Illegal immigrant Harjinder Singh, who allegedly entered the United States illegally in 2018, failed his commercial driver’s license (CDL) knowledge exam 10 times in just two months before finally receiving a license in 2023.
The failure did not prevent him from eventually obtaining a CDL in Washington state, and later, California granted him a second license. Both states have come under scrutiny for issuing licenses to someone with repeated test failures and limited English proficiency.
Singh is accused of causing a fatal crash in Fort Pierce, Florida, on August 12, 2025, when his 18-wheeler jackknifed during an illegal U-turn.
The crash resulted in the deaths of three Haitian migrants traveling in a van that collided with Singh’s semi-truck.
Investigators with the Florida Attorney General’s office confirmed Singh failed his CDL knowledge exam 10 times between March 10 and May 5, 2023.
He also failed the air brakes knowledge exam twice, a critical portion of the CDL test for safely operating large commercial vehicles.
Bodycam footage from a July traffic stop in New Mexico shows Singh struggling to communicate in English, highlighting serious safety concerns for anyone operating heavy machinery on U.S. roads.
Despite these repeated failures, Singh was still issued his first CDL in Washington state, raising questions about the enforcement of federal safety standards.
California later issued Singh another CDL, even though the state has long resisted enforcing federal English language requirements for commercial drivers.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy emphasized the problem, stating that many big-rig drivers fail to meet English proficiency standards, posing risks to American families.
Duffy added that California is the only state refusing to ensure drivers can read road signs and communicate with law enforcement, calling it a “fundamental safety issue.”
The Florida Attorney General’s office has filed a lawsuit against California and Washington in the Supreme Court, seeking to prevent the states from issuing CDLs to illegal immigrants.
The lawsuit argues that both states failed to comply with federal immigration and safety standards, creating a public safety hazard.
The crash highlights broader concerns over federal and state policies that allow illegal immigrants to operate commercial vehicles despite limited English skills.
Singh’s history shows a disturbing pattern: repeated test failures, limited comprehension, and eventual licensing in sanctuary states that prioritize politics over safety.
Officials investigating the wreck confirmed Singh had difficulty with English and road sign tests, yet licensing authorities approved him to drive commercially.
Critics argue the Biden administration’s policies and sanctuary state practices contribute to unsafe conditions on American highways.
The fatal crash has become a focal point for debates over immigration enforcement and CDL licensing, particularly in states that resist federal oversight.
Singh’s case is part of a broader pattern where sanctuary policies and lenient enforcement undermine public safety and place American lives at risk.
The Florida AG’s lawsuit aims to hold states accountable for putting unqualified drivers on the road, emphasizing the importance of English proficiency and proper testing.
Singh’s alleged actions — making an illegal U-turn that caused three deaths — underscore the real-world consequences of policy failures in licensing and immigration enforcement.
Officials also revealed that Singh struggled with English even during training sessions at a Washington-based CDL school, further questioning the effectiveness of these programs.
The public safety community is calling for stricter oversight of CDL issuance and federal enforcement of English proficiency requirements for drivers.
The case also reignites concerns about how illegal immigrants are granted work permits and access to safety-sensitive roles, despite repeated evidence of incompetence.
In a fiery exchange that’s setting political circles ablaze, Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) delivered what many are calling one of the most memorable moments in recent congressional history — a sharp, no-holds-barred takedown of Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) that left the audience erupting in applause and the chamber in stunned silence.
The clash, which unfolded during a heated bipartisan committee hearing late Tuesday afternoon, began with a deceptively simple five-word statement from Sen. Kennedy: “Let’s stick to the facts.”
What followed was a masterclass in rhetorical precision. Kennedy, known for his razor-sharp wit and southern charm, launched into a methodical critique of Rep. Crockett’s statements on criminal justice reform and federal oversight, dismantling her points with what many described as “ironclad” evidence and unshakable composure.
The Moment That Broke the Room
Crockett, a rising Democratic star from Texas known for her outspoken and passionate presence, had been challenging a GOP-backed amendment related to policing accountability. In her remarks, she accused the proposal of being “rooted in bad faith” and “lacking any connection to the communities it aims to serve.”
That’s when Sen. Kennedy, calmly flipping through a binder of case law and statistics, countered with a calm but devastating rebuttal.
“Congresswoman,” he said, “when you speak in slogans, you silence solutions.”
The room went still.
He then proceeded to cite independent studies, crime data from Crockett’s own district, and previous House floor remarks she’d made — all contradicting her stance. His tone remained respectful but firm, his delivery surgical.
“Facts don’t care who holds the mic,” Kennedy added at one point, prompting murmurs and a few audible “wows” from fellow lawmakers.
Applause, Embarrassment, and an Abrupt Exit
As the senator concluded, the audience — consisting of fellow legislators, aides, and members of the press — broke into unexpected applause. Even several Democrats, according to reporters in the room, appeared impressed by the clarity and force of Kennedy’s presentation.
Rep. Crockett, visibly rattled, attempted a brief rebuttal but struggled to regain her footing. Observers said she appeared flustered and abruptly left the chamber shortly after the exchange, skipping the post-hearing press availability.
A source close to Crockett’s team claimed she had “another engagement” to attend, but the timing raised eyebrows.
Social Media Explosion
The moment quickly exploded online, with clips of Kennedy’s takedown circulating widely on X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, and TikTok. The phrase “Facts don’t care who holds the mic” began trending within hours, with thousands praising Kennedy’s composure and command of the debate.
Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro reposted the clip, writing, “John Kennedy just gave a masterclass. This is how it’s done.”
Even some liberal-leaning outlets acknowledged the senator’s impact, with one analyst on MSNBC noting, “Whether you agree with him or not, Kennedy came prepared, and it showed.”
Kennedy’s Team Reacts
In a brief statement after the hearing, a spokesperson for Sen. Kennedy said: “The senator believes in respectful, fact-driven debate. He’s always happy to engage on the issues — and he’ll always come with the facts.”
Kennedy himself brushed off the buzz when asked outside the Capitol. “I just said what needed to be said,” he remarked with a slight smile. “This isn’t about winning or losing — it’s about being honest with the American people.”
Crockett’s Response
As of Wednesday morning, Rep. Jasmine Crockett has not issued a formal response to the incident, but allies have begun circling the wagons, calling the moment “overhyped” and accusing Kennedy of “grandstanding for social media soundbites.” However, privately, some Democratic aides have reportedly expressed frustration over what they saw as a “missed opportunity” by Crockett to defend her position.
A Viral Moment in a Divided Capitol
In a Congress marked by division and noise, Kennedy’s sharp, fact-laden performance cut through the clutter. Whether it will have any legislative impact remains to be seen, but one thing’s certain: on that day, in that chamber, John Kennedy delivered a moment that won’t be forgotten anytime soon.
As one senior aide summed it up: “Crockett came with passion. Kennedy came with receipts. And the receipts won.”