Former U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said in an interview Friday that the FBI never informed him that hundreds of its agents had been deployed inside the crowds during the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.
Sund’s remarks to host John Fawcett of “The Great America Show” came on the heels of a Thursday revelation that the FBI, then under Christopher Wray, had 274 plainclothes agents inside the massive Trump crowds on January 6, 2021 — hundreds more than previously reported.
A senior congressional source said the number of FBI personnel at the Capitol on Jan. 6 is not necessarily surprising, noting that the bureau routinely embeds countersurveillance staff at large public events. Still, the source acknowledged that, given the FBI’s longstanding refusal to detail the scope of its presence that day, the figure is likely to draw skepticism in some quarters, The Blaze reported.
The disclosure follows earlier claims by the Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General that the FBI had no undercover personnel embedded in the Jan. 6 crowds. It also follows a false claim by then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that neither then-President Trump nor anyone else requested National Guard support.
“We found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6,” the DOJ OIG said in an 88-page report released in December 2024.
Wray testified before Congress in July 2023 that he “does not believe” undercover FBI agents were present at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.
“I’m not sure there were undercover agents on scene,” Wray responded to a question from a GOP lawmaker. “As I sit here right now, I do not believe there were undercover agents on.”
Sund said that on January 5, one day before the Capitol protests, he met with representatives from major federal agencies and specifically asked whether any liaison would be assigned from agencies planning to have personnel on the ground. According to Sund, no agency disclosed such plans.
“If they were saying that they were going to have that group in the crowd already, most likely what they’d do is they’d put a liaison up in my command center,” Sund told Fawcett. “I mean, if you’re going to have that type of assets and resources deployed onto someone’s jurisdiction, you’re going to put somebody in their command center. That’s key.
WATCH:
“The only problem with the Capitol is the bureaucracy. Even though, as the Chief of Police, there was a chief law enforcement officer for the House and a chief law enforcement officer for the Senate that sat over top of me. That created the big bureaucracy that I ran into. You’d like to think the chief could call the shots, especially with my experience? Not the case on January 6th,” he added.
“It’s like no other jurisdiction in the world. They really need to fix that,” he said.
In February 2021 testimony before the Senate Rules and Homeland Security committees, Sund said he never received an FBI report that warned of potential violence on January 6. The report, issued on January 5, outlined specific calls for violence ahead of the protest at the Capitol.
According to Sund, while the U.S. Capitol Police did receive the report, it never made its way to his office.
Instead, he testified, a Capitol Police officer assigned to the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force received the document and passed it to an official within the department’s Intelligence Division, where it never made it further up the chain of command.
A community is in mourning after a tragic accident claimed the life of a 12-year-old child at home. Investigators say the victim suffered a fatal electrical shock after stepping on a faulty connection. Despite desperate attempts to save them, the child was pronounced dead soon after, leaving the family shattered and neighbors in disbelief.
What should have been the safest place—home—became the site of unthinkable loss. The hidden danger of faulty wiring turned a familiar setting into tragedy, a reminder that hazards often lurk where we least expect them.
Authorities have launched a full investigation into the cause, examining whether unsafe wiring or negligence played a role. Safety experts stress that many electrical risks remain invisible until it’s too late, underscoring the importance of regular checks, especially in older homes.
Beyond the technical details, this loss speaks to the fragility of life and the duty to protect our children from dangers seen and unseen. May this young soul be remembered with tenderness, and may their passing serve as a call to greater vigilance—so that no other family has to endure the same grief.
The Internal Revenue Service filed the lien in Sonoma County, California, in January 2023, alleging that Mynett’s company, EStreetCo, failed to pay nearly $206,000 in income, Social Security, and Medicare taxes for the 2021 tax year.
The filing came seven months after the company dissolved in June 2022.
EStreetCo was launched in October 2020 by Mynett and his business partner, former Democratic National Committee adviser Will Hailer.
According to archived versions of its website, the firm provided advertising, design, and public relations services and employed at least 17 staff members.
In her 2021 congressional financial disclosure, Omar reported that EStreetCo was a “creative agency” and valued her husband’s stake at no more than $1,000. This was during the same period the IRS claims the company failed to pay its required taxes.
The lien does not involve Mynett’s earlier political consulting firm, E Street Group, which received $2.9 million from Omar’s campaign during the 2020 election cycle. No known tax liens have been filed against that business.
Although the lien remains listed as active in Sonoma County records, a spokesman for EStreetCo insisted the tax debt has been resolved. “The tax bill has been paid in full and a credit is due,” the spokesman told the Free Beacon.
He also provided IRS account transcripts dated September 3, 2025, showing the agency now owes the company a $3,042 tax credit and that no outstanding balance remains. The IRS declined to comment on the matter.
The tax controversy comes as Omar faces growing scrutiny over her rapidly increasing personal wealth.
