![\"Cuomo](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/559741512_1388920312595369_4733750332462409466_n.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Radical socialist Zohran Mamdani\u2019s lead over former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the race to become the next mayor of New York City has narrowed to just 6.6 points \u2014 the tightest margin since July \u2014 according to a new AtlasIntel poll released Saturday.<\/p>\n
The survey shows Mamdani leading with 40.6% of the vote, while Cuomo, running as an independent, has climbed to 34% just days before Tuesday\u2019s election, The New York Post\u00a0reported<\/p>\n
.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe gap is closing fast \u2014 we can feel it on the ground everywhere from the Bronx to Staten Island. At this rate, we win the race. Keep going strong,\u201d Cuomo said.<\/p>\n
\u201cSix points in this election is nothing,\u201d he added while campaigning in Brownsville, Brooklyn.<\/p>\n
Cuomo credited his late-campaign momentum to what he called a voter awakening about Mamdani\u2019s unrealistic promises, including proposals for free bus service and city-run grocery stores.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat has happened is, in the primary, Zohran got away with his TikTok band and a smile,\u201d Cuomo said. \u201cHe had his slogans \u2014 \u2018freeze the rent,\u2019 \u2018free buses,\u2019 \u2018free food\u2019 \u2014 and that was enough. But now people have found out what he\u2019s about.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is no free food, there are no free buses, and he can\u2019t raise corporate taxes statewide and dedicate them to New York City. That can\u2019t happen,\u201d Cuomo said.<\/p>\n
AtlasIntel CEO Andrei Roman said Cuomo\u2019s comeback underscores deep voter anxiety about Mamdani\u2019s far-left agenda.<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom not being inspirational to being really hated and terrifying people \u2014 that\u2019s a major difference,\u201d Roman said. \u201cThat\u2019s what\u2019s happening with Mamdani.\u201d<\/p>\n
Roman added that Cuomo\u2019s path to victory depends on consolidating moderate Democrats, independents, and disaffected Republican voters.<\/p>\n
The new poll also gave Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa his highest mark since summer, showing him at 24.1%, up from 22% in a HarrisX survey in July.<\/p>\n
The results sharply contrast with two earlier polls that showed Mamdani holding a comfortable double-digit lead.<\/p>\n
A Fox News poll released Thursday had Mamdani at 47%, Cuomo at 31%, and Sliwa at 15%.<\/p>\n
An Emerson College poll the same day showed Mamdani at 50%, Cuomo at 25%, and Sliwa at 21%.<\/p>\n
RealClearPolitics\u2019 polling average still gives Mamdani a 14.5-point advantage, with 45% support to Cuomo\u2019s 31% and Sliwa\u2019s 17%.<\/p>\n
However, the AtlasIntel numbers suggest the race may be shifting rapidly in its closing days.<\/p>\n
In a hypothetical two-man race without Sliwa, the poll found Cuomo would lead Mamdani 50% to 42%.<\/p>\n
Political analysts say that the result reflects growing frustration with Mamdani\u2019s anti-police positions and statements critical of Israel \u2014 views that have alienated moderate Democrats and Jewish voters in key boroughs.<\/p>\n
Mamdani appeared at an event in Harlem on Saturday at Rev. Al Sharpton\u2019s National Action Network, where he brushed off suggestions of a tightening race.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m not worried at all,\u201d he told reporters. \u201cI continue to be confident, but I never let that confidence become complacency.\u201d<\/p>\n
Cuomo, meanwhile, spent Saturday in Brighton Beach, Brooklyn, where he told supporters there is \u201cno way\u201d Sliwa can win.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe can only make Zohran Mamdani win,\u201d Cuomo said.<\/p>\n
The AtlasIntel poll surveyed registered voters from Oct. 29 to Nov. 1 and has a margin of error of three percentage points.<\/p>\n
According to the New York City Board of Elections, nearly half a million residents have already voted early, a significant increase over 2021 turnout levels.<\/p>\n
With the election just days away, Mamdani\u2019s once-commanding lead has now narrowed into a fight that could go down to the wire.<\/p>\n
It began as a routine House Judiciary Committee hearing, but by the time it ended, the event had become the most-watched political drama in American history. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), one of the nation\u2019s most visible and controversial progressive figures, found herself at the center of a storm that would shake the foundations of Congress, the media, and the very concept of political authenticity.<\/p>\n
The tension in the hearing room was palpable from the start. AOC, dressed in her signature red Valentino blazer, stood at the microphone, a stack of documents in hand. Her opening salvo was as sharp as it was theatrical: \u201cDirector Patel, you\u2019re a fascist running a Gestapo, and I have the evidence right here.\u201d<\/p>\n
Millions watched live as she accused FBI Director Kash Patel of weaponizing federal law enforcement against progressive members of Congress. Her words, chosen for maximum impact, reverberated across social media, instantly trending under hashtags like #AOCvsPatel and #PoliceStateExposed.<\/p>\n
