Get ready to send it: Summer House’s Kyle Cooke, Amanda Batula, and Lindsay Hubbard will be arriving on a new Bravo series. “See you in the city. Kyle, Amanda, and Lindsay arrive on a new series soon!,” a teaser announcement on Bravo’s Instagram notes.
Viewers last saw what Amanda, Kyle, and Lindsay were up to in Season 9 of Summer House. The season followed Amanda and Kyle as they navigated their marriage and what could be next for them in their happily ever after, as well as their busy careers at Loverboy and beyond. The season also saw Lindsay enter the house expecting her first baby and on her pregnancy journey. Of course, this was all in addition to friend drama, theme parties on theme parties, lighthearted Hamptons antics, and oh so much more.
Next up, viewers will have to stay tuned for additional details on all things Lindsay, Amanda and Kyle as they embark on this new journey together in their upcoming Bravo show.
Amanda and Kyle have been taking fans inside their married life on social media as they work and live their best lives by each other’s sides. The pair also recently celebrated their wedding anniversary. “Greetings from our 4 year wedding anniversary. Now on to the main course!” Kyle shared from their anniversary date filled with a tasty meal to mark another year together.
Lindsay later welcomed her daughter, Gemma, in December 2024. In addition to changes in her personal life, Lindsay also made a major move to a new apartment for her and Gemma. Now that’s what we call a “mamcita” era indeed.
In the meantime, you can check out Summer House past seasons on Peacock. Wondering what else is coming up on the Bravo schedule?
The long-running civil lawsuit against Alec Baldwin stemming from the fatal 2021 Rust shooting has reached a breaking point. The actor is now facing unprecedented legal jeopardy after attorneys for gaffer Serge Svetnoy revealed a crucial piece of evidence in court: Baldwin allegedly refused to appear for a legally required deposition, yet was photographed attending a taping of Dancing with the Stars to support his wife, Hilaria Baldwin.
This blatant display of personal convenience over judicial obligation has reportedly infuriated the presiding judge, leading to an alleged threat to not only impose a colossal $3 MILLION FINE but to escalate the penalty by making it a CRIMINAL legal precedent, citing Baldwin’s conduct as a profound disregard for the rule of law.
For months, Svetnoy’s legal team has been attempting to secure Baldwin’s deposition—key testimony for the civil suit where Svetnoy claims he suffered severe emotional distress after witnessing the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.
On November 12, Svetnoy’s lawyer revealed the shocking pattern of evasion: “In every instance, [Alec and the other defendants] claimed to be unavailable or simply refused to testify.” The documents specifically point out the hypocrisy of Baldwin’s excuses:
The lawyer wrote: “Despite claiming to have work commitment throughout most of September 2025, Alec, 67, would travel to and appear in Los Angeles, California, at the taping of an episode of Dancing With the Stars to support his wife.”
This act of prioritizing a televised celebrity appearance over a court-ordered duty has been presented as definitive proof of Baldwin’s BLATANT disregard for justice.
Sources close to the Los Angeles Superior Court claim the judge was incensed by the evidence of the evasion. While the $3 million figure is tied to potential punitive damages in the civil suit, the judge allegedly threatened to use this case as an opportunity to set a dramatic CRIMINAL legal precedent for non-compliance with subpoenas.
The judicial threat is reportedly twofold:
Maximum Penalty: The judge is said to be demanding Baldwin face the MAXIMUM penalty for civil contempt, which could include massive fines and even potential incarceration if the contempt is deemed willful.
Criminal Precedent: By linking the $3M financial penalty to the deliberate evasion, the court could send a chilling message to high-profile defendants, essentially classifying a calculated refusal to testify—particularly when balanced against non-essential public appearances—as an obstruction of justice that warrants unprecedented and potentially criminal consequences.
Svetnoy’s attorney quoted Albert Einstein in the filing, stating, “‘The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.’ [Svetnoy] now moves [to] break this cycle of insanity.” The court appears ready to grant that break—with catastrophic consequences for the actor.
The legal fallout from the Rust tragedy continues to mount, but this latest development threatens to redefine the legal repercussions for celebrity defendants who believe their fame exempts them from court-ordered duties.