A Free Beacon report earlier this year revealed her net worth climbed from no more than $163,000 in 2023 to as much as $30 million in 2024 — a jump of more than 3,500 percent.
Much of that wealth was tied to two other firms co-owned by Mynett and Hailer: California-based winery eStCru LLC and venture capital firm Rose Lake Capital. Rose Lake previously advertised its ability to structure “legislation” for clients before removing the claim from its website.
Omar’s office did not respond to requests for comment.
Mynett’s financial disclosures in 2023 valued his stake in both companies at no more than $51,000, with combined bank balances under $700.
But by the end of 2024, his holdings reportedly surged to roughly $30 million, following legal settlements with investors who had accused the pair of fraud.
LOS ANGELES, CA — Television is a world of carefully crafted moments, where every emotion is rehearsed, every line is scripted, and every camera angle is deliberate. But last night, during rehearsals for this year’s season of The Voice, a leaked video shattered that illusion. In a brief, unexpected interlude, Reba McEntire, Michael Bublé, John Legend, and Snoop Dogg bowed their heads in a solemn tribute to the late Charlie Kirk. What happened next—especially Michael Bublé’s whispered words to Erika Kirk—left fans and industry insiders reeling, sparking questions about grief, authenticity, and the boundaries of public mourning.
The video surfaced on social media just after midnight, posted anonymously to a fan account before spreading like wildfire. In the grainy footage, the four coaches—each a giant in their own genre—stood in a circle on the dimly lit stage. The mood was somber, a stark contrast to the show’s usual energy.
Reba McEntire, the queen of country, was the first to bow her head. John Legend and Snoop Dogg followed, their faces etched with genuine sorrow. Michael Bublé, known for his charm and effortless vocals, looked visibly shaken, his hands trembling as he reached for Erika Kirk, who stood quietly at the edge of the stage.
For a moment, time seemed to stop.
Charlie Kirk’s presence on The Voice stage was, in many ways, unexpected. As a conservative commentator and activist, he was more often seen at political rallies than entertainment events. Yet his recent passing had touched people across the spectrum, including those in the music industry.
Sources close to the production say the tribute was meant to be private—a moment of respect among colleagues, not a televised segment. “It wasn’t about politics,” one producer explained. “It was about honoring someone who meant a lot to people in that room.”
Reba McEntire, always the anchor, led the tribute with a short prayer. “We’re here to remember a friend, a husband, a father. May his memory be a blessing.”
John Legend, who has spoken openly about the need for empathy in divided times, added, “We may not always agree, but we can always show love.”
Snoop Dogg, ever the iconoclast, simply nodded, his eyes closed in silent reflection.
But it was Michael Bublé’s reaction that truly stunned those present—and, later, the millions who watched the leaked video. As the prayer ended, Bublé turned to Erika Kirk. His face, usually lit with a playful grin, was pale and drawn.
He leaned in, whispering something so quietly that only Erika—and the sensitive boom mic—could catch it. The words were not immediately clear on the leaked audio, but lip readers and audio engineers have since pieced together fragments.
“I’m so sorry,” Bublé said, his voice breaking. “He changed so many lives, but you changed his.”
Erika Kirk’s eyes filled with tears. She reached for Bublé’s hand, squeezing it tightly. For a moment, the two stood in silence, the weight of loss hanging heavy between them.
Fans who saw the video described the moment as “haunting,” “unexpected,” and “piercing.” Many were struck by the intimacy of the exchange—a rare glimpse of vulnerability in a world that often demands composure.
The question on everyone’s mind is simple: Why was this moment not meant for broadcast?
Insiders say the tribute was intended as a private gesture, a way for the coaches and crew to process their own grief before the cameras began rolling. “We have these rituals,” explained a longtime Voice staffer. “Sometimes it’s for someone who’s passed, sometimes it’s for someone who’s struggling. It’s about the people, not the show.”
But the leak has reignited debates about the ethics of privacy, the power of authenticity, and the role of celebrity in public mourning.
Media analyst Dr. Felicia Wong notes, “There’s a hunger for real emotion in entertainment. When something unscripted happens, it cuts through the noise. But there’s a risk—when private pain becomes public content, whose story is it?”
Erika Kirk has found herself at the crossroads of grief and spectacle. In the months since Charlie’s passing, she has been both celebrated and scrutinized, her every word parsed for meaning.
After the tribute, Erika released a statement thanking the coaches and crew for their support. “Last night was one of the hardest nights of my life,” she wrote. “But it was also a reminder that love and kindness can break through even the darkest moments.”
She declined to comment on the specifics of Bublé’s words, saying only, “Michael is a beautiful soul. His kindness meant everything to me.”
Social media exploded in the hours after the leak. Hashtags like #TheVoiceTribute and #BubleErika trended nationwide, with fans dissecting every frame of the video.
