{"id":8747,"date":"2025-11-14T15:30:19","date_gmt":"2025-11-14T15:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/schiff-dems-lies-comes-crashing-down-hawley-pulls-receipts-to-accuse-adam-schiff-dems-of-lying-2\/"},"modified":"2025-11-14T15:30:19","modified_gmt":"2025-11-14T15:30:19","slug":"schiff-dems-lies-comes-crashing-down-hawley-pulls-receipts-to-accuse-adam-schiff-dems-of-lying-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/?p=8747","title":{"rendered":"\u201cSchiff, Dems Lies Comes Crashing Down\u201d \u2013 Hawley Pulls Receipts To Accuse Adam Schiff, Dems of Lying"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\u201cSchiff,<\/p>\n

WASHINGTON, D.C.<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Senator\u00a0Josh Hawley<\/strong>\u00a0(R-MO) delivered a scathing condemnation of the Democratic Party and its leadership, accusing them of a four-year-long campaign of deception regarding President Joe Biden\u2019s cognitive fitness. Armed with documented quotes from Democratic officials and the devastating conclusions of the Department of Justice (DOJ), Hawley used a Senate hearing to demand immediate transparency, effectively calling the Democrats\u2019 bluff on the legality of the Biden administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n

The confrontation centered on a simple, yet explosive contradiction: While top Democrats consistently vouched for Biden\u2019s \u201csharp,\u201d \u201cfocused,\u201d and \u201cformidable\u201d demeanor, the President\u2019s own Justice Department concluded he was too mentally impaired to stand trial for mishandling classified documents.<\/p>\n

Hawley wasted no time, using the absent seats of his Democratic colleagues as a visual symbol of their evasion. \u201cAll you have to do is look over at this side of the dais to see that the stone wall continues. From the party that lied to this nation for four years.\u201d<\/p>\n

The core of Hawley\u2019s accusation hinged on Special Counsel Robert Hur\u2019s DOJ report, which investigated Biden\u2019s illegal retention of classified documents\u2014documents, as Hawley noted, illegally kept \u201cin his garage, in his freezer. I mean, Lord knows where.\u201d<\/p>\n

The report concluded that no charges were warranted largely because Biden was deemed to be a\u00a0\u201cwell-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0who could not form the \u201crequisite mental state to stand trial.\u201d In other words, the President lacked the mental ability to be held accountable for a federal crime.<\/p>\n

Hawley then slammed the Democrats\u2019 public response, which involved outright denial and dismissal of the DOJ\u2019s finding:<\/p>\n

Vice President Kamala Harris:<\/strong>\u00a0Claimed, \u201cThe way that the Hur report characterized the president [is] so wrong. The president\u2019s demeanor is totally fine.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWhere are they now?\u201d Hawley demanded of the empty seats. \u201cThey don\u2019t want to answer for any of those quotes now. They lied to us for four years, and we know they lied. They know they lied. It\u2019s why they\u2019re not here. They don\u2019t want to answer a single question.\u201d<\/p>\n

Hawley condemned the political calculus: \u201cThe bill of goods they sold this country\u2026 they walked this country right into one of the greatest constitutional crises of our history\u2026 and now they are afraid to even show up to admit it.\u201d<\/p>\n

He characterized the Democrats\u2019 continued support of Biden as elder abuse, suggesting the party was prioritizing political power over the well-being of the former President. \u201cThis is embarrassing. But worse than that,\u00a0<\/p>\n

Hawley immediately pivoted to a crucial legal and ethical component that could prove the deception: the use of the\u00a0Autopen<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/strong>\u00a0to sign official documents.<\/p>\n

The discussion centered on the opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), which dictates that the presidential Autopen can only be used when the President \u201cspecifically directs it and it is under his direct authority.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cSo based on the facts we know,\u201d Hawley challenged the witnesses, \u201cdid that happen in this case with all of the pardons and clemencies and other giveaways that Joe Biden signed?\u201d<\/p>\n

A witness confirmed that if the Biden White House followed traditional practice,\u00a0\u201cthere should be records to indicate either through a covering memorandum or briefing books where the President would have signed his signature authorizing his decision.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

Crucially, the witness stated that none of these records have been produced.<\/p>\n

Hawley hammered the point: \u201cThis is a binary question\u2026 We can find out. So I right now today,\u00a0<\/p>\n

Hawley asserted that the paper trail\u2014the records of the staff secretary\u2019s office authorizing the use of the Autopen for acts such as pardoning \u201cmurderers, drug dealers, [and] child rapists\u201d\u2014would prove whether Biden was truly mentally capable of making those decisions, or if staff members were bypassing his cognitive limitations and abusing the power of the office.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf what you did is legal, and if you\u2019re really not embarrassed about it and you think it was totally constitutional, release the paper flow.\u00a0Show us the documents where the President authorized the use of the pen for every single pardon and clemency and stay application.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/strong>\u201d<\/p>\n

Hawley\u2019s final statement was a forceful summary of his purpose: \u201cJosh Hawley did not show up to score political points.\u00a0He showed up to defend the truth and demand honesty from those in power.<\/strong>\u00a0He stood in that chamber like a wall of accountability, refusing to let years of deception, excuses, and political games be brushed aside.\u201d<\/p>\n

The hearing sent an unmistakable message: In an era where trust in government is fragile, leaders who lie, hide, and manipulate the truth will be held to account. The fight for honesty is not finished, but after Hawley\u2019s unwavering resolve, it is stronger than ever.<\/p>\n

