Conservative commentator Stephen Crowder is once again putting Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) back in the spotlight, repeating claims that the congresswoman married her brother to help him immigrate to the United States.
“Here’s a fun fact. You married your brother!” Crowder said in a recent video, citing documents he claims to have reviewed. His remark reignited the long-running controversy that Omar has consistently dismissed as a smear campaign.
Crowder, who has made a career out of challenging the left, argued that the evidence surrounding Omar’s 2009 marriage to Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, a British citizen, raises serious red flags. “Marital records don’t lie,” he said.
Omar has repeatedly denied the allegations, saying in 2019: “These baseless rumors are absolutely false and offensive.” She has maintained that her marriage history is being weaponized by political opponents.
Still, conservative voices like Crowder remain unconvinced. “If it wasn’t her brother, why has she gone to such lengths to hide records?” Crowder asked his audience, pointing to gaps in Omar’s public disclosures.
Omar’s 2009 marriage ended in 2017 when she and Elmi officially divorced. The timeline has fueled speculation among critics who argue that the marriage was never legitimate in the first place.
“The evidence keeps piling up,” Crowder said. “And every time, the mainstream press looks the other way.” His frustration echoes the views of many on the right who believe the media has protected Omar from real scrutiny.
Omar herself has described the rumors as part of a larger racist and Islamophobic campaign against her. “It’s disgusting to lie about immigrants in this way,” she told the Star Tribune
in 2019.
Yet critics note that Omar has avoided answering direct questions about her marriage history. “She’s dodged every attempt to get to the bottom of this,” Crowder said.
Conservative lawmakers have also pressed for clarity. In 2019, Rep. Steve King (R-IA) said: “If she didn’t do this, why not just provide the proof? If she did, the American people deserve to know.”
Omar’s defenders argue that the allegations are nothing more than conspiracy theories designed to delegitimize one of the first Muslim women in Congress. “This is a smear,” Omar said, insisting that the right is targeting her because of who she is.
Crowder isn’t buying it. “This isn’t about race. This isn’t about religion. This is about immigration fraud,” he said, accusing Omar of using identity politics as a shield.
The documents at the center of the controversy come from marriage certificates and school records tied to Omar and Elmi. Conservative outlets have long claimed these records suggest a familial relationship.
“When the paperwork doesn’t match up, when the timelines don’t make sense, the burden of proof falls on her,” Crowder said.
Omar’s spokesman told the Minneapolis Star Tribune in 2019: “There’s no truth at all to this story. This has been debunked multiple times.”
But as Crowder pointed out: “If it’s been debunked, where’s the evidence? Show us the DNA test. Show us the documents.”
Conservative frustration has only grown as media watchdogs refuse to pursue the issue. “They call everything a conspiracy theory,” Crowder said, “until it turns out to be true.”
The controversy gained traction in 2016 when blogger Scott Johnson of Power Line first raised questions about Omar’s marriage records. Since then, critics have pointed to inconsistencies that remain unresolved.
Crowder cited Johnson’s reporting in his video, saying: “These aren’t wild accusations. This is based on actual reporting, on records. Why won’t Omar face the facts?”
Omar’s defenders say the allegations rely on misunderstandings of Somali naming conventions and family structures. But critics argue that this explanation is evasive.
“If the explanation is that complicated, it usually means someone’s hiding something,” Crowder said.
Some Minnesota voters have expressed concern. “If she lied on immigration forms, that’s serious,” one voter told
Crowder insists that this is not a personal vendetta but a matter of integrity. “If a sitting congresswoman committed immigration fraud, the public deserves accountability,” he said.
Omar continues to reject the allegations, but the pressure from Crowder and other conservative voices shows no sign of slowing. “We’re not going to drop this,” Crowder declared.
BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…
Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.
This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.
Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.
According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals’ involvement in Epstein’s criminal network.
She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.
“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”
These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.
Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.
The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.
“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”
Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.
For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.
Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.
What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.
In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.
Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.
Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.
Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.
This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.
Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.
The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.
BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For…
Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.
Speaking from his post as one of President Trump’s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.
