The Federal Bureau of Investigation has released new, higher-quality surveillance footage showing the individual who placed pipe bombs near the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Republican National Committee (RNC) in Washington, D.C., on January 5, 2021.
The updated footage, published on October 22, 2025, offers previously unreleased video clips and longer sequences that show the suspect’s movements more clearly.
The release marks the latest effort by the FBI to solve one of the longest-running unsolved cases connected to the January 6 events.
Authorities confirmed that the reward for information leading to the suspect’s identification, arrest, and conviction has been increased to $500,000.
“The FBI is still offering a $500,000 reward for information that helps identify the person who placed pipe bombs at the offices of the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee on January 5, 2021,” the Bureau announced.
The suspect is seen in the video wearing a gray hooded sweatshirt, gloves, and a mask, carrying a backpack that investigators believe contained the devices.
The person was captured walking through several Capitol Hill neighborhoods between 7:30 p.m. and 8:30 p.m. on the evening of January 5.
Both pipe bombs were found the following day outside the DNC and RNC headquarters. They were safely neutralized before they could detonate, and no injuries occurred.
FBI analysts determined that the devices were constructed with the chemical components of black powder and equipped with kitchen timers.
Even after reviewing thousands of leads and interviewing hundreds of witnesses, investigators have yet to identify the suspect responsible.
Deputy Director of the FBI Dan Bongino reaffirmed the Bureau’s commitment to finding the individual behind the attempted attack.
“If you have information regarding this critical investigation, please call 1-800-CALL-FBI,” Bongino said. “Even the smallest tip could be the key to closing this case.”
The FBI says it has processed over 1,000 interviews and reviewed more than 43,000 video files tied to the ongoing investigation.
In recent weeks, new information has emerged after FBI Director Kash Patel transmitted laboratory analyses and key witness interviews to Congress.
Those documents, obtained by Just the News, show that both bombs contained explosive components but did not include the term “viable” in the FBI’s laboratory report.
This detail has raised new questions about whether the devices were capable of detonating or if they served another purpose that night.
The timeline has also come under scrutiny, as both bombs were found roughly
Director Patel confirmed that all materials related to the case have been turned over to congressional oversight committees for further review.
Deputy Director Bongino said the Bureau would continue pursuing every lead until the case is solved. “This investigation remains active, and our agents are committed to following the evidence wherever it leads,” he stated.
The enhanced footage, now circulating on social media and the FBI’s official website, gives the public the clearest view yet of the suspect’s route through Washington.
Officials hope that viewers may recognize the person’s movements, clothing, or backpack and come forward with identifying information.
Security experts note that the case stands as one of the most complex domestic investigations in recent FBI history.
The renewed attention, combined with the $500,000 reward, could finally generate the tip that has eluded investigators for nearly five years.
The FBI continues to urge anyone with information to contact 1-800-CALL-FBI or submit a confidential tip online at tips.fbi.gov.
BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…
Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.
This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.
Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.
According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals’ involvement in Epstein’s criminal network.
She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.
“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”
These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.
Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.
The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.
“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”
Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.
For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.
Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.
What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.
In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.
Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.
Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.
Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.
This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.
Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.
The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.
BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For…
Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.
Speaking from his post as one of President Trump’s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.
“This is a live federal investigation. We’ve asked ICE to take immediate action,” Homan said during a televised interview.
The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC’s office.
According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.
Homan stressed that AOC’s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.
“This goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There’s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,” he stated.
Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.
AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as “racist” and “oppressors.”
Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.
“If a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that’s a clear violation of federal law,” Homan declared.
Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.
Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.
House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.
“This is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn’t apply to them,” said Rep. Andy Biggs.
Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.
But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.
“This isn’t about politics. It’s about national security and public trust,” he said.
Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.
“We are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,” Homan confirmed.
Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.
Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman’s actions.
Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.
“We must restore the rule of law,” he concluded. “No one, no matter how powerful, is above it.”
BREAKING: The FBI Launches Criminal Investigation Into..
It’s finally happening.
John Brennan and James Comey—two of the most powerful Obama-era intelligence chiefs—are now facing criminal investigations.
Their role in pushing the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion narrative derailed a presidency and deceived the nation.
Sources inside the Justice Department confirm that former CIA Director Brennan is under investigation for allegedly lying to Congress.
Ex-FBI Director Comey is also the subject of an ongoing probe.
Their roles in the origin and manipulation of the Trump-Russia hoax are being scrutinized, years after millions of Americans demanded accountability.
Brennan is accused of pushing the phony Steele dossier into official intelligence assessments.
CIA Russia experts warned the document was so flawed it didn’t meet even “the most basic tradecraft standards.”
