Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi launched into a wild tirade against President Trump and called him a “vile creature” who she believes is acting like a “king” who does not believe in the U.S. Constitution.
During an off-the-rails press event in Washington, D.C., a furious Pelosi declared that “Donald Trump is the worst president for the children we have ever had. And that is why we must organize to stop his extreme agenda and save our health care.”
This is after she called Trump a “vile creature” and doubled down on her statements in an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper.
Pelosi accused President Trump of acting like a king, shredding the US Constitution, and even abolishing the House of Representatives — all of which are untrue and unfounded.
“Our founders did not want a king, so they separated the power. That’s the beauty of the Constitution,” Pelosi said.
“Because he’s the President of the United States, and he does not honor the Constitution of the United States. In fact, he’s turned the Supreme Court into a rogue court. He’s abolished the House of Representatives, he’s chilled the press. He’s scared people who are in our country legally, but making them – smashing into their cars and the rest,” Pelosi added.
Pelosi of California saw her wealth increase by at least 2,292% during her 37 years in Congress, much of it through stock trading.
The former House speaker, who announced Thursday that she will retire from Congress in 2027, reported a minimum net worth of $2,675,036 when she first took office and $63,996,050 in 2024, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation analysis of her financial disclosures. A separate analysis by Quiver Quantitative places her current net worth at roughly $278.76 million.
Pelosi’s 2024 financial disclosures list her maximum net worth at an estimated $311,443,000. Comparable figures were not reported in 1987, when she first entered Congress, the Daily Caller reported.
At 85, Pelosi’s investment portfolio nearly doubled the growth of the S&P 500 in 2024, according to previous Daily Caller News Foundation reporting. Her financial success has fueled renewed calls to tighten restrictions on stock trading by members of Congress and sparked allegations that she may have benefited from insider knowledge of industry trends.
Pelosi’s office has denied any wrongdoing, stating that she does not personally own or manage stocks and has no prior knowledge of, or involvement in, the transactions. Her husband, Paul Pelosi, is responsible for handling the family’s investments.
The congresswoman voiced her support in July for Republican-backed legislation that would ban stock trading by members of Congress, as well as by presidents and vice presidents — the same day former President Donald Trump publicly called for an investigation into her over potential insider trading.
“We must have strong transparency, robust accountability and tough enforcement for financial conduct in office because the American people deserve confidence that their elected leaders are serving the public interest — not their personal portfolios,” Pelosi said at the time.
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee advanced the bill July 30, the Caller reported.
Trump weighed into the debate over Pelosi’s stock trading in 2022.
“She has inside information. It’s not right. It’s not appropriate. It shouldn’t be,” Trump told Breitbart News at the time. “She doesn’t want to discuss that. She wants to discuss other things that shouldn’t be discussed.
“Some of the things that they’re proposing now, like impeaching someone for absolutely no reason for a perfect phone call. You look at that. You look at impeachment—both of them. But you get impeached for a phone call that was like perfecto. So many different things,” he continued.
“I happen to watch her and see her and dealt with her a lot and I think she’s clever in one way and stone-cold crazy. She should not be allowed to do that with the stocks. She should not be allowed to do that. It’s not fair to the rest of this country,” Trump added.
Following Pelosi’s public comments about how lawmakers, like other Americans, should be able to participate in “capitalism” by trading stocks, a bipartisan effort was launched to ban the practice for serving members of Congress.
Newly filed court documents show that former FBI Director James Comey wrote a 2016 note referencing “HRC plans to tie Trump” and “HRC health,” which investigators discovered earlier this year locked inside a long-unused FBI safe.
The handwritten note, dated September 26, 2016, was found by an internal review team in early 2025, according to new evidence in the Justice Department’s criminal case against Comey.
The note, written on FBI letterhead from Comey’s director’s desk, was dated just weeks before the 2016 election and 19 days after the CIA sent Comey an investigative referral regarding intelligence that Hillary Clinton’s campaign had approved a plan to link then-candidate Donald Trump to Russia.
Prosecutors allege that Comey later concealed this referral and other related materials, obstructing internal and congressional investigations.
A federal grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia, indicted Comey on September 25 on one count of making false statements and another of obstruction of justice.
The charges stem from alleged efforts to mislead investigators about the FBI’s handling of politically sensitive probes into both presidential candidates in the final months before the 2016 election.
According to the filings, the note was discovered inside Room 9582, a secure compartmented information facility (SCIF) at FBI headquarters that had not been accessed for years.
The internal team that located it was assigned to reform the bureau’s records and classification procedures following whistleblower complaints in early 2025.
The filing says the room was “seemingly unused” until a sudden burst of activity around the week of President Trump’s January 2025 inauguration.
The discovery of Comey’s note came alongside the original Counterintelligence Operational Lead (CIOL) — the CIA document that alerted the FBI in September 2016 to Clinton’s alleged campaign plan.
The team also recovered access logs showing that Room 9582 experienced an unusual increase in entries and data transfers during the days surrounding the presidential transition, raising questions about who entered the facility and what materials were handled.
The court record includes an internal memo from July 21, 2025, showing that the FBI’s Public Corruption Unit formally requested an investigation into the concealment or removal of documents related to both the Clinton and Trump inquiries.
The memo stated that the missing CIA referral had originally been stored in a filing closet adjacent to the FBI director’s office before being moved to Room 9582.
The documents also contradict Comey’s 2020 Senate testimony, in which he claimed no knowledge of the so-called “Clinton plan intelligence.” During a Judiciary Committee hearing on September 30, 2020, Comey said the allegation “doesn’t ring any bells with me.”
The newly filed exhibits also reference the discovery of five burn bags found on the floor of the same FBI secure facility.
Those bags reportedly contained hundreds of pages of documents related to Crossfire Hurricane, the bureau’s 2016 counterintelligence investigation into alleged Trump-Russia ties.
FBI Director Kash Patel, who ordered the internal review, confirmed the discovery in June and later authorized the declassification of several materials, including the previously unreleased classified appendix of the Durham Special Counsel Report.
The Justice Department filing describes the combination of hidden records, delayed disclosures, and handwritten notes as evidence of “a broader pattern of concealment” by senior FBI officials. It asserts that Comey’s notations “corroborate the existence of contemporaneous awareness of the Clinton plan intelligence and suggest an effort to obscure that awareness from oversight entities.”
Legal analysts say the handwritten note could prove significant in the government’s obstruction case, depending on whether prosecutors can demonstrate intent to conceal or destroy records. The filings suggest investigators are also reviewing whether others within the FBI knowingly participated in removing or sequestering materials related to both the Clinton email probe and the Trump-Russia investigation.
The DOJ filing concludes that “taken together, these records reinforce a fact pattern of alleged obstruction and broader conspiracy” within the upper levels of the FBI during the 2016 election period.