A federal appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to move forward with his effort to overturn his criminal conviction in the hush money case in New York City.
Trump is seeking to transfer the case from New York state court to federal court, arguing that a federal judge should dismiss the jury’s 34-count guilty verdict based on the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on presidential immunity, The Hill reported.
A three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit said it “cannot be confident” that the lower court properly weighed Trump’s arguments in his effort to transfer the case to federal court.
“The court bypassed what we consider to be important issues bearing on the ultimate issue of good cause,” the panel noted in its ruling.
“We leave it to the able and experienced District Judge to decide whether to solicit further briefing from the parties or hold a hearing to help it resolve these issues,” the panel added.
The panel included U.S. Circuit Judges Raymond Lohier and Susan Carney, both appointed by former President Obama, as well as U.S. Circuit Judge Myrna Pérez, who was appointed by former President Biden.
Trump was convicted last year on charges of falsifying business records related to payments intended to conceal an alleged affair with adult film actress Stormy Daniels before the 2016 presidential election.
“President Trump continues to win in his fight against Radical Democrat Lawfare,” a spokesperson for Trump’s legal team said in a statement. “The Supreme Court’s historic decision on Immunity, the Federal and New York State Constitutions, and other established legal precedent mandate that the Witch Hunt perpetrated by the Manhattan DA be immediately overturned and dismissed.”
“President Trump will keep defeating Democrat weaponization at every turn as he focuses on his singular mission to Make America Great Again,” the spokesperson added.
It’s been a rough few weeks for James as she battles her own personal court case.
The judge presiding over New York Attorney General Letitia James’ mortgage fraud case on Friday rejected a motion seeking to compel federal prosecutors to maintain a log of all their communications with the media.
Defense attorney Abbe Lowell had filed the request last week, following James’ arraignment on charges of bank fraud and making false statements. The motion cited a report alleging that U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan exchanged a series of encrypted Signal messages with a reporter regarding the case, the New York Post reported.
Walker further wrote that while Halligan’s Signal chat with Lawfare senior editor Anna Bower earlier this month was “unusual,” he nevertheless declined to offer an opinion “on whether they were improper in any sense, either legal or ethical.”
He went on to order federal prosecutors to follow all rules of the court but did not suggest that they had violated any so far.
He also ordered a “litigation hold preventing the deletion or destruction of any records or communications having to do with the investigation or prosecution of this case.”
Halligan’s Signal messages to the reporter were configured to automatically disappear after eight hours, The Post reported.
The judge did not address whether Halligan’s communications — which reportedly disputed a New York Times story revealing that James’ grandniece told a grand jury she had never paid rent on the Norfolk, Va., property at the center of the case — constituted material subject to discovery requirements.
In response to James’ motion, federal prosecutors requested that Judge Walker impose a gag order on the New York attorney general — a request he declined.
James pleaded not guilty last week to one count of bank fraud and one count of making a false statement to a financial institution.
According to the indictment, the longtime Trump adversary purchased a three-bedroom, one-bathroom home on Peronne Avenue in Norfolk on August 17, 2020, using a $109,600 loan that included a “second home rider” identifying her as the sole occupant. That designation allegedly allowed James to secure more favorable mortgage terms, saving her nearly $19,000.
However, prosecutors say the home “was not occupied or used” by James, but “was instead used as a rental investment property” to house her grandniece, Nakia Thompson.
If convicted on both counts, James faces up to 60 years in prison and a $2 million fine.
At just 21 years old, Alexandra Eala was supposed to be celebrating another competitive season, another climb up the tennis rankings, another milestone in her young and rapidly rising career. Instead, she shocked the global sports and philanthropic communities alike by announcing a monumental
$11.5 million donation to the Changemaker Program — a worldwide initiative dedicated to fighting food insecurity and combating the escalating climate crisis.
But it wasn’t the amount of money that set the world on fire.
It was her message.
A message that sliced through wealth, privilege, and political comfort, triggering intense debate across the internet and boardrooms around the world.
“If you’re a billionaire, why are you a billionaire?” Eala declared. “No hate — but give your money away.”
With that one sentence, Alexandra Eala didn’t just donate.
She detonated.