Behind AOC, her media-savvy team live-streamed the event, their captions blaring \u201cAOC DESTROYS FASCIST FBI DIRECTOR\u201d and \u201cEXPOSING THE POLICE STATE LIVE.\u201d The stage was set for a battle of wits and reputations.<\/p>\n
Patel, in a plain suit and with a calm demeanor, sat motionless at the witness table. He let AOC\u2019s accusations hang in the air, watching her with the detachment of someone who had seen this play before.<\/p>\n
When AOC demanded he respond to the \u201cleaked FBI memoranda\u201d she wielded, Patel\u2019s reply was quiet but devastating: \u201cCongresswoman, may I see these documents?\u201d The request was not what her team had anticipated. They had prepared for denial, deflection, or claims of executive privilege. Instead, Patel\u2019s simple demand for transparency shifted the energy in the room.<\/p>\n
Upon inspection, Patel revealed a crucial detail: the watermark on the documents was from a 2019 design, but he had only become director in 2025. \u201cThose documents are forgeries,\u201d he stated. The committee room fell silent as viewers at home saw the comment feeds slow, replaced by question marks and stunned emojis.<\/p>\n
Patel didn\u2019t stop at exposing the forgery. He opened his own briefcase, revealing folders meticulously labeled: \u201cMet Gala Deception,\u201d \u201cRobert\u2019s Scheme,\u201d \u201cCapital Mythology,\u201d \u201cGreen New Deal Grift,\u201d and \u201cThe Yorktown Files.\u201d Each folder contained evidence, not just of AOC\u2019s alleged misdeeds, but of a pattern of deception stretching back years.<\/p>\n
He began with the infamous \u201cTax the Rich\u201d Met Gala dress. Patel produced receipts, loan agreements, emails, and legal demands showing that AOC had not returned borrowed designer items, totaling $57,700 for one night\u2019s outfit. The pattern, Patel argued, was not mere oversight but a calculated scheme: borrowing luxury goods, never returning them, and funneling campaign funds to designers under the guise of consulting fees.<\/p>\n
Patel\u2019s next folder detailed payments to AOC\u2019s husband, Riley Roberts, through a web of LLCs and consulting contracts. According to campaign finance records, Roberts had received $890,000 for \u201cdigital marketing consulting,\u201d yet staff depositions revealed no evidence of actual work produced. Patel traced $3.7 million in payments from progressive organizations to Roberts\u2019s companies, all tied to gaining access to AOC.<\/p>\n
Emails and text messages painted a damning picture: Roberts was allegedly selling legislative support. \u201cYour husband was selling your vote,\u201d Patel declared. Texts between AOC and Roberts suggested she was not only aware of the scheme, but actively directing it.<\/p>\n
Patel then turned to January 6th, 2021. Security footage, phone records, and staged photographs suggested AOC was never in danger during the Capitol riot, yet she negotiated book deals and speaking engagements in real time. Her \u201csurvivor\u201d narrative, Patel alleged, was crafted for profit, resulting in $7.7 million in earnings from appearances, book advances, and a Netflix documentary.<\/p>\n
Therapy records showed only two sessions, one focused on maximizing the media narrative. Texts revealed a premeditated strategy: \u201cIf anything happens, we need to be ready to own the narrative. This could be our Reichstag fire moment.\u201d<\/p>\n
Patel\u2019s fourth folder revealed SEC records showing AOC\u2019s college roommate and other associates made millions trading renewable energy stocks days before major policy announcements. Texts suggested AOC advised these trades, justifying them as \u201cpolitical intelligence.\u201d The pattern expanded to pharmaceutical and defense stocks, with evidence of coordination with corporate executives for mutual profit.<\/p>\n
\u201cTrading on the future you\u2019re creating,\u201d Patel said, \u201cis not governance. It\u2019s racketeering.\u201d Estimated profits from insider trading: $47 million.<\/p>\n
The final folder exposed alleged fabrications in AOC\u2019s personal biography. Property records, school enrollments, employment and lease agreements, and social media posts suggested her \u201cBartender from the Bronx\u201d persona was manufactured. Patel presented evidence that she grew up in affluent Westchester County, worked only six shifts as a bartender, and staged photos in a friend\u2019s apartment.<\/p>\n
Her voter registration used a Bronx business address to gain city resident discounts. Patel concluded, \u201cYou\u2019re not Alexandria from the Bronx. You\u2019re Sandy from Westchester playing a character designed by political consultants.\u201d<\/p>\n
As Patel finished, FBI agents entered the room. AOC\u2019s staff had abandoned their posts, her live stream cut to an error message, and her carefully constructed persona unraveled in real time. Her voice, stripped of its practiced Bronx cadence, revealed the tones of Westchester privilege.<\/p>\n
Her arrest became the most-watched political event in American history. Memes flooded the internet, pairing her \u201cTax the Rich\u201d dress with images of her Yorktown Heights mansion. The communities she claimed to represent felt betrayed, and young activists who had looked up to her expressed heartbreak.<\/p>\n