Tech billionaire Elon Musk sparked controversy online after posting that the New York City mayoral election ballot is a \u201cscam.\u201d In his message, he claimed that the ballot was designed unfairly, arguing that voters were not required to present identification, that some mayoral candidates appeared more than once, and that former governor Andrew Cuomo\u2019s name was placed in a less visible position on the form. Musk\u2019s comments quickly gained traction, prompting widespread debate over the accuracy of his claims and the fairness of New York City\u2019s election procedures.<\/p>\n

Musk\u2019s post touched on several sensitive issues in American elections, including voter identification laws and ballot design. His first claim \u2014 that no ID is required to vote \u2014 is technically true in certain contexts, but it omits the legal background. In New York, voters are not generally required to present government-issued photo ID at polling places if their registration has been verified. This rule, long established in state law, is meant to make voting accessible to all eligible citizens. Critics of Musk\u2019s statement argued that calling this practice a \u201cscam\u201d misrepresents a standard voting policy used across many U.S. states.<\/p>\n

Another point Musk raised was that some candidates appeared twice on the ballot. While this may seem suspicious to those unfamiliar with local election rules, experts quickly clarified that the repetition is allowed under New York\u2019s \u201cfusion voting\u201d system. This system permits candidates to run on multiple party lines if they have been endorsed by more than one political organization. For example, a candidate like Zohran Mamdani might appear twice on the ballot \u2014 once under the Democratic Party and once under another allied party. Far from being evidence of manipulation, this is a legitimate and long-standing feature of New York\u2019s electoral process.<\/p>\n

Musk also objected to the placement of Andrew Cuomo\u2019s name on the ballot, noting that it appeared last in the bottom right corner. Ballot design and placement are determined by rules established by the city\u2019s Board of Elections, not by individual candidates. The order often follows a structured system based on party status or random drawing, rather than favoritism or bias. Election officials noted that while visual placement can affect voter perception, all candidates were listed in accordance with official procedure.<\/p>\n

The reaction to Musk\u2019s post was swift and mixed. Supporters of the tech entrepreneur praised him for drawing attention to what they perceived as flaws in the electoral process, while critics accused him of spreading misinformation and undermining confidence in democratic institutions. Within hours, journalists, election experts, and fact-checkers weighed in to provide context, explaining that each of Musk\u2019s claims reflected misunderstandings of established election law rather than evidence of misconduct.<\/p>\n

Several reputable media outlets published analyses refuting the suggestion that the ballot was a \u201cscam.\u201d They explained that voter ID laws vary by state, that multiple appearances of a candidate\u2019s name are legal under fusion voting, and that ballot placement follows predetermined administrative rules. These clarifications helped calm some of the online outrage, though the incident reignited ongoing debates about how misinformation spreads rapidly on social media \u2014 especially when amplified by influential figures like Musk.<\/p>\n

Ultimately, the controversy underscored the importance of accurate information and transparency in election reporting. Musk\u2019s post, though quickly corrected by experts, illustrated how easily routine election practices can be misunderstood when taken out of context. As New Yorkers prepare to cast their votes, officials and observers alike have emphasized the need for voters to rely on verified sources for election information. The discussion surrounding Musk\u2019s remarks serves as a reminder that civic trust depends not only on fair elections, but also on responsible public communication about how those elections are conducted.<\/p>\n

Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot during a Q\\&A session at Utah Valley University.<\/p>\n

The attack unfolded as he responded to a question on mass shootings, his final words cut short by a gunshot that struck him in the neck.<\/p>\n

Witnesses described chaos as students screamed, ducked for cover, and scrambled for exits.<\/p>\n

Video captured Kirk collapsing mid-sentence beneath a tent reading \u201cThe American Comeback.\u201d<\/p>\n

Blood pooled on the ground as security rushed forward, unable to prevent the tragedy.<\/p>\n

Initial confusion followed when police detained an elderly man shouting about his rights,<\/p>\n

but authorities later confirmed he was not the shooter. Investigators believe the fatal shot<\/p>\n

came from the Losee Center building nearly 200 yards away, sparking an ongoing manhunt.<\/p>\n

Attendees questioned the lack of security measures at the event, with some noting no bag checks or entry screening.<\/p>\n

Officials admitted that vulnerabilities existed and acknowledged the failure to prevent such a deliberate act.<\/p>\n

Utah Governor Spencer Cox condemned the killing, vowing full accountability for those responsible.<\/p>\n

Former President Donald Trump paid tribute on Truth Social, calling Kirk \u201cGreat, and even Legendary,\u201d<\/p>\n

while California Governor Gavin Newsom denounced the attack as \u201cdisgusting, vile, and reprehensible.\u201d<\/p>\n

Kirk is survived by his wife, Erika Frantzve, and their two young children.<\/p>\n

Married in 2021, the couple had recently marked their fourth anniversary.<\/p>\n

Friends and colleagues remembered him as a passionate activist who built a national movement from his teenage years.<\/p>\n

Law enforcement officials emphasized the gravity of the security breach, with UVU\u2019s police chief expressing heartbreak over the incident. The university community, meanwhile, struggled to process the shocking violence.<\/p>\n

Life has a way of surprising us in the most unexpected moments. For one man, what began as a simple stretch while relaxing in his living room turned into an unusual experience that quickly drew both curiosity and concern. What he thought was just another normal day would end up revealing something strange about his body\u2014something that raised questions, drew laughter online, but also served as a reminder of how delicate our health can be.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON, D.C.\u00a0\u2013 Senator\u00a0Josh Hawley\u00a0(R-MO) delivered a scathing condemnation of the Democratic Party and its leadership, accusing them of a four-year-long campaign of deception regarding President Joe Biden\u2019s cognitive fitness. Armed with documented…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8746,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8747","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t