The Changemaker Program supports communities hit hardest by poverty and climate disasters — from villages in Southeast Asia drowning in rising seas, to African regions facing historic droughts, to Latin American communities fighting catastrophic crop failures.
Food insecurity is reaching levels the world has not seen in decades.
Temperatures are rising. Crops are disappearing. Entire communities are being displaced.
And while governments struggle to respond, philanthropists often hesitate, companies drag their feet, and international aid moves at a painfully slow pace.
Eala saw all of it — up close. Growing up in the Philippines, a country repeatedly battered by typhoons, floods, and extreme heat, she witnessed the consequences of climate change not as distant news headlines but as lived reality. The storm that destroyed her neighborhood when she was a child. The rising prices of food in Manila. The disappearing fisheries in coastal communities. The families displaced every year.
So when she made her donation, it wasn’t symbolic.
It was personal.
Eala’s generosity didn’t come from a billionaire’s bank account. It came from years of earnings, endorsements, partnerships, and investments — money she could have used to expand her brand, secure luxury properties, or build a glamorous lifestyle.Instead, she redirected it to the world’s most vulnerable.
Eala has consistently spoken about inequality, climate justice, and the moral responsibility of the wealthy. But no one expected her to take a step this bold — a step normally reserved for global superstars at the end of long careers.
She did it at 21.
And the world took notice.
During her announcement, Eala delivered a speech that instantly became one of the most replayed philanthropic messages of the year.
She stood on stage, holding back tears, speaking not as an athlete, but as a citizen of the world:
“We live on a planet where children go hungry while people die from heat waves, storms, and floods that we caused. And yet, in that same world, we have individuals holding billions of dollars they will never use. Why? For what? No hate — but give your money away.”
The room fell silent.
Journalists scrambled to take notes.
Cameras clicked wildly.
Twitter, TikTok, and news outlets exploded within seconds.
Supporters called her brave.
Critics called her idealistic.
Billionaires called their PR teams.
Some of the world’s wealthiest individuals subtly pushed back, calling her comments “unrealistic,” “misguided,” or “uninformed.”
But millions disagreed.
People across continents flooded social platforms with support:
• “She said what everyone is afraid to say.”
• “Imagine having the guts to tell billionaires the truth at age 21.”
• “Alex Eala is redefining what it means to be a sports hero.”
Environmental activists praised her courage. Economists debated her logic. Even Hollywood actors reposted her message.
Not since Naomi Osaka’s mental health statements had a young athlete created such a powerful global conversation.
And Eala’s impact didn’t stop there.
The Changemaker Program confirmed that Eala’s donation is earmarked for:
Rapid food distribution in famine-threatened regions
• Agricultural restoration in storm-damaged communities
• Solar energy expansion for rural villages
• Water purification systems for flood-affected areas
• Youth climate education
programs across Asia and Oceania
• Emergency shelter construction for communities displaced by climate disasters
Unlike many celebrity donations that get lost in administrative layers, Eala insisted on full transparency. She demanded quarterly reports, third-party audits, and direct community oversight.
In other words:
She didn’t just give money — she designed a strategy.
Privately, friends say Eala struggled with emotional exhaustion after witnessing devastation in Filipino coastal towns earlier this year.
She met children who hadn’t eaten in two days.
Families who lost everything to flooding.
Farmers whose crops were wiped out three seasons in a row.
She told her coach, crying, “I can’t just play tennis while this is happening. I have to do something real.”
Her donation was not a stunt.
It was an obligation — one she felt deeply.
Her message to billionaires did more than grab attention.
It challenged an entire worldview.
In a society where the wealthy often grow richer while the vulnerable suffer quietly, Eala’s words became a spark — a challenge to morality, to responsibility, to humanity.
Some billionaires may ignore her.
Some may mock her.
Some may pretend she didn’t speak at all.
But the world heard her.
And it will not forget.
Alexandra Eala represents a new type of superstar:
Not one chasing fame.
Not one chasing endorsement contracts.
But one chasing change.
She is proof that athletes — even young ones — hold more power than ever before.
Power to inspire.
Power to call out injustice.
Power to reshape public consciousness.