Democrats distanced themselves overnight, and the progressive movement was rocked by revelations that other \u201cauthentic\u201d candidates had similarly fabricated their biographies. Financial markets crashed as investors realized the extent of insider trading linked to political announcements.<\/p>\n
Riley Roberts was arrested at JFK airport, attempting to flee. The Justice Democrats\u2019 leadership was indicted for conspiracy. Seven other representatives were implicated. The \u201cAuthenticity Act\u201d was rushed through Congress, requiring extensive background verification for all federal candidates and strengthened financial disclosure laws.<\/p>\n
In her trial, AOC was found guilty on all counts: fraud, theft, insider trading, conspiracy, money laundering, and false statements. She was sentenced to 25 years without parole. The progressive policies she championed suffered from association with her corruption, and the authenticity of all politicians was called into question.<\/p>\n
In the end, the saga of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez served as a cautionary tale about the dangers of manufactured authenticity and unchecked ambition. As a Bronx organizer put it, \u201cShe didn\u2019t just lie about who she was. She made it harder for those of us who actually are who we claim to be.\u201d<\/p>\n
The final image was not of AOC, but of the real bartenders, activists, and struggling workers who continued their fights without cameras or costume changes. They were left to rebuild trust in progressive politics, proving that not every claim of injustice is performance art.<\/p>\n
The actress had taken her final bow. In American politics, the show\u2014for once\u2014was over.<\/p>\n
Rachel Maddow, the renowned MSNBC host and political commentator, and her longtime partner, artist Susan Mikula, have reached a heartwarming milestone: 20 years of sharing their lives together.<\/p>\n
The couple, known for their private yet profoundly inspiring relationship, marked this occasion with a minimalist yet deeply romantic photoshoot that has left fans in awe.<\/p>\n
Adding a touch of timeless elegance, Maddow gifted Mikula a simple diamond necklace, symbolizing their enduring love.<\/p>\n
This milestone is not just a celebration of time but a testament to the strength, mutual respect, and quiet devotion that define their bond.<\/p>\n
The story of Rachel Maddow and Susan Mikula began in 1999 in Western Massachusetts, in a moment Maddow famously described as \u201clove at first sight.\u201d At the time, Maddow, fresh from Stanford University and working on her doctoral dissertation at Oxford, took on odd jobs to make ends meet. One such job led her to Mikula\u2019s doorstep, where she was hired to do yard work.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt was very\u00a0Desperate Housewives<\/em>,\u201d Maddow later joked to\u00a0People<\/em>, recalling the serendipitous encounter. The connection was immediate, with Maddow telling\u00a0The New Yorker<\/em>\u00a0in 2017, \u201cBluebirds and comets and stars. It was absolutely 100 percent clear.\u201d Their first date, a quirky outing to the National Rifle Association\u2019s \u201cLadies Day on the Range,\u201d set the tone for a relationship that blends the unconventional with deep commitment.<\/p>\n Over the past two decades, Maddow and Mikula have built a life that balances their contrasting worlds. Maddow, a public figure known for her incisive political commentary on\u00a0The Rachel Maddow Show<\/em>, thrives in the spotlight, while Mikula, a celebrated photographer, prefers a quieter existence focused on her art.<\/p>\n Mikula\u2019s work, often created using vintage techniques like pinhole and Polaroid cameras, has been showcased in galleries across New York, San Francisco, Miami, and beyond, with pieces in the permanent collection of the U.S. Embassy in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico.<\/p>\n Despite their 15-year age gap, their differences have only strengthened their partnership, with Mikula describing Maddow\u2019s relentless work ethic and Maddow crediting Mikula\u2019s support during personal challenges, including her struggles with depression.<\/p>\n The couple\u2019s 20th anniversary photoshoot, shared subtly through social media, captured their understated elegance. Set against the rustic backdrop of their pre-Civil War farmhouse in Western Massachusetts, the images show Maddow and Mikula in simple, earthy tones, their smiles radiating warmth and intimacy.<\/p>\n Fans were particularly touched by the moment Maddow presented Mikula with a delicate diamond necklace, a gesture described as a symbol of \u201ceternal love.\u201d The minimalist design of the necklace mirrors the couple\u2019s approach to their relationship: profound yet unpretentious, grounded in authenticity rather than extravagance.<\/p>\n Social media buzzed with admiration, with fans calling the photos \u201ca beautiful reflection of a love that endures.\u201d<\/p>\n This milestone joins a series of significant moments in their journey together. One of the most poignant was their shared experience during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, when Mikula faced a severe case of the virus.<\/p>\n Maddow, broadcasting from home, shared an emotional update on\u00a0The Rachel Maddow Show<\/em>, calling Mikula \u201cthe center of my universe\u201d and admitting she \u201cwould have moved mountains\u201d to take her place.