Several posts on X made by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) referencing a May incident at the Delaney Hall immigrant detention center in New Jersey, in which U.S. Representative LaMonica McIver was charged with assaulting federal immigration officers, have been removed following an order from Biden-appointed U.S. District Judge Jamel Semper.
Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) was charged in May with assaulting federal immigration officers during a congressional visit to the Delaney Hall immigrant detention center in Newark.
McIver has pleaded not guilty and faces up to 17 years in prison if convicted.
McIver argued that the charges violate the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause and are politically motivated, though she was seen on video physically pushing and striking a federal ICE agent.
After the May incident, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued several statements and social media posts criticizing Rep. McIver and other Democratic lawmakers who visited the Delaney Hall facility that day.
In response, McIver’s legal team filed a motion seeking to prohibit the government from making what they described as “extrajudicial statements” that could prejudice the ongoing legal proceedings, according to the New Jersey Globe. The motion cited eight posts on X and one official press release as examples,
Newsweek reported.
“As of this afternoon, the posts referenced in Defense Exhibits N through U have been removed,” U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche noted in a legal filing dated October 30, Newsweek reported. “The post referenced in Defense Exhibit V, however, remains available on X.com, as it appears to be controlled by a journalist and private citizen, and the Government lacks the authority to remove the post.”
The development follows a hearing held on October 21, during which Judge Semper heard arguments from both the Department of Justice and McIver’s legal team. At that time, the court directed the government to remove the posts and provide an update within a week.
However, eight days later, the Department of Justice had not complied, according to a November 6 letter from McIver’s attorney, Lee Cortes, to the judge, Newsweek added.
” … [E]ven with the additional time, DHS again has failed to remove all of the public statements that Congresswoman McIver brought to the government’s and the Court’s attention,” Cortes wrote in the letter.
Cortes went on to ask the court to issue sanctions if the DHS were to post such statements about McIver again.
“DHS has slow-walked the removal of clearly prejudicial statements, issued new ones, and continued to maintain others on its website. Without a further order from the Court, Congresswoman McIver will be forced to continue ‘play[ing] Whac-A-Mole’ with ‘government officials’…saying things that have absolutely no connection to the indictment,” Cortes noted, according to Newsweek.
One of the posts from DHS that was removed stated: “Delaney Hall Detention Center houses the WORST OF THE WORST! This stunt by sanctuary lawmakers puts the safety of our law enforcement agents and detainees at risk.”
Another post referenced McIver: “What happened on May 9 at Delaney Hall was not oversight. It was a political stunt that put the safety of our law enforcement agents, our staff, and our detainees at risk. This behavior was lawless, and it was beneath this body. Members of Congress are not above the law.”
McIver appeared in federal court last month as she continued to fight a three-count indictment accusing her of impeding and interfering with federal officers at the Newark, N.J., ICE detention facility in May.
Semper did not rule on McIver’s motion to dismiss the charges but raised concerns about Department of Homeland Security statements online referencing the incident.
The judge said it was prejudicial for “fact-free” social media posts from government officials to remain public while McIver’s case is pending, warning they could taint a future jury pool.
Barack and Michelle Obama continue to face persistent rumors about troubles in their marriage, despite efforts to keep their private life tightly guarded.
RadarOnline.com has gathered every public comment the couple — who have been married since 1992 — have made about their relationship as speculation swirls, the outlet reported over the weekend.
Facing the end of his days, a man on death row had one final request that both moved and surprised those around him: to see his loyal dog one last time. This was not just a simple farewell to a pet, but a deeply emotional moment connecting two souls in a bond that transcended the bars and chains that confined him.
The authorities, initially hesitant about the unusual request, eventually agreed to fulfill his wish. On that fateful day, the meeting was more than just a goodbye; it was a reunion of unconditional love and understanding. The dog, sensing the gravity of the situation, approached the man with a gentle demeanor, offering comfort in the only way it knew how.
As they met, those who witnessed the moment were struck by the palpable sense of peace that enveloped the room. It was as if time stood still, allowing the man to find solace in the familiar warmth of his faithful companion. The dog, with its wagging tail and loving eyes, seemed to communicate a message of forgiveness and eternal loyalty.
This touching encounter left an indelible mark on everyone present. For the man, it was a moment of redemption and closure, a chance to embrace something pure amidst the turmoil of his circumstances. For the dog, it was a testament to the unwavering love it held for its human. And for the rest of us, it was a powerful reminder of the profound connections we share with our animal companions.
Candace Cameron Bure, well-known for her role as D.J. Tanner on Full House and its sequel Fuller House, has found herself under media and public scrutiny once again. The actress, who has long been vocal about her Christian faith and traditional values, recently faced backlash—not for something she said this time, but for a photo she shared with her husband, Valeri Bure.
The couple’s love story began back in 1994 when they met at a charity hockey game. They started dating soon after, and just two years later, on June 22, 1996, they tied the knot. Over the years, they’ve become known for their strong, long-lasting marriage, which has now spanned over two decades. Despite their busy schedules and family life, Candace and Valeri have always made an effort to keep the spark alive and to prioritize their relationship.
Recently, Candace shared a lighthearted moment from their marriage on Instagram that quickly turned controversial. In a series of two photos, she showcased the “sweet and spicy” dynamic of her relationship with Valeri. The first photo was sweet and affectionate, showing them smiling together. But it was the second image that caused a stir: in it, Valeri had his arm around Candace’s shoulder, and his hand was resting on her chest in a playful, intimate gesture.
Many of her followers, particularly those who admire her for her Christian values, were quick to express their disapproval. Some commented that the photo was inappropriate or too suggestive for someone who is seen as a role model in the Christian community.
However, Candace didn’t back down in the face of criticism. Instead, she chose to stand by her post and even doubled down by sharing the image again to her Instagram feed. In a follow-up Instagram story, she addressed the backlash directly, laughing off the negative reactions. “Sorry if it offended you… I’m actually not sorry,” she said with a smile. “I’m glad that we have fun together after so many years.”
She explained that the photo was simply a reflection of their healthy and happy marriage, built over 24 years of love, commitment, and yes—fun. “It makes me laugh because it’s my husband,” she said. “He can touch me anytime he wants, and I hope he does.”
Candace’s response was praised by many of her supporters, who admired her confidence and the unapologetic way she defended her marriage. For Candace, the photo wasn’t about being inappropriate—it was about celebrating intimacy, playfulness, and love between two people who have shared their lives together for nearly three decades.
In a world where many relationships in the public eye fall apart, Candace and Valeri’s enduring love is something they’re proud of. And while not everyone may agree with how they choose to express that love, Candace made it clear that their marriage is their business—and they’re happy keeping it that way.
As I stood there, vulnerable and exposed, I felt a surge of emotions that I couldn’t quite describe. The room was filled with a heavy silence, interrupted only by the awkward shuffling of feet and the hushed whispers of guests. My mother-in-law’s triumphant smirk seemed to widen, but her moment of victory was short-lived.
Suddenly, a voice broke through the tension. It was my best friend, Sarah, who had been with me through every part of my cancer journey. She stepped forward, her voice unwavering and strong, “How dare you humiliate someone who has already battled so hard to stand here today?” Her words echoed in the church, bouncing off the walls and penetrating the hearts of everyone present.