Some praised the coaches for their empathy, calling it “the most authentic moment in TV history.” Others questioned the motives behind the leak, accusing producers of exploiting grief for ratings.
“Is nothing sacred anymore?” asked one Twitter user. “Let people mourn in peace.”
But the overwhelming response was one of empathy. Fans shared their own stories of loss, drawing parallels between Erika’s pain and their own. For a brief moment, the usual snark and cynicism of internet culture gave way to something gentler—a collective acknowledgment of the universality of grief.
Producers scrambled to contain the fallout, issuing statements about privacy and respect. “We deeply regret that a private moment was shared without consent,” read an official release. “Our hearts go out to Erika and the Kirk family.”
The network has launched an internal investigation, vowing to tighten security and prevent future leaks. But behind the scenes, there is a sense that the genie cannot be put back in the bottle.
“People saw something real,” admits one executive. “You can’t unsee that.”
The leaked tribute comes at a time when public mourning is increasingly common. From celebrity funerals to viral memorials, the boundaries between private sorrow and public spectacle are blurred.
Sociologist Dr. Robert Fields explains, “We live in an age of performative grief. People want to share, to connect, but there’s also a risk of exploitation. The challenge is to honor the pain without turning it into content.”
For Erika Kirk, the tribute was both a comfort and a burden. “I never wanted my grief to be entertainment,” she told a close friend. “But I’m grateful for the love. It helps me keep going.”
Michael Bublé’s role in the tribute has sparked renewed interest in his own journey. Known for his smooth vocals and easy charm, Bublé has faced his own share of hardship, including his son’s battle with cancer.
Fans see his interaction with Erika as a reflection of his character—empathetic, genuine, and unafraid to show emotion.
“He’s always been real,” says longtime fan Jessica Martin. “That’s why we love him.”
Industry insiders say Bublé’s vulnerability is part of what makes him so compelling. “He’s not afraid to break the fourth wall,” says producer Mark Daniels. “He reminds us that music—and life—is about connection.”
As The Voice prepares for its live shows, the shadow of the tribute lingers. Producers are reportedly considering a formal segment to honor Charlie Kirk, though no decision has been made.
Erika Kirk has been invited to attend, but sources say she is weighing her options. “She wants to honor Charlie,” says a family friend. “But she also needs space to heal.”
The coaches, meanwhile, have vowed to continue supporting Erika and the Kirk family. “We’re here for her,” Reba McEntire told reporters. “Whatever she needs.”
In a world obsessed with spectacle, the leaked tribute stands out for its authenticity. It was not meant for broadcast, not designed for ratings or virality. It was, simply, a moment of human connection—a reminder that, behind the lights and cameras, real lives are being lived.
For Erika Kirk, for Michael Bublé, and for the millions who watched, the message was clear: Grief is universal, and kindness matters.
As the dust settles and The Voice returns to its usual rhythms, the haunting words whispered on that stage will linger. They are a testament to the power of empathy, the importance of privacy, and the enduring need for real connection in a world that often feels unreal.
Jennifer L. Harper is a senior feature writer with more than twenty years’ experience covering entertainment, culture, and the intersections of public and private life. Her work has appeared in Rolling Stone, Vanity Fair, and The Los Angeles Times.
In a riveting development that has sent shockwaves through Washington and beyond, Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna has shared harrowing details from her recent discussions with survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s notorious sex trafficking network.
The Florida Republican, speaking in an interview following a closed-door meeting with victims, described the revelations as “scary” and emphasized the involvement of “a lot of wealthy, bad people.”
This comes amid the release of approximately 33,000 pages of documents related to Epstein’s case, which Luna indicated could expose a web of powerful figures but stops short of revealing victim identities for privacy reasons.
The meeting, attended by a bipartisan group of lawmakers including Luna, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, and others, provided a platform for six Epstein accusers to recount their experiences.
Luna highlighted one victim’s story in particular: a woman who was just 14 when Epstein began abusing her. According to Luna, this survivor has gaps in her memory due to the trauma and hopes the newly released files will fill in those blanks to aid her therapy and healing process.
“She’s hoping to find that out so that she can actually bring it to her therapist and continue the healing process,” Luna stated, underscoring the long-lasting psychological damage inflicted on these individuals.
Epstein, the disgraced financier who died in custody in 2019 under suspicious circumstances, has long been at the center of conspiracy theories and allegations involving high-profile personalities from politics, business, and entertainment.
His associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, was convicted in 2021 for her role in the trafficking scheme and is serving a 20-year sentence. The recent document dump, facilitated by the Department of Justice under pressure from congressional task forces, includes investigative files that were previously withheld.
Luna praised the DOJ for finally delivering the materials, noting that delays were partly due to redacting sensitive victim information.
