\/p>\n Sources inside the Justice Department confirm that former CIA Director Brennan is under investigation for allegedly lying to Congress.<\/p>\n Ex-FBI Director Comey is also the subject of an ongoing probe.<\/p>\n Their roles in the origin and manipulation of the Trump-Russia hoax are being scrutinized, years after millions of Americans demanded accountability.<\/p>\n Brennan is accused of pushing the phony Steele dossier into official intelligence assessments.<\/p>\n CIA Russia experts warned the document was so flawed it didn\u2019t meet even \u201cthe most basic tradecraft standards.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cJasmine Crockett didn\u2019t just insult Trump,\u201d Leavitt said during her White House briefing. \u201cShe smeared over 70 million Americans who believe in freedom, God, secure borders, and the Constitution. Calling them mentally ill is not just false\u2014it\u2019s dangerous.\u201d<\/p>\n Brennan ignored the warnings and formalized his demand in writing, insisting the fake dossier be included anyway.<\/p>\n James Comey, for his part, did the same.<\/p>\n The CIA\u2019s review makes clear: FBI leadership under Comey pressured the intelligence community to embed the Steele dossier in their final report on Russian election interference.<\/p>\n The FBI \u201crepeatedly pushed\u201d for its inclusion.<\/p>\n These two didn\u2019t just make bad calls. They rigged the process.<\/p>\n Even worse, Brennan later told Congress under oath that the Steele dossier \u201cwasn\u2019t part of the corpus of intelligence\u201d used in the Russia assessment.<\/p>\n But a newly surfaced email shows that he pushed the dossier hard, despite being warned it could destroy the report\u2019s credibility.<\/p>\n And why did they push it so aggressively? Because it wasn\u2019t about national security.<\/p>\n It was about kneecapping President Trump before he was even sworn in.<\/p>\n \u201cThis was Obama, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan deciding, \u2018We\u2019re going to screw Trump,\u2019\u201d former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told the press.<\/p>\n \u201cThey all knew what they were doing.\u201d<\/p>\n Millions of tax dollars were wasted. Reputations were destroyed.<\/p>\n \u201cJasmine Crockett should visit a Trump rally before shooting her mouth off,\u201d Leavitt challenged.<\/p>\n \u201cShe\u2019ll meet grandmothers, veterans, farmers, teachers, truckers\u2014all proud Americans who just want their country back. These are the people she called mentally ill. What an absolute disgrace.\u201d<\/p>\n And for what? To push Hillary Clinton\u2019s opposition research as gospel truth.<\/p>\n Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt.<\/p>\n Fusion hired British ex-spy Christopher Steele. Steele gave them fiction.<\/p>\n Senator Josh Hawley demanded action: \u201cIf Brennan and Comey lied to Congress or weaponized their agencies against a political opponent, they should be prosecuted\u2014no exceptions, no excuses.\u201d<\/p>\n This scandal is bigger than Watergate.<\/p>\n It poisoned public trust, warped the 2016 election aftermath, and set the tone for years of baseless attacks on a sitting president.<\/p>\n The investigations are underway.<\/p>\n Now the question is, will the justice system do its job, or will the same people who buried the truth for years bury it again?<\/p>\n Brennan and Comey must be held accountable.<\/p>\n No one is above the law, not even the architects of one of the most dishonest political smear campaigns in American history.<\/p>\n BREAKING: Joe Biden Admits to New York Times That\u2026<\/p>\n Joe Biden admitted to The New York Times that he did not personally sign off on every pardon and commutation issued during his presidency, an acknowledgment that has sparked intense debate over how involved he truly was in carrying out one of the most consequential powers of the office.<\/p>\n \u201cI made every decision on the categories and top-level individuals, but the mechanics were left to staff,\u201d Biden told the Times. That sentence alone sent shockwaves through political and legal communities.<\/p>\n According to the New York Post, Biden\u2019s White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients authorized the use of the autopen to execute a sweeping set of clemency actions on January 19, 2025. This included about 2,500 pardons and 1,500 commutations.<\/p>\n The New York Post confirmed, \u201cBiden admitted that he didn\u2019t review every clemency case individually and that his chief of staff, Jeff Zients, authorized the use of the autopen.\u201d<\/p>\n The same report added, \u201cThe autopen application, which Biden also used to sign some legislation, allowed staff to speed up paperwork processing.\u201d<\/p>\n While Biden insisted, as quoted in ABC News, that he personally made \u201cevery decision,\u201d he conceded that he did not individually sign off on each document, saying, \u201cI approved each of the clemency decisions before they were issued.\u201d<\/p>\n The Daily Beast quoted Biden dismissing Republican criticism: \u201cThat is utter BS,\u201d he said, responding to allegations that he had no hand in the clemency spree.<\/p>\n Still, Biden\u2019s comments confirmed the worst fears of critics who have questioned his cognitive fitness and decision-making capacity. As Time reported, the final flurry of clemency actions was conducted with Biden out of public view.<\/p>\n Time added context, noting, \u201cEmails show Biden\u2019s chief of staff, Jeff Zients, approved the use of the autopen to execute clemency documents on the president\u2019s behalf.