“This is a live federal investigation. We’ve asked ICE to take immediate action,” Homan said during a televised interview.
The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC’s office.
According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.
Homan stressed that AOC’s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.
“This goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There’s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,” he stated.
Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.
AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as “racist” and “oppressors.”
Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.
“If a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that’s a clear violation of federal law,” Homan declared.
Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.
Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.
House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.
“This is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn’t apply to them,” said Rep. Andy Biggs.
Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.
But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.
“This isn’t about politics. It’s about national security and public trust,” he said.
Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.
“We are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,” Homan confirmed.
Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.
Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman’s actions.
Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.
“We must restore the rule of law,” he concluded. “No one, no matter how powerful, is above it.”
BREAKING: The FBI Launches Criminal Investigation Into..
It’s finally happening.
John Brennan and James Comey—two of the most powerful Obama-era intelligence chiefs—are now facing criminal investigations.
Their role in pushing the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion narrative derailed a presidency and deceived the nation.
Sources inside the Justice Department confirm that former CIA Director Brennan is under investigation for allegedly lying to Congress.
Ex-FBI Director Comey is also the subject of an ongoing probe.
Their roles in the origin and manipulation of the Trump-Russia hoax are being scrutinized, years after millions of Americans demanded accountability.
Brennan is accused of pushing the phony Steele dossier into official intelligence assessments.
CIA Russia experts warned the document was so flawed it didn’t meet even “the most basic tradecraft standards.”
“Jasmine Crockett didn’t just insult Trump,” Leavitt said during her White House briefing. “She smeared over 70 million Americans who believe in freedom, God, secure borders, and the Constitution. Calling them mentally ill is not just false—it’s dangerous.”
Brennan ignored the warnings and formalized his demand in writing, insisting the fake dossier be included anyway.
James Comey, for his part, did the same.
The CIA’s review makes clear: FBI leadership under Comey pressured the intelligence community to embed the Steele dossier in their final report on Russian election interference.
The FBI “repeatedly pushed” for its inclusion.
These two didn’t just make bad calls. They rigged the process.
Even worse, Brennan later told Congress under oath that the Steele dossier “wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence” used in the Russia assessment.
But a newly surfaced email shows that he pushed the dossier hard, despite being warned it could destroy the report’s credibility.
And why did they push it so aggressively? Because it wasn’t about national security.
It was about kneecapping President Trump before he was even sworn in.
“This was Obama, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan deciding, ‘We’re going to screw Trump,’” former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told the press.
“They all knew what they were doing.”
Millions of tax dollars were wasted. Reputations were destroyed.
“Jasmine Crockett should visit a Trump rally before shooting her mouth off,” Leavitt challenged.
“She’ll meet grandmothers, veterans, farmers, teachers, truckers—all proud Americans who just want their country back. These are the people she called mentally ill. What an absolute disgrace.”
And for what? To push Hillary Clinton’s opposition research as gospel truth.
Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt.
Fusion hired British ex-spy Christopher Steele. Steele gave them fiction.
Senator Josh Hawley demanded action: “If Brennan and Comey lied to Congress or weaponized their agencies against a political opponent, they should be prosecuted—no exceptions, no excuses.”
This scandal is bigger than Watergate.
It poisoned public trust, warped the 2016 election aftermath, and set the tone for years of baseless attacks on a sitting president.
The investigations are underway.
Now the question is, will the justice system do its job, or will the same people who buried the truth for years bury it again?
Brennan and Comey must be held accountable.
No one is above the law, not even the architects of one of the most dishonest political smear campaigns in American history.
BREAKING: Joe Biden Admits to New York Times That…
Joe Biden admitted to The New York Times that he did not personally sign off on every pardon and commutation issued during his presidency, an acknowledgment that has sparked intense debate over how involved he truly was in carrying out one of the most consequential powers of the office.
“I made every decision on the categories and top-level individuals, but the mechanics were left to staff,” Biden told the Times. That sentence alone sent shockwaves through political and legal communities.
According to the New York Post, Biden’s White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients authorized the use of the autopen to execute a sweeping set of clemency actions on January 19, 2025. This included about 2,500 pardons and 1,500 commutations.