And Eala just used that power in one of the most explosive and impactful ways imaginable.
She’s only 21.
She has decades of tennis ahead.
But with one donation and one sentence, she reshaped her legacy forever.
Alexandra Eala is no longer just a rising tennis star.
She is a global force for humanity — bold, fearless, and uncompromising.
And the world is watching what she does next.
Senator John Neely Kennedy didn’t enter the federal press chamber so much as erupt into it. Reporters barely had time to stand before he marched to the podium with a binder the color of a warning flare, its cover stamped in block letters:
“NYC FRAUD – 1.4 MILLION GHOST VOTES.”
The sound of it slamming onto the table thundered louder than the cameras snapping. It was the sound of a political grenade without its pin.
For a moment, Kennedy said nothing. He simply stared out at the crowd — stone-still, jaw locked — before unleashing a tirade that transformed a routine oversight hearing into the most explosive political event of the year.
THE DETONATION
When his voice finally broke the silence, it didn’t waver.
“One-point-four million fake ballots in the New York City mayoral race.”
Gasps ricocheted across the room.
Kennedy continued, every word sharper than the last:
“All timestamped 3:14 a.m.
Same printer. Same ink. Same thumbprint.
All traced to a DRUM warehouse that—surprise—burned to the ground at 2:47 this morning.”
He lifted one page from the red binder, shaking it in front of the cameras. The paper trembled, but his hand did not.
“We have Starlink footage,” he said. “Three U-Haul trucks unloading boxes at 3:00 a.m.
License plates? Registered to the campaign manager of one Zohran Mamdani.”
Pandemonium. Reporters shouted over one another. Aides scrambled to hand him notes he refused to take.
And then — the moment that would dominate every social feed and cable chyron by noon — Kennedy snapped the binder shut, spun toward the front row, and pointed directly at NYC mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, who had been invited for what was supposed to be a policy roundtable.
Kennedy’s voice boomed:
“ARREST.
THAT.
MAN.”
He jabbed the air again.
“You ‘won’ by two thousand, one hundred eighty-four votes — the
exact count of the ghost stack.
Dirty money from the Unity and Justice Fund? A hundred grand funneled through shell groups.
Maximum sentence. Federal lockup.
No plea, no mercy.
And hand over the keys to Gracie Mansion!”
The room exploded into chaos.
THE TACKLE
Before anyone could process the accusation, Mamdani bolted up from his seat, knocking over his chair. Cameras whipped around as he darted toward the side exit.
But he didn’t get far.
Three Secret Service officers intercepted him like linebackers reading a quarterback’s eyes. They slammed him to the ground with such force that reporters flinched. Papers scattered, a microphone toppled, and a woman near the aisle screamed.
Someone shouted, “He’s resisting!”
Another yelled, “Get the cuffs!”
Within seconds, Mamdani was pinned, immobilized, and surrounded.
Across the aisle, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez stood and shrieked:
“RACIST! This is political targeting — racist political targeting!”
Kennedy didn’t pause.
He leaned into his mic, eyes blazing:
“Sugar, racist is stealing New York City while hiding behind daddy’s trust fund!”
Half the room gasped; the other half roared.
Security hustled AOC back as officers lifted Mamdani and began escorting him toward a restricted hallway. The cameras followed him until the last possible second.
THE RED BINDER
The binder became its own character within the unfolding drama.
Kennedy opened it again, turning pages like he was flipping through a crime novel only he already knew the ending to.
Inside, he claimed, were:
Time-stamped ballot logs
Fingerprint analyses
Ink-composition match reports
U-Haul rental agreements
A Starlink satellite sequence
Digital maps of ballot routing patterns
Photos of the warehouse inferno
He held up a grainy satellite still.
“Three trucks,” he said. “Three men. One heist.”
Kennedy then delivered the line that would anchor every headline:
“This is not irregularity. It is not miscount.
It is a 1.4 million ballot heist.”
SHOCKWAVES ACROSS WASHINGTON
Phones vibrated on desks like a swarm of insects. Aides tried, unsuccessfully, to maintain composure as notifications poured in.
By 11:03 a.m., former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared on Fox News, visibly energized.
