![\"Senate](\"https:\/\/news2.watchtowatch.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Screenshot_1220-2.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The U.S. Senate has confirmed Rodney Scott as head of Customs and Border Protection.<\/p>\n
Scott formerly served as Border Patrol Chief and currently commands the Department of Homeland Security\u2019s (DHS) biggest enforcement department, which has approximately 65,000 workers.<\/p>\n
CBP consists of two divisions: the Border Patrol, which is in charge of protecting the nation\u2019s borders between ports of entry, and the Office of Field Operations (OFO), which is in charge of security at ports of entry.<\/p>\n
Scott was confirmed on a 51-46 party-line vote, with all Republicans in favor and all Democrats opposed.<\/p>\n
Scott was forced out of his post as Border Patrol Chief during the Biden administration after opposing politically motivated changes at CBP. In April 2021, Acting CBP Commissioner Troy Miller informed Scott that the agency would use the phrase \u201cundocumented immigrant\u201d instead of the legally accurate \u201cillegal alien.\u201dAt the time, Chief Scott sent an internal memorandum to Miller arguing that, \u201cThe U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) is and must remain an apolitical federal law enforcement agency\u2026Despite every attempt by USBP leadership to ensure that all official messaging remained consistent with law, fact, and evidence, there is no doubt that the reputation of the USBP has suffered because of the many outside voices. Mandating the use of terms which are inconsistent with law has the potential to further erode public trust in our government institutions.\u201d<\/p>\n
Scott will retire as Chief of the Border Patrol in August 2021.<\/p>\n
After leaving the Border Patrol, Commissioner Scott remained a major advocate on the need to protect our borders, repeatedly calling for a return to Trump-era practices. In the autumn of 2021, he will begin working as a Distinguished Senior Fellow for Border Security at the Texas Public Policy Foundation.<\/p>\n
Scott spoke in front of Congress on many occasions and made countless media appearances advocating for tougher immigration enforcement.<\/p>\n
Along with Safe Third Country agreements and the Remain in Mexico program, which requires asylum applicants to wait in Mexico for court proceedings, Scott backed border wall building, which remains a top objective in a second Trump administration.<\/p>\n
Commissioner Scott sounded a positive note following the Senate vote. In a statement, Scott said: \u201cI\u2019m honored that the United States Senate has confirmed me, and I want to thank President Trump and Secretary Noem for their trust and unwavering leadership. I started my career on the front lines, and now I am ready to lead my CBP family with integrity and a clear mission to defend our sovereignty, enforce the law, and put America first.\u201d<\/p>\n
President Donald Trump likewise praised Scott when announcing his nomination.<\/p>\n
\u201cRodney served nearly three decades in the Border Patrol, building vast experience and knowledge in Law Enforcement and Border Security. Rodney served as the 24th Chief of the U.S. Border Patrol, where he implemented Remain-in-Mexico, Title 42, Safe Third Agreements, and achieved record low levels of illegal immigration,\u201d Trump said.<\/p>\n
Scott\u2019s confirmation comes at a critical time for CBP.<\/p>\n
As the country struggles to recover from four years of open-borders policy, the agency plays a crucial role in fulfilling President Trump\u2019s promise to restore order at the border.<\/p>\n
In the next weeks and months, FAIR hopes to collaborate closely with the Trump administration and CBP to undo the damage caused by the Biden administration\u2019s practices.<\/p>\n
Recently, the Supreme Court\u00a0approved\u00a0the Trump administration\u2019s request to pause a lower court injunction that had blocked deportations of individuals to third countries without prior notice.<\/p>\n
The decision marks a\u00a0near-term victory\u00a0for the administration as it aims to implement its immigration crackdown swiftly.<\/p>\n
The Court\u00a0ruled 6-3\u00a0in favor of staying the injunction, with Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting.<\/p>\n
The case involved a group of migrants contesting their deportations to third countries\u2014nations other than their countries of origin.<\/p>\n
Representative Jerry Nadler, one of the most prominent and longest-serving Democrats in Congress, announced that he will not seek reelection in 2026.<\/p>\n
The decision brings to a close a career spanning more than three decades, defined by his central role in shaping American political debates, leading President Donald Trump\u2019s first impeachment, and championing progressive causes from civil rights to marriage equality.<\/p>\n
