Skip to content

Breaking News USA

Menu
  • Home
  • Hot News (1)
  • Breaking News (6)
  • News Today (7)
Menu

BOMBSHELL: Leaked Documents Reveal Jan. 6 Investigation Was…

Posted on November 15, 2025

BOMBSHELL: Leaked Documents Reveal Jan. 6 Investigation Was…

Newly unearthed congressional letters have confirmed the worst fears of Trump supporters — that the January 6th Committee was never about “defending democracy” but about weaponizing government power to destroy President Donald J. Trump.

The shocking letters, released by congressional investigators, show direct coordination between disgraced former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Special Counsel Jack Smith, the Biden Justice Department’s top political hitman.

Authored by Cheney and then–Committee Chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the two documents reveal that the anti-Trump duo quietly handed over materials from their so-called investigation before Republicans took back the House in 2023.

The letters, dated December 2022, confirm that the Jan. 6 panel transferred at least 16 interviews and deposition transcripts to Smith’s office. These included attached exhibits, text messages, and even spreadsheets detailing Trump administration communications.

One of the letters explicitly stated the committee’s intention to make all gathered evidence “available to the Department of Justice.” That statement alone shatters any illusion of separation between the congressional probe and Smith’s ongoing witch hunt.

Within just four days, Cheney and Thompson wrote again to Smith, this time proudly announcing they had sent text messages from Trump’s then–Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and confidential documents from attorney John Eastman.

“Along with the latter, we are producing a staff-created spreadsheet of the Meadows texts that contain additional information from privilege logs,” they bragged, showing a complete disregard for privacy and executive privilege.

The pair even promised to send “additional evidence on a rolling basis,” effectively making the Jan. 6 Committee an unofficial branch of the Biden Department of Justice.

According to the House Judiciary Committee, these newly revealed communications prove that the partisan panel worked “hand-in-hand” with Smith to politically target Trump and his associates.

Smith, who was personally appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland, would go on to indict Trump twice — once over a records dispute with the National Archives, and again over Trump’s challenge to the 2020 election results.

The collusion between Cheney’s committee and Smith’s prosecutors shows that the Jan. 6 operation was part of a coordinated effort to criminalize political opposition.

It also raises serious questions about the ethics of lawmakers sharing privileged materials with a prosecutor before their own investigation had even formally concluded.

Many Republicans are now calling it one of the most blatant abuses of congressional power in modern American history.

Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), who is leading the current probe into the Jan. 6 Committee’s activities, says the revelations confirm that the previous panel may have engaged in “criminal or unethical behavior.”

Loudermilk’s new investigation is focused on allegations that the committee deleted files, manipulated evidence, and conducted itself as an arm of the Democratic Party rather than a neutral fact-finding body.

Adding to the outrage, both Cheney and Thompson reportedly received preemptive pardons from President Joe Biden for any actions tied to the Jan. 6 investigation.

That revelation has sparked fury among conservatives, who view the pardons as a blatant attempt to shield political allies from accountability.

The original Jan. 6 Committee was hand-selected by then–Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who barred pro-Trump lawmakers from serving on it — ensuring the panel’s conclusions were politically one-sided from the start.

Cheney, who lost her seat in a landslide after turning on Trump, used her position to promote the Democrat narrative that the former president was responsible for the Capitol riot.

Meanwhile, Thompson oversaw the committee’s public hearings, which featured selectively edited footage, staged testimony, and heavily scripted “evidence” designed to manipulate public opinion.

Now, the release of these letters confirms that behind the scenes, the same individuals who claimed to be seeking “truth” were secretly feeding information to federal prosecutors.

Even worse, that information would later form the backbone of Smith’s politically motivated indictments against President Trump.

The entire saga paints a disturbing picture of government collusion — where congressional Democrats, anti-Trump Republicans, and DOJ officials conspired to weaponize the legal system against a sitting and future president.

For millions of Americans, these revelations only reaffirm what they have long believed: that the Jan. 6 investigation was a partisan hit job masquerading as justice.

BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…

Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.

This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.

Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.

According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals’ involvement in Epstein’s criminal network.

She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.

“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”

These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.

Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.

The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.

“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”

Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.

For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.

Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.

What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.

In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.

Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.

Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.

Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.

This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.

Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.

The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.

BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For…

Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.

Speaking from his post as one of President Trump’s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.

“This is a live federal investigation. We’ve asked ICE to take immediate action,” Homan said during a televised interview.

