Left-wing Gen Z City Councilman Chi Osse is planning to launch a primary challenge against House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) in next year’s congressional race — a move made despite direct opposition from New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, according to the New York Post.
“He said he wants to strike when the iron is hot,” one insider said of the TikToker, per The Post.
According to a source, Mamdani told Osse he did not want him to mount a primary challenge against Jeffries, warning that it could upset the fragile truce between the party’s far-left and moderate factions. Mamdani had spent months working to bring the Democratic establishment together in preparation for his upcoming term as mayor, said the outlet.
“Strike while the iron is hot?” another insider complained to The Post. “How about listen to the next mayor, who is the hottest thing in politics right now.”
A second source confirmed that Osse has already begun assembling a campaign team to take on the Brooklyn Democrat.
The rift between Osse and Mamdani — both known for their active social media presence — was significant enough that Osse skipped the mayor-elect’s victory celebration following his historic win last Tuesday night, noted the outlet.
Osse rejoined the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) over the summer after previously leaving the group in 2020.
The dispute underscores what some political insiders see as a major challenge for the 34-year-old mayor-elect as he works to advance his ambitious socialist agenda. Mamdani will need to balance the interests of the Democratic establishment — including Gov. Kathy Hochul — with those of the insurgent far-left, which is looking to leverage his victory to take on more moderate Democrats.
Osse is expected to formally announce his campaign later this week, The Post reported.
Justin Chermol, a spokesperson for Jeffries, said in a statement the lawmaker “is focused on battling Donald Trump, ending the Republican shutdown of the federal government and addressing the crushing GOP healthcare crisis.”
Republicans have consistently voted to reopen the goverment; however, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, also from New York, has been instructing his Democratic caucus to repeatedly vote no for more than 40 days.
Mamdani campaigned on promises of affordability, free public services, and economic equality. But his victory party in Brooklyn offered none of that — featuring a pricey cash bar where drinks cost up to $22.
The democratic socialist celebrated his narrow win Tuesday night at the newly renovated Brooklyn Paramount, a historic music venue packed with cheering supporters. Mamdani edged out former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who ran as an independent, and Republican Curtis Sliwa to capture just over 50% of the vote, The New York Post reported.
But while the self-styled man of the people pledged free buses and universal childcare, his partygoers were greeted with prices more in line with Manhattan’s high-end cocktail lounges.
Photos posted by Politico reporter Jeff Coltin showed Pabst
Charlie Kirk’s prophetic words now echo across America — a chilling reminder of his foresight and the dangerous climate cultivated by the radical Left.
Months before his assassination, Kirk sounded the alarm about rising violence in political culture. His warnings were dismissed by critics, but today, they stand as hauntingly accurate.
Kirk spoke openly about the threat: “Assassination culture is spreading on the left. Forty-eight percent of liberals say it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Elon Musk. Fifty-five percent said the same about Donald Trump.”
His analysis was not speculation; it was rooted in polling data that revealed a shocking acceptance of political violence among left-wing activists.
“The left is being whipped into a violent frenzy,” Kirk warned. “Any setback, whether losing an election or losing a court case, justifies a maximally violent response.”
Those words now ring with tragic clarity, as Kirk himself became the victim of the very violence he predicted.
Kirk further cautioned against complacency: “The cowardice of local prosecutors and school officials have turned the left into a ticking time bomb.”
His message was clear — if America ignored the warning signs, bloodshed was inevitable.
Instead of heeding his words, the mainstream media mocked and vilified him, dismissing his concerns as paranoia.
But Kirk’s warning was not paranoia; it was prescience. His death is proof of the culture of violence he spent his final months trying to expose.
Conservatives across the country are now pointing to Kirk’s words as undeniable evidence of what happens when the Left normalizes hate.
For years, Kirk was targeted with threats, harassment, and censorship, yet he continued to speak boldly about the dangers America faced.
His ability to see the trajectory of violence made him both a prophet and a target.
Now, even skeptics admit his warnings were disturbingly accurate. His assassination has forced the nation to confront the reality he described.
His widow, Erika Kirk, has vowed to ensure his mission does not die with him.
“To everyone listening tonight across America, the movement my husband built will not die. It won’t, I refuse to let that happen … All of us will refuse to let that happen,” Erika declared.
She added with force: “No one will ever forget my husband’s name, and I will make sure of it.”
Her words carry the same urgency as Charlie’s final warnings, signaling that the battle he fought is far from over.
Supporters argue that Kirk’s death, though tragic, has only amplified his message — that political violence must be exposed and defeated.
His legacy is no longer just about building a movement; it is about revealing the deadly cost of ignoring America’s cultural decay.
Charlie Kirk warned America, and America did not listen. Now his words are etched in history with the ultimate proof.
He foresaw the danger. He spoke the truth. And he paid the price.
For conservatives, Kirk’s warnings must not be forgotten — they must serve as a rallying cry to defend freedom and restore order in a nation at risk.
BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…
Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.
This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.
Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.
According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals’ involvement in Epstein’s criminal network.
She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.
“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”
These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.
Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.
The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.
“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”
Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.
For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.
Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.
What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.
In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.
Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.
Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.
Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.
This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.
Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.
The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.
BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For…
Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.
Speaking from his post as one of President Trump’s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.
“This is a live federal investigation. We’ve asked ICE to take immediate action,” Homan said during a televised interview.
The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC’s office.
According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.
Homan stressed that AOC’s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.
“This goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There’s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,” he stated.
Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.
AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as “racist” and “oppressors.”
Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.
“If a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that’s a clear violation of federal law,” Homan declared.
Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.
Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.
House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.
“This is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn’t apply to them,” said Rep. Andy Biggs.
Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.
But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.
“This isn’t about politics. It’s about national security and public trust,” he said.
Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.
“We are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,” Homan confirmed.
Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.
Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman’s actions.
Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.
“We must restore the rule of law,” he concluded. “No one, no matter how powerful, is above it.”
Governor Tim Walz of Minnesota, who has previously served as a failed vice presidential candidate, is facing significant legal pressure as he has been slapped with a new subpoena by the United States House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
The committee, which is currently chaired by Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC), is investigating the Feeding Our Futures (FOF) scandal, which involved the alleged misappropriation of $250 million intended for feeding children during the coronavirus pandemic.
The ongoing investigation, which has already resulted in multiple arrests and criminal charges, has raised serious concerns about the way in which public funds were misused.
House Republican leaders are weighing harsh action against Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) after her recent remarks about the late Charlie Kirk drew widespread condemnation.
Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.), who is running for U.S. Senate, is leading an effort to strip Omar of her committee assignments. Carter accused her and the “radical left” of normalizing the practice of meeting free speech with violence.
On Monday, the Georgia Republican introduced a motion to remove Omar from the House Budget Committee and the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, where she serves as the ranking Democrat on the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections.
Critics seized on Omar’s remarks last week in an interview with former MSNBC anchor Mehdi Hasan, where she said Charlie Kirk’s death reminded her of his past positions on gun control.
“But what I do know for sure is that Charlie Kirk was someone who once said, ‘Guns save lives’ after a school shooting,” Omar said. “Charlie was someone who was willing to debate and downplay the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police … downplay slavery and what Black people have gone through in this country by saying Juneteenth should never exist.”
Omar then disagreed with commentators who framed Kirk as “just wanting to have a civil debate,” which led Hasan to call falsely label their characterization a “complete rewriting of history.”
“Yeah,” Omar responded. “There is nothing more effed up than to completely pretend that his words and actions have not been recorded and in existence for the last decade or so.” She went on to accuse President Donald Trump of “incit[ing] violence against people like me,” though she has never been attacked or assaulted by someone on the right.
“These people are full of s**t,” Omar told Hasan about Republicans in general. “And it’s important for us to call them out while we feel anger and sadness, and have, you know, empathy, which Charlie said, ‘No, it shouldn’t exist,’ because that’s a newly created word or something.”
“Disparaging Charlie Kirk’s legacy, a God-fearing, honorable man, for boldly sharing his conservative beliefs is disgusting. The radical left has normalized meeting free speech with violence, and it must stop,
“No one who justifies the assassination of someone with different political views than them deserves to sit on a committee, and Ilhan Omar openly used language that incites violence toward her political opponents. Committees are for serious lawmakers, not hate-spewing politicians,” he added.
Kirk, 31, founder of Turning Point USA, was assassinated last week during a campus speaking event at Utah Valley University, sparking national outrage, a massive manhunt, and renewed debate over political violence in America.
He was delivering remarks under a tent to a crowd of roughly 3,000 students and supporters on September 10 when a sniper-style shot struck him in the neck. He was rushed to a nearby hospital but died shortly afterward.
Shock at Buckingham Palace: King Charles Delivers Heartbreaking News About Queen Camilla
Something was clearly wrong at Buckingham Palace last night. Just after midnight, lights blazed in the royal residence as senior aides were rushed through side entrances for what insiders described as an “unprecedented” emergency meeting.
Hours later, King Charles III appeared before the cameras, his face solemn and his voice trembling, to deliver a statement no one could have anticipated.
The King’s Emotional Words
Known for his composed and deliberate style, King Charles struggled to contain his emotions as he addressed the nation.
“It is with the deepest sadness that I must share this with you…”
Witnesses noted the King paused several times, his voice breaking, before continuing. It was less a formal royal address and more a husband speaking openly about the woman he loves.
A Palace in Mourning
Though full details remain closely guarded, palace sources confirmed the announcement concerned Queen Camilla’s health and well-being. One insider described the moment as “raw, emotional, and devastating,” adding that the King’s vulnerability struck everyone present.
Following the statement, Buckingham Palace fell into quiet mourning. Curtains were drawn, staff moved in hushed tones, and senior royals—including Princess Anne—gathered privately to comfort the King.
Britain Reacts
As the news spread, crowds began to gather outside Buckingham Palace, leaving flowers, candles, and handwritten notes. Across social media, hashtags like #PrayersForCamilla and #StayStrongCharles trended globally, reflecting a wave of sympathy from Britain and the wider Commonwealth.
A Human Side to the Crown
For decades, Charles and Camilla have endured scrutiny, but this moment of grief and vulnerability stripped away the formality of monarchy. As one commentator observed:
“For all the crowns and jewels, what we saw today was simply a man grieving for his wife. That is something we can all understand.”
Conclusion
King Charles’s emotional announcement has united the nation in concern and compassion. It was a rare glimpse into the private heart of the monarchy—a reminder that even those who reign are not shielded from love, fear, or loss. As Britain waits for further updates, the King and his family now face one of their most personal challenges, a moment that may redefine how the world sees both the monarch and the man.
“We didn’t think he’d make it through the night.” He was very ill—low oxygen, high fever, barely conscious. But through it all, he kept whispering one name: “Murphy… Murphy…” We thought it might be a son or old friend. But when asked, he softly said:
We called his daughter. Her voice broke: “Murphy is his 13-year-old Golden Retriever. We left him at my brother’s while Dad’s i