“Jasmine Crockett didn’t just insult Trump,” Leavitt said during her White House briefing. “She smeared over 70 million Americans who believe in freedom, God, secure borders, and the Constitution. Calling them mentally ill is not just false—it’s dangerous.”
Brennan ignored the warnings and formalized his demand in writing, insisting the fake dossier be included anyway.
James Comey, for his part, did the same.
The CIA’s review makes clear: FBI leadership under Comey pressured the intelligence community to embed the Steele dossier in their final report on Russian election interference.
The FBI “repeatedly pushed” for its inclusion.
These two didn’t just make bad calls. They rigged the process.
Even worse, Brennan later told Congress under oath that the Steele dossier “wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence” used in the Russia assessment.
But a newly surfaced email shows that he pushed the dossier hard, despite being warned it could destroy the report’s credibility.
And why did they push it so aggressively? Because it wasn’t about national security.
It was about kneecapping President Trump before he was even sworn in.
“This was Obama, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan deciding, ‘We’re going to screw Trump,’” former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told the press.
“They all knew what they were doing.”
Millions of tax dollars were wasted. Reputations were destroyed.
“Jasmine Crockett should visit a Trump rally before shooting her mouth off,” Leavitt challenged.
“She’ll meet grandmothers, veterans, farmers, teachers, truckers—all proud Americans who just want their country back. These are the people she called mentally ill. What an absolute disgrace.”
And for what? To push Hillary Clinton’s opposition research as gospel truth.
Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt.
Fusion hired British ex-spy Christopher Steele. Steele gave them fiction.
Senator Josh Hawley demanded action: “If Brennan and Comey lied to Congress or weaponized their agencies against a political opponent, they should be prosecuted—no exceptions, no excuses.”
This scandal is bigger than Watergate.
It poisoned public trust, warped the 2016 election aftermath, and set the tone for years of baseless attacks on a sitting president.
The investigations are underway.
Now the question is, will the justice system do its job, or will the same people who buried the truth for years bury it again?
Brennan and Comey must be held accountable.
No one is above the law, not even the architects of one of the most dishonest political smear campaigns in American history.
BREAKING: Joe Biden Admits to New York Times That…
Joe Biden admitted to The New York Times that he did not personally sign off on every pardon and commutation issued during his presidency, an acknowledgment that has sparked intense debate over how involved he truly was in carrying out one of the most consequential powers of the office.
“I made every decision on the categories and top-level individuals, but the mechanics were left to staff,” Biden told the Times. That sentence alone sent shockwaves through political and legal communities.
According to the New York Post, Biden’s White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients authorized the use of the autopen to execute a sweeping set of clemency actions on January 19, 2025. This included about 2,500 pardons and 1,500 commutations.
The New York Post confirmed, “Biden admitted that he didn’t review every clemency case individually and that his chief of staff, Jeff Zients, authorized the use of the autopen.”
The same report added, “The autopen application, which Biden also used to sign some legislation, allowed staff to speed up paperwork processing.”
While Biden insisted, as quoted in ABC News, that he personally made “every decision,” he conceded that he did not individually sign off on each document, saying, “I approved each of the clemency decisions before they were issued.”
The Daily Beast quoted Biden dismissing Republican criticism: “That is utter BS,” he said, responding to allegations that he had no hand in the clemency spree.
Still, Biden’s comments confirmed the worst fears of critics who have questioned his cognitive fitness and decision-making capacity. As Time reported, the final flurry of clemency actions was conducted with Biden out of public view.
Time added context, noting, “Emails show Biden’s chief of staff, Jeff Zients, approved the use of the autopen to execute clemency documents on the president’s behalf.”
In the same article, the legal implications were underscored: “While it is legally permissible, it is extremely rare for a president to use an autopen to sign something as consequential as a clemency order.”
Republican leaders swiftly seized on the opportunity to highlight Biden’s detachment. House Oversight Chair James Comer was quoted as saying, “This isn’t just about a signature. It’s about transparency, accountability, and who really was making decisions in that White House.”
Comer continued, as cited in ABC News, “We are investigating whether this use of the autopen was a way to obscure Biden’s declining capacity and whether any of the beneficiaries had connections to the administration.”
The legal debate over autopen use isn’t new, but Biden’s large-scale application is unprecedented. According to Time, “It has never been used on this scale or for something with the constitutional gravity of a pardon.”
Even some Democrats were privately concerned. One DNC strategist, speaking anonymously to Politico, said, “It feeds the narrative that Biden isn’t all there.”
The same strategist added, “If he wasn’t fully engaged on something as serious as clemency, what else was he rubber-stamping?”
