President Donald Trump Friday evening said he was ending deportation protections for Somalis in Minnesota “effective immediately.”
“Minnesota, under Governor [Tim Walz] Waltz, is a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity,” Trump posted on Truth Social.
He continued, “I am, as President of the United States, hereby terminating, effective immediately, the Temporary Protected Status (TPS Program) for Somalis in Minnesota.”
President Donald Trump Friday evening said he was ending deportation protections for Somalis in Minnesota immediately. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Trump claimed that “Somali gangs are terrorizing the people of that great State, and BILLIONS of Dollars are missing. Send them back to where they came from. It’s OVER! President DJT.”
Minnesota has a sizable Somali population and the TPS program allows Somali nationals temporary legal status to live and work in the U.S. because of the dangerous conditions in the African country.
Fox News Digital has reached out to Walz’s office and the White House for comment.
SEE MORE :
The government closed down for a record 43 days this fall. And if you thought you’d seen the worst of Congress, it truly won’t get any better when the majority of the federal government could shut down in the wee hours of January 31st.
That’s right. Lawmakers have yet to address the very issues which sparked this year’s astonishing shutdown. Some of those are legislative. Some are policy related. And the biggest problems are political.
Frankly, the political ones may be the most challenging.
Let’s start with the most obvious ways to extinguish a wintertime crisis in Washington.
A view of the U.S. Capitol Building at sunset on Jan. 30, 2025 (Emma Woodhead/Fox News Digital)
Included in the interim bill to reopen the government were three bills to fund major sections of the federal government through September 30, 2027 – the end of the current fiscal year. Congress adopted three of the 12 appropriations bills which run the government every year. Those are Legislative Branch for Congress, Military Construction/VA for military building programs, and the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Agriculture. Even though that’s three of the 12 annual spending bills, it’s not anywhere close to a “quarter” of all spending which Congress appropriates annually. More than half of all Congressionally-controlled spending goes to the Pentagon alone. So the House and Senate must pass all nine of the remaining nine annual bills in order to avoid a repeat of this fall at 12:00:01 on Saturday, January 31.
That is a tall order. But leading appropriators from both sides of the aisle and both sides of the Capitol say there’s been marked progress on these bills. Still, syncing everything up in a little more than two months – with Congress now out of session again this week and slated to be out for Christmas and New Year’s – strikes some as doom date with destiny. Keep in mind that Congress did not stay in session in late July and August to tackle some of those same bills. One wonders why anything will be different now.
And we haven’t even gotten to nettlesome questions which lurk in the individual bills themselves.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) speaks at a press conference with other members of Senate Republican leadership following a policy luncheon in Washington, D.C. on Oct. 28, 2025. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
The “Labor-H” bill, which funds the Department of Labor along with Health and Human Services is always a political thicket. Imagine how tough that bill will be this time, with both sides sparring over policies dictated by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., about vaccines and other controversial health statements. That’s to say nothing of the core issue which prompted Democrats to oppose funding the government in September: an extension of Obamacare health subsidies.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., is now promising a vote related to an extension of those tax credits to defray spiking health care cost premiums. But no one knows what that package will look like. Some Republicans, like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green, R-Ga., are now embracing the subsidies. She’s now retiring in January. Other Republicans are looking at ways to reform the program. Democrats might balk at that. And still other conservatives are using this as an opportunity to possibly torpedo Obamacare – the bane of their existence since 2009.
That could be the grandest political irony of all. Imagine a world where Republicans tried from 2009 through 2017 to repeal and replace Obamacare – yet stumbled at every turn. Then in 2025, Democrats refused to vote to fund the government in an effort to prop up Obamacare – and that’s finally what unwound the program.
Wow.
Moreover, President Trump is threatening to veto any bill which extends the Obamacare subsidies.
So we could already find ourselves barreling toward another government shutdown unless Democrats relent from their tactics this fall.
Much of what we’ve discussed addresses the legislative and policy disputes which lawmakers must resolve before late January. But the political challenges dwarf those issues.
Imagine a coda of what unfolded this fall. Most Democrats refuse to fund the government. But a coalition of some Democrats and most Republicans keep the government afloat to prevent another shutdown.
Recriminations inside the Democratic Party will be staggering. Anticipate epic infighting about Democrats executing yet another strategy. There will be calls for the ousters of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., — even though both sided with most Democrats to refrain from funding the government unless there was a deal on health care money.
Sen. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., talks after a policy luncheon on Capitol Hill, Sept. 24, 2024, in Washington. (Mariam Zuhaib/AP Photo)
Democrats could find themselves entering a civil war in the early days of 2026 – just as they see opportunities to vanquish Republicans at the polls in the 2026 midterms. On paper, Democrats stand a very good chance to win control of the House. The Senate is a reach based on a map which heavily favors the GOP. But Democrats think they could be within striking distance if they hold the seats of retiring Sens. Gary Peters, D-Mich., Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H. Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., would have to win reelection in a competitive state. Democrats would then need to flip the seat of retiring Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., plus flip Ohio and maybe pull an armadillo out of a hat in Texas. It’s not impossible. But very challenging.
Internecine squabbling could trip up Democrats on that very narrow Senate pathway. The same with the House. Democrats must appear united heading into the 2026 midterms. But bickering about government shutdown #1 or government shutdown #2 does the party no favors.
Republicans aren’t inoculated from tricky politics in 2026 which are tethered to the shutdown(s).
Democrats made this fall’s shutdown about health care. And if Republicans don’t bend to the Democrats’ demand to extend the health care subsidies, the GOP may find itself upside down with voters on the topic. If so, Democrats may not have won the government shutdown battle. But perhaps they prevail in the war: the 2026 midterms.
That’s why few exhaled after Congress voted to re-open the government last week. Everyone who is dialed into Capitol Hill knows things probably won’t get any better over the next nine weeks.
And as bad as this fall was, things may only get worse.
Well, that didn’t take long. One of the biggest reasons Zohran Mamdani pulled off his win is because he peddled a fantasy — the classic socialist sales pitch of “free buses and frozen rents.” He convinced struggling New Yorkers that he could magically fix the city’s affordability crisis by bleeding the rich and redistributing the spoils.
It’s the same tired con every leftist runs: promise utopia, punish success, and pretend the laws of economics don’t exist.
Now, let’s be real — Mamdani isn’t going to deliver even half of what he promised. If he somehow manages to make buses “free,” they’ll quickly turn into rolling homeless shelters that no sane person would want to ride. And that whole “rent freeze” idea? It’s economic suicide.
Freezing rents doesn’t make housing affordable; it destroys it. Landlords won’t be able to maintain their properties, buildings will rot, and the very people Mamdani claims to be helping will end up living in crumbling, unsafe apartments.
But setting aside the fact that Mamdani’s promises are pure economic fiction, the irony of what happened next is almost too rich. This guy sold voters on a utopian future where “the rich” would foot the bill for everything — free housing, free transit, free whatever — and then, literally the day after his win, he turned around and started begging the working people for money.
He launched a fundraising drive for his transition team, asking for donations from the very New Yorkers he just promised wouldn’t have to pay for anything. You can’t make this up.
He actually had the nerve to claim he’d told supporters to stop donating a few months back — as if that somehow made his new plea more noble. But now, suddenly, the “people’s champion” is right back to rattling the tin cup, asking those same “working people” to cough up cash because, shocker, his transition team “costs money.”
Mamdani explained with a straight face that the transition “will require staff, it will require research, it will require infrastructure.” In other words, the guy who promised everything would be free is now discovering that reality — unlike his campaign rhetoric — comes with a price tag:
“Those are things we will have to provide. I’m excited for the fact that it will be funded by the very people who brought us to this point, the working people who have been left behind by the politics of this city.”
Pay up, folks! You really thought all that “free stuff” was actually free? Welcome to Socialist Economics 101 — nothing’s free, especially when the people promising it get into power. Now Mamdani and his crew have their hands out, asking the very same “working people” he claimed he was fighting for to bankroll his transition.
They need your money, they say, for “research” and “infrastructure.” Research for what, exactly — how to figure out new ways to give away things you already paid for?
And here’s a question no one in the press will ask: what happened to all those deep-pocketed NGOs that backed Mamdani’s campaign? What about the Soros network that helped prop him up? Why isn’t he passing the hat their way instead of shaking down middle-class New Yorkers?
As we’ve pointed out before, it was the college-educated crowd — the latte liberals and campus idealists — who flocked to Mamdani. The folks without the degrees, the ones who actually work for a living, knew better.
Unfortunately for New Yorkers, reality’s about to hit hard. They’re going to learn very quickly that nothing is free — not the buses, not the housing, not the fantasy Mamdani sold them. And the price they’ll pay for that lesson? Sky-high taxes, crumbling infrastructure, and a city circling the drain. In short: they voted for socialism, and now they’re about to get the bill.