The New York Post confirmed, “Biden admitted that he didn’t review every clemency case individually and that his chief of staff, Jeff Zients, authorized the use of the autopen.”
The same report added, “The autopen application, which Biden also used to sign some legislation, allowed staff to speed up paperwork processing.”
While Biden insisted, as quoted in ABC News, that he personally made “every decision,” he conceded that he did not individually sign off on each document, saying, “I approved each of the clemency decisions before they were issued.”
The Daily Beast quoted Biden dismissing Republican criticism: “That is utter BS,” he said, responding to allegations that he had no hand in the clemency spree.
Still, Biden’s comments confirmed the worst fears of critics who have questioned his cognitive fitness and decision-making capacity. As Time reported, the final flurry of clemency actions was conducted with Biden out of public view.
Time added context, noting, “Emails show Biden’s chief of staff, Jeff Zients, approved the use of the autopen to execute clemency documents on the president’s behalf.”
In the same article, the legal implications were underscored: “While it is legally permissible, it is extremely rare for a president to use an autopen to sign something as consequential as a clemency order.”
Republican leaders swiftly seized on the opportunity to highlight Biden’s detachment. House Oversight Chair James Comer was quoted as saying, “This isn’t just about a signature. It’s about transparency, accountability, and who really was making decisions in that White House.”
Comer continued, as cited in ABC News, “We are investigating whether this use of the autopen was a way to obscure Biden’s declining capacity and whether any of the beneficiaries had connections to the administration.”
The legal debate over autopen use isn’t new, but Biden’s large-scale application is unprecedented. According to Time, “It has never been used on this scale or for something with the constitutional gravity of a pardon.”
Even some Democrats were privately concerned. One DNC strategist, speaking anonymously to Politico, said, “It feeds the narrative that Biden isn’t all there.”
The same strategist added, “If he wasn’t fully engaged on something as serious as clemency, what else was he rubber-stamping?”
In response to concerns, the Daily Beast reported that Biden maintained, “Each recipient was vetted and met the established standards for clemency.”
But skepticism remains. As Time highlighted, “The Justice Department is now investigating whether any of the pardons were improperly influenced.”
This adds to a growing list of concerns among voters and lawmakers alike. ABC News reported that the clemency decisions were made with “speed and secrecy,” raising transparency questions.
Donald Trump, seizing the moment, weighed in: “He didn’t have the guts or the capacity to do his job,” he said during a recent rally, as quoted in The Daily Beast.
Trump added, “You don’t get to hide behind a machine when you’re playing with the law.”
Seven out of ten people now believe that the Democratic Party is “out of touch“ with the actual issues of many Americans, according to a recent survey, which presents a frightening image for the party as it enters 2026. The results are based on a large survey conducted between November 2024 and June 2025 by the center-left research firm Welcome, which polled over half a million people. The findings show a growing gap between the Democratic Party’s platform and the interests of moderates, minorities, and working-class voters—the very group that formerly drove its success.
70% of voters think Democrats are focused on specialized social issues like “protecting the rights of undocumented immigrants” and “protecting the rights of LGBTQ+ Americans,” ignoring more pressing issues like public safety, border security, and inflation, according to the Deciding to Win report. Only 51% of respondents believed Democrats were out of touch in 2013, but that percentage has now risen by over 20 points. In comparison, opinions of the Republican Party have marginally improved during the same time frame, falling from 70% in 2013 to 65% now.
Democrats need to reorient themselves to be politically viable, the research advises frankly. The group added, “Democrats must concentrate less on climate change, democracy, abortion, and identity and cultural issues and more on the issues that voters believe we prioritize too little: the economy, the cost of living, health care, border security, and public safety.” Additionally, it called on the party to “moderate our positions on issues where our agenda is unpopular,” specifically those related to crime, immigration, and energy policy.