\u201d<\/p>\n In the same article, the legal implications were underscored: \u201cWhile it is legally permissible, it is extremely rare for a president to use an autopen to sign something as consequential as a clemency order.\u201d<\/p>\n Republican leaders swiftly seized on the opportunity to highlight Biden\u2019s detachment. House Oversight Chair James Comer was quoted as saying, \u201cThis isn\u2019t just about a signature. It\u2019s about tansparency, accountability, and who really was making decisions in that White House.\u201d<\/p>\n Comer continued, as cited in ABC News, \u201cWe are investigating whether this use of the autopen was a way to obscure Biden\u2019s declining capacity and whether any of the beneficiaries had connections to the administration.\u201d<\/p>\n The legal debate over autopen use isn\u2019t new, but Biden\u2019s large-scale application is unprecedented. According to Time, \u201cIt has never been used on this scale or for something with the constitutional gravity of a pardon.\u201d<\/p>\n Even some Democrats were privately concerned. One DNC strategist, speaking anonymously to Politico, said, \u201cIt feeds the narrative that Biden isn\u2019t all there.\u201d<\/p>\n The same strategist added, \u201cIf he wasn\u2019t fully engaged on something as serious as clemency, what else was he rubber-stamping?\u201d<\/p>\n In response to concerns, the Daily Beast reported that Biden maintained, \u201cEach recipient was vetted and met the established standards for clemency.\u201d<\/p>\n But skepticism remains. As Time highlighted, \u201cThe Justice Department is now investigating whether any of the pardons were improperly influenced.\u201d<\/p>\n This adds to a growing list of concerns among voters and lawmakers alike. ABC News reported that the clemency decisions were made with \u201cspeed and secrecy,\u201d raising transparency questions.<\/p>\n Donald Trump, seizing the moment, weighed in: \u201cHe didn\u2019t have the guts or the capacity to do his job,\u201d he said during a recent rally, as quoted in The Daily Beast.<\/p>\n Trump added, \u201cYou don\u2019t get to hide behind a machine when you\u2019re playing with the law.\u201d<\/p>\n The U.S. Congress is getting older. Nearly 120 members are 70 or older, prompting questions about whether cognitive tests should be required for lawmakers. Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez introduced the idea earlier this year, proposing a neutral process to determine if any member suffers from serious cognitive issues. Although the amendment did not pass, many Americans remain uneasy about entrusting major decisions to officials who might face cognitive decline.<\/p>\n Cognitive decline often accompanies old age, but the proposed tests aimed to assess process, not age. Supporters argue that such exams could rebuild trust in Congress. Critics worry they could be politically manipulated or clash with constitutional rights.<\/p>\n Many insist voters, not medical exams, should decide who governs. Lawmakers counter that mandatory testing could infringe on privacy. Legally, implementing such a requirement is complicated. The Constitution sets the qualifications for Congress, and new laws cannot override them. A constitutional amendment would be needed\u2014a challenging feat.<\/p>\n Currently, Congress can discipline or expel members for misconduct. However, expulsion requires a two-thirds vote, and incapacity alone rarely triggers action.<\/p>\n Globally, cognitive requirements for officials are uncommon. In Singapore, officeholders must be of \u201csound mind,\u201d though no routine tests exist. Medical panels may intervene if a mental issue arises.<\/p>\n Communist Party leaders undergo internal cognitive and health evaluations, though details are limited. Similarly, Vatican City expects leaders to be of sound mind, and incapacity can disqualify a candidate.<\/p>\n Even if Congress required tests, selecting the right tool is tricky. Clinical tools like the MMSE and MoCA were not designed to evaluate a person\u2019s fitness for office. Results can be affected by education, language, and culture.<\/p>\n Set the bar too low, and serious issues may be overlooked. Set it too high, and officials could be wrongly disqualified. Alternatives include greater transparency from candidates about health or testing only when credible concerns arise.<\/p>\n Democracy relies on voters to choose leaders. Mandatory cognitive tests remain politically and legally difficult. Still, options exist to boost trust: transparency about officials\u2019 health and fair processes to address serious concerns.<\/p>\n A constitutional amendment would be required for mandatory testing\u2014a rare and difficult path. Meanwhile, hiding cognitive or physical decline becomes harder as symptoms become visible. Public debates, like those involving President Biden and former President Trump, have highlighted these challenges. Sudden changes in an official\u2019s condition can leave voters shaken and disillusioned<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Former Vice President Kamala Harris has just admitted what conservatives have known for years \u2014 Joe Biden\u2019s presidency was never about progress or innovation, but about protecting Democrat donors and union bosses….<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4058,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4059","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t