The 78-year-old lawmaker, who has represented New York in the House of Representatives since 1992, revealed his decision in an interview with The New York Times.<\/p>\n
Nadler explained that he believes the Democratic Party is ready for \u201cgenerational change\u201d and that it is time for him to step aside so that younger voices can step forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis has not been an easy decision,\u201d Nadler said. \u201cBut I know in my heart it is the right one and that it is the right time to pass the torch to a new generation.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nadler emphasized that his decision was influenced by the shifting dynamics within the Democratic Party following President Biden\u2019s withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race after a contentious debate with Donald Trump.<\/p>\n
He argued that the party must bring in younger leaders who can better face the challenges of the modern political era.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m not saying we should change over the entire party,\u201d he explained. \u201cBut I think a certain amount of change is very helpful, especially when we face the challenge of Trump and his incipient fascism.\u201d<\/p>\n
The congressman\u2019s comments reflect broader debates within the Democratic Party, where a rising generation of younger candidates has been pressing for more representation and new leadership at the highest levels. Nadler\u2019s departure opens the door for that shift to accelerate in one of the nation\u2019s most influential states.<\/p>\n
Nadler declined to name a preferred successor, instead leaving the race open for competition. However, one challenger had already emerged before his announcement: Liam Elkind, a 26-year-old progressive organizer who had criticized the party for being out of step with younger generations.<\/p>\n
In an August interview with CBS News, Elkind said, \u201cWe need to be the party of fighters. We need to be the party of organizers. We need to be more generationally relevant, better organized and ready to fight.\u201d<\/p>\n
Elkind\u2019s campaign had already drawn attention as a potential generational showdown, and Nadler\u2019s decision now clears the way for him and others to mount serious campaigns for the seat.<\/p>\n
Nadler\u2019s political career began in New York state politics, but his tenure in Congress was cemented in 1992 when he won a special election to represent Manhattan\u2019s west side.<\/p>\n
Over the years, he became known as a staunch liberal voice, consistently advocating for civil rights, LGBTQ+ protections, women\u2019s rights, and oversight of presidential power.<\/p>\n
His most high-profile role came as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee from 2019 to 2023. In that position, he presided over impeachment proceedings against Donald Trump, a responsibility that placed him at the center of one of the most divisive chapters in American political history.<\/p>\n
Nadler later became the ranking member of the committee, though he stepped aside from the leadership role in late 2024 after Representative Jamie Raskin mounted a challenge.<\/p>\n
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries praised Nadler\u2019s decades of service, calling him \u201ca relentless fighter for justice, civil rights and liberties and the fundamental promise of equality for all.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAs the legendary Chairman of the powerful House Judiciary Committee, he helped lead two historic impeachments and ensure that no one, not even the President, is above the law,\u201d Jeffries said. \u201cJerry\u2019s years of leadership have earned him a spot among our nation\u2019s greatest public servants.\u201d<\/p>\n
In addition to his role in impeachment, Nadler played a central part in legislative battles that defined Democratic priorities. He was instrumental in advancing the Respect for Marriage Act, which enshrined same-sex marriage protections into federal law.<\/p>\n
He also fought for voting rights, protections against discrimination, and oversight of surveillance programs, often clashing with Republicans over constitutional interpretations.<\/p>\n
He was known among colleagues as both an intellectual and a fighter, someone who combined legal expertise with an ability to navigate Washington\u2019s partisan battles.<\/p>\n
His reputation for diligence earned him the respect of allies and critics alike, even as he often found himself at the center of the nation\u2019s most bitter disputes.<\/p>\n
Though his national profile was considerable, Nadler\u2019s final years in office were not without challenges. Internally, he faced a leadership contest from Jamie Raskin, signaling tensions within the Democratic caucus about the direction of the Judiciary Committee.<\/p>\n