<\/p>\n The ordeal, which Maddow described as the \u201cscariest thing\u201d she had ever faced, underscored the depth of their bond. Mikula\u2019s recovery, though slow due to lingering symptoms like fatigue and headaches, was a turning point that deepened their appreciation for each other.<\/p>\n Other milestones highlight their shared life. Their first vacation together, a trip that solidified their early connection, allowed them to explore shared passions.<\/p>\n Mikula has been a steadfast presence at Maddow\u2019s career milestones, from Emmy wins to book launches, including\u00a0Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0Blowout<\/em>.<\/p>\n Likewise, Maddow has supported Mikula\u2019s art exhibitions, often attending openings, such as Mikula\u2019s 2009 show in Provincetown and her 2011\u00a0American Bond<\/em>\u00a0series in San Francisco.<\/p>\n Their annual anniversary celebrations, often private and reflective, have been moments to honor their journey, with Maddow once calling their relationship her \u201cproudest accomplishment\u201d in a 2008 interview with\u00a0The Nation<\/em>.<\/p>\n The couple\u2019s decision to forgo marriage, despite its legalization in Massachusetts in 2004, reflects their belief in the unique creativity of their bond.<\/p>\n Maddow has expressed ambivalence about traditional institutions, noting in 2019 that she values the \u201calternative ways of recognizing relationships\u201d developed within gay culture.<\/p>\n Instead, they\u2019ve built a life centered on shared spaces\u2014a Manhattan apartment and their Massachusetts farmhouse\u2014where they enjoy simple pleasures like Mikula\u2019s home-cooked meals and the antics of their \u201cenormous dog\u201d who \u201cbarks at floppy hats but not skateboarders.\u201d<\/p>\n Maddow and Mikula\u2019s 20-year milestone is more than a personal triumph; it\u2019s a beacon for the LGBTQ+ community, showcasing a love that thrives on mutual respect and individuality.<\/p>\n Their minimalist anniversary photos and the diamond necklace gift encapsulate a relationship that doesn\u2019t need grand gestures to shine.<\/p>\n As Maddow continues to shape political discourse and Mikula creates art that captures the essence of place and identity, their partnership remains a quiet, powerful force.<\/p>\n Fans, moved by their story, continue to celebrate a couple whose love, as Maddow once said, is \u201cthe only thing I would kill or die for without hesitation.\u201d<\/p>\n The American people have every right to know who is funding their candidates and what agendas those backers represent. A growing web of financial connections now links a controversial Muslim civil rights network\u2014long scrutinized for its ties to radical organizations\u2014to one of the largest donors backing a Democratic Socialist mayoral candidate.<\/p>\n At the center of this story is the Unity and Justice Fund, a political action committee that pumped $120,000 into the campaign of Zohran Mamdani, a self-proclaimed socialist running for New York City mayor. What raises immediate concern is not just the amount but the deeper affiliations behind that check.<\/p>\n The Unity and Justice Fund shares addresses and leadership personnel with CAIR Action, a political arm operating under the broader umbrella of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. CAIR, which has long positioned itself as a Muslim civil rights organization, has also faced years of scrutiny over its alleged radical ties.<\/p>\n Despite claims that CAIR Action is legally distinct from the non-profit CAIR, the overlapping addresses and shared individuals blur the lines. This looks less like a separation and more like a shell game, designed to mask political operations behind a non-profit veil.<\/p>\n Additional PACs linked to the same network are involved as well. Unity Lab PAC, which donated $23,500 to Mamdani\u2019s PAC, is run by an individual who also operates as a spokesperson for a regional chapter of the parent organization. These interconnections raise red flags about coordination and transparency.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, the Unity and Justice Fund is run by a former chapter leader of the parent group, who also serves as treasurer for its political wing. This is not mere coincidence. It reflects a deliberate strategy to create political influence pipelines using groups that purport to be civil rights advocates.<\/p>\n Radical anti-Israel activist Linda Sarsour openly celebrated the influence of these PACs in Mamdani\u2019s campaign, boasting that a large majority of his financial backing came from Muslim-American donors mobilized by these very organizations.<\/p>\n That statement alone should have set off alarms among ethics watchdogs and campaign-finance authorities. Yet, the only action taken by the involved parties was to add a legal disclaimer\u2014hardly the kind of meaningful transparency the public deserves.<\/p>\n This network of political activity is also housed at the same address as the national office of the civil rights organization, further cementing suspicions that these entities are working hand-in-hand despite the technical distinctions on paper.<\/p>\n This is more than just politics as usual. It\u2019s a sophisticated funding apparatus working to shape U.S. elections using money from groups that have faced serious questions about their allegiances and activities.