ROSELAND, La. (AP) — A fire at an automotive supply plant in Louisiana was 90% contained Sunday, but a mandatory evacuation order remained in place as crews tried to address remaining flames, law enforcement officials said.
The fire at Smitty’s Supply just north of the town of Roseland ignited Friday after an explosion at the facility sent flames into the air and black smoke billowing over the surrounding rural area. No injuries have been reported.
Everyone within a one-mile (1.6-kilometer) radius of the plant was ordered to evacuate. The order remained in place at noon Sunday, state police said. During a press conference Saturday, police urged residents to minimize their contact with soot from the fire.
Louisiana State Police wrote in the update Sunday that all air monitoring for contaminants has shown “either non-detectable readings or levels well below health-based or actionable thresholds.”
Response crews were removing structural debris and addressing covered hotspots. Environmental response efforts were ongoing in the Tangipahoa River and surrounding waterways.
Smitty’s Supply delivers “high performance lubricants and automotive parts,” including oils, brake fluid, power steering fluid and antifreeze, according to the company’s website. Local officials said the plant employs about 400 people.
Roseland, which is home to about 1,100 people, is roughly 50 miles (80 kilometers) northeast of Baton Rouge.
A towering column of dark smoke was visible across Melbourne’s skyline this week after a large industrial fire broke out at a factory complex in Derrimut, in the city’s western suburbs. The incident prompted one of the most extensive firefighting operations in Victoria in recent years, with authorities warning the clean-up and recovery could take weeks.
The blaze began late Wednesday morning at a factory on Swann Drive, an industrial zone surrounded by warehouses, transport depots, and distribution centers. Fire Rescue Victoria (FRV) confirmed that multiple chemical storage drums inside the facility were caught in the flames, triggering bursts of heat and debris.
Deputy Commissioner Michelle Cowling said firefighters received reports of a rapidly spreading fire just after 11 a.m. Within minutes, thick smoke was visible for kilometres, with residents from both Melbourne’s west and inner suburbs reporting they could see the plume stretching across the horizon.
“This was an aggressive fire requiring a large-scale response,” Cowling said. “The warehouse contained a range of chemicals, and as a result, our crews had to take every precaution to protect both themselves and the wider community.”
In total, more than 180 firefighters were called to the scene, supported by dozens of fire trucks and aerial units. Crews from both FRV and the Country Fire Authority (CFA) worked side by side under intense conditions.
By mid-afternoon, authorities confirmed the fire was officially “under control,” though smaller hotspots would continue to burn for days. Firefighters are expected to maintain a presence at the site until the risk of reignition is fully eliminated.
“This is not something that will be resolved overnight,” Cowling said. “Our teams will remain here for as long as necessary to ensure the site is safe.”
As a precaution, factories and offices in the immediate area were evacuated. Several major roads were also closed, including sections of the Western Freeway, which caused delays for drivers during the busy afternoon commute. Power outages in nearby suburbs disrupted traffic signals, adding to congestion.
By Wednesday evening, some arterial roads were reopened, but police urged motorists to avoid the area if possible to give emergency services clear access.
Witnesses described dramatic scenes as barrels and containers inside the warehouse overheated and launched into the air. Ravenhall worker Trent Chamberlain, whose office is three kilometres away, said the fire’s scale was alarming.
“Every few minutes, there was another burst that went high into the air,” he told reporters. “The smoke was thick and heavy — it was impossible to miss.”
Residents as far away as St Kilda, more than 20 kilometres from the scene, reported seeing the dark plume against the afternoon sky.
Despite the scale of the fire and the hazardous materials on site, authorities confirmed there were no injuries among factory workers, nearby residents, or emergency personnel. Ambulance Victoria said paramedics were stationed at the site from the early stages of the emergency but did not need to transport anyone for treatment.
“This is a positive outcome considering the risks our teams faced,” Cowling said. “All staff are accounted for, and no firefighters have been seriously harmed.”