Locally, Nadler encountered a younger, energized base of voters eager for change. Liam Elkind\u2019s primary challenge epitomized the generational divide that has reshaped Democratic politics, particularly in urban districts with a strong progressive presence.<\/p>\n
Nadler acknowledged that this rising tide of generational pressure influenced his decision. \u201cA younger successor can maybe do better, can maybe help us more,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Adding to the complexity of his final years, Nadler\u2019s Manhattan district office became the site of a dramatic incident in June, when Department of Homeland Security officers handcuffed one of his aides.<\/p>\n
The confrontation, captured on video by an observer monitoring immigration court activity in the same federal building, showed DHS officers entering the office and accusing staffers of \u201charboring rioters.\u201d<\/p>\n
One aide was seen in tears as she was handcuffed, while another demanded to see a warrant before officers attempted to enter a private area of the office.<\/p>\n
In the video, one officer claimed, \u201cI\u2019m a federal officer. We\u2019re here checking on something. We have the right to check.\u201d The episode fueled outrage among Nadler\u2019s supporters, who viewed it as an overreach by federal authorities.<\/p>\n
It also raised questions about the environment faced by staff members working in politically charged conditions.<\/p>\n
Nadler\u2019s announcement arrives at a moment of profound change for Democrats. President Biden\u2019s decision not to seek reelection in 2024 created a leadership vacuum, while Trump\u2019s enduring influence on the Republican Party has reshaped the stakes of national elections.<\/p>\n
Against this backdrop, calls for new leadership within the Democratic Party have grown louder.<\/p>\n
For many Democrats, Nadler\u2019s decision is emblematic of the generational shift underway. His retirement signals that the long era of leadership from figures elected in the 1990s and early 2000s may be giving way to a new cohort ready to carry the party into the future.<\/p>\n
Tributes poured in after Nadler\u2019s announcement. Hakeem Jeffries lauded his leadership not only in impeachment but also in legislative achievements protecting marginalized communities. Colleagues praised his commitment to constitutional oversight, with many recalling his consistent stance that \u201cno one is above the law.\u201d<\/p>\n
Progressive groups pointed to his decades-long advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights and his role in securing marriage equality as evidence of his lasting impact. Civil rights organizations likewise highlighted his dedication to advancing voting protections and addressing systemic discrimination.<\/p>\n
Nadler has made clear that while he will leave Congress, he does not intend to retire from public life. \u201cI don\u2019t know what the future beyond 2026 holds, but I plan to stay fully engaged in the community that is my home and in the causes that I\u2019ve championed throughout my life,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
For the next sixteen months, he pledged to continue his work in Washington, defending democracy, protecting institutions, and fighting for the values he has long represented. His focus will remain on the legislative battles before Congress until his term concludes.<\/p>\n
Attention now turns to who will succeed Nadler in representing his district. Liam Elkind, already an announced challenger, is expected to continue his campaign, emphasizing themes of generational renewal and progressive activism. Other candidates are likely to enter the race, given the rarity of an open seat in a district as influential as Nadler\u2019s.<\/p>\n
Observers expect the contest to become a symbolic battle over the Democratic Party\u2019s future direction. Will voters choose a young activist seeking to energize a new generation, or will they prefer a more experienced political figure who can preserve Nadler\u2019s legacy? The answer may offer clues about the broader trajectory of Democratic politics heading into the late 2020s.<\/p>\n
Jerry Nadler\u2019s decision not to seek reelection in 2026 marks the end of an era in New York and national politics. From his early years representing Manhattan\u2019s west side to his central role in impeaching Donald Trump, Nadler has been a towering figure in the House of Representatives.<\/p>\n
His legacy of fighting for civil rights, marriage equality, and constitutional oversight will be remembered as hallmarks of his career.<\/p>\n
Yet his decision also reflects the growing recognition that political leadership must evolve with the times. By stepping aside, Nadler has made room for the new generation of Democrats he himself says are needed to face the challenges ahead.<\/p>\n
Whether his successor will live up to that challenge remains to be seen, but Nadler\u2019s imprint on American politics is assured.<\/p>\n