While 59% of voters disagree, only 39% believe the Democratic Party now has the correct priorities. According to the poll, Democrats are overwhelmingly in favor of focusing on securing the border (53%), lowering everyday costs (79%), making health care affordable (74%), creating jobs and economic growth (74%), lowering middle-class taxes (66%), lowering crime (56%), and protecting Social Security and Medicare (82%). Priorities including defending illegal immigrants (23%), raising social program funding (24%), and promoting LGBTQ+ rights (25%), on the other hand, came in last.
Democrats seem to have suffered greatly among minority and blue-collar voters as a result of that disparity. Since 2012, the party’s popularity has decreased by 11 points among Black voters without a college degree, 15 points among Asian voters without a college degree, and 16 points among Latino voters without a college degree. Whites with college degrees were the only group to increase their support, by just 4%.
Welcome arrived at the conclusion that “winning does not happen by accident.” “It’s a decision—a decision to be methodical, strategic, and prepared to face challenging realities about the electorate.”
Those “difficult truths” might be reaching Democrats either too late or just in time.To join the Diamond and Silk Monthly Supporter Program, visit http://SupportDiamondandSilk.com.Lindell TV, VOCL, ChatDit, Rumble, TruthSocial, and Diamond and Silk Media are all excellent ways to stay connected with Diamond and Silk
The percentage of Americans who believe the Democratic Party is “out of touch” has increased by double-digits over the last decade, with 70% indicating the party is disconnected from the issues that matter to voters.
The Democratic Party is perceived as being overly-focused on “Protecting the rights of undocumented immigrants” and “Protecting the rights of LGBTQ+ Americans” – alienating voters who care more about secure borders and crime reduction, a survey released Monday by Welcome, a center-left group, found.
“To win elections, Democrats need to make the following changes. First, we need to focus more on the issues voters do not think we prioritize enough (the economy, the cost of living, health care, border security, public safety), and focus less on the issues voters think we prioritize too highly (climate change, democracy, abortion, and identity and cultural issues),” read the conclusion of Welcome’s “Deciding to Win” survey.
“Second, we need to moderate our positions on issues where our agenda is unpopular, including immigration, public safety, energy production, and some identity and cultural issues,” the group noted.
In 2013, 51% of voters viewed the Democratic Party as “out of touch,” but the number surged to 70% in 2025, the pollster found.
Meanwhile, the Republican Party improved – going from 70% viewing it as “out of touch” in 2013, to 65% in 2025.
Welcome also highlighted polling showing only 39% of voters say the Democratic Party has the right priorities, while 59% of voters say Democrats do not.
The Democratic Party’s priorities should be “Protecting Social Security and Medicare” (82%); “Lowering everyday costs” (79%); “Making healthcare more affordable” (74%); “Creating jobs and economic growth” (74%); “Cutting taxes on the middle class” (66%); “Lowering the rate of crime” (56%); and “Securing the border” (53%), according to Welcome’s massive survey of more than 500,000 Americans.
The issues garnering the lowest level of support for Democratic prioritization included protecting illegal immigrants (23%), hiking taxes to increase spending on “social programs” (24%) and protecting LGBTQ rights (25%).
Voters viewed the Democratic Party as 26% more focused on illegal immigrant rights and 23% more focused on LGBTQ rights than they should be, in the survey conducted from Nov. 13, 2024 through June 18, 2025.
The party was also rated as being 21% more focused on securing the borders than it needed to be.
As a result of the party’s failure to align with the priorities of voters, support for Democrats “has declined significantly among working-class and minority voters since 2012,” particularly from moderates and conservatives in these categories, the pollster found.
Between 2012 and 2024, support for the Democratic Party only grew amongst college-educated white voters (+4%) and all college-educated voters (+2%).
Over the same period, the party hemorrhaged support from non-college-educated Latino voters (−16%), non-college-educated AAPI voters (−15%) and non-college-educated Black voters (−11%) among several other groups.
“It is essential that we make these strategic shifts because it is essential that we win,” Welcome’s conclusions continued.
“But winning does not happen by accident. Winning is a choice — a choice to be disciplined and strategic and to be willing to confront difficult truths about the electorate,” the group added.
