![\"Supreme](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Screenshot_535-1762164226-q80.webp\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The Supreme Court has cleared the path for the Trump administration to deport a group of immigrants held at a U.S. military base in Djibouti to South Sudan.<\/p>\n
The order came less than two weeks after the high court temporarily stayed a ruling by U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy, whose order barred the federal government from deporting immigrants to \u201cthird countries\u201d\u2014those not explicitly named in their removal orders\u2014without first ensuring, through a series of safeguards, that the individuals would not face torture upon deportation<\/p>\n
Murphy\u2019s May 21 ruling found that the government violated his April 18 order by attempting to deport eight men to South Sudan. The U.S. has evacuated all non-emergency personnel from South Sudan, and the State Department advises against travel there due to \u201ccrime, kidnapping, and armed conflict.\u201d<\/p>\n
The flight carrying the immigrants bound for South Sudan instead landed in nearby Djibouti, where the men have since been held at a U.S. military base.<\/p>\n
On May 27, the Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court to stay Murphy\u2019s April 18 order, seeking permission to proceed with \u201cthird country\u201d removals while the legal battle over the practice unfolds.<\/p>\n
U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer contended that Murphy\u2019s \u201cjudicially created procedures are currently wreaking havoc on the third-country removal process\u201d and \u201cdisrupt[ing] sensitive diplomatic, foreign policy, and national-security efforts.\u201d<\/p>\n
Several hours after the Supreme Court responded to the Trump administration\u2019s first request, made on June 23, Murphy then claimed that his May 21 order remained unaffected by the high court\u2019s decision.<\/p>\n
The Trump administration returned to the Supreme Court the following day, requesting that the justices clarify the federal government\u2019s authority to proceed with deporting the immigrants currently held in Djibouti. Sauer urged the court to act swiftly to address what he called Murphy\u2019s \u201cunprecedented defiance\u201d of the court\u2019s authority.<\/p>\n
In Thursday\u2019s brief, an unsigned 7-2 opinion, the majority indicated that the court\u2019s \u201cJune 23 order stayed the April 18 preliminary injunction in full. The May 21 remedial order cannot now be used to enforce an injunction that our stay rendered unenforceable.\u201d<\/p>\n
Two of the Supreme Court\u2019s liberals, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented, while the third liberal, Justice Elena Kagan, sided with the court\u2019s conservative majority.<\/p>\n
She noted that she had previously disagreed with the Supreme Court\u2019s original ruling permitting third-country removals to proceed. \u201cBut a majority of this court saw things differently, and I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this court has stayed,\u201d she wrote.<\/p>\n
The eight illegal immigrants include individuals from Cuba, Vietnam, and Laos, reports noted.<\/p>\n
Sotomayor\u2019s dissent contended that \u201c[w]hat the Government wants to do, concretely, is send the eight noncitizens it illegally removed from the United States from Djibouti to South Sudan, where they will be turned over to the local authorities without regard for the likelihood that they will face torture or death.\u201d<\/p>\n
She argued that the court should not have considered the government\u2019s request at all, as the government should have made its arguments in the lower courts first. Moreover, she suggested that the Supreme Court\u2019s \u201ccontinued refusal to justify its extraordinary decisions in this case, even as it faults lower courts for failing to properly divine their import, is indefensible<\/p>\n
Newly unearthed congressional letters have confirmed the worst fears of Trump supporters \u2014 that the January 6th Committee was never about \u201cdefending democracy\u201d but about weaponizing government power to destroy President Donald J. Trump.<\/p>\n
The shocking letters, released by congressional investigators, show direct coordination between disgraced former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Special Counsel Jack Smith, the Biden Justice Department\u2019s top political hitman.<\/p>\n
Authored by Cheney and then\u2013Committee Chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the two documents reveal that the anti-Trump duo quietly handed over materials from their so-called investigation before Republicans took back the House in 2023.<\/p>\n
The letters, dated December 2022, confirm that the Jan. 6 panel transferred at least 16 interviews and deposition transcripts to Smith\u2019s office. These included attached exhibits, text messages, and even spreadsheets detailing Trump administration communications.<\/p>\n
One of the letters explicitly stated the committee\u2019s intention to make all gathered evidence \u201cavailable to the Department of Justice.\u201d That statement alone shatters any illusion of separation between the congressional probe and Smith\u2019s ongoing witch hunt.<\/p>\n
Within just four days, Cheney and Thompson wrote again to Smith, this time proudly announcing they had sent text messages from Trump\u2019s then\u2013Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and confidential documents from attorney John Eastman.<\/p>\n