As dark smoke spread across Melbourne’s west, the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) issued warnings for surrounding suburbs. Residents were urged to remain indoors where possible, close doors and windows, and switch off heating or cooling systems that draw in outside air.
EPA monitoring units were deployed to measure air quality. While the smoke was expected to dissipate with changing wind conditions, residents with respiratory sensitivities were advised to take precautions.
The fire prompted concerns from community groups, particularly given the site’s industrial nature. The factory is understood to belong to ACB Group, a company that has previously experienced fire-related incidents. The company did not provide comment during the immediate aftermath.
Authorities stressed the importance of keeping the community safe while crews continued to manage the site. “We ask that people stay away from the area,” Cowling said. “These are hazardous conditions, and the fewer people nearby, the safer it is for everyone involved.”
Beyond the immediate firefighting efforts, attention quickly turned to the potential environmental impacts of the incident. The factory stored large quantities of chemical substances, including kerosene, fuel products, and ethanol. When such materials are exposed to heat and water during firefighting, there is a risk of runoff entering nearby creeks and storm drains.
EPA officials confirmed they were working closely with Melbourne Water to contain contaminated water and prevent it from spreading into natural waterways. Trucks and pumps were deployed to capture excess water, while sandbags were installed to slow runoff.
“Right now, we are focused on limiting the impact on local creeks,” an EPA spokesperson said. “Monitoring will continue for as long as needed.”
This is not the first time Melbourne’s western suburbs have faced major industrial blazes. In recent years, sites in Footscray, Tottenham, and West Footscray have experienced large-scale fires that raised long-term questions about storage practices and regulatory oversight.
Experts say these incidents highlight the challenges of balancing industrial growth with environmental safety. “The community has every right to be concerned,” said one environmental specialist. “We need stronger prevention measures to ensure these events are less likely to happen in the first place.”
Authorities have confirmed that investigators will enter the site once it is deemed safe. At this stage, the cause of the fire remains unknown, but early indications suggest it was not deliberately lit.
“This will be a thorough investigation,” Cowling said. “It’s important that we determine exactly what occurred so that steps can be taken to reduce future risks.”
WorkSafe Victoria is also expected to review the incident as part of its ongoing oversight of industrial sites.
Although the fire is largely contained, its aftermath is expected to stretch into the weeks and months ahead. Environmental clean-up, workplace inspections, and community reassurance will all form part of the recovery process.
For now, firefighters remain stationed at the factory, ensuring the site is stable and preventing any chance of reignition. Residents are being kept updated through official emergency channels, with regular air quality and traffic bulletins issued.
While Melbourne has seen industrial fires before, the Derrimut blaze serves as a stark reminder of the risks associated with large chemical storage facilities. The incident has reignited calls for tighter safety measures and stricter enforcement to protect both the environment and local communities.
Some people just have a natural talent for business. When you mix that with hard work, a desire to take chances, and the drive to improve their skills, it creates a powerful recipe for success.
An 11-year-old boy from Utah named Seth has launched his own business, and his clever marketing plan has impressed a lot of people lately.
It turned out that instead of opening a lemonade stand, he chose to sell something else. He stood by the sidewalk with a sign that said, “Ice Cold Beer.”
Some people thought it was adorable and complimented him for launching a business, but other neighbors were worried about a kid selling beer, so they called the police.
Before long, a couple of officers came by Seth’s stand, and instead of scolding him, they ended up sharing a good laugh.
It turned out that this young business whiz was selling root beer, but the word “root” was in tiny green letters, while “beer” was in much bigger letters.
The Brigham City Police Department thought Seth’s poster was a really smart way to promote things. To be honest, not every kid could pull off something like that.
As soon as the story appeared online, everyone started sharing their thoughts about it.
