House Speaker Mike Johnson revealed on Tuesday that Democrats are demanding billions in wasteful and ideological spending, including $3.9 million for LGBTQI+ democracy grants in the Western Balkans, as part of their conditions to reopen the government.
Speaking on the 14th day of what he called the Democrat government shutdown, Johnson said the American people are suffering because Democrats have chosen politics over responsibility.
“Welcome to day 14 of the Democrat government shutdown,” Johnson said during his press briefing. “It’s two weeks of Democrats in Congress inflicting untold pain on the American people for nothing other than pure politics.”
Johnson explained that House Republicans had already offered a clean continuing resolution to keep the government funded, but Democrats repeatedly rejected it.
Instead, he said, Democrats are tying unrelated left-wing priorities to essential government operations in an attempt to strong-arm Republicans into approving radical spending measures.
He accused Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of catering to what he described as the party’s “Marxist base.”
The Speaker laid out details from the Democrats’ counterproposal, calling it a $1.5 trillion wish list of reckless spending that would send taxpayer money to liberal causes and foreign projects that have nothing to do with running the U.S. government.
Among the examples he cited were $24.6 million for climate resilience programs in Honduras.
Another $13.4 million would go to civic engagement programs in Zimbabwe.
An additional $2.9 million is earmarked for desert locust risk reduction in the Horn of Africa.
The Democrats’ plan also calls for $2 million to fund “organizing for feminist democratic principles” in Africa, according to Johnson.
Johnson highlighted the $3.9 million in LGBTQI+ democracy grants for the Western Balkans as an example of Democrats’ misplaced priorities.
“They want to spend 3.9 million of your hard-earned dollars for LGBTQI+ democracy grants in the Western Balkans,” Johnson said. “We are not doing that.”
He argued that Democrats are also trying to undo common-sense reforms enacted by Republicans that prevent illegal immigrants from accessing taxpayer-funded healthcare.
“This is a fact,” he said. “They would add illegal aliens and non-citizens back to taxpayer-funded benefits. It would cost taxpayers nearly $200 billion.”
Johnson further warned that Democrats want to roll back modest work requirements placed on able-bodied young men without dependents.
At the same time, Democrats are pushing to make COVID-era Obamacare subsidies permanent, with no income limits or meaningful reforms.
Johnson said this approach would not only punish working Americans but also reward dependency and mismanagement.
The Speaker accused Democrats of prioritizing ideological projects over the immediate needs of the American people.
He said their proposal exposes how out of touch the party has become, highlighting spending for causes abroad while Americans face uncertainty at home.
“This is not about keeping the lights on,” Johnson said. “This is about Democrats trying to use the shutdown as leverage to fund their far-left agenda.”
Johnson reminded reporters that Republicans have already passed legislation to reopen the government responsibly, without any of the unrelated political riders Democrats insist on including.
The Republican plan, he said, would maintain government operations, protect taxpayers, and prevent wasteful spending abroad.
Johnson also pointed out that the Democrats’ proposal would restore funding to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, sending a half-billion dollars to what he described as liberal media outlets that have long benefited from taxpayer subsidies.
He described it as another example of Democrats using government funding to reward their political allies rather than serving the public good.
“These are not the priorities of the American people,” Johnson said firmly. “They are the priorities of a radical political class that has forgotten who they work for.”
The Speaker ended his remarks by calling on Democrats to stop the political games and join Republicans in reopening the government immediately.
“We have a clean bill ready to go,” he said. “It keeps the government open, pays our troops, secures the border, and protects hardworking taxpayers. Democrats need to stop holding America hostage.”
Johnson’s comments reflect growing frustration among House Republicans who say Democrats are using the shutdown to push through spending on social experiments, foreign projects, and activist groups under the guise of government funding.
He warned that such spending will only deepen America’s fiscal crisis and fuel public anger toward Washington’s political class.
“This is a moment for leadership,” Johnson concluded. “It’s time to put the American people first and end this shutdown—not by giving in to woke demands, but by standing firm for fiscal sanity and common sense.”
International sports may soon take a major step in restoring fairness as the International Olympic Committee (IOC) prepares to ban all transgender athletes who have undergone male puberty from competing in female Olympic events. This move, which reflects a growing global consensus, marks a turning point in the fight to preserve women’s sports.
The decision comes after mounting evidence and public pressure demanding that biological differences not be ignored in competitive sport. The IOC’s new working group, named “Protection of the Female Category,” is reviewing a final draft of policy recommendations for the 2026 Winter Olympics and the 2028 Summer Games.
The Guardian and Reuters reported that the IOC confirmed the group’s formation, stating that its purpose is to “provide further guidance to International Federations on eligibility criteria for their sport and disciplines.”
Jane Thornton, the IOC’s medical and scientific director, presented findings that have made the path forward difficult to dispute. “Even after hormone treatment, individuals who have experienced male puberty retain certain physical advantages,” she stated during a scientific meeting in Lausanne, as reported by the Los Angeles Times.
The IOC is seriously considering a blanket ban on transgender athletes who have gone through male puberty from competing in any female Olympic category. Sources close to the committee told The Times of India that such a rule is the most likely outcome.
This development follows policies by other international bodies such as FINA and World Athletics, who have already implemented restrictions on transgender athletes in order to uphold the integrity of women’s competition.
A spokesperson for the IOC told Reuters, “No decisions have been taken yet. We are still in the process of consulting with stakeholders and reviewing the evidence base.” Despite the caution in public statements, multiple sources confirm the committee is moving decisively.
Female athletes and women’s sports advocates have long argued that allowing biologically male athletes into female divisions negates the purpose of sex-based competition.
British Olympic swimmer Sharron Davies said, “It is not hateful to demand fairness. We just want a level playing field.”
American Olympic runner Inga Thompson warned, “If we are not protecting female athletes at the Olympic level, then what message are we sending to every young girl who dreams of gold?”
The IOC’s previous policy allowed transgender athletes to compete if they reduced their testosterone levels. But as science has shown, the physical benefits of male puberty remain even after years of hormone therapy.
The proposed ban would recognize these realities and prioritize fairness for female athletes who train and compete at the highest level.
This policy change comes as public sentiment continues to shift. Across the globe, national federations and political leaders are demanding that international sport restore balance and biology to the forefront of eligibility.
The Times of India quoted an anonymous IOC working group member who said, “The evidence is simply overwhelming. Fairness for female athletes cannot be compromised.”
The policy would take effect before the Milan-Cortina Winter Olympics in 2026 and be fully implemented ahead of the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles.
Progressive activists have condemned the pending ban, calling it discriminatory. But defenders argue that it is necessary to uphold the spirit of fair competition.
Nancy Hogshead-Makar, a former U.S. Olympic swimmer, said, “We cannot afford to ignore biology. If we do, we are telling young women their sacrifices mean nothing.”
The IOC’s reevaluation represents a rare victory for women’s sports advocates and conservatives who have spent years warning about the long-term consequences of gender ideology in elite competition.
For too long, female athletes have been told to sit down, shut up, and accept second place in their own leagues. This pending IOC decision would begin to reverse that.
The left has attempted to redefine gender and erase sex-based categories in the name of inclusivity. But fairness and truth cannot be compromised for ideology.