Zohran Mamdani’s democratic socialist allies are reportedly considering primary challenges next year against several congressional Democrats in New York City, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.
However, a senior political advisor to Jeffries has vowed that anyone attempting to unseat the top Democrat in the House during next year’s primaries will face a “forceful and unrelenting” response, Fox News is reporting.
Mamdani, the 33-year-old Ugandan-born democratic socialist assemblyman from Queens, sent political shockwaves nationwide with his decisive victory two weeks ago over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and nine other candidates in New York City’s Democratic mayoral primary.
His win marks a significant step toward potentially becoming the city’s first Muslim mayor, but would also signal the Democratic Party’s increasing shift to the extreme far-left.
In the wake of Mamdani’s primary victory in June, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) highlighted that “this movement is bigger than one person, election, city, or organization.”
“We encourage all people inspired by the Zohran campaign to join their local DSA or YDSA chapter and get involved so we can continue to fight alongside Zohran and DSA elected officials across the country to create the future we all deserve,” the party added.
Now, following Mamdani’s victory, DSA leaders are reportedly considering mounting primary challenges not only against Jeffries but also other House Democrats representing New York City districts, including Reps. Ritchie Torres, Jerry Nadler, Dan Goldman, and Yvette Clarke, Fox added.
Jeffries, who succeeded longtime House Democratic leader and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi two years ago, has faced criticism from some of New York City’s far-left leaders, who label him a moderate and establishment Democrat.
“His leadership has left a vacuum that organizations like DSA are filling. I think that is more important right now,” New York City’s Democratic Socialists of America chapter co-chair Gustavo Gordillo said in a CNN interview recently.
Democratic socialist state Sen. Jabari Brisport, who represents some of the same areas of Brooklyn that Jeffries does in the U.S. House, told Fox News in a statement that the longtime congressman is “rapidly growing out of touch with an insurgent and growing progressive base within his own district that he should pay more attention to.”
Democratic strategist Andre Richardson, a senior political advisor to Jeffries, highlighted the sweeping actions taken by President Donald Trump during the early months of his second term in the White House that the left vehemently opposes, said, “Leader Hakeem Jeffries is focused on taking back the House from the MAGA extremists who just ripped health care away from millions of Americans.”
Richardson also sent a warning in a statement to CNN against a hard-left primary challenge to Jeffries. “If Team Gentrification [Mamdani allies] wants a primary fight, our response will be forceful and unrelenting. We will teach them and all of their incumbents a painful lesson on June 23, 2026,” he warned.
The tension is escalating as pressure mounts on state and local Democrats in the city to support Mamdani in the general election, amid fears they could face primary challenges if they fail to join his coalition. Mamdani will face Republican Curtis Sliwa in November, while former Governor Andrew Cuomo and incumbent Mayor Eric Adams will appear on the ballot under minor party lines, the New York Post noted.
Brooklyn State Assemblywoman Phara Souffrant Forrest, a DSA member whose district overlaps with Jeffries’ congressional seat, cautioned Jeffries to be careful what he wishes for.“Weird threat to make since Hakeem already went after @JabariBrisport [DSA state senator] and I.How’d that go for him, again?” Forrest said in a statement on X on Thursday.
In a stunning turn of events during a recent House Judiciary Committee hearing, first lady Jill Biden found herself at the center of a political firestorm after her bold attempt to confront Kash Patel, the newly appointed director of the FBI. What began as a routine oversight session quickly escalated into a dramatic clash that captivated the nation and raised serious questions about accountability in American politics.
The atmosphere in the House Judiciary Committee hearing room was electric, filled with lawmakers from both parties, reporters, and spectators eager to witness the unfolding drama. At the witness table sat Kash Patel, a figure of calm authority, prepared to outline his vision for the FBI amidst growing scrutiny. The hearing, titled “FBI Leadership Priorities and Reform under New Direction,” was intended to focus on Patel’s plans to restore public trust in law enforcement.
However, Jill Biden’s unexpected interjection transformed the proceedings into a spectacle. Known for her advocacy in education, she had been invited to discuss the intersections of federal enforcement and educational policy. But her intentions took a sharp turn when she decided to make a personal attack on Patel.