The galaxy is buzzing with anticipation—Ahsoka Season 2 is officially on the horizon! After the resounding success of the first season, fans are eager to dive back into the Star Wars universe with everyone’s favorite former Jedi, Ahsoka Tano. Whether you’re curious about the
Before diving into what’s next, let’s quickly revisit where it all began. Ahsoka, a Disney+ original series, follows Ahsoka Tano, the beloved character first introduced in Star Wars: The Clone Wars
Season 1 captivated both new and longtime Star Wars fans by introducing live-action versions of Sabine Wren, Ezra Bridger, and Grand Admiral Thrawn. The show ended on a cliffhanger, with Ahsoka stranded in a distant galaxy—setting up massive stakes for Season 2.
One of the most frequently searched questions is: When is Ahsoka Season 2 coming out?
As of mid-2025, Lucasfilm has confirmed that Ahsoka Season 2 is in development, but an official release date has not been announced. However, industry insiders speculate that the release will likely fall in late 2026 or early 2027, depending on filming schedules and post-production timelines.
Given the visual scale and heavy special effects, Ahsoka Season 2 will likely follow the release pattern of other Star Wars shows like The Mandalorian, which typically have 12–18 months between seasons.
Key takeaway: While there’s no exact Ahsoka Season 2 release date yet, fans can expect updates toward the end of 2025.
Another hot topic is the potential for an Ahsoka Season 2 trailer. Unfortunately, as of now, there is no official trailer available. However, filming is rumored to be starting soon, meaning we might get a teaser trailer by mid-2026—perhaps revealed at
When the Ahsoka Season 2 trailer does drop, expect glimpses of intense lightsaber battles, mysterious Force lore, and perhaps more of the enigmatic Baylan Skoll storyline left hanging after Season 1.
Tip for fans: Keep your eyes on Disney+ and the official Star Wars YouTube channel for teaser announcements.
Season 1 introduced mystical elements like the World Between Worlds and ancient Force lore. In Season 2, showrunner Dave Filoni is expected to dig even deeper into these mystical aspects, especially with Ahsoka’s spiritual journey continuing in a new galaxy.
Grand Admiral Thrawn, played by Lars Mikkelsen, is now a looming threat to the New Republic. Fans anticipate that Thrawn will start rallying forces, potentially tying directly into the upcoming Star Wars: Heir to the Empire film also being developed by Filoni.
Thrawn is not just a villain—he’s a master strategist. Season 2 will likely focus on the conflict between Thrawn’s return and the fragile peace established post-Empire.
The reunion between Sabine Wren and Ezra Bridger was one of Season 1’s most emotional payoffs. Season 2 is expected to further explore their bond and evolution. Sabine, who is now Force-sensitive, might undergo formal training under Ahsoka—or clash with her.
Ezra’s adjustment to returning to the known galaxy and what role he plays in resisting Thrawn will be another central thread.
While Disney has yet to announce the full cast of Ahsoka Season 2, here are the actors likely to return:
Rosario Dawson as Ahsoka Tano
Natasha Liu Bordizzo as Sabine Wren
Eman Esfandi as Ezra Bridger
Lars Mikkelsen as Grand Admiral Thrawn
Diana Lee Inosanto as Morgan Elsbeth (if flashbacks are involved)
A major question mark is the character of Baylan Skoll, originally portrayed by the late Ray Stevenson. Lucasfilm may choose to recast the role or write a new arc around it.
Ahsoka Season 2 may not be a standalone story. With Dave Filoni building a shared Star Wars timeline with The Mandalorian, The Book of Boba Fett, and Skeleton Crew, crossovers are highly likely. Expect potential cameos or tie-ins as Disney+ leads toward its major Star Wars theatrical crossover event.
Ahsoka Season 2 is shaping up to be a cornerstone of the live-action Star Wars universe. With new threats, deeper Force mythology, and beloved characters returning, it’s no surprise fans are eagerly awaiting every update.
While the Ahsoka Season 2 release date and trailer are still under wraps, the series continues to build buzz and excitement. Until then, fans can rewatch Season 1 on Disney+ and keep an eye on announcements from Lucasfilm and Star Wars Celebration 2025.