Several top Democrats, such as former Vice President Kamala Harris, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, and California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, are all expected to run for president in 2028.
But one young, up-and-coming figure says he is not planning to jump into the race, CNN noted.
Maryland Democratic Gov. Wes Moore says he will not run for president in 2028, despite being frequently touted among Democrats as a prospective presidential contender.
That hasn’t prevented continuous speculation about his future political aspirations, especially since he continues to make engagements outside of Maryland, which boost his national image. On Friday, he will fly to South Carolina, an early presidential primary state, to speak at the Blue Palmetto Dinner.
When questioned about 2028, the governor was straightforward.
“I’m not running,” Moore told The Associated Press in an interview. He also said, when asked, that he isn’t trying to get his name in the conversation for a potential vice presidential candidacy, either.
Moore downplayed his high-profile trips to battleground states, including a recent trip to South Carolina.
“And people should get very used to me going all over the country bringing business back to Maryland, because that’s exactly what I plan on doing as long as I’m the governor of the state,” Moore said after a dedication in Annapolis for a memorial to former Rep. Parren Mitchell.
Moore, who is in the third year of his first term, expects to compete for reelection in predominantly Democratic Maryland next year. He said becoming the state’s governor during a difficult period requires his whole attention.
Another name continues to be floated as making early moves before 2028: Pete Buttigieg.
Buttigieg continues to force his way into the digital media sphere, defying traditional Democratic standards as talk of a presidential run grows.
The former secretary came to Washington this week to attend an event with Democratic content producers and make some media appearances, as talk mounts about a 2028 presidential run following Buttigieg’s revelation that he will not compete for the open Michigan Senate or gubernatorial seat.
Buttigieg spoke with the Washington Examiner about his views on new media, how to engage people who do not identify with established parties, the current political landscape, and what he is doing to assure the success of his party after leaving the Biden administration.
“I’m using my voice best I can in traditional media and new media, and I’m going to continue having conversations with neighbors, with voters, talking about how we could have a better way,” Buttigieg told the Washington Examiner. “I don’t know what that means for me, politically or professionally, a long way from making any decisions about that, but I know that’s what I need to be doing right now.”
Ezra Klein of the New York Times labeled Buttigieg the “Democratic Party’s acknowledged best-of-class communicator” last year, just weeks before the Democrats suffered a severe defeat in November.
Throughout the 2024 presidential campaign, President Donald Trump made several visits on podcasts and forums popular among young people, one of which being Joe Rogan’s podcast.
“It’s certainly shadow primary season. Pete’s strategy so far is on point,” influencer and CEO of Girl and the Gov Sammy Kanter told the Washington Examiner.
“He’s going on podcasts, and with that, he’s meeting Americans where they are on both sides of the aisle. He’s interacting with creators and taking the online sphere in a serious manner, as it should be. And he’s excelling in that space because he is able to explain complex happenings in an approachable way,” Kanter continued.
In April, Buttigieg cleared the path for a 2028 presidential campaign after announcing that he would not run for Michigan’s open U.S. Senate seat.
Senator Adam Schiff, a prominent Democratic figure, finds himself at the center of a growing scandal that threatens not only his political career but could also result in significant legal consequences, including up to 20 years in prison and substantial fines.The allegations, which date back to Schiff’s time in the U.S. House of Representatives, revolve around claims from a whistleblower who asserts that Schiff authorized the leaking of classified intelligence during the Trump-Russia investigation in order to undermine President Donald Trump.
If these claims are proven true, Schiff could face a series of legal repercussions, including hefty fines and potentially lengthy prison sentences.The whistleblower, a former staff member of the House Intelligence Committee, alleges that Schiff was directly involved in leaking derogatory classified information about Trump to the media.According to the whistleblower, Schiff, in an all-staff meeting, declared that the committee would leak classified intelligence to harm Trump’s reputation and that these leaks would ultimately be used to help indict the president.The whistleblower, who worked for the committee for over a decade, also claims that he objected to this plan, describing it as “unethical and possibly treasonous.” Despite his concerns, the group allegedly assured him that they would not be caught in the act of leaking sensitive information.The whistleblower also claims that Schiff believed he had been promised the position of CIA Director if Hillary Clinton had won the 2016 presidential election. This revelation adds a layer of complexity to the allegations, suggesting that Schiff’s motivations may have been tied not only to political gains but to personal ambitions as well.
Furthermore, the whistleblower pointed to Representative Eric Swalwell (D-CA) as a possible conduit for these leaks, and he claims that after raising his concerns with the FBI, he was abruptly fired from his position.Despite the seriousness of these claims, the whistleblower says the FBI took no action, even after he repeated his account to agents in 2023.Former U.S. Attorney Brett Tolman, commenting on the potential legal fallout from these allegations, warned that Schiff could face steep financial and criminal penalties if the charges are proven true.Leaking classified information is a serious crime, and the consequences could include fines of up to $250,000 per leak, depending on the number of leaks involved.
Tolman also explained that the context of the leaks—if they were part of a larger conspiracy to undermine the president—could escalate the legal exposure even further.He noted that such leaks could lead to charges under conspiracy statutes, interference with official proceedings, and potentially even treason-related crimes, although he acknowledged that the treason charge might be difficult to prove in this case.Tolman’s comments suggest that Schiff’s legal troubles could be severe if the allegations are substantiated. “The purpose of the leak or the possession of classified documentation illegally becomes very important,” Tolman said.“If prosecutors find an intent to undermine the United States, the penalties could reach up to 20 years in federal prison.” These statements underscore the gravity of the situation Schiff finds himself in and highlight the potential for significant consequences if prosecutors choose to pursue the case.
The fact that the FBI allegedly failed to act on these claims is also drawing criticism. Critics, including Trump administration officials, have accused the FBI of shielding politically connected figures while aggressively pursuing political opponents.Kash Patel, a former senior official in the Trump administration, has suggested that the FBI was not only aware of Schiff’s actions but may have deliberately ignored them.Patel has also pointed to the agency’s use of confidential informants leading up to the January 6th Capitol riots as evidence that the FBI had foreknowledge of certain events but failed to act appropriately.Schiff’s refusal to respond to the allegations publicly has only fueled further speculation about his involvement in the alleged leaks. In the past, Schiff has vehemently denied accusations of leaking classified information, often characterizing them as partisan attacks aimed at discrediting his work.However, with the recent revelations coming from the whistleblower and backed by newly declassified FBI reports, Schiff’s denials may no longer suffice.
As the investigation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how much of the whistleblower’s account can be corroborated, and whether Schiff will face legal action as a result.If the allegations are proven to be true, the political ramifications for Schiff could be severe. As a leading figure in the House Intelligence Committee during the Trump-Russia investigation, Schiff has built a reputation as one of the most outspoken critics of the Trump administration.His role in leading the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and his involvement in the impeachment proceedings against Trump cemented his position as a key figure in the Democratic Party.
However, these new allegations cast a shadow over his legacy, suggesting that Schiff may have crossed ethical and legal lines in an effort to further his political agenda.The fallout from these revelations could go beyond Schiff’s personal and professional life. If proven, these leaks could have a profound impact on public trust in the institutions of American democracy.For years, Schiff has positioned himself as a defender of national security and a staunch advocate for transparency. However, these allegations paint a picture of a man who may have betrayed the very principles he claims to uphold, potentially undermining the integrity of the House Intelligence Committee and the intelligence community as a whole.Schiff’s political career, which has spanned decades, could be in jeopardy if these allegations are substantiated. While he has long been a prominent figure within the Democratic Party, his role in the Trump-Russia investigation has made him a polarizing figure, even among some within his own party.
The prospect of a criminal investigation into Schiff’s actions will only add to the political volatility surrounding him and could shift the focus of the Democratic Party away from his leadership.Beyond the legal and political implications, these allegations raise broader questions about the culture of secrecy and accountability within Washington.Schiff’s position on the House Intelligence Committee granted him access to some of the most sensitive information in the U.S. government. If the whistleblower’s claims are accurate, it would suggest that Schiff may have abused this access for political gain, leaking classified information in an effort to damage the president and further his own career.Such behavior, if proven, would be a violation of the trust placed in public officials and could have lasting consequences for how intelligence is handled in the future.
At this stage, it is important to remember that these are still allegations, and Schiff has yet to be charged with any crime. However, the seriousness of the claims, combined with the whistleblower’s testimony and the newly declassified FBI reports, means that the stakes are high.The investigation into these leaks could take months or even years to fully resolve, but the political and legal fallout could be felt long before a final decision is made.For now, Schiff’s political future hangs in the balance as the investigation into his actions continues. If the allegations are proven true, it could mark the end of his career in Congress and cast a long shadow over his legacy in American politics.Whether or not Schiff will face charges remains to be seen, but the growing scrutiny of his actions suggests that his days in the public spotlight may soon be numbered.In the meantime, the American public is left to wonder how many other public officials are abusing their power and betraying the trust of the people they are meant to serve.