In response to concerns, the Daily Beast reported that Biden maintained, “Each recipient was vetted and met the established standards for clemency.”
This adds to a growing list of concerns among voters and lawmakers alike. ABC News reported that the clemency decisions were made with “speed and secrecy,” raising transparency questions.
Donald Trump, seizing the moment, weighed in: “He didn’t have the guts or the capacity to do his job,” he said during a recent rally, as quoted in The Daily Beast.
Trump added, “You don’t get to hide behind a machine when you’re playing with the law.”
It started quietly, the way most political scandals do.
A local lawmaker. A respected community figure. A man with a polished smile and a clean public image.
But by the time federal agents finished their investigation, the portrait of Massachusetts State Representative Christopher Flanagan had been shattered beyond repair.
In a stunning move, the U.S. Department of Justice announced the 37-year-old Democrat’s arrest and indictment on multiple felony counts — including wire fraud, falsification of records, and an elaborate cover-up scheme designed to deceive not only investigators but the very people who trusted him most.
And among the most jaw-dropping revelations buried inside the federal indictment?
Flanagan allegedly used stolen money not only to fund his political campaign — but to pay for “psychic services.”
Before his arrest, Christopher Flanagan’s résumé read like the blueprint for a rising political star.
A husband, father, and lifelong Cape Cod resident, he served as state representative for the town of Dennis — one of Massachusetts’s most picturesque seaside communities.
He also held the position of executive director of the Cape Cod Home Builders Association, a respected trade group representing small contractors and local business owners.
His annual income from both roles reportedly topped $180,000 — more than enough to live comfortably in the coastal enclave he represented.
Yet behind the polished speeches and photo-ops, federal prosecutors say, Flanagan’s personal life was collapsing.
According to U.S. Attorney Leah Foley, Flanagan was “facing personal financial difficulty”, with thousands of dollars in credit card debt, overdue mortgage payments, and hundreds in bank overdraft fees.
In short, the man entrusted to help steer his community’s economic future was drowning in his own.
According to the DOJ’s criminal complaint, the scheme began sometime in late 2021, when Flanagan allegedly discovered a way to exploit his position as head of the Cape Cod Home Builders Association (HBA).
Over a period spanning 14 months, prosecutors say, he carried out five separate wire transfers totaling more than $36,000 from the organization’s accounts directly into his own.
The money, investigators allege, didn’t go toward housing, community projects, or charitable donations.
Instead, it was used to pay off his personal bills, buy luxury goods, and — in one of the most bizarre details revealed by the DOJ — to fund psychic consultations.
Yes. Psychic consultations.
The indictment claims Flanagan repeatedly authorized payments for “psychic services,” all while positioning himself publicly as a “man of the people” devoted to transparency and ethics.
The revelation stunned residents of Cape Cod, who said they felt “betrayed” and “deceived” by the very man they had supported at the ballot box.
U.S. Attorney Foley didn’t mince words.
“Today’s charges against Massachusetts State Representative Christopher Flanagan reveal an appalling breach of public trust,” she said.
“According to the indictment, Mr. Flanagan defrauded the very organization he was supposed to serve — funneling tens of thousands of dollars into his own pockets to pay off personal bills, buy luxury items, and bankroll his political campaign.”
But the deception didn’t stop there.
“He allegedly stole money and then went to extraordinary lengths to cover it up, going so far as fabricating fake personas to mislead those who questioned his conduct,” Foley added.
“This alleged scheme was calculated on every level. No one is entitled to power by way of fraud — and the people of Massachusetts deserve better.”
Federal agents described a tangled trail of falsified invoices, altered financial statements, and phony email accounts created to mask the transfers.
According to investigators, Flanagan allegedly used fake names and fictional company records to justify the missing money.
When members of the Home Builders Association began to question discrepancies, he allegedly invented fake staff identities and sent emails to himself — pretending to be other employees — to “explain” where the money had gone.
At one point, prosecutors allege, he even impersonated a consultant to “verify” expenses that never existed.
The deception worked for more than a year — until one suspicious board member requested an outside audit.
That audit triggered a federal investigation, leading to the discovery of the missing funds and, ultimately, to Flanagan’s arrest.
Flanagan was taken into custody in Boston and later appeared in federal court, where he pleaded not guilty to all charges.
He was released on bond pending his next hearing.
Each count of wire fraud carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine, while the falsification of records charge could add another 20 years.
If convicted on all counts, Flanagan faces up to 120 years behind bars.
Outside the courthouse, officials from multiple federal agencies spoke bluntly.
Ketty Larco-Ward, Inspector in Charge of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service’s Boston Division, said the arrest shows that “elected officials are not above the law.”