“The FBI is raiding six locations in Queens,” she said.
“Started at 4 a.m.
112 agents.
Ballots are the first priority.
Mamdani will be in cuffs by sunrise.”
Reporters in the chamber rushed their updates to editors, some typing so fast their keyboards rattled.
The hashtag
#KennedyPointsAtMamdani detonated across the internet, reaching 789 million posts in 43 minutes, according to Meta Trendline Analytics. It surpassed the previous record held by the “Red Wave Walkout” viral cascade from two years prior.
Screens across Capitol Hill lit up in unison as notifications chimed.
Then came the Truth Social megaphone.
WordPress Theme Sales
At 11:27 a.m., former President Donald J. Trump posted:
“KENNEDY JUST EXPOSED THE SOCIALIST HEIST — LOCK HIM UP!”
Within five minutes, it was the platform’s most shared post of the week.
INSIDE THE INVESTIGATION (FICTIONAL)
As the congressional chamber descended into a hurricane of shouting, Kennedy motioned to his staff to bring forward two forensic analysts. Both wore ID badges embossed with the seal of the Senate Oversight Division.
One analyst held a portable forensic scanner.
The other carried charred scraps of cardboard.
Kennedy gestured to the debris.
“Warehouse fire residue,” he said. “This was the site of the ballot duplication ring. The fire started at 2:47 a.m.
Authorities were notified at 2:49.
At 2:51, the building collapsed inward — professionally collapsed.”
Reporters murmured. A few exchanged wide-eyed glances.
Kennedy continued:
“Same thumbprint appears on 1.4 million ballots — a right-hand partial from an unknown individual.
But we recovered one clean print from a scorched box.”
He flipped to another page.
“It matches a DRUM warehouse employee—who also happens to be the roommate of Mamdani’s campaign manager.”
The room buzzed like a hive of furious bees.
RESPONSE FROM MAMDANI’S TEAM (FICTIONAL)
A spokesperson for Mamdani, speaking through a quickly assembled press gaggle outside the building, declared:
“This is a political ambush built on fabricated evidence, doctored satellite images, and coordinated extremism.
The mayor-elect categorically denies any involvement.”
But the denial was quickly overshadowed by the footage of his attempted exit — a moment instantly slowed down, replayed, and memed.
Political strategists debated whether it looked like guilt, panic, or simply shock.
REACTION FROM THE PUBLIC
Across New York City, crowds formed at City Hall, Gracie Mansion, and several precinct stations. Some chanted “LOCK HIM UP!” while others screamed “FASCISM!” through megaphones.
Taxi drivers blasted radio updates.
TikTokers livestreamed from the steps of courthouses.
Barbershops held impromptu debates.
Letter-stuffed bulletin boards filled with competing theories.
Everywhere, the same question circulated:
“Did this really happen?”
And perhaps stranger:
“What happens next?”
THE RECOUNT ORDER (FICTIONAL)
By early afternoon, Kennedy issued an official request for a federal emergency recount, citing “credible evidence of systemic interference.”
The recount order included:
Full forensic examination of every ballot
Audit of the city’s digital vote log
Cross-referencing ballot IDs with voter rolls
Independent oversight by a bipartisan election review board
The Board of Elections announced it would comply “under protest.”
If the recount overturned Mamdani’s win, the city would be plunged into an unprecedented political vacuum.
KENNEDY’S FINAL WORDS
As chaos simmered into a tense standoff between reporters and officers still guarding the exits, Kennedy closed the binder one final time.
He placed a hand on it like a judge reading a verdict.
“Ladies and gentlemen,” he said, voice grave,
“election integrity is the cornerstone of this republic.
And when someone tries to crack that stone — whether in New York, Nevada, Wisconsin, or anywhere else — they will face federal justice.”
He paused.
“This binder is not speculation.
It is evidence.”
With that, he stepped away from the podium — slow, deliberate, unshaken — while the chamber erupted once more behind him.
A CITY — AND COUNTRY — ON EDGE
By sunset, the story dominated every network, every feed, every whisper in every hallway of power.
A mayoral race once hailed as an “upset victory” had been recast into a national scandal of staggering proportions.