\u201cAlong with the latter, we are producing a staff-created spreadsheet of the Meadows texts that contain additional information from privilege logs,\u201d they bragged, showing a complete disregard for privacy and executive privilege.<\/p>\n
The pair even promised to send \u201cadditional evidence on a rolling basis,\u201d effectively making the Jan. 6 Committee an unofficial branch of the Biden Department of Justice.<\/p>\n
According to the House Judiciary Committee, these newly revealed communications prove that the partisan panel worked \u201chand-in-hand\u201d with Smith to politically target Trump and his associates.<\/p>\n
Smith, who was personally appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland, would go on to indict Trump twice \u2014 once over a records dispute with the National Archives, and again over Trump\u2019s challenge to the 2020 election results.<\/p>\n
The collusion between Cheney\u2019s committee and Smith\u2019s prosecutors shows that the Jan. 6 operation was part of a coordinated effort to criminalize political opposition.<\/p>\n
It also raises serious questions about the ethics of lawmakers sharing privileged materials with a prosecutor before their own investigation had even formally concluded.<\/p>\n
Many Republicans are now calling it one of the most blatant abuses of congressional power in modern American history.<\/p>\n
Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), who is leading the current probe into the Jan. 6 Committee\u2019s activities, says the revelations confirm that the previous panel may have engaged in \u201ccriminal or unethical behavior.\u201d<\/p>\n
Loudermilk\u2019s new investigation is focused on allegations that the committee deleted files, manipulated evidence, and conducted itself as an arm of the Democratic Party rather than a neutral fact-finding body.<\/p>\n
Adding to the outrage, both Cheney and Thompson reportedly received\u00a0preemptive pardons<\/strong>\u00a0from President Joe Biden for any actions tied to the Jan. 6 investigation.<\/p>\n That revelation has sparked fury among conservatives, who view the pardons as a blatant attempt to shield political allies from accountability.<\/p>\n The original Jan. 6 Committee was hand-selected by then\u2013Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who barred pro-Trump lawmakers from serving on it \u2014 ensuring the panel\u2019s conclusions were politically one-sided from the start.<\/p>\n Cheney, who lost her seat in a landslide after turning on Trump, used her position to promote the Democrat narrative that the former president was responsible for the Capitol riot.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, Thompson oversaw the committee\u2019s public hearings, which featured selectively edited footage, staged testimony, and heavily scripted \u201cevidence\u201d designed to manipulate public opinion.<\/p>\n Now, the release of these letters confirms that behind the scenes, the same individuals who claimed to be seeking \u201ctruth\u201d were secretly feeding information to federal prosecutors.<\/p>\n Even worse, that information would later form the backbone of Smith\u2019s politically motivated indictments against President Trump.<\/p>\n The entire saga paints a disturbing picture of government collusion \u2014 where congressional Democrats, anti-Trump Republicans, and DOJ officials conspired to weaponize the legal system against a sitting and future president.<\/p>\n For millions of Americans, these revelations only reaffirm what they have long believed: that the Jan. 6 investigation was a partisan hit job masquerading as justice.<\/p>\n BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED\u2026<\/p>\n Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.<\/p>\n This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.<\/p>\n Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.<\/p>\n According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals\u2019 involvement in Epstein\u2019s criminal network.<\/p>\n She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.<\/p>\n \u201cEven if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,\u201d Luna told Fox News. \u201cWe have been more than patient.\u201d<\/p>\n These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein\u2019s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.<\/p>\n Luna\u2019s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.<\/p>\n The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ\u2019s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,\u201d Luna said. \u201cThis is corruption at the highest level.\u201d<\/p>\n Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. \u201cHad this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,\u201d one conservative commentator noted.<\/p>\n For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America\u2019s elite circles. The financier\u2019s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.<\/p>\n Now, Luna\u2019s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.<\/p>\n What\u2019s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals\u2014politicians, celebrities, and global financiers\u2014who participated in or enabled Epstein\u2019s crimes.<\/p>\n In this context, Luna\u2019s SHRED Act isn\u2019t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.