Jeana Keough accused Shannon Beador of being “mean” to her for “no reason,” and she shared what triggered their feud. The Real Housewives of Orange County alum also gave an update on her sons Shane Keough and Colton Keough, who were featured often in early seasons.
Four seasons after Jeana left the show, Shannon ‘stormed’ in. For 10 years, Shannon has been open about her life, including her ex-husband David Beador’s past affair. Throughout their marriage, Shannon was also honest about their marriage struggles.
“You know who’s mean to me for no reason is Shannon Beador,” said Jeana on Vicki Gunvalson‘s podcast, My Friend, My Soulmate, My Podcast. “There’s no reason to be mean to me.”
Jeana then hinted at what triggered their feud.
“All I said was that [it] was really stupid of [Shannon] — I told one of the girls. It wasn’t even on camera — [that] it [was] really stupid for you to tell everybody [on camera that] you hadn’t had sex with your husband for a year. Because he’s good-looking and rich, there’s girls that are gonna go after that dude.”
“And I was right. They went after him,” she continued. “She should have gone on the next episode [and said], ‘I screwed his brains out every morning, night, and evening now.’”
Vicki’s cohost, Christian Gray Snow, added, “She should’ve rolled in in a wheelchair to that confessional.”
At one point in the episode, Jeana gave an update on her kids.
“Colton’s working in Camarillo, [California] for fire insurance,” said Jeana. “And Shane’s in Florida. His daughter‘s in Florida, so. [Colton] was there for nine months, but he came back … He just missed all his friends.”
“But Camarillo’s not close to Orange County,” said Vicki.
“No,” said Jeana. “But it’s a big job, and he couldn’t say no.”
Back in 2021, Shane shared some details about his career.
“I live in Jacksonville, Florida. I’m in real estate,” said Shane on WWHL After Show, via Bravo TV. “I have an environmental sustainability agency, so we focus on how to make the world a better place.”
“Colton’s doing real estate,” he added. “He works with my mom down in Irvine, so family business, I guess.”
The long-running civil lawsuit against Alec Baldwin stemming from the fatal 2021 Rust shooting has reached a breaking point. The actor is now facing unprecedented legal jeopardy after attorneys for gaffer Serge Svetnoy revealed a crucial piece of evidence in court: Baldwin allegedly refused to appear for a legally required deposition, yet was photographed attending a taping of Dancing with the Stars to support his wife, Hilaria Baldwin.
This blatant display of personal convenience over judicial obligation has reportedly infuriated the presiding judge, leading to an alleged threat to not only impose a colossal $3 MILLION FINE but to escalate the penalty by making it a CRIMINAL legal precedent, citing Baldwin’s conduct as a profound disregard for the rule of law.
For months, Svetnoy’s legal team has been attempting to secure Baldwin’s deposition—key testimony for the civil suit where Svetnoy claims he suffered severe emotional distress after witnessing the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.
On November 12, Svetnoy’s lawyer revealed the shocking pattern of evasion: “In every instance, [Alec and the other defendants] claimed to be unavailable or simply refused to testify.” The documents specifically point out the hypocrisy of Baldwin’s excuses:
The lawyer wrote: “Despite claiming to have work commitment throughout most of September 2025, Alec, 67, would travel to and appear in Los Angeles, California, at the taping of an episode of Dancing With the Stars to support his wife.”
This act of prioritizing a televised celebrity appearance over a court-ordered duty has been presented as definitive proof of Baldwin’s BLATANT disregard for justice.
Sources close to the Los Angeles Superior Court claim the judge was incensed by the evidence of the evasion. While the $3 million figure is tied to potential punitive damages in the civil suit, the judge allegedly threatened to use this case as an opportunity to set a dramatic CRIMINAL legal precedent for non-compliance with subpoenas.
The judicial threat is reportedly twofold:
Maximum Penalty: The judge is said to be demanding Baldwin face the MAXIMUM penalty for civil contempt, which could include massive fines and even potential incarceration if the contempt is deemed willful.
Criminal Precedent: By linking the $3M financial penalty to the deliberate evasion, the court could send a chilling message to high-profile defendants, essentially classifying a calculated refusal to testify—particularly when balanced against non-essential public appearances—as an obstruction of justice that warrants unprecedented and potentially criminal consequences.
Svetnoy’s attorney quoted Albert Einstein in the filing, stating, “‘The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.’ [Svetnoy] now moves [to] break this cycle of insanity.” The court appears ready to grant that break—with catastrophic consequences for the actor.
The legal fallout from the Rust tragedy continues to mount, but this latest development threatens to redefine the legal repercussions for celebrity defendants who believe their fame exempts them from court-ordered duties.