HE’S SAVY, NEAT AND CLEAN! HARD WORKING AND THINKING ABOUT WHAT APPEALS TO THE PUBLIC…HE CAN GO ANYWHERE WITH THAT MINDSET! AND WITH THAT COMMUNITY OF GREAT POLICE OFFICERS SUPPORTING HIM, HE’S ALREADY GOT MENTORING!!! LOVE THIS! one person wrote.
Some folks think that the person who called the police on this young man should feel bad about it, but the police department had a different opinion. They said, “Our community members should never feel guilty or awkward for reaching out to us. They were just reporting something they thought was suspicious. It’s all good.”
The officers spent a dollar on some root beer and helped promote Seth’s business by telling his adorable story.
You can do the same by sharing it too.
JUST IN: The U.S. Senate has voted 50–46 to terminate former President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canadian imports, marking a significant shift in U.S.-Canada trade relations. The vote has sparked a heated debate, particularly among those who strongly supported Trump’s “America First” trade policies.
Several Republicans joined Democrats in voting to repeal the tariffs, drawing the ire of many conservative lawmakers. Among those who sided with the opposition were Senators Lisa Murkowski, Mitch McConnell, Susan Collins, and Rand Paul, all of whom broke ranks with their party’s stance on trade. Their votes have become a flashpoint for criticism from Trump supporters.
Despite the Senate’s vote, the bill still faces a major hurdle: it must clear the House of Representatives before becoming law. However, given the political landscape, it’s highly unlikely that the measure will pass the House, where the Republican majority remains more sympathetic to Trump’s trade policies.
The tariffs, which were a key part of Trump’s strategy to bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. and address the trade imbalance with Canada, were intended to protect American industries from cheap imports. Trump’s “America First” approach to trade has been credited with reshaping the global trading landscape, and many of his supporters view the repeal as a step backward.
Proponents of the tariffs argue that they were necessary to protect U.S. workers and strengthen the domestic economy. They see the vote to eliminate them as a blow to the legacy of Trump’s administration, which emphasized American self-reliance and the protection of U.S. jobs through tough trade measures.
Opponents of the tariffs, however, argue that they were detrimental to American consumers, raising prices on goods and disrupting supply chains. They contend that dismantling the tariffs could help reduce costs for U.S. businesses and consumers, and restore smoother trade relations with Canada.
As the debate continues, Trump’s supporters remain adamant that his “America First” trade stance remains essential for U.S. prosperity. While this Senate vote may signal a shift in policy, the former president’s influence on trade and economic policy is far from over.
see more
BREAKING: Congressman Brandon Gill (R-TX) has officially begun drafting Articles of Impeachment against Judge James Boasberg, sparking a growing movement within Congress. The push for accountability is gaining momentum rapidly, with lawmakers rallying behind the idea of holding judges to a higher standard.
Rep. Chip Roy has already voiced strong support for the impeachment measure, signaling a shift in the Republican Party’s stance toward judicial accountability. This move marks a significant step in efforts to hold members of the judiciary accountable for actions that many believe undermine the integrity of the court system.
Judge Boasberg is accused of weaponizing the bench against conservative interests, and critics argue that he has aligned himself with the Department of Justice’s political agenda. His decisions have been viewed by many as a clear abuse of power, fueling outrage among conservatives who believe the judiciary should remain impartial and nonpartisan.
The allegations against Boasberg have ignited a firestorm in Washington, as lawmakers across the country express their frustration with what they perceive as judicial overreach. The movement to impeach him is gaining traction, as more members of Congress join the call for his removal from the bench.
The message coming out of Congress is loud and clear: No one is above the law — not even a judge. This initiative is seen as a critical step in reasserting checks and balances and ensuring that judges uphold the principles of justice without bias or political influence.
The impeachment push also reflects broader concerns about the potential politicization of the judiciary. With the stakes higher than ever, many lawmakers argue that this is an opportunity to restore public trust in the justice system by holding judges accountable for their actions.
As the movement continues to build, it’s clear that this is just the beginning of a much larger effort to “clean house” and restore fairness to the American legal system. It’s time to restore justice to the Justice System.