The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC’s office.

According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.

Homan stressed that AOC’s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.

“This goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There’s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,” he stated.

Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.

AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as “racist” and “oppressors.”

Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.

“If a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that’s a clear violation of federal law,” Homan declared.

Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.

Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.

House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.

“This is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn’t apply to them,” said Rep. Andy Biggs.

Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.

But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.

“This isn’t about politics. It’s about national security and public trust,” he said.

Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.

“We are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,” Homan confirmed.

Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.

Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman’s actions.

Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.

“We must restore the rule of law,” he concluded. “No one, no matter how powerful, is above it.”

BREAKING: The FBI Launches Criminal Investigation Into..

It’s finally happening.

John Brennan and James Comey—two of the most powerful Obama-era intelligence chiefs—are now facing criminal investigations.

Their role in pushing the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion narrative derailed a presidency and deceived the nation.

Sources inside the Justice Department confirm that former CIA Director Brennan is under investigation for allegedly lying to Congress.

Ex-FBI Director Comey is also the subject of an ongoing probe.

Their roles in the origin and manipulation of the Trump-Russia hoax are being scrutinized, years after millions of Americans demanded accountability.

Brennan is accused of pushing the phony Steele dossier into official intelligence assessments.

CIA Russia experts warned the document was so flawed it didn’t meet even “the most basic tradecraft standards.”

“Jasmine Crockett didn’t just insult Trump,” Leavitt said during her White House briefing. “She smeared over 70 million Americans who believe in freedom, God, secure borders, and the Constitution. Calling them mentally ill is not just false—it’s dangerous.”

Brennan ignored the warnings and formalized his demand in writing, insisting the fake dossier be included anyway.

James Comey, for his part, did the same.

The CIA’s review makes clear: FBI leadership under Comey pressured the intelligence community to embed the Steele dossier in their final report on Russian election interference.

The FBI “repeatedly pushed” for its inclusion.

These two didn’t just make bad calls. They rigged the process.

Even worse, Brennan later told Congress under oath that the Steele dossier “wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence” used in the Russia assessment.

But a newly surfaced email shows that he pushed the dossier hard, despite being warned it could destroy the report’s credibility.

And why did they push it so aggressively? Because it wasn’t about national security.

It was about kneecapping President Trump before he was even sworn in.

“This was Obama, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan deciding, ‘We’re going to screw Trump,’” former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told the press.

“They all knew what they were doing.”

Millions of tax dollars were wasted. Reputations were destroyed.

“Jasmine Crockett should visit a Trump rally before shooting her mouth off,” Leavitt challenged.

“She’ll meet grandmothers, veterans, farmers, teachers, truckers—all proud Americans who just want their country back. These are the people she called mentally ill. What an absolute disgrace.”

And for what? To push Hillary Clinton’s opposition research as gospel truth.

Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt.

Fusion hired British ex-spy Christopher Steele. Steele gave them fiction.

Senator Josh Hawley demanded action: “If Brennan and Comey lied to Congress or weaponized their agencies against a political opponent, they should be prosecuted—no exceptions, no excuses.”

This scandal is bigger than Watergate.

It poisoned public trust, warped the 2016 election aftermath, and set the tone for years of baseless attacks on a sitting president.

The investigations are underway.

Now the question is, will the justice system do its job, or will the same people who buried the truth for years bury it again?

Brennan and Comey must be held accountable.

No one is above the law, not even the architects of one of the most dishonest political smear campaigns in American history.

BREAKING: Joe Biden Admits to New York Times That…

Joe Biden admitted to The New York Times that he did not personally sign off on every pardon and commutation issued during his presidency, an acknowledgment that has sparked intense debate over how involved he truly was in carrying out one of the most consequential powers of the office.

“I made every decision on the categories and top-level individuals, but the mechanics were left to staff,” Biden told the Times. That sentence alone sent shockwaves through political and legal communities.

According to the New York Post, Biden’s White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients authorized the use of the autopen to execute a sweeping set of clemency actions on January 19, 2025. This included about 2,500 pardons and 1,500 commutations.

The New York Post confirmed, “Biden admitted that he didn’t review every clemency case individually and that his chief of staff, Jeff Zients, authorized the use of the autopen.”

The same report added, “The autopen application, which Biden also used to sign some legislation, allowed staff to speed up paperwork processing.”

While Biden insisted, as quoted in ABC News, that he personally made “every decision,” he conceded that he did not individually sign off on each document, saying, “I approved each of the clemency decisions before they were issued.”