“Flanagan’s egregious betrayal to his positions of trust and his deplorable actions of lining his own pockets for personal or political reasons are unacceptable,” Larco-Ward said.
“The people of Massachusetts deserve better.”
Thomas Demeo, Acting Special Agent in Charge for the IRS Criminal Investigation Division, was equally direct:
“Flanagan not only stole from his employer to enrich himself, but also to fill the coffers of his campaign in an effort to become an elected official,” Demeo said.
“He failed his constituents, who trusted in him to uphold the law, by using embezzled funds to become a state representative — and then actively obstructing the investigation into his scheme.”
For those who knew Flanagan personally, the news came as a gut punch.
In public, he was charismatic — a young lawmaker who talked about affordable housing, small business growth, and “restoring trust in government.”
In private, prosecutors say, he was a man spiraling — juggling debts, political pressure, and a craving for power he could no longer afford.
The alleged thefts coincided with the peak of his political ambition.
In 2022, he launched an aggressive campaign to secure re-election, pouring thousands of dollars into ads, mailers, and events.
Federal investigators now believe some of that campaign cash may have come from embezzled funds.
“It’s like watching a double life unfold,” said one former colleague from the Home Builders Association. “You’d see him shaking hands with business leaders in the morning, then learn he was wiring money to himself that night.”
Among the strangest details in the indictment — and the one that has captivated the public — are the payments Flanagan allegedly made for “psychic services.”
While investigators have not disclosed the name of the psychic involved, federal filings indicate that a portion of the stolen money was used to pay for multiple online and in-person psychic consultations.
A federal source told reporters the payments were “non-negligible” — meaning Flanagan spent thousands of dollars on spiritual readings, “energy work,” and “manifestation guidance.”
“It’s almost poetic,” one DOJ official said anonymously. “A politician trying to predict his future — while destroying it.”
The psychic angle has since turned the case into a media sensation across Massachusetts, spawning memes, late-night jokes, and heated social commentary about the state of modern politics.
But for the residents of Dennis, it’s not funny.
“He was supposed to represent us,” said one constituent. “And he was spending our money calling psychics?”
The arrest has sent shockwaves through the Massachusetts Democratic Party, which is already grappling with public frustration over taxes, housing costs, and corruption scandals.
Party leaders have yet to comment directly on Flanagan’s indictment, though several state officials privately expressed “disbelief” and “embarrassment.”
Meanwhile, Republican strategists have seized on the story, arguing it reinforces their message that Democrats have lost touch with working-class voters.
“While families are struggling to afford groceries and energy bills, this Democrat was wiring money to a psychic,” one GOP official told reporters. “You couldn’t script it better.”
Political observers say the case could become a talking point in next year’s elections, particularly as national headlines continue to focus on the ethical crises facing both parties.
The Department of Justice emphasized that Flanagan’s arrest is not an isolated event.
Officials said it is part of a broader crackdown on public corruption and financial misconduct nationwide.
“This case sends a message,” Foley said. “No one — not even a state lawmaker — can defraud the public and expect to get away with it.”
The DOJ noted that in the past six months alone, federal prosecutors have charged more than a dozen elected officials across multiple states with corruption-related crimes, ranging from bribery to embezzlement.
The agency said that while most public servants “honor their oaths,” cases like Flanagan’s undermine public confidence in democracy itself.
“Every dollar stolen from the people is a dollar taken from those who need it most,” Foley said.
Flanagan’s trial is expected to begin in early 2026, but the fallout has already begun.
The Cape Cod Home Builders Association has launched an internal audit and removed all officials tied to the organization during Flanagan’s tenure.
Meanwhile, Flanagan’s seat in the Massachusetts House remains technically occupied — though growing pressure from both parties may soon force his resignation.
Local officials in Dennis have begun holding emergency meetings to discuss damage control, worried about what the scandal could mean for their town’s image.
As for Flanagan himself, he has remained silent since entering his plea.
His attorney, reached briefly by reporters, said only:
“My client maintains his innocence and looks forward to clearing his name.”
Political historians often say corruption doesn’t start with greed — it starts with rationalization.
It begins with small decisions: a cut corner here, a late payment there.
And then, one day, a line is crossed.
Flanagan’s story, prosecutors argue, is a classic tale of ego, pressure, and self-inflicted downfall.
A man entrusted to lead his community allegedly betrayed the very institution that gave him power.
He took from those he represented.
He lied to cover it up.
And, in a moment of almost surreal irony, he paid a psychic to help him find clarity.
If convicted, Christopher Flanagan will spend decades behind bars.
But for the people who believed in him — and for a state still grappling with political cynicism — the damage may last far longer.