Jassi Rideaux returned to The Real Housewives of Potomac as a friend of the show for its 10th season. She has appeared in multiple episodes so far, and many fans say she should be a full-time cast member. Now, she’s opening up on social media and shedding light on her marriage to NFL player
As RHOP viewers know, Jassi is on the most recent cast trip to Nevis. Things became heated in one of the recent episodes, leading
Jassi took to X to vent her frustrations about the discussions surrounding Darius and his kids. Luckily, Queens of Bravo Plus posted screenshots. She wrote, “My husband did not have two children on me. Let’s make that very clear. He simply didn’t tell me a woman was already seven months pregnant with their 2nd child when we first got together. No more, no less. The baby was coming before I ever entered his life. This narrative so gross.”
Jassi Rideaux Screenshots | Instagram
She said in a different post, “Anything to have something to say, though! You know you’re that girl when they have to LIE to make you look bad.”
Jassi then made another post on the matter. She said, “Ya’ll gone stop playing on Darus Harris’ top! As for the “cheating” talk… what he did when we didn’t even live in the same state, in the first 2 – 3 months of dating, wasn’t shocking.”
She then said, “I didn’t expect a man I barely knew to be sitting in a room alone. Let’s be real.”
The Real Housewives of Potomac airs on Sunday nights on Bravo. The episodes are available to stream the following day on Hulu.
The long-running civil lawsuit against Alec Baldwin stemming from the fatal 2021 Rust shooting has reached a breaking point. The actor is now facing unprecedented legal jeopardy after attorneys for gaffer Serge Svetnoy revealed a crucial piece of evidence in court: Baldwin allegedly refused to appear for a legally required deposition, yet was photographed attending a taping of Dancing with the Stars to support his wife, Hilaria Baldwin.
This blatant display of personal convenience over judicial obligation has reportedly infuriated the presiding judge, leading to an alleged threat to not only impose a colossal $3 MILLION FINE but to escalate the penalty by making it a CRIMINAL legal precedent, citing Baldwin’s conduct as a profound disregard for the rule of law.
For months, Svetnoy’s legal team has been attempting to secure Baldwin’s deposition—key testimony for the civil suit where Svetnoy claims he suffered severe emotional distress after witnessing the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.
On November 12, Svetnoy’s lawyer revealed the shocking pattern of evasion: “In every instance, [Alec and the other defendants] claimed to be unavailable or simply refused to testify.” The documents specifically point out the hypocrisy of Baldwin’s excuses:
The lawyer wrote: “Despite claiming to have work commitment throughout most of September 2025, Alec, 67, would travel to and appear in Los Angeles, California, at the taping of an episode of Dancing With the Stars to support his wife.”
This act of prioritizing a televised celebrity appearance over a court-ordered duty has been presented as definitive proof of Baldwin’s BLATANT disregard for justice.
Sources close to the Los Angeles Superior Court claim the judge was incensed by the evidence of the evasion. While the $3 million figure is tied to potential punitive damages in the civil suit, the judge allegedly threatened to use this case as an opportunity to set a dramatic CRIMINAL legal precedent for non-compliance with subpoenas.
The judicial threat is reportedly twofold:
Maximum Penalty: The judge is said to be demanding Baldwin face the MAXIMUM penalty for civil contempt, which could include massive fines and even potential incarceration if the contempt is deemed willful.
Criminal Precedent: By linking the $3M financial penalty to the deliberate evasion, the court could send a chilling message to high-profile defendants, essentially classifying a calculated refusal to testify—particularly when balanced against non-essential public appearances—as an obstruction of justice that warrants unprecedented and potentially criminal consequences.
Svetnoy’s attorney quoted Albert Einstein in the filing, stating, “‘The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.’ [Svetnoy] now moves [to] break this cycle of insanity.” The court appears ready to grant that break—with catastrophic consequences for the actor.
The legal fallout from the Rust tragedy continues to mount, but this latest development threatens to redefine the legal repercussions for celebrity defendants who believe their fame exempts them from court-ordered duties.