The Daily Beast quoted Biden dismissing Republican criticism: “That is utter BS,” he said, responding to allegations that he had no hand in the clemency spree.

Still, Biden’s comments confirmed the worst fears of critics who have questioned his cognitive fitness and decision-making capacity. As Time reported, the final flurry of clemency actions was conducted with Biden out of public view.

Time added context, noting, “Emails show Biden’s chief of staff, Jeff Zients, approved the use of the autopen to execute clemency documents on the president’s behalf.”

In the same article, the legal implications were underscored: “While it is legally permissible, it is extremely rare for a president to use an autopen to sign something as consequential as a clemency order.”

Republican leaders swiftly seized on the opportunity to highlight Biden’s detachment. House Oversight Chair James Comer was quoted as saying, “This isn’t just about a signature. It’s about transparency, accountability, and who really was making decisions in that White House.”

Comer continued, as cited in ABC News, “We are investigating whether this use of the autopen was a way to obscure Biden’s declining capacity and whether any of the beneficiaries had connections to the administration.”

The legal debate over autopen use isn’t new, but Biden’s large-scale application is unprecedented. According to Time, “It has never been used on this scale or for something with the constitutional gravity of a pardon.”

Even some Democrats were privately concerned. One DNC strategist, speaking anonymously to Politico, said, “It feeds the narrative that Biden isn’t all there.”

The same strategist added, “If he wasn’t fully engaged on something as serious as clemency, what else was he rubber-stamping?”

In response to concerns, the Daily Beast reported that Biden maintained, “Each recipient was vetted and met the established standards for clemency.”

This adds to a growing list of concerns among voters and lawmakers alike. ABC News reported that the clemency decisions were made with “speed and secrecy,” raising transparency questions.

Donald Trump, seizing the moment, weighed in: “He didn’t have the guts or the capacity to do his job,” he said during a recent rally, as quoted in The Daily Beast.

Trump added, “You don’t get to hide behind a machine when you’re playing with the law.”

At least 14 people were killed when a decades-old lake barrier burst in Taiwan, a government official said Wednesday, after Super Typhoon Ragasa pounded the island with torrential rain.

Tragedy in Cariri: A Family’s Final Journey and the Questions Left Behind

Something about the crash didn’t sit right with thos*x who arrived first. A clear morning. A quiet road. And yet, a car submerged in a rural stream — its silence heavier than the water that covered it.

Near Sítio Piripiri, where the CE-060 highway winds quietly through the countryside, danger is rare. That’s why this accident is raising more than grief — it’s raising questions.

On the morning of Sunday, July 16, tragedy struck just after sunris*x, shattering the peace of the Cariri region.

A family of three — Hérida Nascimento da Silva, s*xbastião Cícero Gomes, and their 3-year-old son, Miguel Nascimento Gomes — died when their vehicle veered off the road and plunged into a stream between Caririaçu and Juazeiro do Norte.

The family had s*xt out from Várzea Alegre on what should have been a simple, one-hour drive. Their destination was Juazeiro do Norte — not for leisure, but for something deeply personal: a surgical procedure for young Miguel. It was a journey rooted in hope. It ended in heartbreak.

According to reports from TV Verdes Mares and the Ceará Military Fire Department, the crash occurred around 7 a.m., with the vehicle leaving the asphalt and disappearing into waters five meters deep. Recovery efforts were difficult, the depth of the stream making rescue nearly impossible. By the time responders arrived, there was nothing they could do.

What caus*xd the vehicle to veer off cours*x remains under investigation. Officials are exploring mechanical failure, human error, and other contributing factors. But for locals, something feels off. The road isn’t known for danger. There were no weather complications. No other vehicles involved. Just a family — now gone — and a region left s*xarching for answers.

In the aftermath, the Cariri community is struggling to come to terms with the loss. For thos*x who knew the couple, and for anyone who has ever feared losing what they love most, the story cuts deep. It’s not just about an accident. It’s about how life, in one instant, can change forever — and how something so routine can become unthinkably tragic.

Calls for improved road safety and highway inspections have gained urgency. The CE-060, though not notorious for accidents, now stands as a symbol of how fragile the line between everyday life and disaster can be.

But beyond the statistics, beyond the road conditions and the investigations, is a grieving family and a wounded region. Their pain is not a headline — it is a daily reality. And for thos*x left behind, the memory of that morning will never fade.