However, Luna cautioned that the released pages are just the tip of the iceberg. “There’s going to be names. The attorneys kept emphasizing, you need to follow up on the names,” she told the interviewer.
When pressed on whether public officials were implicated in the victims’ testimonies, Luna clarified that no elected figures were named during the meeting, but “very, very wealthy people” were mentioned.
She refrained from disclosing specifics, explaining that doing so could prompt those individuals to destroy evidence. “They told us not to because they don’t want those people to start basically burning files,” Luna said, hinting at an impending criminal investigation.
This reluctance to name names has fueled speculation and frustration among the public. On social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter), users have been quick to react.
One post from user @ShadowofEzra highlighted Luna’s suggestion that Epstein may have been a foreign intelligence asset, without specifying which country. “Epstein may have been working with foreign intelligence,” the post quoted Luna, garnering thousands of likes and reposts.
Another user, @LeadingReport, announced that the files would include names, sparking widespread anticipation and debate.
The broader context of these revelations ties into ongoing efforts by Congress to declassify federal secrets. Luna heads the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, a body formed to push for transparency on issues like the Epstein files and even the JFK assassination records.
Earlier in the year, she accused Attorney General Pam Bondi of stonewalling releases, demanding full disclosure beyond superficial documents like Epstein’s phonebook.
In a February statement, Luna expressed disappointment when initial releases fell short of expectations: “This is not what we or the American people asked for and a complete disappointment.”
Sources from the House Oversight Committee have confirmed that the 33,000 pages Luna referenced are largely already public material, with about 97% previously available through court filings and media reports.
This has led to accusations that the release is a tactic to placate demands without true transparency. Critics, including fellow Republican Rep. Thomas Massie, have filed discharge petitions to force further disclosures, vowing to press forward despite internal party resistance.
The victims’ testimonies painted a picture of an international trafficking operation far more extensive than previously understood. Luna revealed that the network involved shell companies, secret bank accounts, and funds routed through institutions like Deutsche Bank.
Women from Slavic countries were lured under false pretenses of immigration opportunities, only to be trapped in exploitation. Multiple foreign governments were implicated, though details remain vague. One chilling account involved a victim whose infant daughter was threatened to ensure her silence.
Even more disturbing, Luna noted that Epstein continued abusing minors during his “work release” period in Florida, where he wore an ankle monitor but was allowed daytime freedom, returning to jail only at night.
This leniency has raised questions about complicity within the justice system. Attorneys for the accused have already begun contacting victims’ lawyers in attempts to mitigate fallout, signaling that the revelations could lead to new legal actions.
Public reaction has been intense, with figures like Rep. Nancy Mace reportedly leaving the meeting in tears after hearing the graphic details. On X, posts demanding justice have proliferated.
User @TheIntelSCIF shared a video compilation emphasizing the need for prison time for all involved elites. Others, like @Osint613, speculated on the international dimensions, including potential ties to foreign intelligence.
Luna stressed the need for bipartisan cooperation to tackle this issue. “The only way to collectively attack this is as a group and as a whole, meaning that Democrats and Republicans have to work together and back Congress subpoenas,” she said.
Chairman Comer has already requested financial data from the U.S. Treasury to trace the money trails, which could uncover laundering methods and hidden assets.
The Epstein saga has long captivated the American public, stemming from his 2008 plea deal that many viewed as overly lenient. Accusations of elite involvement have persisted, with names like former President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and others appearing in flight logs and court documents, though no charges have resulted from those associations.
Luna’s task force, backed by the Trump administration’s transfer of materials, aims to change that by ensuring full accountability.
As the documents circulate—initially causing a Google Drive crash due to overwhelming demand—analysts are poring over them for new insights. Social media influencers and journalists have expressed outrage, with some accusing conservative figures of selective releases to protect allies.
Luna, however, remains committed, stating, “People need to go to prison for what happened.”
This unfolding story highlights deeper systemic issues: the protection of the powerful, the trauma endured by survivors, and the quest for justice in a divided political landscape.
With more names expected to emerge and subpoenas on the horizon, the Epstein case could reshape public trust in institutions. Luna’s call for unity across party lines offers a glimmer of hope that, finally, the full truth might emerge, allowing victims to heal and perpetrators to face consequences.
Experts warn that unraveling this network will be complex, involving international cooperation and forensic financial analysis. The involvement of foreign entities adds layers of diplomatic sensitivity, potentially implicating allies in compromising operations.
Luna’s acknowledgment of Epstein as a possible “foreign asset” echoes long-standing theories about intelligence agencies using him for blackmail purposes.
In the coming weeks, as Congress reviews the files and pursues leads, the American people will watch closely. Will this lead to arrests and trials, or will it fade into another chapter of unresolved scandal?
Luna’s determination suggests the former, but history cautions skepticism. For now, the survivors’ voices, amplified through these meetings, demand action—and the nation awaits.