<\/p>\n Despite Luna\u2019s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ\u2019s handling of Epstein evidence.<\/p>\n Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.<\/p>\n This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.<\/p>\n Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ\u2019s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.<\/p>\n The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna\u2019s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.<\/p>\n BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For\u2026<\/p>\n Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.<\/p>\n Speaking from his post as one of President Trump\u2019s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is a live federal investigation. We\u2019ve asked ICE to take immediate action,\u201d Homan said during a televised interview.<\/p>\n The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC\u2019s office.<\/p>\n According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.<\/p>\n Homan stressed that AOC\u2019s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.<\/p>\n \u201cThis goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There\u2019s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,\u201d he stated.<\/p>\n Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.<\/p>\n AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as \u201cracist\u201d and \u201coppressors.\u201d<\/p>\n Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.<\/p>\n \u201cIf a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that\u2019s a clear violation of federal law,\u201d Homan declared.<\/p>\n Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.<\/p>\n Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.<\/p>\n House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn\u2019t apply to them,\u201d said Rep. Andy Biggs.<\/p>\n Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.<\/p>\n But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.<\/p>\n \u201cThis isn\u2019t about politics. It\u2019s about national security and public trust,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,\u201d Homan confirmed.<\/p>\n Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.<\/p>\n Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.<\/p>\n \u201cWe must restore the rule of law,\u201d he concluded. \u201cNo one, no matter how powerful, is above it.\u201d<\/p>\n BREAKING: The FBI Launches Criminal Investigation Into..<\/p>\n It\u2019s finally happening.<\/p>\n John Brennan and James Comey\u2014two of the most powerful Obama-era intelligence chiefs\u2014are now facing criminal investigations.<\/p>\n Their role in pushing the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion narrative derailed a presidency and deceived the nation.<\/p>\n Sources inside the Justice Department confirm that former CIA Director Brennan is under investigation for allegedly lying to Congress.<\/p>\n Ex-FBI Director Comey is also the subject of an ongoing probe.<\/p>\n Their roles in the origin and manipulation of the Trump-Russia hoax are being scrutinized, years after millions of Americans demanded accountability.<\/p>\n Brennan is accused of pushing the phony Steele dossier into official intelligence assessments.<\/p>\n CIA Russia experts warned the document was so flawed it didn\u2019t meet even \u201cthe most basic tradecraft standards.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cJasmine Crockett didn\u2019t just insult Trump,\u201d Leavitt said during her White House briefing. \u201cShe smeared over 70 million Americans who believe in freedom, God, secure borders, and the Constitution. Calling them mentally ill is not just false\u2014it\u2019s dangerous.\u201d<\/p>\n Brennan ignored the warnings and formalized his demand in writing, insisting the fake dossier be included anyway.<\/p>\n James Comey, for his part, did the same.<\/p>\n The CIA\u2019s review makes clear: FBI leadership under Comey pressured the intelligence community to embed the Steele dossier in their final report on Russian election interference.<\/p>\n The FBI \u201crepeatedly pushed\u201d for its inclusion.<\/p>\n These two didn\u2019t just make bad calls. They rigged the process.<\/p>\n Even worse, Brennan later told Congress under oath that the Steele dossier \u201cwasn\u2019t part of the corpus of intelligence\u201d used in the Russia assessment.<\/p>\n But a newly surfaced email shows that he pushed the dossier hard, despite being warned it could destroy the report\u2019s credibility.<\/p>\n And why did they push it so aggressively? Because it wasn\u2019t about national security.<\/p>\n It was about kneecapping President Trump before he was even sworn in.<\/p>\n \u201cThis was Obama, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan deciding, \u2018We\u2019re going to screw Trump,\u2019\u201d former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told the press.<\/p>\n \u201cThey all knew what they were doing.\u201d<\/p>\n Millions of tax dollars were wasted. Reputations were destroyed.<\/p>\n \u201cJasmine Crockett should visit a Trump rally before shooting her mouth off,\u201d Leavitt challenged.<\/p>\n \u201cShe\u2019ll meet grandmothers, veterans, farmers, teachers, truckers\u2014all proud Americans who just want their country back. These are the people she called mentally ill. What an absolute disgrace.