As the hearing commenced, Chairman Jim Jordan praised Patel’s early efforts to streamline investigations. Suddenly, Jill Biden raised her hand, demanding the floor with a sense of urgency. Dressed in a navy blue suit, she stepped forward, locking eyes with Patel, and launched into a passionate tirade.
“Director Patel,” she declared, “you represent a grave peril to the very foundations of American democracy.” The room fell silent as she accused him of politicizing the FBI and turning it into a tool of intimidation. “You are a clear and present danger to democracy itself,” she concluded, invoking gasps from both sides of the aisle.
Her remarks were calculated, aiming to paint Patel as a villain in a narrative of institutional decay. However, she underestimated Patel’s composure and the evidence he was prepared to present.
Patel remained unfazed by Biden’s accusations. After a brief moment of silence, he addressed her with measured professionalism. “Dr. Biden, I appreciate your passionate defense of democratic principles,” he began, before revealing that he had an active FBI case file with her name on it. The tension in the room escalated as he lifted a thick folder stamped with “Highly Restricted” and declared, “Perhaps we should examine some concrete examples of accountability right here in this room.”
The folder contained details of an active investigation into financial irregularities linked to Jill Biden’s affiliated entities. As Patel began to outline the specifics, the atmosphere shifted dramatically. What had started as a personal attack on him was quickly turning into a public examination of her actions.
Patel’s presentation was methodical and precise. He detailed how the FBI’s financial crimes unit had uncovered significant discrepancies in the financial records of Jill Biden’s educational foundations, revealing over $350,000 in unreported transfers from donor funds to personal consulting entities. As he laid out the evidence, including charts and bank statements, the gravity of the situation became apparent.
Jill Biden’s initial confidence began to wane as Patel highlighted transactions that appeared to divert charitable donations intended for educational programs into personal real estate acquisitions. The room was filled with murmurs of disbelief and concern as lawmakers processed the implications of Patel’s revelations.
As Patel continued to present evidence, Jill Biden attempted to defend herself, claiming that the funds in question were legitimate administrative fees for program development. However, Patel countered her assertions with documented evidence of suspicious transactions, including a series of suspicious activity reports from major banks.
The tension reached a boiling point when Patel revealed that the FBI had obtained court-authorized surveillance recordings that implicated Jill Biden in discussions about fund allocation. The recordings captured her voice discussing strategies to keep donor streams “clean but flexible,” suggesting a calculated effort to obscure the true nature of the funds.
The implications were staggering. What began as a confrontation over Patel’s leadership turned into a detailed exposé of Jill Biden’s financial dealings, raising serious questions about her integrity and the potential misuse of federal funds.
As the hearing progressed, it became clear that the narrative had shifted. Instead of being the hero of her own story, Jill Biden found herself on the defensive, struggling to maintain her composure as Patel presented a relentless stream of evidence. The audience, including reporters and lawmakers, were captivated by the unfolding drama, with many realizing that the stakes were far higher than anyone had anticipated.
Patel’s calm demeanor and unwavering commitment to presenting the facts stood in stark contrast to Jill Biden’s increasingly desperate attempts to regain control of the narrative. Her legal team scrambled to respond to the allegations, but the evidence Patel presented was overwhelming.
The turning point came when Patel announced that a federal grand jury had been impaneled to review the evidence for potential indictments. The room erupted in gasps as the implications sank in. This was no longer a simple oversight hearing; it was a serious investigation into potential criminal activity.
Jill Biden’s defiance began to crack as the weight of the federal machinery bore down on her. Her team rushed to formulate a defense strategy, but the damage had been done. What was supposed to be a moment of triumph for her advocacy had spiraled into a meticulously dismantled facade.
As the hearing concluded, the ramifications of the day’s events were profound. Cash Patel emerged not just as a figure of authority within the FBI, but as a symbol of accountability in government. His evidence-driven approach restored faith in the integrity of federal law enforcement, sending a clear message that no one, regardless of their legacy, stands above the law.
The fallout from the hearing would reverberate throughout Washington, with calls for greater transparency and accountability echoing in the halls of Congress. Jill Biden’s public career faced an uncertain future, overshadowed by the revelations that had come to light.
In the end, the hearing served as a stark reminder of the importance of integrity in public service. As the nation watched, it became clear that the pursuit of justice and accountability remains a cornerstone of democracy, and that the truth, no matter how uncomfortable, will always find a way to surface.