<\/p>\n The background of these groups is not irrelevant. Leaders of their affiliated networks have previously been convicted of financing foreign terrorist organizations. Several high-profile trials have exposed the extent to which some of these so-called charities were functioning as financial channels for radical Islamist movements.<\/p>\n Yet these same networks are now pouring funds into the campaign of a mayoral candidate with openly radical positions, including praise for individuals convicted of funding terrorism. That should be deeply troubling to every American.<\/p>\n One such case involved a now-defunct charity whose directors were sentenced for funneling money to Hamas. During that trial, the civil rights group connected to the Mamdani campaign was named as an unindicted co-conspirator.<\/p>\n Even more disturbing is Mamdani\u2019s own record. Years ago, he released a song in which he explicitly praised the convicted directors of that radical charity, telling listeners to \u201clook \u2019em up.\u201d That\u2019s not a slip\u2014it\u2019s a declaration.<\/p>\n The message being sent here is that it\u2019s perfectly acceptable to glamorize convicted criminals, accept funding from groups under investigation, and advance a political platform that aligns with far-left ideologies and radical sympathies.<\/p>\n This entire operation represents a gross manipulation of campaign finance laws, exploiting nonprofit protections to funnel massive political donations into the coffers of socialist candidates.<\/p>\n The American people are being kept in the dark about who is really backing some of the most extreme voices rising in today\u2019s political ranks. And when those backers have controversial, even dangerous, affiliations, the implications become urgent.<\/p>\n This isn\u2019t about smearing one religion or community. This is about national security, campaign integrity, and the need for full transparency in our electoral system.<\/p>\n Every dollar entering a political campaign should be traceable, accountable, and free from the shadow of extremism. When we allow dark-money operations tied to radical networks to go unchecked, we threaten the very foundations of our democracy.<\/p>\n The candidate in question has not refuted the source of the donations, nor has he returned the money. That silence is as telling as any endorsement. It signals complicity or, at the very least, indifference to the origins of his campaign\u2019s financial backing.<\/p>\n Congress must act. Campaign finance rules must be updated to prevent nonprofits from serving as political fronts. Audits must be conducted. PACs with suspicious affiliations must be shut down.<\/p>\n Voters deserve to know who\u2019s trying to buy influence in American cities\u2014and for what purpose. In this case, the answer appears to be power cloaked in radicalism.<\/p>\n BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED\u2026<\/p>\n Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.<\/p>\n This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.<\/p>\n Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.<\/p>\n According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals\u2019 involvement in Epstein\u2019s criminal network.<\/p>\n She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.<\/p>\n \u201cEven if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,\u201d Luna told Fox News. \u201cWe have been more than patient.\u201d<\/p>\n These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein\u2019s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.<\/p>\n Luna\u2019s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.<\/p>\n The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ\u2019s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,\u201d Luna said. \u201cThis is corruption at the highest level.\u201d<\/p>\n Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. \u201cHad this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,\u201d one conservative commentator noted.<\/p>\n For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America\u2019s elite circles. The financier\u2019s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.<\/p>\n Now, Luna\u2019s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.<\/p>\n What\u2019s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals\u2014politicians, celebrities, and global financiers\u2014who participated in or enabled Epstein\u2019s crimes.<\/p>\n In this context, Luna\u2019s SHRED Act isn\u2019t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.<\/p>\n Despite Luna\u2019s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ\u2019s handling of Epstein evidence.<\/p>\n Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.<\/p>\n This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.<\/p>\n Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ\u2019s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.<\/p>\n The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna\u2019s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Radical socialist Zohran Mamdani\u2019s lead over former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the race to become the next mayor of New York City has narrowed to just 6.6 points \u2014 the tightest…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6860,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6861","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t