\u201d<\/p>\n And for what? To push Hillary Clinton\u2019s opposition research as gospel truth.<\/p>\n Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt.<\/p>\n Fusion hired British ex-spy Christopher Steele. Steele gave them fiction.<\/p>\n Senator Josh Hawley demanded action: \u201cIf Brennan and Comey lied to Congress or weaponized their agencies against a political opponent, they should be prosecuted\u2014no exceptions, no excuses.\u201d<\/p>\n This scandal is bigger than Watergate.<\/p>\n It poisoned public trust, warped the 2016 election aftermath, and set the tone for years of baseless attacks on a sitting president.<\/p>\n The investigations are underway.<\/p>\n Now the question is, will the justice system do its job, or will the same people who buried the truth for years bury it again?<\/p>\n Brennan and Comey must be held accountable.<\/p>\n No one is above the law, not even the architects of one of the most dishonest political smear campaigns in American history.<\/p>\n BREAKING: Joe Biden Admits to New York Times That\u2026<\/p>\n Joe Biden admitted to The New York Times that he did not personally sign off on every pardon and commutation issued during his presidency, an acknowledgment that has sparked intense debate over how involved he truly was in carrying out one of the most consequential powers of the office.<\/p>\n \u201cI made every decision on the categories and top-level individuals, but the mechanics were left to staff,\u201d Biden told the Times. That sentence alone sent shockwaves through political and legal communities.<\/p>\n According to the New York Post, Biden\u2019s White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients authorized the use of the autopen to execute a sweeping set of clemency actions on January 19, 2025. This included about 2,500 pardons and 1,500 commutations.<\/p>\n The New York Post confirmed, \u201cBiden admitted that he didn\u2019t review every clemency case individually and that his chief of staff, Jeff Zients, authorized the use of the autopen.\u201d<\/p>\n The same report added, \u201cThe autopen application, which Biden also used to sign some legislation, allowed staff to speed up paperwork processing.\u201d<\/p>\n While Biden insisted, as quoted in ABC News, that he personally made \u201cevery decision,\u201d he conceded that he did not individually sign off on each document, saying, \u201cI approved each of the clemency decisions before they were issued.\u201d<\/p>\n The Daily Beast quoted Biden dismissing Republican criticism: \u201cThat is utter BS,\u201d he said, responding to allegations that he had no hand in the clemency spree.<\/p>\n Still, Biden\u2019s comments confirmed the worst fears of critics who have questioned his cognitive fitness and decision-making capacity. As Time reported, the final flurry of clemency actions was conducted with Biden out of public view.<\/p>\n Time added context, noting, \u201cEmails show Biden\u2019s chief of staff, Jeff Zients, approved the use of the autopen to execute clemency documents on the president\u2019s behalf.\u201d<\/p>\n In the same article, the legal implications were underscored: \u201cWhile it is legally permissible, it is extremely rare for a president to use an autopen to sign something as consequential as a clemency order.\u201d<\/p>\n Republican leaders swiftly seized on the opportunity to highlight Biden\u2019s detachment. House Oversight Chair James Comer was quoted as saying, \u201cThis isn\u2019t just about a signature. It\u2019s about transparency, accountability, and who really was making decisions in that White House.\u201d<\/p>\n Comer continued, as cited in ABC News, \u201cWe are investigating whether this use of the autopen was a way to obscure Biden\u2019s declining capacity and whether any of the beneficiaries had connections to the administration.\u201d<\/p>\n The legal debate over autopen use isn\u2019t new, but Biden\u2019s large-scale application is unprecedented. According to Time, \u201cIt has never been used on this scale or for something with the constitutional gravity of a pardon.\u201d<\/p>\n Even some Democrats were privately concerned. One DNC strategist, speaking anonymously to Politico, said, \u201cIt feeds the narrative that Biden isn\u2019t all there.\u201d<\/p>\n The same strategist added, \u201cIf he wasn\u2019t fully engaged on something as serious as clemency, what else was he rubber-stamping?\u201d<\/p>\n In response to concerns, the Daily Beast reported that Biden maintained, \u201cEach recipient was vetted and met the established standards for clemency.\u201d<\/p>\n This adds to a growing list of concerns among voters and lawmakers alike. ABC News reported that the clemency decisions were made with \u201cspeed and secrecy,\u201d raising transparency questions.<\/p>\n Donald Trump, seizing the moment, weighed in: \u201cHe didn\u2019t have the guts or the capacity to do his job,\u201d he said during a recent rally, as quoted in The Daily Beast.<\/p>\n Trump added, \u201cYou don\u2019t get to hide behind a machine when you\u2019re playing with the law.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The Supreme Court has cleared the path for the Trump administration to deport a group of immigrants held at a U.S. military base in Djibouti to South Sudan. The order came less…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8669,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8670","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t