The Fallout TV series made a powerful debut with its first season, captivating fans of the iconic video game franchise and sci-fi lovers alike. With its unique post-apocalyptic storytelling, dark humor, and rich world-building, the show quickly gained popularity. Now, all eyes are on Fallout Season 2—fans are eager to know what’s next for the survivors of the wasteland.

In this article, we’ll break down everything we know so far about Fallout Season 2, including updates on the Fallout Season 2 release date, cast, plot expectations, and more. Whether you’re a longtime fan of the Fallout video games or just binge-watched the first season, this guide is for you.

Good news, Vault Dwellers! Amazon Prime has officially renewed Fallout TV show Season 2 following the success of Season 1. The show was praised for its faithful nods to the game’s lore while offering original narratives and characters that resonated with both hardcore fans and new viewers.

The confirmation of Fallout Season 2 came shortly after Season 1 premiered, highlighting the series’ instant impact on audiences and strong streaming numbers.

While Fallout Season 2 release date hasn’t been officially confirmed, insiders suggest that filming will begin in late 2024 or early 2025. That puts the estimated premiere of Season 2 around late 2025 or early 2026.

Of course, this could change depending on production schedules, script development, and post-production timelines. Still, based on Amazon Prime Video’s commitment to the series, fans won’t likely have to wait too long to return to the wasteland.

Expected Start of Filming: Late 2024

Potential Release Window: Late 2025 to early 2026

Platform: Amazon Prime Video

The Fallout TV show Season 2 will likely see the return of the core cast members who helped bring the first season to life. Though official cast announcements are pending, here are the characters we expect to return:

Ella Purnell as Lucy — the naive but tough Vault Dweller exploring the brutal surface world.

Aaron Moten as Maximus — the Brotherhood of Steel soldier with a conflicted sense of duty.

Walton Goggins as The Ghoul — a bounty hunter with deep connections to pre-war America.

As with any evolving universe, Season 2 will probably introduce new characters—possibly drawing inspiration from other Fallout games like

While Amazon is keeping the plot for Fallout Season 2 under wraps, we can make some educated guesses based on how Season 1 ended.

Lucy’s journey into the surface world will likely deepen as she uncovers more about the history of Vault-Tec and its twisted experiments.

Maximus may continue climbing the ranks of the Brotherhood of Steel—possibly leading to internal conflict or rebellion.

The Ghoul’s background, particularly his pre-war past, might come further into focus, offering emotional depth and political intrigue.

Fans are also hoping that Fallout Season 2 explores new settings from the games—such as the Mojave Wasteland or Capital Wasteland—alongside new monsters, vaults, and wasteland cultures.

What made the first season such a hit was its dedication to the original Fallout video game series. From the power armor of the Brotherhood of Steel to classic creatures like Deathclaws and Radroaches, the show packed in Easter eggs while telling an accessible and engaging story.

Fallout Season 2 is expected to maintain this approach, giving longtime fans what they love while continuing to broaden the universe for new viewers.

Since the announcement, social media has been buzzing with theories, wishlist ideas, and excitement for Fallout Season 2. On Reddit and Twitter, fans are calling for more in-depth lore, extended exploration of different factions, and cameo appearances from iconic game characters.

Popular theories include:

An Enclave resurgence

Vaults with twisted social experiments

Lucy turning into a hardened wastelander

Whatever the direction, one thing is clear: Fallout Season 2 has a built-in fanbase that’s ready to return to the wasteland.

With its mix of post-apocalyptic grit, dark comedy, and deep storytelling, the Fallout TV show is shaping up to be one of the best video game adaptations to date. As anticipation builds for Fallout Season 2, fans can look forward to expanded lore, character development, and high-stakes adventures.

Though we may have to wait until late 2025 or early 2026 for the Fallout Season 2 release date, one thing’s for sure: the next chapter will be worth the wait. So grab your Nuka-Cola, charge your Pip-Boy, and get ready to survive another day in the wasteland.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Planes Trains and Automobiles 2 Holiday Chaos 2026
  • The Iron Giant 2 Iron Resurgence 2026
  • Heated Rivalry 2 Breaking the Ice 2026
  • Outlander Season 9 The Legacy of Stones 2026
  • Gossip Girl The Empire Unleashed 2026

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025

Categories

  • Breaking News
  • Hot News
  • Today News
©2026 Breaking News USA | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme