The U.S. Senate voted overwhelmingly to pass a key piece of legislation aimed at bolstering the country’s nuclear energy sector.
The bill passed by a vote of 88-2 with Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) opposing the measure. The nuclear package was combined with another bill that reauthorized the U.S. Fire Administration and grant programs for firefighters.
The measure aims to accelerate the process of approving the construction of new nuclear plants as many of the country’s existing plants reach the end of their serviceable lives. Additionally, it reduces the licensing fees that power companies must pay to initiate projects. It also mandates the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to prepare a report examining ways to simplify and expedite the environmental review process.
The Trump administration has placed an extreme focus on “unleashing American energy.”
President Trump issued four executive orders directing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reduce rules and expedite new licenses for nuclear power facilities, acting on applications within 18 months.
The United States was formerly the world leader in nuclear design and construction, but delays and exorbitant prices have given that position to China, which is building a record number of reactors.
The directives aim to expedite federal permitting for new nuclear projects and technology, as well as implement cost-cutting strategies to reduce the NRC’s footprint.
The sector will benefit from federal subsidies, since the House of Representatives’ draft budget legislation retains tax incentives for new and existing nuclear facilities, but requires them to begin construction before January 1, 2029.
The plan is to triple domestic nuclear power generation over the next 25 years, boosting capacity from around 100 gigawatts to 400 gigawatts by 2050.
On Tuesday, OpenAI and Oracle disclosed their intention to construct five additional data center sites as part of the “Stargate” initiative.
This initiative would substantially enhance the U.S. AI infrastructure and could potentially influence the grid composition in numerous states.
The companies, which are collaborating with SoftBank, stated that Stargate, which is supported by President Trump, has approximately 7 gigawatts of planned capacity and $400 billion in planned investment over the next three years.
This brings the initiative in close proximity to its initial objective of investing $500 billion in AI infrastructure and constructing 10 gigawatts of data center capacity by 2028.
The development of data centers is being closely monitored due to their potential to revolutionize the electric grid and its energy consumption.
The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimates that the AI build-out could utilize approximately 12 percent of the U.S. electricity by 2028.
In July, Oracle and OpenAI signed an agreement to invest over $300 billion in data centers over the next five years, which is the source of the majority of the new capacity. The corporations have announced that they are in the process of constructing data center sites in Shackelford County, Texas; Doña Ana County, New Mexico; and an unspecified location in the Midwest.
The new complexes are anticipated to generate over 5.5 gigawatts of power capacity and create over 25,000 jobs in conjunction with an operational Stargate site in Abilene, Texas, according to the companies.
That is more than twice the amount of electricity necessary to supply electricity to San Francisco.
The other two new Stargate sites, which are currently under development by OpenAI and SoftBank, are located in Milam County, Texas, and Lordstown, Ohio.
The Texas location is being supported by SB Energy, a SoftBank subsidiary, while the Ohio complex has commenced construction and is anticipated to be operational next year. The companies indicated that they may shortly disclose additional locations associated with Stargate.
Oracle, OpenAI, and SoftBank officials stated that they evaluated more than 300 proposals for data centers throughout the nation in order to determine the most suitable locations.
Microsoft, OpenAI’s supporter, is collaborating with Constellation Energy to restart the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor in Pennsylvania and is currently in the process of constructing a $4 billion data center complex in Wisconsin.
Meta is constructing an AI compound in Louisiana that will consume power equivalent to that of Manhattan. In Pennsylvania, Amazon is investing $20 billion to establish AI facilities.
Nvidia announced earlier this week that it would provide OpenAI with computer processors and invest $100 billion in the technology company.
Brooke Rollins, agriculture secretary under the renewed Trump vision for America, dropped a bombshell on the American public. She exposed a rot within the federal welfare system that not only drains taxpayer dollars but also emboldens corruption and inefficiency. Rollins revealed in an interview that nearly 5,000 dead individuals were still receiving SNAP benefits and that over 500,000 instances of duplicate enrollees had been uncovered.
This isn’t just a bureaucratic blunder. This is emblematic of a broken system that Democrats have allowed to fester, enabling abuse at the expense of working Americans. For decades, the left has wrapped welfare in the warm language of compassion, but what Rollins reveals is a scheme benefiting fraudsters, illegals, and career welfare recipients while punishing the responsible and the honest.
“We found one guy receiving benefits in six different states,” Rollins said. This is not just anecdotal. It’s systemic. It’s widespread. And it’s been protected by blue states that refused to cooperate with federal investigations into their welfare rolls.
Rollins’ testimony reinforces what conservatives have warned for years: that the Democratic Party is less interested in accountability and more invested in creating a permanent dependent class that can be controlled and harvested for votes.
This revelation confirms what President Trump emphasized during both his terms and campaign trail speeches: America must put its citizens first, and part of that is cleaning up fraud and prioritizing the deserving over the deceitful.
Under Rollins’ leadership, nearly 700,000 individuals have already been removed from the rolls. But the job is far from over. Democrat-led states have refused to share eligibility data and have filed lawsuits to block investigations. What are they hiding?
It’s no surprise that the Biden administration resisted such reforms. While Rollins and Trump aimed to safeguard the public trust and restore fiscal integrity, the Biden camp seems committed to open-handed spending with little oversight.
The mainstream media barely blinked at Rollins’ revelation. Had a Trump official been caught enabling such fraud, the outcry would be deafening. But when Democrats are the culprits, silence prevails.
The question Americans must ask is simple: Why is the left so afraid of transparency? Why do they fight to keep dead people on welfare and illegals on the dole?
Every fraudulent SNAP card represents dollars stolen from hard-working Americans. It means fewer resources for truly needy citizens. And it means a culture of dependency is being fostered, not the self-reliance and dignity that America First policies promote.
Rollins framed this as a national security issue as well, with illegal immigrants potentially benefitting from these systems through fraudulent documentation. This is not just an economic drain; it’s an attack on national sovereignty.
President Trump has long called for E-Verify, biometric ID, and strict eligibility rules for any federal assistance. His policies, backed by data like Rollins presented, are the only viable path forward.
What this country needs is a full audit of every entitlement program. The rot is deeper than SNAP. If dead people can draw food assistance, who else is bleeding the system dry?
The welfare state must be rebuilt from the ground up. And the only party willing to do that is the one led by Trump.
Blue states are terrified of what audits might reveal: networks of fraud, collusion, and incompetence that date back decades. They would rather sue than comply because exposure would cost them power.
This is a wake-up call to every Republican governor and lawmaker. The time for polite requests is over. Subpoenas and legislation must compel compliance. Any official obstructing this mission is complicit in theft.
Brooke Rollins has done more than expose fraud. She has given patriots the ammunition to demand change. The GOP must seize this moment.
Taxpayers must understand that the stakes are high. Every dollar wasted on a dead man’s EBT card is a dollar not spent securing the border, rebuilding infrastructure, or helping our veterans.
The American people have every right to know who is funding their candidates and what agendas those backers represent. A growing web of financial connections now links a controversial Muslim civil rights network—long scrutinized for its ties to radical organizations—to one of the largest donors backing a Democratic Socialist mayoral candidate.
At the center of this story is the Unity and Justice Fund, a political action committee that pumped $120,000 into the campaign of Zohran Mamdani, a self-proclaimed socialist running for New York City mayor. What raises immediate concern is not just the amount but the deeper affiliations behind that check.
The Unity and Justice Fund shares addresses and leadership personnel with CAIR Action, a political arm operating under the broader umbrella of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. CAIR, which has long positioned itself as a Muslim civil rights organization, has also faced years of scrutiny over its alleged radical ties.
Despite claims that CAIR Action is legally distinct from the non-profit CAIR, the overlapping addresses and shared individuals blur the lines. This looks less like a separation and more like a shell game, designed to mask political operations behind a non-profit veil.
Additional PACs linked to the same network are involved as well. Unity Lab PAC, which donated $23,500 to Mamdani’s PAC, is run by an individual who also operates as a spokesperson for a regional chapter of the parent organization. These interconnections raise red flags about coordination and transparency.
Meanwhile, the Unity and Justice Fund is run by a former chapter leader of the parent group, who also serves as treasurer for its political wing. This is not mere coincidence. It reflects a deliberate strategy to create political influence pipelines using groups that purport to be civil rights advocates.
Radical anti-Israel activist Linda Sarsour openly celebrated the influence of these PACs in Mamdani’s campaign, boasting that a large majority of his financial backing came from Muslim-American donors mobilized by these very organizations.
That statement alone should have set off alarms among ethics watchdogs and campaign-finance authorities. Yet, the only action taken by the involved parties was to add a legal disclaimer—hardly the kind of meaningful transparency the public deserves.
This network of political activity is also housed at the same address as the national office of the civil rights organization, further cementing suspicions that these entities are working hand-in-hand despite the technical distinctions on paper.
This is more than just politics as usual. It’s a sophisticated funding apparatus working to shape U.S. elections using money from groups that have faced serious questions about their allegiances and activities.
The background of these groups is not irrelevant. Leaders of their affiliated networks have previously been convicted of financing foreign terrorist organizations. Several high-profile trials have exposed the extent to which some of these so-called charities were functioning as financial channels for radical Islamist movements.
Yet these same networks are now pouring funds into the campaign of a mayoral candidate with openly radical positions, including praise for individuals convicted of funding terrorism. That should be deeply troubling to every American.
One such case involved a now-defunct charity whose directors were sentenced for funneling money to Hamas. During that trial, the civil rights group connected to the Mamdani campaign was named as an unindicted co-conspirator.
Even more disturbing is Mamdani’s own record. Years ago, he released a song in which he explicitly praised the convicted directors of that radical charity, telling listeners to “look ’em up.” That’s not a slip—it’s a declaration.
The message being sent here is that it’s perfectly acceptable to glamorize convicted criminals, accept funding from groups under investigation, and advance a political platform that aligns with far-left ideologies and radical sympathies.
This entire operation represents a gross manipulation of campaign finance laws, exploiting nonprofit protections to funnel massive political donations into the coffers of socialist candidates.
The American people are being kept in the dark about who is really backing some of the most extreme voices rising in today’s political ranks. And when those backers have controversial, even dangerous, affiliations, the implications become urgent.
This isn’t about smearing one religion or community. This is about national security, campaign integrity, and the need for full transparency in our electoral system.
Every dollar entering a political campaign should be traceable, accountable, and free from the shadow of extremism. When we allow dark-money operations tied to radical networks to go unchecked, we threaten the very foundations of our democracy.
The candidate in question has not refuted the source of the donations, nor has he returned the money. That silence is as telling as any endorsement. It signals complicity or, at the very least, indifference to the origins of his campaign’s financial backing.
Congress must act. Campaign finance rules must be updated to prevent nonprofits from serving as political fronts. Audits must be conducted. PACs with suspicious affiliations must be shut down.
Voters deserve to know who’s trying to buy influence in American cities—and for what purpose. In this case, the answer appears to be power cloaked in radicalism.