The red binder was now as iconic as any political prop in recent memory — a symbol, depending on one’s view, of either justice or hysteria.
What comes next?
Raids.
Recounts.
Court battles.
Political warfare.
For now, one thing is certain in this fictional universe:
New York City’s mayoral election has become ground zero in a political superstorm — and its aftershocks have only just begun.
Brooke Rollins, agriculture secretary under the renewed Trump vision for America, dropped a bombshell on the American public. She exposed a rot within the federal welfare system that not only drains taxpayer dollars but also emboldens corruption and inefficiency. Rollins revealed in an interview that nearly 5,000 dead individuals were still receiving SNAP benefits and that over 500,000 instances of duplicate enrollees had been uncovered.
This isn’t just a bureaucratic blunder. This is emblematic of a broken system that Democrats have allowed to fester, enabling abuse at the expense of working Americans. For decades, the left has wrapped welfare in the warm language of compassion, but what Rollins reveals is a scheme benefiting fraudsters, illegals, and career welfare recipients while punishing the responsible and the honest.
“We found one guy receiving benefits in six different states,” Rollins said. This is not just anecdotal. It’s systemic. It’s widespread. And it’s been protected by blue states that refused to cooperate with federal investigations into their welfare rolls.
Rollins’ testimony reinforces what conservatives have warned for years: that the Democratic Party is less interested in accountability and more invested in creating a permanent dependent class that can be controlled and harvested for votes.
This revelation confirms what President Trump emphasized during both his terms and campaign trail speeches: America must put its citizens first, and part of that is cleaning up fraud and prioritizing the deserving over the deceitful.
Under Rollins’ leadership, nearly 700,000 individuals have already been removed from the rolls. But the job is far from over. Democrat-led states have refused to share eligibility data and have filed lawsuits to block investigations. What are they hiding?
It’s no surprise that the Biden administration resisted such reforms. While Rollins and Trump aimed to safeguard the public trust and restore fiscal integrity, the Biden camp seems committed to open-handed spending with little oversight.
The mainstream media barely blinked at Rollins’ revelation. Had a Trump official been caught enabling such fraud, the outcry would be deafening. But when Democrats are the culprits, silence prevails.
The question Americans must ask is simple: Why is the left so afraid of transparency? Why do they fight to keep dead people on welfare and illegals on the dole?
Every fraudulent SNAP card represents dollars stolen from hard-working Americans. It means fewer resources for truly needy citizens. And it means a culture of dependency is being fostered, not the self-reliance and dignity that America First policies promote.
Rollins framed this as a national security issue as well, with illegal immigrants potentially benefitting from these systems through fraudulent documentation. This is not just an economic drain; it’s an attack on national sovereignty.
President Trump has long called for E-Verify, biometric ID, and strict eligibility rules for any federal assistance. His policies, backed by data like Rollins presented, are the only viable path forward.
What this country needs is a full audit of every entitlement program. The rot is deeper than SNAP. If dead people can draw food assistance, who else is bleeding the system dry?
The welfare state must be rebuilt from the ground up. And the only party willing to do that is the one led by Trump.
Blue states are terrified of what audits might reveal: networks of fraud, collusion, and incompetence that date back decades. They would rather sue than comply because exposure would cost them power.
This is a wake-up call to every Republican governor and lawmaker. The time for polite requests is over. Subpoenas and legislation must compel compliance. Any official obstructing this mission is complicit in theft.
Brooke Rollins has done more than expose fraud. She has given patriots the ammunition to demand change. The GOP must seize this moment.
Taxpayers must understand that the stakes are high. Every dollar wasted on a dead man’s EBT card is a dollar not spent securing the border, rebuilding infrastructure, or helping our veterans.
BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…
Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.
This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.
Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.
According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals’ involvement in Epstein’s criminal network.
She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.
“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”
These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.
Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.
The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.
“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”
Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.
For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.
Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.
What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.
In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.
Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.
Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.
Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.
This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.
Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.
The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.
BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For…
Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.
Speaking from his post as one of President Trump’s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.
“This is a live federal investigation. We’ve asked ICE to take immediate action,” Homan said during a televised interview.
The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC’s office.
According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.
Homan stressed that AOC’s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.