WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) delivered a scathing condemnation of the Democratic Party and its leadership, accusing them of a four-year-long campaign of deception regarding President Joe Biden’s cognitive fitness. Armed with documented quotes from Democratic officials and the devastating conclusions of the Department of Justice (DOJ), Hawley used a Senate hearing to demand immediate transparency, effectively calling the Democrats’ bluff on the legality of the Biden administration’s actions.
The confrontation centered on a simple, yet explosive contradiction: While top Democrats consistently vouched for Biden’s “sharp,” “focused,” and “formidable” demeanor, the President’s own Justice Department concluded he was too mentally impaired to stand trial for mishandling classified documents.
Hawley wasted no time, using the absent seats of his Democratic colleagues as a visual symbol of their evasion. “All you have to do is look over at this side of the dais to see that the stone wall continues. From the party that lied to this nation for four years.”
The core of Hawley’s accusation hinged on Special Counsel Robert Hur’s DOJ report, which investigated Biden’s illegal retention of classified documents—documents, as Hawley noted, illegally kept “in his garage, in his freezer. I mean, Lord knows where.”
The report concluded that no charges were warranted largely because Biden was deemed to be a “well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory” who could not form the “requisite mental state to stand trial.” In other words, the President lacked the mental ability to be held accountable for a federal crime.
Hawley then slammed the Democrats’ public response, which involved outright denial and dismissal of the DOJ’s finding:
Vice President Kamala Harris: Claimed, “The way that the Hur report characterized the president [is] so wrong. The president’s demeanor is totally fine.”
“Where are they now?” Hawley demanded of the empty seats. “They don’t want to answer for any of those quotes now. They lied to us for four years, and we know they lied. They know they lied. It’s why they’re not here. They don’t want to answer a single question.”
Hawley condemned the political calculus: “The bill of goods they sold this country… they walked this country right into one of the greatest constitutional crises of our history… and now they are afraid to even show up to admit it.”
He characterized the Democrats’ continued support of Biden as elder abuse, suggesting the party was prioritizing political power over the well-being of the former President. “This is embarrassing. But worse than that,
Hawley immediately pivoted to a crucial legal and ethical component that could prove the deception: the use of the Autopen
to sign official documents.
The discussion centered on the opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), which dictates that the presidential Autopen can only be used when the President “specifically directs it and it is under his direct authority.”
“So based on the facts we know,” Hawley challenged the witnesses, “did that happen in this case with all of the pardons and clemencies and other giveaways that Joe Biden signed?”
A witness confirmed that if the Biden White House followed traditional practice, “there should be records to indicate either through a covering memorandum or briefing books where the President would have signed his signature authorizing his decision.”
Crucially, the witness stated that none of these records have been produced.
Hawley hammered the point: “This is a binary question… We can find out. So I right now today,
Hawley asserted that the paper trail—the records of the staff secretary’s office authorizing the use of the Autopen for acts such as pardoning “murderers, drug dealers, [and] child rapists”—would prove whether Biden was truly mentally capable of making those decisions, or if staff members were bypassing his cognitive limitations and abusing the power of the office.
“If what you did is legal, and if you’re really not embarrassed about it and you think it was totally constitutional, release the paper flow. Show us the documents where the President authorized the use of the pen for every single pardon and clemency and stay application.
”
Hawley’s final statement was a forceful summary of his purpose: “Josh Hawley did not show up to score political points. He showed up to defend the truth and demand honesty from those in power. He stood in that chamber like a wall of accountability, refusing to let years of deception, excuses, and political games be brushed aside.”
The hearing sent an unmistakable message: In an era where trust in government is fragile, leaders who lie, hide, and manipulate the truth will be held to account. The fight for honesty is not finished, but after Hawley’s unwavering resolve, it is stronger than ever.
Washington D.C. — In a fiery and unprecedented moment on Capitol Hill, former judge and Fox News commentator Jeanine Pirro took the floor and delivered what many are calling a political reckoning for former Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The usually composed hearing room erupted into chaos as Pirro unleashed a series of explosive allegations that left even veteran lawmakers speechless.
Eyewitnesses described the scene as “a storm in Congress.” Pirro, armed with documents and a piercing tone, laid out accusations ranging from financial misconduct to backdoor political deals that allegedly benefited Pelosi’s closest allies. “The American people have been kept in the dark for too long,” Pirro declared. “Today, the curtain falls. The truth will finally see daylight.”
As the accusations poured in, Pelosi struggled to maintain her composure. Sources inside the chamber say her staff rushed to contain the fallout while Democratic members exchanged nervous glances. Reporters scrambled for footage as murmurs of resignation and investigation spread like wildfire through the corridors of power. What began as a routine oversight session quickly transformed into one of the most dramatic confrontations in recent political memory.Pirro’s words echoed across social media within minutes. Hashtags like #PelosiExposed and #PirroStrikesBack began trending nationwide. Supporters hailed Pirro as a “voice of justice” while critics dismissed the spectacle as “political theater.” Regardless of opinion, one fact remained undeniable: Pelosi’s once-iron grip on Washington appeared to be slipping.
Behind the scenes, analysts say this moment could signal the beginning of a larger reckoning. “If even half of what Pirro presented holds weight,” one senior political strategist noted, “it could shake the foundation of the Democratic establishment.” Several Republican lawmakers have already called for a full inquiry, demanding transparency on every allegation raised.
By the end of the day, the hearing room had fallen silent — but the aftershocks were only beginning. Pelosi’s office issued a short, tense statement denying all claims and accusing Pirro of “peddling baseless conspiracy theories.” Yet the damage, many argue, was already done. Public confidence, once a source of strength for Pelosi, now faces its greatest test.
As night fell over Washington, headlines blazed across every platform: “Pelosi Exposed,” “The Fall of a Power Icon,” “Pirro’s Day of Reckoning.” For many Americans watching at home, it felt like the curtain had finally been pulled back on the hidden drama of Capitol Hill.
Whether this moment marks the end of Pelosi’s reign or merely another chapter in Washington’s endless wars remains to be seen — but one thing is certain: Jeanine Pirro’s words have changed the conversation forever.